How do people in USA feel about Native Americans?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#201 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]Fair and square? Have you even read US history?redstorm72

Fair in the sense that EVERY single nation on earth was formed by taking land forcefully from someone. It sucks but that was (and still sort of is) how the world works.

Who cares? One instance of imperialism is just as bad as another. The fact that it's been ubiquitous doesn't mean anything. Just because it's common doesn't mean it shouldn't be opposed.
Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#202 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

lol your joking right?

ghoklebutter

Not at all.

Anarchists are just a bunch of pansies, your all complete jokes. How about someone just break into your home then, after all the concept of owning land makes no sense to you, so don't call the cops when someone intrudes on your property. And you pay taxes and drive on public roads and use police departmetns and schools ect...your not an anarchist, you just want to pretend you are so you can be "cool".

Your probably just some kid who doesn't know any better. People who claim to be anarchists are just silly.

Avatar image for majoras_wrath
majoras_wrath

6062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#203 majoras_wrath
Member since 2005 • 6062 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

lol your joking right?

ShadowMoses900

Not at all.

Anarchists are just a bunch of pansies, your all complete jokes. How about someone just break into your home then, after all the concept of owning land makes no sense to you, so don't call the cops when someone intrudes on your property. And you pay taxes and drive on public roads and use police departmetns and schools ect...your not an anarchist, you just want to pretend you are so you can be "cool".

Your probably just some kid who doesn't know any better. People who claim to be anarchists are just silly.

Heh. Like Noam Chomsky right?  What a f*cking kid. [spoiler] complaining about ignorance while blatantly displaying your own. oh my [/spoiler]
Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#204 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] Not at all. majoras_wrath

Anarchists are just a bunch of pansies, your all complete jokes. How about someone just break into your home then, after all the concept of owning land makes no sense to you, so don't call the cops when someone intrudes on your property. And you pay taxes and drive on public roads and use police departmetns and schools ect...your not an anarchist, you just want to pretend you are so you can be "cool".

Your probably just some kid who doesn't know any better. People who claim to be anarchists are just silly.

Heh. Like Noam Chomsky right?  What a f*cking kid. [spoiler] complaining about ignorance while blatantly displaying your own. oh my [/spoiler]

No one gives two sh!ts about him, have you ever seen The Road? Because that's Anarchy is. In a real anrachy setting people would form into tribes (which means obeying some rules and customs of said tribe) and setting up camps (land ownership and terriorty) and defend and fight other groups for resources or whatever (war).

As you can clearly see, you anarchists are hypocrites who are just trying to be "cool", I bet that guy paid taxes and used public services and when shopping in society right? Ya like I said, kids. Mabey not in body, but defianetly in mind.

Avatar image for pie-junior
pie-junior

2866

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#205 pie-junior
Member since 2007 • 2866 Posts
How did you decide Majoras was an anarchist?
Avatar image for majoras_wrath
majoras_wrath

6062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#206 majoras_wrath
Member since 2005 • 6062 Posts
[QUOTE="majoras_wrath"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]Anarchists are just a bunch of pansies, your all complete jokes. How about someone just break into your home then, after all the concept of owning land makes no sense to you, so don't call the cops when someone intrudes on your property. And you pay taxes and drive on public roads and use police departmetns and schools ect...your not an anarchist, you just want to pretend you are so you can be "cool".Your probably just some kid who doesn't know any better. People who claim to be anarchists are just silly.ShadowMoses900
Heh. Like Noam Chomsky right?  What a f*cking kid. [spoiler] complaining about ignorance while blatantly displaying your own. oh my [/spoiler]

No one gives two sh!ts about him, have you ever seen The Road? Because that's Anarchy is. In a real anrachy setting people would form into tribes (which means obeying some rules and customs of said tribe) and setting up camps (land ownership and terriorty) and defend and fight other groups for resources or whatever (war). As you can clearly see, you anarchists are hypocrites who are just trying to be "cool", I bet that guy paid taxes and used public services and when shopping in society right? Ya like I said, kids. Mabey not in body, but defianetly in mind.

You mean other then being one of the most respected scientists and political theorists in the world? Other then the fact that he is cited far more then most scholars could dream to achieve? I'm not an anarchist and I disagree with him on most things in that area, but denying his importance is f*cking ignorant. You also have no idea what anarchy means beyond your grade-school interpretation of it. You're outta your league kid.
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#207 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

lol your joking right?

ShadowMoses900

Not at all.

Anarchists are just a bunch of pansies, your all complete jokes. How about someone just break into your home then, after all the concept of owning land makes no sense to you, so don't call the cops when someone intrudes on your property. And you pay taxes and drive on public roads and use police departmetns and schools ect...your not an anarchist, you just want to pretend you are so you can be "cool".

