Feminists attack Protein World, and get triggered in return

@harisinghnalwa: Well I'm glad to be wrong.

Its not like the Romans had an upper and lower class system and traded goods for currency, right?

And I just would like to point out that Protein World won.. This whole fiasco has skyrocketed their sales.

So the feminists are upset because the ad featured a thin women, and I suppose they believe that by doing so the company is engaging in "fat shaming" and that every woman should feel comfortable with her body type and not have to fit a certain notion of beauty? But if those are there beliefs, shouldn't thin women also be able to feel comfortable with their own body, and wouldn't pressuring companies not to use thin women as models exclude women of this body type and make them feel bad?

I suppose Victoria's Secret models do a lot of body shaming because they encourage women to look sexy too....... I mean, if I were a woman, why would I want to feel insecure wearing sexy lingerie?

@FireEmblem_Man: these companies need to trigger these morons more. It is turning over much greater profits than if the ad wasn't even paid attention to for its supposed controversial material.

Yes they do, it's in Women's nature that Women are always jealous of other women. So, this ad is no harm done but a very butt-hurt woman that wishes she could be as good looking as the model of the picture. Men are less to be jealous of other men, as we end up complimenting men for their hard work and dedication.

Look at former Westboro Baptist escapist, Lauren Drain

It's funny how Feminist don't attack her for showing off too much skin and "objectifying" herself to the public, but then they go attack an Ad.... sheesh