This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="-Jiggles-"]I highly don't care.Fundamentalist Christians tend to oppose the specific theories of science that contradicts their literal interpretation of the Bible. This being said, I have reason to believe that you only oppose the theory of evolution due to your religious beliefs.
If so, I suggest you form a more open mindset and actually learn more about evolution and all the evidence supporting it. You may claim to know all there is to know about evolution, but from posts I've seen from you in the past, I would highly doubt that. Highly.
-Jiggles-
Oh, but I know you do. If you didn't care, you wouldn't be posting in this very topic against evolution. If you didn't care, you would've just posted "I believe in creationism" and leave it at that--but no, you laugh and argue against the acknowledgements of another poster, so it's blatantly obvious that you do care what we think.
Go ahead and deny the fact that you do care, because that is your choice. However, be aware that showing a false sign of apathy doesn't support your arguement(s) in any conceivable way--it hurts your ambitions if anything.
I was saying I don't care if you doubt I know about evolution. :roll:[QUOTE="-Jiggles-"][QUOTE="Revinh"] I highly don't care.Revinh
Oh, but I know you do. If you didn't care, you wouldn't be posting in this very topic against evolution. If you didn't care, you would've just posted "I believe in creationism" and leave it at that--but no, you laugh and argue against the acknowledgements of another poster, so it's blatantly obvious that you do care what we think.
Go ahead and deny the fact that you do care, because that is your choice. However, be aware that showing a false sign of apathy doesn't support your arguement(s) in any conceivable way--it hurts your ambitions if anything.
I was saying I don't care if you doubt I know about evolution. :roll:Yet I've seen you repeat this tactic with others in this thread and within past threads as well.
If you're not willing to put effort into your arguement(s), you shouldn't be arguing at all. It only diminishes the integrity of the cause or belief you support.
[QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="-Jiggles-"]I was saying I don't care if you doubt I know about evolution. :roll:Oh, but I know you do. If you didn't care, you wouldn't be posting in this very topic against evolution. If you didn't care, you would've just posted "I believe in creationism" and leave it at that--but no, you laugh and argue against the acknowledgements of another poster, so it's blatantly obvious that you do care what we think.
Go ahead and deny the fact that you do care, because that is your choice. However, be aware that showing a false sign of apathy doesn't support your arguement(s) in any conceivable way--it hurts your ambitions if anything.
-Jiggles-
Yet I've seen you repeat this tactic with others in this thread and within past threads as well.
If you're not willing to put effort into your arguement(s), you shouldn't be arguing at all. It only diminishes the integrity of the cause or belief you support.
What tactic? I even highlighted what I was replying to. :roll:[QUOTE="-Jiggles-"][QUOTE="Revinh"] I was saying I don't care if you doubt I know about evolution. :roll:Revinh
Yet I've seen you repeat this tactic with others in this thread and within past threads as well.
If you're not willing to put effort into your arguement(s), you shouldn't be arguing at all. It only diminishes the integrity of the cause or belief you support.
What tactic? I even highlighted what I was replying to. :roll:The "I don't care about any arguement I cannot refute" tactic I've seen you pull so many times before. Your "HTML cannot evolve" discussion from a while back emphasized this; just pretend you don't care that proposed evidence contradicts your own and call the other person wrong without proving why.:roll:
If you have nothing to contribute to the topic (whether you say you care about it or not), I don't see why you're posting here. As for me, I have more willing posters to attend to.
[QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="-Jiggles-"]What tactic? I even highlighted what I was replying to. :roll:Yet I've seen you repeat this tactic with others in this thread and within past threads as well.
If you're not willing to put effort into your arguement(s), you shouldn't be arguing at all. It only diminishes the integrity of the cause or belief you support.
-Jiggles-
The "I don't care about any arguement I cannot refute" tactic I've seen you pull so many times before. Your "HTML cannot evolve" discussion from a while back emphasized this; just pretend you don't care that proposed evidence contradicts your own and call the other person wrong without proving why.:roll:
If you have nothing to contribute to the topic (whether you say you care about it or not), I don't see why you're posting here. As for me, I have more willing posters to attend to.