Your probably just some kid who doesn't know any better. People who claim to be anarchists are just silly.

Theft is still a crime in an anarchist society - you're assuming that the institution of private property is the only way to defend possessions. It's not. Usufruct is enough to establish a secure system of material possession. Anyway, I'm not an anarchist in practice, but that doesn't indicate any flaw in anarchism. And you're only assuming that I'm blind because you probably don't even understand what anarchy entails. There can still be a code of law with anarchy, and many serious anarchists are, in fact, pacifists. I suggest that you study anarchism from an unbiased source before you make silly conclusions.
Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#208 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"][QUOTE="majoras_wrath"] Heh. Like Noam Chomsky right?  What a f*cking kid. [spoiler] complaining about ignorance while blatantly displaying your own. oh my [/spoiler] majoras_wrath
No one gives two sh!ts about him, have you ever seen The Road? Because that's Anarchy is. In a real anrachy setting people would form into tribes (which means obeying some rules and customs of said tribe) and setting up camps (land ownership and terriorty) and defend and fight other groups for resources or whatever (war). As you can clearly see, you anarchists are hypocrites who are just trying to be "cool", I bet that guy paid taxes and used public services and when shopping in society right? Ya like I said, kids. Mabey not in body, but defianetly in mind.

You mean other then being one of the most respected scientists and political theorists in the world? Other then the fact that he is cited far more then most scholars could dream to achieve? I'm not an anarchist and I disagree with him on most things in that area, but denying his importance is f*cking ignorant. You also have no idea what anarchy means beyond your grade-school interpretation of it. You're outta your league kid.

All I hear from this post of your is "Shadow kicked my ass, I'm upset now, I'm going to throw insults like a child at him blah blah blah"

Get over yourself. I don't care about his ligustic theories, all that is well and good. But he is still an idiot and hypocrite for being an Anarchist. Your all a bunch of jokes.

Avatar image for redstorm72
redstorm72

4646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#209 redstorm72
Member since 2008 • 4646 Posts

[QUOTE="redstorm72"]

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]Fair and square? Have you even read US history?ghoklebutter

Fair in the sense that EVERY single nation on earth was formed by taking land forcefully from someone. It sucks but that was (and still sort of is) how the world works.

Who cares? One instance of imperialism is just as bad as another. The fact that it's been ubiquitous doesn't mean anything. Just because it's common doesn't mean it shouldn't be opposed.

Alright, why don't you take the first step and give up your house to the people whose ancestors once owned the land your house is on? It's 's only fair since that land was wrongfully taken from them, right?

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#210 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] Not at all. ghoklebutter

Anarchists are just a bunch of pansies, your all complete jokes. How about someone just break into your home then, after all the concept of owning land makes no sense to you, so don't call the cops when someone intrudes on your property. And you pay taxes and drive on public roads and use police departmetns and schools ect...your not an anarchist, you just want to pretend you are so you can be "cool".

Your probably just some kid who doesn't know any better. People who claim to be anarchists are just silly.

Theft is still a crime in an anarchist society - you're assuming that the institution of private property is the only way to defend possessions. It's not. Usufruct is enough to establish a secure system of material possession. Anyway, I'm not an anarchist in practice, but that doesn't indicate any flaw in anarchism. And you're only assuming that I'm blind because you probably don't even understand what anarchy entails. There can still be a code of law with anarchy, and many serious anarchists are, in fact, pacifists. I suggest that you study anarchism from an unbiased source before you make silly conclusions.

Anarchy means no lay or order, what fantasy world do you live in? There wouldbeno "Crime", how can you claim to be something you don't even understand? If this was anarchy (anarchist society is an oxymoron btw) then I could take whatever the hell I want from you, after all you siad you don't believe in property in the first place so you could just give it to me like a wuss and not fight back.

And lol at being an anarchist and a pacifist, you'd be dead within an hour of an anarchy environement. A guy would come along and try to hurt you and your family and you would let them and get killed in the process. And no sh!t your not an anarchist in practice, if your were you'd be arrested. Your not an anarchist period, your just a joke.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]Fair and square? Have you even read US history?redstorm72

Fair in the sense that EVERY single nation on earth was formed by taking land forcefully from someone. It sucks but that was (and still sort of is) how the world works.

