How can you be pro 6@y and anti incest...?..

Both are consensual acts that dont harm outside persons

side note: gs blocks the word gay in the title. are they implying that gay is a derrogatory term? you liberals should get on that

You can't if want to remain consistent.

i dont really see how there are relatable, except for the fact that it could be consentual.

two different things.

Homosexuality isn't a genetic disaster waiting to happen. Incest is.

Homosexuality isn't a genetic disaster waiting to happen. Incest is.

BuryMe

Homosexuality isn't a genetic disaster waiting to happen. Incest is.

BuryMe

Then force them to wear condoms, and that doesn't prohibit Same sex Incest.

Different things are judged differently.

I have no problem with incest. I'd never do it, if someone else wants to then whatever.

[QUOTE="BuryMe"]

Homosexuality isn't a genetic disaster waiting to happen. Incest is.

Philokalia

Then force them to wear condoms, and that doesn't prohibit Same sex Incest.

Condoms, although the best form of birthcontrol, aren't 100% effective. They can berak, expire, not be used properly, and lead to pregnancy (hough it is admitedly very rare.)

[QUOTE="BuryMe"]

Homosexuality isn't a genetic disaster waiting to happen. Incest is.

mingmao3046

Your comparison doesn't work. There are other things we as society can do to reduce crime. The problem is we don't do them.

Incest isn't the identity of a broad group of people. Unless you count West Virginia.

Homosexuality isn't a genetic disaster waiting to happen. Incest is.

BuryMe

[QUOTE="Philokalia"]

[QUOTE="BuryMe"]

Homosexuality isn't a genetic disaster waiting to happen. Incest is.

BuryMe

Then force them to wear condoms, and that doesn't prohibit Same sex Incest.

Condoms, although the best form of birthcontrol, aren't 100% effective. They can berak, expire, not be used properly, and lead to pregnancy (hough it is admitedly very rare.)

[QUOTE="BuryMe"]

Homosexuality isn't a genetic disaster waiting to happen. Incest is.

Ringx55

The problem isn't so much the first generation, it's when families decide they need to do it for generations. Although rare, it has happened. As you increase the number of generations, you increase the liklihood of problems.

[QUOTE="BuryMe"]

Homosexuality isn't a genetic disaster waiting to happen. Incest is.

mingmao3046

they're not?

[spoiler] [/spoiler]

Depending how close the incest is, you can make mentally retarded and/or physically disabled offspring. That isn't debatable, it happens in animals all the time and you can see it. It shows in inbred cats a lot, I had one and my boyfriend's family has one, and they're slow and they have oversized ears and small faces and weird feet.

Incest between two consenting adult parties is not anything wrong to me outside of the inbreeding issue. It's only kinda gross to me because I would never do it. But then again, I'd find it kinda gross personally to have sexual relations with another woman, seeing as I'm straight. I don't have any opposition to either, I just will not do them.

I'm ok with both of them, consenting adults are consenting, there's no more to say.

Comparing gay sex and incest doesn't make sense to me. But anyway.

Incest grosses me out, but beef also grosses me out and I'm not ant-beef.

People that are anti-incest because of increased rates of birth defects, are you also against anyone that carries a gene that increases the likelihood of a child that would be prone to genetic orders from having sex?

[QUOTE="champion837"][QUOTE="Laihendi"]How is it unethical or unnatural?Laihendi

People that are anti-incest because of increased rates of birth defects, are you also against anyone that carries a gene that increases the likelihood of a child that would be prone to genetic orders from having sex?IdioticIcarus

Yes, the foundation itself is flawed and is against the value of family.

I'm pro gay but I'm pretty indifferent to incest. I don't care.

Also, incest gets a bad rap because a lot of the times it's connected to child molestation, exploitation, and a lot of nasty stuff.

[QUOTE="champion837"][QUOTE="Laihendi"]You keep saying it's unethical/immoral, and yet you seem incapable of explaining how it is unethical or immoral. Do you expect people to just take your word for it?Laihendi

Easy. LGBT relations are far more likely than Incestuous relations to produce people who are mentally and intellectually defunct enough to think that both of them have the same moral and/or social implications and thus must be treated in exactly the same way. I'm not a supporter of anti-incest laws between adults, but you have to admit that if they would reduce the number of people who would write something as blatantly stupid as the O.P., then that already counts as a valid reason for them.

Nothing wrong with an incestuous relationship between consenting adults who use birth control.MannyDelgado

Unnatural as it risks offspring having diseaseschampion837

incest does not harm people?

do you even know what happens when people of the same family have a kid?

[QUOTE="MannyDelgado"]Nothing wrong with an incestuous relationship between consenting adults who use birth control.MannyDelgado

Unnatural as it risks offspring having diseaseschampion837

yeah because condoms are the answers, thats why undesired pregnancy is practically nonexistant.