h0m0sexu@lity choice or born that way???

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#301 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

[QUOTE="Ravensmash"][QUOTE="omho88"]

I hope you aren't agreeing wz him on "the animals can be gays so we can be as well" ..... I was like

I dun know about my friend, I would eventually accept it .... but I think my relation with him could be uch more limited ... I think.

omho88

You were the one who brought nature into this debate.

I didn't mean, forests, animals ... I meant that part of ur incorrupted soul ... I dun know the term in english .. sorry.

Souls don't exist. you need to use facts if you are going to convince anyone.

I'm still waiting for that reason as to why you think gays are bad.

Avatar image for TheFlush
TheFlush

5965

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#302 TheFlush
Member since 2002 • 5965 Posts

[QUOTE="omho88"][QUOTE="Ravensmash"] You were the one who brought nature into this debate. toast_burner

I didn't mean, forests, animals ... I meant that part of ur incorrupted soul ... I dun know the term in english .. sorry.

Souls don't exist. you need to use facts if you are going to convince anyone.

I'm still waiting for that reason as to why you think gays are bad.

In the end it just boils down to "I think it's icky what they do in private"

Avatar image for AdamPA1006
AdamPA1006

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#303 AdamPA1006
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="omho88"] I didn't mean, forests, animals ... I meant that part of ur incorrupted soul ... I dun know the term in english .. sorry.TheFlush

Souls don't exist. you need to use facts if you are going to convince anyone.

I'm still waiting for that reason as to why you think gays are bad.

In the end it just boils down to "I think it's icky what they do in private"

I bet there is a lot of stuff that people do in private that you dont approve of and think is "icky"
Avatar image for AdamPA1006
AdamPA1006

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#304 AdamPA1006
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="omho88"] I didn't mean, forests, animals ... I meant that part of ur incorrupted soul ... I dun know the term in english .. sorry.TheFlush

Souls don't exist. you need to use facts if you are going to convince anyone.

I'm still waiting for that reason as to why you think gays are bad.

In the end it just boils down to "I think it's icky what they do in private"

Why do I have to approve of and accept and like what they do? My duty as a citizen is not to harrass them or harm them and let them go about their lives. Which I do. I do not believe that they deserve the same monetary benifits (marriage) as a heterosexual couple though.

Avatar image for Ring_of_fire
Ring_of_fire

15880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#305 Ring_of_fire
Member since 2003 • 15880 Posts

[QUOTE="TheFlush"]

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]Souls don't exist. you need to use facts if you are going to convince anyone.

I'm still waiting for that reason as to why you think gays are bad.

AdamPA1006

In the end it just boils down to "I think it's icky what they do in private"

Why do I have to approve of and accept and like what they do? My duty as a citizen is not to harrass them or harm them and let them go about their lives. Which I do. I do not believe that they deserve the same monetary benifits (marriage) as a heterosexual couple though.

You say you want to do "no harm", but then you admit you do by denying them the same monetary benefits (and other benefits) that marriage brings. But still, that is besides the point of the conversation.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#306 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

[QUOTE="TheFlush"]

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]Souls don't exist. you need to use facts if you are going to convince anyone.

I'm still waiting for that reason as to why you think gays are bad.

AdamPA1006

In the end it just boils down to "I think it's icky what they do in private"

Why do I have to approve of and accept and like what they do? My duty as a citizen is not to harrass them or harm them and let them go about their lives. Which I do. I do not believe that they deserve the same monetary benifits (marriage) as a heterosexual couple though.

You are harming them financially.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#307 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="TheFlush"]

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]Souls don't exist. you need to use facts if you are going to convince anyone.

I'm still waiting for that reason as to why you think gays are bad.

AdamPA1006

In the end it just boils down to "I think it's icky what they do in private"

Why do I have to approve of and accept and like what they do? My duty as a citizen is not to harrass them or harm them and let them go about their lives. Which I do. I do not believe that they deserve the same monetary benifits (marriage) as a heterosexual couple though.

You don't have to like it, or approve of it. Hell you don't really even have to accept it. But saying they don't deserve the same monetary benefits as a hetero couple is just stupid, especially when you claim your duty is to not harm them and then speak out against them. You don't even have religion to hide behind.
Avatar image for AdamPA1006
AdamPA1006

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#308 AdamPA1006
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts

How is not giving them monetary benefits harming them? I know there is necessary stuff in any relationship like hospital visitation rights, inheritance, etc, and all of this is possible to gay couples with a living will and naming the other your heir. They arent missing out on anything but the money.