Actually the current configuration of nations in the world was largely due to the indoeuropean conquest of the world (one group of people). Before that there were many non expansionist groups that lived well. So you can't say that's how the world or our species works, just that one instance of our species became incredibly violent and conquered almost everybody else.
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#212 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="redstorm72"]

Fair in the sense that EVERY single nation on earth was formed by taking land forcefully from someone. It sucks but that was (and still sort of is) how the world works.

redstorm72

Who cares? One instance of imperialism is just as bad as another. The fact that it's been ubiquitous doesn't mean anything. Just because it's common doesn't mean it shouldn't be opposed.

Alright, why don't you take the first step and give up your house to the people whose ancestors once owned the land your house is on? It's 's only fair since that land was wrongfully taken from them, right?

No, that's not a good solution either. Land belongs to no one.
Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#213 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="redstorm72"]

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] Who cares? One instance of imperialism is just as bad as another. The fact that it's been ubiquitous doesn't mean anything. Just because it's common doesn't mean it shouldn't be opposed.ghoklebutter

Alright, why don't you take the first step and give up your house to the people whose ancestors once owned the land your house is on? It's 's only fair since that land was wrongfully taken from them, right?

No, that's not a good solution either. Land belongs to no one.

Yep, troll confirmed.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#214 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Anarchists are just a bunch of pansies, your all complete jokes. How about someone just break into your home then, after all the concept of owning land makes no sense to you, so don't call the cops when someone intrudes on your property. And you pay taxes and drive on public roads and use police departmetns and schools ect...your not an anarchist, you just want to pretend you are so you can be "cool".

Your probably just some kid who doesn't know any better. People who claim to be anarchists are just silly.

ShadowMoses900

Theft is still a crime in an anarchist society - you're assuming that the institution of private property is the only way to defend possessions. It's not. Usufruct is enough to establish a secure system of material possession. Anyway, I'm not an anarchist in practice, but that doesn't indicate any flaw in anarchism. And you're only assuming that I'm blind because you probably don't even understand what anarchy entails. There can still be a code of law with anarchy, and many serious anarchists are, in fact, pacifists. I suggest that you study anarchism from an unbiased source before you make silly conclusions.

Anarchy means no lay or order, what fantasy world do you live in? There wouldbeno "Crime", how can you claim to be something you don't even understand? If this was anarchy (anarchist society is an oxymoron btw) then I could take whatever the hell I want from you, after all you siad you don't believe in property in the first place so you could just give it to me like a wuss and not fight back.

And lol at being an anarchist and a pacifist, you'd be dead within an hour of an anarchy environement. A guy would come along and try to hurt you and your family and you would let them and get killed in the process. And no sh!t your not an anarchist in practice, if your were you'd be arrested. Your not an anarchist period, your just a joke.

Please learn things from actual academic sources rather than basing your entire idea of a political system on a fictional novel/movie.
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#215 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

Anarchy means no lay or order, what fantasy world do you live in? There wouldbeno "Crime", how can you claim to be something you don't even understand? If this was anarchy (anarchist society is an oxymoron btw) then I could take whatever the hell I want from you, after all you siad you don't believe in property in the first place so you could just give it to me like a wuss and not fight back.

And lol at being an anarchist and a pacifist, you'd be dead within an hour of an anarchy environement. A guy would come along and try to hurt you and your family and you would let them and get killed in the process. And no sh!t your not an anarchist in practice, if your were you'd be arrested. Your not an anarchist period, your just a joke.

ShadowMoses900

No, anarchy is the absence of the state, not necessarily law and order. Anything that is a violation of individual rights can constitute crime - and that includes a host of things, including murder, rape, theft, etc. And no, you can't take something from me because you need my consent and you must actually prove that I don't really need it.

It's true that some anarchist thinkers have advocated violence, but they don't define the whole school of thought. Anarcho-pacifism is, in fact, a real form of anarchism that most people advocate. It involves dismantling the state through nonviolent means. Anyone who thinks that anarchy naturally entails violence is an idiot.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#216 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="redstorm72"]

Alright, why don't you take the first step and give up your house to the people whose ancestors once owned the land your house is on? It's 's only fair since that land was wrongfully taken from them, right?

ShadowMoses900

No, that's not a good solution either. Land belongs to no one.

Yep, troll confirmed.

No. I'm quite serious about my stance against land-acquisition. Land isn't something to be owned by any particular group or individual.
Avatar image for redstorm72
redstorm72

4646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#217 redstorm72
Member since 2008 • 4646 Posts

No, that's not a good solution either. Land belongs to no one.ghoklebutter

Well, my propery ownership documents say differently. If you want to get metaphysical about it, yeah, no one can own anything. But really, where do you draw the line? If I can't own a peice of land, can I own a car? A computer? Hell, are my children really even mine? It's pointless to speculate about that though because the world doesn't, and never will, work like that.