You should cite specific posts and explain whatever it is you're saying 'cause I don't really get what tactic it is you say I've pulled...cause so far you're simply saying I've pulled it.[QUOTE="-Jiggles-"][QUOTE="Revinh"] What tactic? I even highlighted what I was replying to. :roll:Revinh
The "I don't care about any arguement I cannot refute" tactic I've seen you pull so many times before. Your "HTML cannot evolve" discussion from a while back emphasized this; just pretend you don't care that proposed evidence contradicts your own and call the other person wrong without proving why.:roll:
If you have nothing to contribute to the topic (whether you say you care about it or not), I don't see why you're posting here. As for me, I have more willing posters to attend to.
You should cite specific posts and explain whatever it is you're saying 'cause I don't really get what tactic it is you say I've pulled...cause so far you're simply saying I've pulled it.Oh, so now you care?:roll:
I never tagged the topic, but I'll give it a search come tomorrow morning. It's late here and I have academics to attend to in the morning.
[QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="-Jiggles-"]You should cite specific posts and explain whatever it is you're saying 'cause I don't really get what tactic it is you say I've pulled...cause so far you're simply saying I've pulled it.The "I don't care about any arguement I cannot refute" tactic I've seen you pull so many times before. Your "HTML cannot evolve" discussion from a while back emphasized this; just pretend you don't care that proposed evidence contradicts your own and call the other person wrong without proving why.:roll:
If you have nothing to contribute to the topic (whether you say you care about it or not), I don't see why you're posting here. As for me, I have more willing posters to attend to.
-Jiggles-
Oh, so now you care?:roll:
I never tagged the topic, but I'll give it a search come tomorrow morning. It's late here and I have academics to attend to in the morning.
Care about what? I don't even know what you say I care about. :roll: :roll: :roll:[QUOTE="-Jiggles-"][QUOTE="Revinh"] You should cite specific posts and explain whatever it is you're saying 'cause I don't really get what tactic it is you say I've pulled...cause so far you're simply saying I've pulled it.Revinh
Oh, so now you care?:roll:
I never tagged the topic, but I'll give it a search come tomorrow morning. It's late here and I have academics to attend to in the morning.
Care about what? I don't even know what you say I care about. :roll: :roll: :roll:Okay, seriously, the eye-rolling is just getting stupid.
For reference, the topic to which Jiggles refers is entitled creation/intelligent design.
By the way, Revinh, I would encourage you to remove the "Did we evolve from apes?" blog from your profile. It offers no real evidence against evolution; it merely appeals to emotions, and is therefore completely unconvincing. Instead, I would encourage you, if you do not believe in evolution, to actually post a blog with legitimate reasons why, not simple pictures juxtaposing humans with apes and quotes from The Bible with "We just adapted differently." Also, please do not criticize me for telling you to do this. I am merely trying to help.
Oh, and, for the record, I personally think that evolution is the better explanation.
[QUOTE="GTALoco"]You're so funny. :|Screw trying to figure stuff out...if I don't understand it, then clearly God did it. I know this is true cause the Bible says so.
*Covers ears with hands*
LALALALALALALALALALALALA
harashawn
And you're so sarcastic. Aren't we just a hoot?
[QUOTE="GTALoco"]You're so funny. :|Screw trying to figure stuff out...if I don't understand it, then clearly God did it. I know this is true cause the Bible says so.
*Covers ears with hands*
LALALALALALALALALALALALA
harashawn
He's got a point.
[QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="-Jiggles-"]Care about what? I don't even know what you say I care about. :roll: :roll: :roll:Oh, so now you care?:roll:
I never tagged the topic, but I'll give it a search come tomorrow morning. It's late here and I have academics to attend to in the morning.
chessmaster1989
Okay, seriously, the eye-rolling is just getting stupid.