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#309 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

How is not giving them monetary benefits harming them? I know there is necessary stuff in any relationship like hospital visitation rights, inheritance, etc, and all of this is possible to gay couples with a living will and naming the other your heir. They arent missing out on anything but the money.

AdamPA1006
If you haven't noticed, money helps people obtain things that improve their quality of life.
Avatar image for VoodooHak
VoodooHak

15989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#310 VoodooHak
Member since 2002 • 15989 Posts

opinions?

I for one think that both are true as nothing in nature is that black and white.

frannkzappa

I agree with you that this type if thing is hardly binary.

Avatar image for TheFlush
TheFlush

5965

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#311 TheFlush
Member since 2002 • 5965 Posts

[QUOTE="TheFlush"]

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]Souls don't exist. you need to use facts if you are going to convince anyone.

I'm still waiting for that reason as to why you think gays are bad.

AdamPA1006

In the end it just boils down to "I think it's icky what they do in private"

I bet there is a lot of stuff that people do in private that you dont approve of and think is "icky"

Yes, there are a lot of things people do in private that I think are icky. But as long as they don't harm anyone with it, I won't deny them human and civil rights, I'm not going to tell them what they can't do.

I really really dislike religion, but I will be the last one to tell you you can't practice your religion. Freedom is valuable and we should treasure it. I will however come in action when someones supposed freedom is harming another ones freedom.

Avatar image for AdamPA1006
AdamPA1006

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#312 AdamPA1006
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts
[QUOTE="AdamPA1006"]

How is not giving them monetary benefits harming them? I know there is necessary stuff in any relationship like hospital visitation rights, inheritance, etc, and all of this is possible to gay couples with a living will and naming the other your heir. They arent missing out on anything but the money.

DroidPhysX
If you haven't noticed, money helps people obtain things that improve their quality of life.

So according to this logic the government is "harming" everyone by not giving every person millions.
Avatar image for TheFlush
TheFlush

5965

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#313 TheFlush
Member since 2002 • 5965 Posts

How is not giving them monetary benefits harming them? I know there is necessary stuff in any relationship like hospital visitation rights, inheritance, etc, and all of this is possible to gay couples with a living will and naming the other your heir. They arent missing out on anything but the money.

AdamPA1006

You are misinformed, educate yourself.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#314 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

How is not giving them monetary benefits harming them? I know there is necessary stuff in any relationship like hospital visitation rights, inheritance, etc, and all of this is possible to gay couples with a living will and naming the other your heir. They arent missing out on anything but the money.

AdamPA1006
Funny, you get all in a huff about taxes but when it comes to gay people's money they can just shove off.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#315 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="AdamPA1006"]

How is not giving them monetary benefits harming them? I know there is necessary stuff in any relationship like hospital visitation rights, inheritance, etc, and all of this is possible to gay couples with a living will and naming the other your heir. They arent missing out on anything but the money.

AdamPA1006
If you haven't noticed, money helps people obtain things that improve their quality of life.

So according to this logic the government is "harming" everyone by not giving every person millions.

'xcept one is about an entity that discriminates against a certain group
Avatar image for Ring_of_fire
Ring_of_fire

15880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#316 Ring_of_fire
Member since 2003 • 15880 Posts
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="AdamPA1006"]

How is not giving them monetary benefits harming them? I know there is necessary stuff in any relationship like hospital visitation rights, inheritance, etc, and all of this is possible to gay couples with a living will and naming the other your heir. They arent missing out on anything but the money.

AdamPA1006
If you haven't noticed, money helps people obtain things that improve their quality of life.

So according to this logic the government is "harming" everyone by not giving every person millions.

Why should a loving gay couple not receive the same benefits as a straight indifferent couple?
Avatar image for AdamPA1006
AdamPA1006

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#317 AdamPA1006
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts

[QUOTE="AdamPA1006"]

How is not giving them monetary benefits harming them? I know there is necessary stuff in any relationship like hospital visitation rights, inheritance, etc, and all of this is possible to gay couples with a living will and naming the other your heir. They arent missing out on anything but the money.

TheFlush

You are misinformed, educate yourself.

