This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="kuraimen"]The funny thing Vurk is that you complain a lot about big government but a system such as the one I described takes power away from big government probably more than in any other country or society today and actually gives it to the population and the people. Yet you still refuse to even consider it.VuurkLook mate, I'm a strong supporter of individual liberty. Communism and individual liberty can not coexist. Communism requires strong wealth redistribution. You're idea of communism is simply taking the authority away from the federal government and giving it all to the majority of the population. However, what about the individual ? What if an individual does not want to live in a society in which the means of production are publically owned? The individual is the ultimate minority. I do not support a system that merely adheres to the rights of the majority. It is individual rights which are most harmed by a communist system.
The individual is part of a social system no matter where you put him. He's either part of a community and dependent on others or part of a country and also dependent on others. As a social species humans can't work truly individually for anything so why pretend we could? and what if a person now wants to live in such a society but their freedom is limited by the current system? The same on that other system. People will just get used to it. I think that it could turn out to be much better than the current system for the vast majority of people so I don't think many will complain in the end.
Also living in communities doesn't mean minorities would get discriminated. On the contrary, people closer to each other discriminate less with a friend than a person they don't know so racism would be less within a community even if there are more diverse people. You also fight discrimination with education. Like I said before such a system would have to be accompanied by a very good educational system.
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="Vuurk"]And Kuraimen quietly disappears from the thread as he realizes that his ideas about communism are flawed. What a surprise. VuurkActually the problem is that I have a life outside GS :P You just leave abruptly as the conversation starts to scrutinize communism? Idk about you but when I leave a discussion that seems to be going against me, I'll always let people know if I have to go and then I'll return later to address their points. Communism has to one of the worst economic systems ever created. There is a reason is dying rapidly. Socialism isn't much above it.
[QUOTE="Vuurk"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Actually the problem is that I have a life outside GS :PDarkOfKnightYou just leave abruptly as the conversation starts to scrutinize communism? Idk about you but when I leave a discussion that seems to be going against me, I'll always let people know if I have to go and then I'll return later to address their points. Communism has to one of the worst economic systems ever created. There is a reason is dying rapidly. Socialism isn't much above it.Communism never really existed. It's too idealistic. These so called "communist" parties and countries that exist/have existed are nothing more than an insult to the idea of true communism. More or less, it's always been about capitalism.
If we're going to overcome the crushing socioeconomic inequality in the US, slacktivism isn't' going to cut it. We need something like the French Revolution where we just murder all of the rich people and redistribute everything they stole from us. It's just like all of the slacktivism about bullying. If someone is bullying you, man up and knock their teeth in. Don't create some lame "awareness campaign."bigfoot2045
Proof that the Occupy movements have started something...class warfare. You're fvcked up.
[QUOTE="ristactionjakso"].......I wouldnt say the rich are the ones to be targeting. Corrupt government officials are more to blame than anything. Not just one of them like Bush or Obama. It's all of them. As of right now we're governed by plutocracies that means the government and the rich are mostly the same.[QUOTE="bigfoot2045"]If we're going to overcome the crushing socioeconomic inequality in the US, slacktivism isn't' going to cut it. We need something like the French Revolution where we just murder all of the rich people and redistribute everything they stole from us. kuraimen
Obviously then the best course of action is to give the government even more power. Great idea.
So they are hypocrits. Yes. I oppose both bank bailouts and sh*tty in parks.[QUOTE="Vuurk"][QUOTE="SEANMCAD"]
cost to tax payers for occupied parks = ?
cost to tax payers for bank bailouts = ??
SEANMCAD
again I ask.
If someone outside your house is sh*ting on your yard and is a hypocrite but IS calling the fire department because you house is on fire do your really care if they are sh*ting on your yard and are hypocrites?
You would rather see an entire forest burn then to support someone who sh8ts in a park and is a hypocrite?
I, frankly, dont believe it.
they are LITERALLY the only people who are getting media exposure who are saying 'we think bank bailouts are bad' and you are trying to shut them down.