Actually the current configuration of nations in the world was largely due to the indoeuropean conquest of the world (one group of people). Before that there were many non expansionist groups that lived well. So you can't say that's how the world or our species works, just that one instance of our species became incredibly violent and conquered almost everybody else.kuraimen

War and conquest are universal human traits (no just European), to say otherwise is just naive.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#218 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts
[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] No, that's not a good solution either. Land belongs to no one.ghoklebutter

Yep, troll confirmed.

No. I'm quite serious about my stance against land-acquisition. Land isn't something to be owned by any particular group or individual.

Then I hope you aren't living in a home that is "owned" by anyone.
Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#219 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] Theft is still a crime in an anarchist society - you're assuming that the institution of private property is the only way to defend possessions. It's not. Usufruct is enough to establish a secure system of material possession. Anyway, I'm not an anarchist in practice, but that doesn't indicate any flaw in anarchism. And you're only assuming that I'm blind because you probably don't even understand what anarchy entails. There can still be a code of law with anarchy, and many serious anarchists are, in fact, pacifists. I suggest that you study anarchism from an unbiased source before you make silly conclusions.Ace6301

Anarchy means no lay or order, what fantasy world do you live in? There wouldbeno "Crime", how can you claim to be something you don't even understand? If this was anarchy (anarchist society is an oxymoron btw) then I could take whatever the hell I want from you, after all you siad you don't believe in property in the first place so you could just give it to me like a wuss and not fight back.

And lol at being an anarchist and a pacifist, you'd be dead within an hour of an anarchy environement. A guy would come along and try to hurt you and your family and you would let them and get killed in the process. And no sh!t your not an anarchist in practice, if your were you'd be arrested. Your not an anarchist period, your just a joke.

Please learn things from actual academic sources rather than basing your entire idea of a political system on a fictional novel/movie.

The Road was a very respected novel and film, it provided a back drop of how society happens when lose law. That's what anarchy is, stop pretending to be a Mr. Know it all, it's hilarious because your the complete opposite. I think your trolling most of the time honestly, you never seem to know what your talking about.

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#220 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] No, that's not a good solution either. Land belongs to no one.ghoklebutter

Yep, troll confirmed.

No. I'm quite serious about my stance against land-acquisition. Land isn't something to be owned by any particular group or individual.

Then give me your house then. After all you don't own it right? I do now.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#221 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
War and conquest are universal human traits (no just European), to say otherwise is just naive.redstorm72
Actually to say otherwise shows ignorance. If you actually read anthropological studies on groups before and after leaving Africa you would notice that such violence is by FAR not an universal human trait in fact even Darwin made emphasis on the cooperative traits of humans as the key aspects for our evolution not the violent and competitive. Of course if you base your conclusions on your daily newspaper then you wouldn't imagine that.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#222 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts
[QUOTE="redstorm72"]War and conquest are universal human traits (no just European), to say otherwise is just naive.kuraimen
Actually to say otherwise shows ignorance. If you actually read anthropological studies on groups before and after leaving Africa you would notice that such violence is by FAR not an universal human trait in fact even Darwin made emphasis on the cooperative traits of humans as the key aspects for our evolution not the violent and competitive. Of course if you base your conclusions on your daily newspaper then you wouldn't imagine that.

It's pretty much accepted that humans have been in conflict with each throughout much of history.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#223 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Anarchy means no lay or order, what fantasy world do you live in? There wouldbeno "Crime", how can you claim to be something you don't even understand? If this was anarchy (anarchist society is an oxymoron btw) then I could take whatever the hell I want from you, after all you siad you don't believe in property in the first place so you could just give it to me like a wuss and not fight back.

And lol at being an anarchist and a pacifist, you'd be dead within an hour of an anarchy environement. A guy would come along and try to hurt you and your family and you would let them and get killed in the process. And no sh!t your not an anarchist in practice, if your were you'd be arrested. Your not an anarchist period, your just a joke.

ShadowMoses900

Please learn things from actual academic sources rather than basing your entire idea of a political system on a fictional novel/movie.

The Road was a very respected novel and film, it provided a back drop of how society happens when lose law. That's what anarchy is, stop pretending to be a Mr. Know it all, it's hilarious because your the complete opposite. I think your trolling most of the time honestly, you never seem to know what your talking about.