Enlighten me. The government should give every person money as to not "harm" them?
Avatar image for AdamPA1006
AdamPA1006

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#318 AdamPA1006
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts
[QUOTE="AdamPA1006"]

How is not giving them monetary benefits harming them? I know there is necessary stuff in any relationship like hospital visitation rights, inheritance, etc, and all of this is possible to gay couples with a living will and naming the other your heir. They arent missing out on anything but the money.

Ace6301
Funny, you get all in a huff about taxes but when it comes to gay people's money they can just shove off.

Where are you getting this idea from?
Avatar image for Ring_of_fire
Ring_of_fire

15880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#319 Ring_of_fire
Member since 2003 • 15880 Posts
[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="AdamPA1006"]

How is not giving them monetary benefits harming them? I know there is necessary stuff in any relationship like hospital visitation rights, inheritance, etc, and all of this is possible to gay couples with a living will and naming the other your heir. They arent missing out on anything but the money.

AdamPA1006
Funny, you get all in a huff about taxes but when it comes to gay people's money they can just shove off.

Where are you getting this idea from?

You want gay couples to pay more taxes.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#320 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="AdamPA1006"]

How is not giving them monetary benefits harming them? I know there is necessary stuff in any relationship like hospital visitation rights, inheritance, etc, and all of this is possible to gay couples with a living will and naming the other your heir. They arent missing out on anything but the money.

AdamPA1006
Funny, you get all in a huff about taxes but when it comes to gay people's money they can just shove off.

Where are you getting this idea from?

You. Unless you want to change your statement that losing money does no harm.
Avatar image for AdamPA1006
AdamPA1006

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#321 AdamPA1006
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts
[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="AdamPA1006"][QUOTE="Ace6301"] Funny, you get all in a huff about taxes but when it comes to gay people's money they can just shove off.

Where are you getting this idea from?

You. Unless you want to change your statement that losing money does no harm.

I thought he meant I wouldnt take or want gay peoples money. The state grants monetary benefits to hetero couples because the state wants power. They want increased population for electoral vote or increased tax revenue, and encouraging hetero couples encourages population growth. Now according to this logic old people or infertile couples shouldnt get married. The cases or really old people getting married are very few, and I dont think anyone would support a fertility test to get married.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#322 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
[QUOTE="AdamPA1006"][QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="AdamPA1006"] Where are you getting this idea from?

You. Unless you want to change your statement that losing money does no harm.

I thought he meant I wouldnt take or want gay peoples money. The state grants monetary benefits to hetero couples because the state wants power. They want increased population for electoral vote or increased tax revenue, and encouraging hetero couples encourages population growth. Now according to this logic old people or infertile couples shouldnt get married. The cases or really old people getting married are very few, and I dont think anyone would support a fertility test to get married.

So basically you're just admitting you're fine with gays not being equal citizens. Alright.
Avatar image for Ring_of_fire
Ring_of_fire

15880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#323 Ring_of_fire
Member since 2003 • 15880 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="AdamPA1006"] Where are you getting this idea from?AdamPA1006
You. Unless you want to change your statement that losing money does no harm.

I thought he meant I wouldnt take or want gay peoples money. The state grants monetary benefits to hetero couples because the state wants power. They want increased population for electoral vote or increased tax revenue, and encouraging hetero couples encourages population growth. Now according to this logic old people or infertile couples shouldnt get married. The cases or really old people getting married are very few, and I dont think anyone would support a fertility test to get married.

Irrelevant. There are enough people in this country that have kids (and too many kids without parents) for the state to bother with procreation.

Side, but relevant question: Do you believe DOMA (Defense of marriage act) should be legal?

Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#324 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts
[QUOTE="AdamPA1006"][QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="AdamPA1006"] Where are you getting this idea from?

You. Unless you want to change your statement that losing money does no harm.

I thought he meant I wouldnt take or want gay peoples money. The state grants monetary benefits to hetero couples because the state wants power. They want increased population for electoral vote or increased tax revenue, and encouraging hetero couples encourages population growth. Now according to this logic old people or infertile couples shouldnt get married. The cases or really old people getting married are very few, and I dont think anyone would support a fertility test to get married.

...........lol. I am definitely going to need to drink before I deal with this bs.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#325 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

I think that many people become predisposed to having homosexual tendencies at a young age. It seems to be the result of their psychological and emotional development being affected by some type of early influence, often trauma. I'm not sure if anyone is "born that way." If this is the case, it does not change the fact that many conditions that people are born with can be changed. I'm not saying that gay people shouldn't be allowed to live their lives the way that they want to. That's their right, unless God enforces otherwise. However, it is a disabilitiy. Being homosexual prevents people from naturally biologically procreating due to a mental condition.

Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#326 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts

I think that many people become predisposed to having homosexual tendencies at a young age. It seems to be the result of their psychological and emotional development being affected by some type of early influence, often trauma. I'm not sure if anyone is "born that way." If this is the case, it does not change the fact that many conditions that people are born with can be changed. I'm not saying that gay people shouldn't be allowed to live their lives the way that they want to. That's their right, unless God enforces otherwise. However, it is a disabilitiy. Being homosexual prevents people from naturally biologically procreating due to a mental condition.

hartsickdiscipl
Dude, they can still procreate. Also, what's with you and procreation?
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#327 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

I think that many people become predisposed to having homosexual tendencies at a young age. It seems to be the result of their psychological and emotional development being affected by some type of early influence, often trauma. I'm not sure if anyone is "born that way." If this is the case, it does not change the fact that many conditions that people are born with can be changed. I'm not saying that gay people shouldn't be allowed to live their lives the way that they want to. That's their right, unless God enforces otherwise. However, it is a disabilitiy. Being homosexual prevents people from naturally biologically procreating due to a mental condition.

hartsickdiscipl
God isn't real, bro.
Avatar image for DJ-Lafleur
DJ-Lafleur

35604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#328 DJ-Lafleur
Member since 2007 • 35604 Posts

What if gay people are actually aliens? Sent to spark up controversy so their overlords can begin their attack while we are distracted arguing over marriage?

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#329 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts
[QUOTE="l4dak47"] Dude, they can still procreate.

Not only that, but they also generally have the desire to procreate as well. The only thing that's missing is heterosexual attraction. That's not a lack of ability.
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#330 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

What if gay people are actually aliens? Sent to spark up controversy so their overlords can begin their attack while we are distracted arguing over marriage?

DJ-Lafleur
No wonder they're unnatural. =O
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#331 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

I think that many people become predisposed to having homosexual tendencies at a young age. It seems to be the result of their psychological and emotional development being affected by some type of early influence, often trauma. I'm not sure if anyone is "born that way." If this is the case, it does not change the fact that many conditions that people are born with can be changed. I'm not saying that gay people shouldn't be allowed to live their lives the way that they want to. That's their right, unless God enforces otherwise. However, it is a disabilitiy. Being homosexual prevents people from naturally biologically procreating due to a mental condition.

l4dak47

Dude, they can still procreate. Also, what's with you and procreation?

Please explain how 2 men or 2 women can copulate and reproduce without some form of technological interference.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#332 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

What if gay people are actually aliens? Sent to spark up controversy so their overlords can begin their attack while we are distracted arguing over marriage?

DJ-Lafleur
They're probably busy laughing that the debate is now about friend chicken.
Avatar image for AdamPA1006
AdamPA1006

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#333 AdamPA1006
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts
[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

I think that many people become predisposed to having homosexual tendencies at a young age. It seems to be the result of their psychological and emotional development being affected by some type of early influence, often trauma. I'm not sure if anyone is "born that way." If this is the case, it does not change the fact that many conditions that people are born with can be changed. I'm not saying that gay people shouldn't be allowed to live their lives the way that they want to. That's their right, unless God enforces otherwise. However, it is a disabilitiy. Being homosexual prevents people from naturally biologically procreating due to a mental condition.

DroidPhysX
God isn't real, bro.

Why do all catholics get ripped on this forum? Its the same as me hasassing a gay user and telling them they are wrong for what they feel/believe.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#334 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

I think that many people become predisposed to having homosexual tendencies at a young age. It seems to be the result of their psychological and emotional development being affected by some type of early influence, often trauma. I'm not sure if anyone is "born that way." If this is the case, it does not change the fact that many conditions that people are born with can be changed. I'm not saying that gay people shouldn't be allowed to live their lives the way that they want to. That's their right, unless God enforces otherwise. However, it is a disabilitiy. Being homosexual prevents people from naturally biologically procreating due to a mental condition.

DroidPhysX

God isn't real, bro.

Yeah but Alex Jones is.

Avatar image for Ring_of_fire
Ring_of_fire

15880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#335 Ring_of_fire
Member since 2003 • 15880 Posts

What if gay people are actually aliens? Sent to spark up controversy so their overlords can begin their attack while we are distracted arguing over marriage?

DJ-Lafleur
Damnit, you figured it out. It was the highest rated program on the intergalactic networks
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#336 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

I think that many people become predisposed to having homosexual tendencies at a young age. It seems to be the result of their psychological and emotional development being affected by some type of early influence, often trauma. I'm not sure if anyone is "born that way." If this is the case, it does not change the fact that many conditions that people are born with can be changed. I'm not saying that gay people shouldn't be allowed to live their lives the way that they want to. That's their right, unless God enforces otherwise. However, it is a disabilitiy. Being homosexual prevents people from naturally biologically procreating due to a mental condition.

DroidPhysX

God isn't real, bro.

Maybe not in the sense that most people think of "God," but yes.. God is real.

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#337 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

I think that many people become predisposed to having homosexual tendencies at a young age. It seems to be the result of their psychological and emotional development being affected by some type of early influence, often trauma. I'm not sure if anyone is "born that way." If this is the case, it does not change the fact that many conditions that people are born with can be changed. I'm not saying that gay people shouldn't be allowed to live their lives the way that they want to. That's their right, unless God enforces otherwise. However, it is a disabilitiy. Being homosexual prevents people from naturally biologically procreating due to a mental condition.

hartsickdiscipl

Dude, they can still procreate. Also, what's with you and procreation?

Please explain how 2 men or 2 women can copulate and reproduce without some form of technological interference.

WIth this logic, infertile heterosexual couples have a mental condition.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#338 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

I think that many people become predisposed to having homosexual tendencies at a young age. It seems to be the result of their psychological and emotional development being affected by some type of early influence, often trauma. I'm not sure if anyone is "born that way." If this is the case, it does not change the fact that many conditions that people are born with can be changed. I'm not saying that gay people shouldn't be allowed to live their lives the way that they want to. That's their right, unless God enforces otherwise. However, it is a disabilitiy. Being homosexual prevents people from naturally biologically procreating due to a mental condition.

hartsickdiscipl

God isn't real, bro.

Maybe not in the sense that most people think of "God," but yes.. God is real.

Where's the proof?
Avatar image for Ring_of_fire
Ring_of_fire

15880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#339 Ring_of_fire
Member since 2003 • 15880 Posts
[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="l4dak47"] Dude, they can still procreate. Also, what's with you and procreation? DroidPhysX

Please explain how 2 men or 2 women can copulate and reproduce without some form of technological interference.

WIth this logic, infertile heterosexual couples have a mental condition.

And hetero couples who don't want children.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#340 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

I think that many people become predisposed to having homosexual tendencies at a young age. It seems to be the result of their psychological and emotional development being affected by some type of early influence, often trauma. I'm not sure if anyone is "born that way." If this is the case, it does not change the fact that many conditions that people are born with can be changed. I'm not saying that gay people shouldn't be allowed to live their lives the way that they want to. That's their right, unless God enforces otherwise. However, it is a disabilitiy. Being homosexual prevents people from naturally biologically procreating due to a mental condition.

hartsickdiscipl

Dude, they can still procreate. Also, what's with you and procreation?

Please explain how 2 men or 2 women can copulate and reproduce without some form of technological interference.

The two men have sex with the two women. They may not be sexually attracted to the women but that doesn't make it impossible. Besides that we DO have the technological means. So who cares. We don't discriminate against infertile people, why should we discriminate against gays who just don't want to have sex with the gender that would allow them to have natural children?
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#341 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="l4dak47"] Dude, they can still procreate. Also, what's with you and procreation? DroidPhysX

Please explain how 2 men or 2 women can copulate and reproduce without some form of technological interference.

WIth this logic, infertile heterosexual couples have a mental condition.

Obviously not. They have a physical condition. Illnesses can be physical or mental, no? You have to play with the cards you're dealt to function best as a human being. If you're a male, you were dealt a penis testicles, and various other factors that make you a male. If you're a woman, you were dealt female reproductive organs chemical makeup.

Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#342 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

I think that many people become predisposed to having homosexual tendencies at a young age. It seems to be the result of their psychological and emotional development being affected by some type of early influence, often trauma. I'm not sure if anyone is "born that way." If this is the case, it does not change the fact that many conditions that people are born with can be changed. I'm not saying that gay people shouldn't be allowed to live their lives the way that they want to. That's their right, unless God enforces otherwise. However, it is a disabilitiy. Being homosexual prevents people from naturally biologically procreating due to a mental condition.

hartsickdiscipl

Dude, they can still procreate. Also, what's with you and procreation?

Please explain how 2 men or 2 women can copulate and reproduce without some form of technological interference.

Oh, so it has to be "natural" now. Well, you should probably get off the internet. It's not natural and doesn't help procreation. In fact, it's probably hindering it.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#343 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

hartsick implied all transgendered persons are also handicapped.

This is the part where you stop replying to him.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#344 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

hartsick implied all transgendered persons are also handicapped.

This is the part where you stop replying to him.

Aljosa23
mhm
Avatar image for juden41
juden41

4447

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#345 juden41
Member since 2010 • 4447 Posts
You're born that way.
Avatar image for -Toshy-
-Toshy-

1376

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#346 -Toshy-
Member since 2008 • 1376 Posts
Now according to this logic old people or infertile couples shouldnt get married. The cases or really old people getting married are very few, and I dont think anyone would support a fertility test to get married. AdamPA1006
But didn't you just say couples shouldn't get monetary benefits (marriage) for that very reason? What separates gay couples from the elderly and the infertile? If you're going to side with fidosim with regards to monetary benefits being the determining factor, at least be consistent in the reasons you give out those benefits. At this point, it sounds like the sole reason is purely because they engage in homosexual behavior.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#347 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="l4dak47"] Dude, they can still procreate. Also, what's with you and procreation? Ace6301

Please explain how 2 men or 2 women can copulate and reproduce without some form of technological interference.

The two men have sex with the two women. They may not be sexually attracted to the women but that doesn't make it impossible. Besides that we DO have the technological means. So who cares. We don't discriminate against infertile people, why should we discriminate against gays who just don't want to have sex with the gender that would allow them to have natural children?

You just demonstrated that a man and a woman have to have sex to reproduce. The 2 men or 2 women didn't procreate together, nor were their bodies designed to do so. Congratulations, you just proved my point. A person who uses their body the way it is clearly configured to be used is obviously entitled to help in reproduction, because they're trying to play with the cards they were dealt. People can change themselves from within without technological help. People can't change sexes without major surgery and ongoing treatments. You tell me which one is more healthy.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#348 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="l4dak47"] Dude, they can still procreate. Also, what's with you and procreation? l4dak47

Please explain how 2 men or 2 women can copulate and reproduce without some form of technological interference.

Oh, so it has to be "natural" now. Well, you should probably get off the internet. It's not natural and doesn't help procreation. In fact, it's probably hindering it.

No, I'll continue using it. It keeps me up to speed on how messed up the world is.

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#349 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

Please explain how 2 men or 2 women can copulate and reproduce without some form of technological interference.

artsickdiscipl

WIth this logic, infertile heterosexual couples have a mental condition.

Obviously not. They have a physical condition. Illnesses can be physical or mental, no? You have to play with the cards you're dealt to function best as a human being. If you're a male, you were dealt a penis testicles, and various other factors that make you a male. If you're a woman, you were dealt female reproductive organs chemical makeup.

But they cant reproduce without some interference

therefore they have a mental condition

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#350 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

Please explain how 2 men or 2 women can copulate and reproduce without some form of technological interference.

hartsickdiscipl

The two men have sex with the two women. They may not be sexually attracted to the women but that doesn't make it impossible. Besides that we DO have the technological means. So who cares. We don't discriminate against infertile people, why should we discriminate against gays who just don't want to have sex with the gender that would allow them to have natural children?

You just demonstrated that a man and a woman have to have sex to reproduce. The 2 men or 2 women didn't procreate together, nor were their bodies designed to do so. Congratulations, you just proved my point. A person who uses their body the way it is clearly configured to be used is obviously entitled to help in reproduction, because they're trying to play with the cards they were dealt. People can change themselves from within without technological help. People can't change sexes without major surgery and ongoing treatments. You tell me which one is more healty.

People desire to be who they wish to be. It's unhealthy to make them pretend to be something they aren't. Since when is technology a bad thing? It's the reason why we're the most advanced species we know of and it's the reason why we're even having this conversation. To say we should deny and belittle others because you don't think it's natural is idiotic. I think you're a paranoid schizo but I don't hold it against you or treat you any different than how I would treat anyone else saying the same things you say.