[QUOTE="Cloud_Insurance"][QUOTE="Laihendi"] Please explain how one must be a bad person to be unwilling to compensate for an employer who is unwilling to provide his employee with an adequate wage. Please explain why one must be a bad person to be unwilling to compensate for an inadequate wage that the employee voluntarily agreed to work for.Laihendi
The idea is that its bad for the employer to pay a flat wage. Why? Because there is no incentive for the employees to perform their job well. If they are paid a flat rate, they'll most likely work no harder than what is required for them to keep their job. Whereas if their reward (their pay) is tied to their paerformance, they will be encouraged to do their job at a higher level since they see more benefit in return. And as a result of all of the great service provided by the waitstaff, the restaurant will get more customers, as people who eat out want good service in addition to good food. People are willing to pay significantly higher prices for excellent service.
When you go to a restaurant, you pay the same price for the food whether you eat in or take out. If you eat in and thus require the use of the waitstaff and then fail to tip, you aren't paying anything for that service.
It is an act of moral cowardice to give charity to a stranger, and that is what a tip is unless it is explicitly stated that tips are mandatory. If restaurants want to pay based on merit, they should make use of an evaluation system for customers to participate in.Its not charity. Its the cost of service provided by the waitstaff. That cost isn't fixed, its variable. You, the customer, choose the cost of that service provided. Its a good thing. Normal, civilized people base it on the quality of the service provided.
You can say whatever you want, at the end of the day you are just trying to rationalize that you aren't cheap.
And you conveniently ignored the part where I mentioned the price of food not changing depending on whether you choose to eat in or take out.
Log in to comment