I actually think the same about you, but then I realize your ideas are more similar to that of a sorely ignorant individual. Please get a clue about anarchism before you try and discuss it while using a post-apocalyptic fiction novel as your only source. May as well argue against Monarchy while citing Mario or Zelda.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#224 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="redstorm72"]War and conquest are universal human traits (no just European), to say otherwise is just naive.LJS9502_basic
Actually to say otherwise shows ignorance. If you actually read anthropological studies on groups before and after leaving Africa you would notice that such violence is by FAR not an universal human trait in fact even Darwin made emphasis on the cooperative traits of humans as the key aspects for our evolution not the violent and competitive. Of course if you base your conclusions on your daily newspaper then you wouldn't imagine that.

It's pretty much accepted that humans have been in conflict with each throughout much of history.

Which history? I just told you that there are anthropological studies that show relatively peaceful and non expansionist groups of people and that even Darwin defended such notion. What is your source?
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#225 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Yep, troll confirmed.

ShadowMoses900

No. I'm quite serious about my stance against land-acquisition. Land isn't something to be owned by any particular group or individual.

Then give me your house then. After all you don't own it right? I do now.

No, in an anarchist society, I actually would own it, and you wouldn't have a right to take it away without my consent. Again, usufruct.
Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#226 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] Please learn things from actual academic sources rather than basing your entire idea of a political system on a fictional novel/movie. Ace6301

The Road was a very respected novel and film, it provided a back drop of how society happens when lose law. That's what anarchy is, stop pretending to be a Mr. Know it all, it's hilarious because your the complete opposite. I think your trolling most of the time honestly, you never seem to know what your talking about.

I actually think the same about you, but then I realize your ideas are more similar to that of a sorely ignorant individual. Please get a clue about anarchism before you try and discuss it while using a post-apocalyptic fiction novel as your only source. May as well argue against Monarchy while citing Mario or Zelda.

Sounds to me like your upset a bit, too bad I don't care. Anarchy is a damn joke, anyone who thinks otherwise is living in fantasy land.

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#227 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] No. I'm quite serious about my stance against land-acquisition. Land isn't something to be owned by any particular group or individual.ghoklebutter

Then give me your house then. After all you don't own it right? I do now.

No, in an anarchist society, I actually would own it, and you wouldn't have a right to take it away without my consent. Again, usufruct.

But there's no law, I can take whatever I want from you and you can't do a damn thing about it. It would be my guns VS your pacifism, guess which would win?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#228 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Actually to say otherwise shows ignorance. If you actually read anthropological studies on groups before and after leaving Africa you would notice that such violence is by FAR not an universal human trait in fact even Darwin made emphasis on the cooperative traits of humans as the key aspects for our evolution not the violent and competitive. Of course if you base your conclusions on your daily newspaper then you wouldn't imagine that.

It's pretty much accepted that humans have been in conflict with each throughout much of history.

Which history? I just told you that there are anthropological studies that show relatively peaceful and non expansionist groups of people and that even Darwin defended such notion. What is your source?

You should use some more contemporary than Darwin. History has evolved since his time and much more is known.
Avatar image for Sunfyre7896
Sunfyre7896

1644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#229 Sunfyre7896
Member since 2011 • 1644 Posts

Don't have anything negative towards them. Would be friends with some, but you don't see any in most states that are actually 100%. Many people have a bit of their genes, but it's a rarity indeed to see a whole blooded Native American Indian.

As to what we did I think it was despicable. Drove them onto reservations and caused them to develop alcoholism at an alarming rate due to their plight. At least, they get some benefits back from the Fed. Govt.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#230 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Then give me your house then. After all you don't own it right? I do now.

ShadowMoses900

No, in an anarchist society, I actually would own it, and you wouldn't have a right to take it away without my consent. Again, usufruct.

But there's no law, I can take whatever I want from you and you can't do a damn thing about it. It would be my guns VS your pacifism, guess which would win?

Like I said, law enforcement can exist with anarchy. Anarchists oppose hierarchal authority, not law and order.

Nevertheless, you bring up an important point. I certainly will abandon anarchism if it becomes clear to me that authority is absolutely necessary for law and order.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#231 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

The Road was a very respected novel and film, it provided a back drop of how society happens when lose law. That's what anarchy is, stop pretending to be a Mr. Know it all, it's hilarious because your the complete opposite. I think your trolling most of the time honestly, you never seem to know what your talking about.

ShadowMoses900

I actually think the same about you, but then I realize your ideas are more similar to that of a sorely ignorant individual. Please get a clue about anarchism before you try and discuss it while using a post-apocalyptic fiction novel as your only source. May as well argue against Monarchy while citing Mario or Zelda.

Sounds to me like your upset a bit, too bad I don't care. Anarchy is a damn joke, anyone who thinks otherwise is living in fantasy land.

Often the one making the accusation of "sounding upset" is reflecting their own emotional state onto the topic at hand. I will admit when I see people like you I feel a little sad that they live willfully ignorant because they're too lazy to actually learn and would rather believe their ignorance is just as good as knowledge. A sad state of affairs that's happening more and more often despite how easy it is to get information that could rectify their mistaken beliefs.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#232 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts
[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] I actually think the same about you, but then I realize your ideas are more similar to that of a sorely ignorant individual. Please get a clue about anarchism before you try and discuss it while using a post-apocalyptic fiction novel as your only source. May as well argue against Monarchy while citing Mario or Zelda.Ace6301

Sounds to me like your upset a bit, too bad I don't care. Anarchy is a damn joke, anyone who thinks otherwise is living in fantasy land.

Often the one making the accusation of "sounding upset" is reflecting their own emotional state onto the topic at hand. I will admit when I see people like you I feel a little sad that they live willfully ignorant because they're too lazy to actually learn and would rather believe their ignorance is just as good as knowledge. A sad state of affairs that's happening more and more often despite how easy it is to get information that could rectify their mistaken beliefs.

Should I grab the popcorn? I have some time to kill before the Pens game....
Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#233 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] No, in an anarchist society, I actually would own it, and you wouldn't have a right to take it away without my consent. Again, usufruct.ghoklebutter

But there's no law, I can take whatever I want from you and you can't do a damn thing about it. It would be my guns VS your pacifism, guess which would win?

Like I said, law enforcement can exist with anarchy. Anarchists oppose hierarchal authority, not law and order.

Law enforcement wouldn't exist, it would be just a bunch of guys with guns (me)pushing the people without guns around(you). Where would the freedom be in that? It would just be a savage world, I think you don't know what Anarchy is, I think your describing something else. I recommend you go live with the Amish, they seem to be more catered to what you want.

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#234 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] I actually think the same about you, but then I realize your ideas are more similar to that of a sorely ignorant individual. Please get a clue about anarchism before you try and discuss it while using a post-apocalyptic fiction novel as your only source. May as well argue against Monarchy while citing Mario or Zelda.Ace6301

Sounds to me like your upset a bit, too bad I don't care. Anarchy is a damn joke, anyone who thinks otherwise is living in fantasy land.

Often the one making the accusation of "sounding upset" is reflecting their own emotional state onto the topic at hand. I will admit when I see people like you I feel a little sad that they live willfully ignorant because they're too lazy to actually learn and would rather believe their ignorance is just as good as knowledge. A sad state of affairs that's happening more and more often despite how easy it is to get information that could rectify their mistaken beliefs.

Anarchy is a joke, get over it.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#235 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]It's pretty much accepted that humans have been in conflict with each throughout much of history.LJS9502_basic
Which history? I just told you that there are anthropological studies that show relatively peaceful and non expansionist groups of people and that even Darwin defended such notion. What is your source?

You should use some more contemporary than Darwin. History has evolved since his time and much more is known.

*Facepalm* The human race is 200 thousands years old. Written history (which is apparently what you are referring to) is like 5000 years old. That means you are referring to 2.5% of human history and you said that it was "accepted that humans have been in conflict with each throughout much of history.". You are forgetting the 97.5% of human history where war, as we known it, didn't even exist and this is where anthropological and evolutionary studies (like those of Darwin) shine some light.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#236 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"] Often the one making the accusation of "sounding upset" is reflecting their own emotional state onto the topic at hand. I will admit when I see people like you I feel a little sad that they live willfully ignorant because they're too lazy to actually learn and would rather believe their ignorance is just as good as knowledge. A sad state of affairs that's happening more and more often despite how easy it is to get information that could rectify their mistaken beliefs.

Should I grab the popcorn? I have some time to kill before the Pens game....

I'd save it for the game. He's usually not very good at come backs.
Anarchy is a joke, get over it.ShadowMoses900
He's very obliging though.
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#237 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

But there's no law, I can take whatever I want from you and you can't do a damn thing about it. It would be my guns VS your pacifism, guess which would win?

ShadowMoses900

Like I said, law enforcement can exist with anarchy. Anarchists oppose hierarchal authority, not law and order.

Law enforcement wouldn't exist, it would be just a bunch of guys with guns (me)pushing the people without guns around(you). Where would the freedom be in that? It would just be a savage world, I think you don't know what Anarchy is, I think your describing something else. I recommend you go live with the Amish, they seem to be more catered to what you want.

I'm describing anarchism proper. It's not like people can't enforce the law without an artificial, imposed authority like the state.
Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#238 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Which history? I just told you that there are anthropological studies that show relatively peaceful and non expansionist groups of people and that even Darwin defended such notion. What is your source?kuraimen
You should use some more contemporary than Darwin. History has evolved since his time and much more is known.

*Facepalm* The human race is 200 thousands years old. Written history (which is apparently what you are referring to) is like 5000 years old. That means you are referring to 2.5% of human history and you said that it was "accepted that humans have been in conflict with each throughout much of history.". You are forgetting the 97.5% of human history where war, as we known it, didn't even exist and this is where anthropological and evolutionary studies (like those of Darwin) shine some light.

I think war has been going on with humans since like...forever. And while yes the human race as a whole is alot older than 5000 years, however scientists speculate that Modern Man is roughly around 5000 to 6000. Sorry that's the way the world is, it sucks but someday we may have peace.

But I think that only God can truly do that, not man.

Avatar image for Jamiemydearx3
Jamiemydearx3

4062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#239 Jamiemydearx3
Member since 2008 • 4062 Posts

So long ago it doesn't even matter anymore. :( Sorry natives!

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#240 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Ace6301"] Should I grab the popcorn? I have some time to kill before the Pens game....Ace6301
I'd save it for the game. He's usually not very good at come backs.
Anarchy is a joke, get over it.ShadowMoses900
He's very obliging though.

I'm not here to have some internet drama with some teenager, I'm here to have a discussion. One in which you are uneducated with. Anarchy can't work, it's a lack of order, not this magical fantasy land where you believe everyone get's along without law or authority. What would happen is people would come and take what they want from you and your family/group, there's no authority to stop them.

And the fact that you don't believe in owning guns makes you the victim, people with the guns would come and shoot you and take everything. There's no law becasue they ARE the law!

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#241 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]You should use some more contemporary than Darwin. History has evolved since his time and much more is known.ShadowMoses900

*Facepalm* The human race is 200 thousands years old. Written history (which is apparently what you are referring to) is like 5000 years old. That means you are referring to 2.5% of human history and you said that it was "accepted that humans have been in conflict with each throughout much of history.". You are forgetting the 97.5% of human history where war, as we known it, didn't even exist and this is where anthropological and evolutionary studies (like those of Darwin) shine some light.

I think war has been going on with humans since like...forever. And while yes the human race as a whole is alot older than 5000 years, however scientists speculate that Modern Man is roughly around 5000 to 6000. Sorry that's the way the world is, it sucks but someday we may have peace.

But I think that only God can truly do that, not man.

Modern man as in the species is 200 thousand years old not 5000. Modern civilization (post-agricultural revolution) is around 5000 and 10000 years old but that has nothing to do with the species. Warfare as we know it is also 5000-10000 years old since it comes with modern civilizations, there was NOTHING like war before that. Anthropologist know there are skirmishes from time to time but not constant organized war with specialized institutions like armies like it happened after the agricultural revolution.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#242 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]You should use some more contemporary than Darwin. History has evolved since his time and much more is known.ShadowMoses900

*Facepalm* The human race is 200 thousands years old. Written history (which is apparently what you are referring to) is like 5000 years old. That means you are referring to 2.5% of human history and you said that it was "accepted that humans have been in conflict with each throughout much of history.". You are forgetting the 97.5% of human history where war, as we known it, didn't even exist and this is where anthropological and evolutionary studies (like those of Darwin) shine some light.

I think war has been going on with humans since like...forever. And while yes the human race as a whole is alot older than 5000 years, however scientists speculate that Modern Man is roughly around 5000 to 6000. Sorry that's the way the world is, it sucks but someday we may have peace.

But I think that only God can truly do that, not man.

50,000 - 60,000*
Avatar image for gun65
gun65

3312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#243 gun65
Member since 2004 • 3312 Posts

Well, my future fiance is Native American so I suppose i like them :P

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#244 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
'm not here to have some internet drama with some teenager, I'm here to have a discussion. One in which you are uneducated with. Anarchy can't work, it's a lack of order, not this magical fantasy land where you believe everyone get's along without law or authority. What would happen is people would come and take what they want from you and your family/group, there's no authority to stop them.And the fact that you don't believe in owning guns makes you the victim, people with the guns would come and shoot you and take everything. There's no law becasue they ARE the law!ShadowMoses900
In the future I'd suggest if you wish to have anyone take you seriously in a discussion that you should actually demonstrate knowledge in what you're talking about. I can't say I'm too surprised given your demonstrated lack of understanding on the subject of other political ideas in the past but I guess I'm an optimist when it comes to people like you. Now, would you please go look up any actual definition of anarchy? I don't even care if you don't admit I'm right, I just want you to learn. And no I'm not an anarchist. In fact I think it's really not a very good idea. However hating what you don't even understand is just juvenile.
Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#245 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]'m not here to have some internet drama with some teenager, I'm here to have a discussion. One in which you are uneducated with. Anarchy can't work, it's a lack of order, not this magical fantasy land where you believe everyone get's along without law or authority. What would happen is people would come and take what they want from you and your family/group, there's no authority to stop them.And the fact that you don't believe in owning guns makes you the victim, people with the guns would come and shoot you and take everything. There's no law becasue they ARE the law!Ace6301
In the future I'd suggest if you wish to have anyone take you seriously in a discussion that you should actually demonstrate knowledge in what you're talking about. I can't say I'm too surprised given your demonstrated lack of understanding on the subject of other political ideas in the past but I guess I'm an optimist when it comes to people like you. Now, would you please go look up any actual definition of anarchy? I don't even care if you don't admit I'm right, I just want you to learn.

All I got from this is that you don't have any idea what your talking about and this is your way of admitting defeat. Muhahhahaha

Sorry if I upset you, but it's not my fault that you don't know much about this subject. Don't get mad at me.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#246 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]'m not here to have some internet drama with some teenager, I'm here to have a discussion. One in which you are uneducated with. Anarchy can't work, it's a lack of order, not this magical fantasy land where you believe everyone get's along without law or authority. What would happen is people would come and take what they want from you and your family/group, there's no authority to stop them.And the fact that you don't believe in owning guns makes you the victim, people with the guns would come and shoot you and take everything. There's no law becasue they ARE the law!ShadowMoses900

In the future I'd suggest if you wish to have anyone take you seriously in a discussion that you should actually demonstrate knowledge in what you're talking about. I can't say I'm too surprised given your demonstrated lack of understanding on the subject of other political ideas in the past but I guess I'm an optimist when it comes to people like you. Now, would you please go look up any actual definition of anarchy? I don't even care if you don't admit I'm right, I just want you to learn.

All I got from this is that you don't have any idea what your talking about and this is your way of admitting defeat. Muhahhahaha

Sorry if I upset you, but it's not my fault that you don't know much about this subject. Don't get mad at me.

What ever happened to wishing to have a debate?
Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#247 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] In the future I'd suggest if you wish to have anyone take you seriously in a discussion that you should actually demonstrate knowledge in what you're talking about. I can't say I'm too surprised given your demonstrated lack of understanding on the subject of other political ideas in the past but I guess I'm an optimist when it comes to people like you. Now, would you please go look up any actual definition of anarchy? I don't even care if you don't admit I'm right, I just want you to learn.Ace6301

All I got from this is that you don't have any idea what your talking about and this is your way of admitting defeat. Muhahhahaha

Sorry if I upset you, but it's not my fault that you don't know much about this subject. Don't get mad at me.

What ever happened to wishing to have a debate?

It got deralied by people who don't know what Anarchy is.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#248 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

All I got from this is that you don't have any idea what your talking about and this is your way of admitting defeat. Muhahhahaha

Sorry if I upset you, but it's not my fault that you don't know much about this subject. Don't get mad at me.

ShadowMoses900

What ever happened to wishing to have a debate?

It got deralied by people who don't know what Anarchy is.

How true. At least you've admitted it, that's a step. I'd suggest you watch some of Noam Chomsky on the philosophy of Anarchism if you want to expand your knowledge in case you find yourself in a similar debate in the future.
Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#249 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] What ever happened to wishing to have a debate?Ace6301

It got deralied by people who don't know what Anarchy is.

How true. At least you've admitted it, that's a step. I'd suggest you watch some of Noam Chomsky on the philosophy of Anarchism if you want to expand your knowledge in case you find yourself in a similar debate in the future.

Anarchy is a lack of order, there is no law in such an environement. And all these anarchists are jokes, I don't know which anarchy you are thinking of, but it's not the real one.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#250 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

It got deralied by people who don't know what Anarchy is.

ShadowMoses900

How true. At least you've admitted it, that's a step. I'd suggest you watch some of Noam Chomsky on the philosophy of Anarchism if you want to expand your knowledge in case you find yourself in a similar debate in the future.

Anarchy is a lack of order, there is no law in such an environement. And all these anarchists are jokes, I don't know which anarchy you are thinking of, but it's not the real one.

That's one definition but it's not the one used by actual anarchists. I've always felt judging people what they actually think rather than what you think they think is the best way to go about things. Actual anarchists, not petulant socially apathetic teens who want to just break the law with no boundaries, believe in minimal interference from any authority but still believe in some form of law and that there should still be an institution that upholds those laws. Ownership of objects still exists. Think more wild west and less fall out. Actual wild west and not American serial wild west. The one with very few murders and extremely little government intervention.