For reference, the topic to which Jiggles refers is entitled creation/intelligent design.
By the way, Revinh, I would encourage you to remove the "Did we evolve from apes?" blog from your profile. It offers no real evidence against evolution; it merely appeals to emotions, and is therefore completely unconvincing. Instead, I would encourage you, if you do not believe in evolution, to actually post a blog with legitimate reasons why, not simple pictures juxtaposing humans with apes and quotes from The Bible with "We just adapted differently." Also, please do not criticize me for telling you to do this. I am merely trying to help.
Oh, and, for the record, I personally think that evolution is the better explanation.
I know it's that thread, idk specifically what he's talking about. If you think "we just adapted differently" is good enough of an explanation to you as to why humans are different then it is to you. It's not to me, creation's is a better, more meaningful explanation. I don't really care if the blog doesn't convince other people. It's simply there to show one of the reasons why I believe / don't believe which, whether it "appeals to emotion" or whatever it is.I know it's that thread, idk specifically what he's talking about. If you think "we just adapted differently" is good enough of an explanation to you as to why humans are different then it is to you. It's not to me, creation's is a better, more meaningful explanation. I don't really care if the blog doesn't convince other people. It's simply there to show one of the reasons why I believe / don't believe which, whether it "appeals to emotion" or whatever it is.Revinh
The question "did we evolve from apes" shows that you have no credibility when speaking on evolution, because it shows that you don't know very much about it.
The third option in your poll is actually called Theistic Evolution.
For those curious, here's a rather simple definition.
The third option in your poll is actually called Theistic Evolution.
For those curious, here's a rather simple definition.
TheWakingArmy
Because most scientists are atheistic
the bull **** that creationist spew is unbelievable.
[QUOTE="Guybrush_3"]@ Revinh, Your sig shows that your knowledge on evolution is limited at bestRevinhHow so?
Evolution does not say that we evolved from apes.
[QUOTE="Guybrush_3"][QUOTE="Revinh"] How so?Revinh
Evolution does not say that we evolved from apes.
"Ape-like ancestors," whatever they were, you might as well call them "apes."Apes and humans once shared a common ancestor. That common ancestor was probably neither in that case.
[QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="Guybrush_3"]"Ape-like ancestors," whatever they were, you might as well call them "apes."Evolution does not say that we evolved from apes.
Shad0ki11
Apes and humans once shared a common ancestor. That common ancestor was probably neither in that case.
[QUOTE="Shad0ki11"][QUOTE="Revinh"] "Ape-like ancestors," whatever they were, you might as well call them "apes."Red-XIII
Apes and humans once shared a common ancestor. That common ancestor was probably neither in that case.
Yeah true.
The third option in your poll is actually called Theistic Evolution.
For those curious, here's a rather simple definition. TheWakingArmy
[QUOTE="Revinh"][QUOTE="Guybrush_3"]"Ape-like ancestors," whatever they were, you might as well call them "apes."Evolution does not say that we evolved from apes.
Shad0ki11
Apes and humans once shared a common ancestor. That common ancestor was probably neither in that case.
I wrote that too in my blog, it just shows GuyBrush3 didn't even read.[QUOTE="Shad0ki11"][QUOTE="Revinh"] "Ape-like ancestors," whatever they were, you might as well call them "apes."Revinh
Apes and humans once shared a common ancestor. That common ancestor was probably neither in that case.
I wrote that too in my blog, it just shows GuyBrush3 didn't even read.Read what? Your blog?
Please don't tell me to study Human Evolution because my point is that a wide gap exists.
Revinhsblog
You must not have studied human evolution, (either that or you are ignoring what you have read)
Evolution...cuz it makes sense....for example god made flowers in dunno what day and after that the sun well dunno what u are thinkin but i know that a plant cant survive without sunlight....
and im wondering how the church always needs money well uhmm what god has no money?If he is almighty he could make money for churches and stuff like that....This bible **** is just a big lie....if u watched Zeitgeist u gonna understand what i mean ;)
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment