[QUOTE="dunl12496"]
[QUOTE="Former_Slacker"]
If you feel like you have a case against it's occurrence, then submit your findings to peer review. You could get published, possibly win a nobel prize, if you're right.
Edit: I love my new sig quote.
Former_Slacker
Trust But Verify, Ronald Reagan. We have not verified. AT ALL.
Those quotes have nothing to do with one another. Kennedy was warning about rushing to form an opinion while not thinking of it. Reagan's quote doesn't make sense. Why would you trust without verifying? Secondly over 90% of climatologists agree on the subject, that is an overwhelming majority. The research is there and has not been disproven.
That's bull **** and you know it. That's all the climatologists people choose to survey. And when was that survey done? Everything changes. And verifying global warming before we dump HUMAN'S jobs down the drain to protect something there's no proof of. That's like saying: "Someone is going to get sick, so we need to spend lots of money on it." And why hasn't government tested it? Gone out into the desert and dumped co2 in the air to see if it's real? Why is there no "hot spot" of warming that is quick to change? It's sun beams that will warm it. Not only that but how does the co2 get in the atmosphere? And what about volcanos? High up and spouting co2 constantly? Why is that area not dangerous? And what about (don't laugh) dinosaur farts? Wouldn't those make more co2 than cows. :P Ok that was kind of a joke but... why doesn't the government question this publicly? How can there be almost no doubt when we're not on fire and there's been no change for the average man?
Log in to comment