Exactly!!! Preach, brother. The OWS are actually in the streets, being active while the others are just sitting on there sofas, grumbling.[QUOTE="bigfoot2045"]If we're going to overcome the crushing socioeconomic inequality in the US, slacktivism isn't' going to cut it. We need something like the French Revolution where we just murder all of the rich people and redistribute everything they stole from us. It's just like all of the slacktivism about bullying. If someone is bullying you, man up and knock their teeth in. Don't create some lame "awareness campaign."SpartanMSU
Proof that the Occupy movements have started something...class warfare. You're fvcked up.
It's only class warfare when money gets distributed down to the middle and lower class (the engine of the economy), and not when bankers rob us blind?[QUOTE="RushKing"][QUOTE="SpartanMSU"]It's only class warfare when money gets distributed down to the middle and lower class (the engine of the economy), and not when bankers rob us blind? Bankers aren't robbing you. (other than the fed). The government is robbing you. If you don't want the government robbing you then stop electing dumb*ss politicians who bailout the losers and spend money irresponsibly. You're probably one of those people who support the auto bailouts though because "all of the jobs" it saved.... the irony. Nope, I think americains should have direct control over what our tax gets spent on.Proof that the Occupy movements have started something...class warfare. You're fvcked up.
Vuurk
Yet, it is the government who authorize those bailouts. You should be occupying D.C., not wall street.[QUOTE="Vuurk"][QUOTE="SEANMCAD"]
I am going out on a limb here when I say 'all' but here goes. I think ALL OWS people know this. We really dont see any difference between the goverment and the banks in this context. The reason banks are targeted is becuase banks are the ones with the power. In real terms Goverment doesnt rule over business, business rules over goverment.
SEANMCAD
your not following me.
we believe that corporations run the goverment and the goverment is just a proxy.
everyone with power in the goverment has vested intrests in corporate. The guys who 'authorize it' often just got off the phone with Chase with the instructions on what to do. I exragate to make the point but its not far off.
Not to mention that if hte bail out didn't take place.. The executives responsible will get off scott free with a nice bonus.. And the loss would be put upon every one else in the lower level workers and lowly customers.. It was a no win situation, the bail out was the lesser of two evils at the time unfortunately.Not to mention that if hte bail out didn't take place.. The executives responsible will get off scott free with a nice bonus.. And the loss would be put upon every one else in the lower level workers and lowly customers.. It was a no win situation, the bail out was the lesser of two evils at the time unfortunately.[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="SEANMCAD"]
your not following me.
we believe that corporations run the goverment and the goverment is just a proxy.
everyone with power in the goverment has vested intrests in corporate. The guys who 'authorize it' often just got off the phone with Chase with the instructions on what to do. I exragate to make the point but its not far off.
SEANMCAD
not really.
Think about this.
people who had house loans failed.
banks who packaged bad loans as good loans failed.
Who is less 'guilty'? well actually the home buyer.
Give the money to the banks so the loans dont go bad, or give the money to the people so the loans dont go bad. Both will inject back into the economy, so the only choice is who is more guilty. The guy selling grass as pot or the one who bought grass thinking it was pot
Yeah except fact that there were numerous scandals in which banks specifically used deception in giving people bad loans as well.... And it wasn't just home loans it was countless other problems it would have caused..The point of a movement is not to inspire ideas, its to inspire actions. The Occupy movement did neither.
[QUOTE="00-Riddick-00"]Think about what the Occupy Wall street people wanted.. Then think about what the basis of Communism is.SEANMCAD
Occupy movement wants two of the following. please read closely and carefully.
1. stop giving large corporate handouts using public money.
2. have the wealthy pay the same tax % as everyone else (in some realms this is called a flat tax)
you call that communism?
why do so many of your SUPPORT the one aspect of our economic system that IS NOT captialism, that being giving away public money to private companies.
please explain in detail
We have an Occupy Movement in Canada.
We did not bail out our financial institutions. No Canadian banks were seriously threatened by the meltdown. We did bail out the auto industry and are being repaid. All indications are we will make a small profit on that exchange.
We have a progressive tax system. We have a surtax on higher amounts. There are few deductions in the Canadian tax system. If you are a high income person in Canada you pay a higher % tax. Period.
By your own logic there is no point to the Occupy Movement in Canada.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment