If Israel tries to attack Iran.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Redinko
Redinko

133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#451 Redinko
Member since 2011 • 133 Posts

[QUOTE="Redinko"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"] Being against the right for Jews to engage in self-determination but support it for other people=anti-semitism.themajormayor

Puting words into other people's mouth = bad argument.

I'm against Zionism being used as a justification to confiscate land and build illegal settlements.

Guy who doesn't seem to understand the definition of Zionism and talking about irrelevances=you

You're right, when has Zionism ever been used as a justification to take more land from the Palestinians.. silly me.

Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#452 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts
[QUOTE="Darkman2007"]

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]isnt zionism just being against israel existing as a jewish state? You cant still support israel's existence without saying that it should be a jewish state in the same way iran is a muslim state....Xx_Socrates_xX

you mean anti zionism? being anti zionist is essentially saying the Jews do not deserve a state of their own (just like there is a German state, or a French state, or a Chinese state) if one says that Israel shouldn't be a Jewish state then he is essentially saying he doesn't want the Jews to have a state

Exactly, but that does not mean they are against Judahism or Jewish people from a religious stand point.

technically it is , because a core part of the Jewish religion itself is to retake the holy land and recreate the Jewish state (and really with the exception of some , its an agreed concept), the main conflict then is not wheter there is a Jewish state , its what its nature is (how much of a Halakhic state should it be) but by this logic, I could say "the Chinese do not deserve a state", it would be very similar, and I think most Chinese people would find it offensive.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#453 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

[QUOTE="Redinko"]Puting words into other people's mouth = bad argument.

I'm against Zionism being used as a justification to confiscate land and build illegal settlements.

Redinko

Guy who doesn't seem to understand the definition of Zionism and talking about irrelevances=you

You're right, when has Zionism ever been used as a justification to take more land from the Palestinians.. silly me.

First of all it hasn't. Second of all we were talking about whether or not anti-zionism was anti-semitic and not when it has "been used as a justification".
Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#454 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

[QUOTE="BossPerson"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"]

you mean anti zionism? being anti zionist is essentially saying the Jews do not deserve a state of their own (just like there is a German state, or a French state, or a Chinese state) if one says that Israel shouldn't be a Jewish state then he is essentially saying he doesn't want the Jews to have a state

themajormayor

I dont want tibet (assume for a second that its a country) to be a buddhist state; am I anti-buddhist?

You don't even know what a Jew is apparently.

I understand that Jews are basically a race, but I just dont believe in any religious states. Thats the point i was making, Jews (as a people) deserve a state but I dont think any religion anywhere deserves a state
Avatar image for Xx_Socrates_xX
Xx_Socrates_xX

3604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#455 Xx_Socrates_xX
Member since 2012 • 3604 Posts
@Darkman2007: I see your point now, all Jewish people in Israel are probably like that.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#456 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]I dont want tibet (assume for a second that its a country) to be a buddhist state; am I anti-buddhist?BossPerson

You don't even know what a Jew is apparently.

I understand that Jews are basically a race, but I just dont believe in any religious states. Thats the point i was making, Jews (as a people) deserve a state but I dont think any religion anywhere deserves a state

That's good cause Israel doesn't have an official religion. It's a secular state and it's home of the Jewish people. There are mosques everywhere and even Sharia courts. Trust me the Jewish nature of Israel has very little to do with religion.

Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#457 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts
[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

[QUOTE="BossPerson"][QUOTE="themajormayor"]

If I'm not mistaken he's against Zionism and Israel's existence as a Jewish state. That for me is anti-semitic. But if he's not then I guess he's not. But this is the impression I've got from him.

His quote: "I objected to the founding of Israel as a Jewish state. I don't think a Jewish or Christian or Islamic state is a proper concept. I would object to the United States as a Christian state." Also, being against zionism is not anti-semetic. Being against Israel's existence is. But saying one is anti-semetic for being against zionism is like saying one is anti-islam for saying Iran shouldnt be an islamic state.

I don't think you understand what Zionism is. And BTW Jews are a people. Israel was founded as the home for the Jewish PEOPLE not the Jewish religion. So if you are against the existence of a state for the Jewish people but at the same time support the existence of a state for the Palestinian people for example then yes I think you're anti-semitic.

I agree with pretty much all of that you post, but really I cannot stand when people say that a jew is a race. It's not, it is based off religon, they have no common ancestory to tie in with eachother, it's like saying that christians are a race, they aren't. They are called that because they believe in christianity, not because their blood is christian. No such thing.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#458 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts
[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]I dont want tibet (assume for a second that its a country) to be a buddhist state; am I anti-buddhist?BossPerson

You don't even know what a Jew is apparently.

I understand that Jews are basically a race, but I just dont believe in any religious states. Thats the point i was making, Jews (as a people) deserve a state but I dont think any religion anywhere deserves a state

well , not really a race, its an ethnicity. if anything belong to the semetic race (along with Arabs, Druze, etc) Israel defines itself as a state for the Jewish people , not religion per se. that said, there are certainly some religous elements to it, its kind of complex , but there is a relation between the Jewish religion and ethnicity, and its difficult to understand if youre used to a universal religion like Islam or Christianity.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#459 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts
[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]His quote: "I objected to the founding of Israel as a Jewish state. I don't think a Jewish or Christian or Islamic state is a proper concept. I would object to the United States as a Christian state." Also, being against zionism is not anti-semetic. Being against Israel's existence is. But saying one is anti-semetic for being against zionism is like saying one is anti-islam for saying Iran shouldnt be an islamic state.xscrapzx

I don't think you understand what Zionism is. And BTW Jews are a people. Israel was founded as the home for the Jewish PEOPLE not the Jewish religion. So if you are against the existence of a state for the Jewish people but at the same time support the existence of a state for the Palestinian people for example then yes I think you're anti-semitic.

I agree with pretty much all of that you post, but really I cannot stand when people say that a jew is a race. It's not, it is based off religon, they have no common ancestory to tie in with eachother, it's like saying that christians are a race, they aren't. They are called that because they believe in christianity, not because their blood is christian. No such thing.

I can assure you us Jews do have a common ancestry, all Jews started in the same area , as one people, and frankly conversion was never a big thing in the Jewish world.
Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#460 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

[QUOTE="Redinko"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"] Guy who doesn't seem to understand the definition of Zionism and talking about irrelevances=you

themajormayor

You're right, when has Zionism ever been used as a justification to take more land from the Palestinians.. silly me.

First of all it hasn't. Second of all we were talking about whether or not anti-zionism was anti-semitic and not when it has "been used as a justification".

It hasnt? Have you watched Netanyahu's speech at Washington last year where he called the west bank Judea and Sumeria essentially saying that they are jewish historical lands and that they are not engaging in an occupation?

I have seen this issue largely objectively on this board pointing out the bad sides of both parties in the conflict, yet you have never admitted Israel has done anything wrong at all. Is that really fair? Israel is not perfect, and they have done wrongthings, can you at least admit that?

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#461 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]His quote: "I objected to the founding of Israel as a Jewish state. I don't think a Jewish or Christian or Islamic state is a proper concept. I would object to the United States as a Christian state." Also, being against zionism is not anti-semetic. Being against Israel's existence is. But saying one is anti-semetic for being against zionism is like saying one is anti-islam for saying Iran shouldnt be an islamic state.xscrapzx

I don't think you understand what Zionism is. And BTW Jews are a people. Israel was founded as the home for the Jewish PEOPLE not the Jewish religion. So if you are against the existence of a state for the Jewish people but at the same time support the existence of a state for the Palestinian people for example then yes I think you're anti-semitic.

I agree with pretty much all of that you post, but really I cannot stand when people say that a jew is a race. It's not, it is based off religon, they have no common ancestory to tie in with eachother, it's like saying that christians are a race, they aren't. They are called that because they believe in christianity, not because their blood is christian. No such thing.

Well it's not really a "race" it's an ethno-religious group. In fact the whole religion is about the Jewish people/nation. Also it's a non-exclusive ethnicity which means you can "join" it. That's why if you'd convert to Judaism you actually become one of the Jewish people. Think of it as being adopted to Abraham. So all Jews have common ancestry in Israel or has been "adopted" to the group.
Avatar image for Redinko
Redinko

133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#462 Redinko
Member since 2011 • 133 Posts

[QUOTE="Redinko"]

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"]

thats actually nonense.

yes, Iran has 20,000 Jews in it, but thats hiding the fact that in 1979 , there were over 100,000, and there is a reason they all left , in just a few years afterwards (it wasn't the Mullah's love and affection towards the Jews I can assure you of that), so yes, I would say the regime hates Jews, its willing to live with them if they are dhimmi , thats about it.

the justification is partly that, partly the fact that Iran will try and destabalise the region, and the fact that Iran might just try to throw a bomb into Tel Aviv .

and I really don't think Iran gives a damn about wheter there is a mosque in Jerusalem , weve both seen cases of Muslims destorying mosques during a war (most recently in Iraq)

Darkman2007

If the 1979 revolution was so bad for the Jews you can partially thank Americans for helping spur it on.

So wait let me get this right, Iran is willing to live with thousands of Jews but is a few short years away from nukeing millions of jews without being provoked. LOL do you really believe that? You do know that once they nuke Tel Aviv, Tehran will be the next city to go. A city with around 16 million Irianians.

The Mosque in Jersalem is Islam's third holiest site. No one can call themselves a Muslim and not care if that mosque gets damaged.

1) common trick to blame the US for something the Mullahs did, and it wasn't just the revolution , alot of the Jews left after the revolution. 2) yes I believe the Iranians have no issue with killing millions of Jews, wheter the policy of MAD works is something else. 3) that may well be, but the fact is, Muslims have destroyed mosques before, Iraq is just one example.

Notice I used the word "partial" I think it's historically pretty sound and goes back to something called blow back. But I can see how the concept of blow back can be a touchy subject because it would imply that the actions of countries in the West, including Israel, doesn't simply happen in a vacuum. It would assume that some of the actions of gonverments in the West have lead to reactions. It would also weaken the argument of "OMG all muslims are Jew hating terrorits and uncivilized. This gives us the justification to bomb them whenever we feel like it. (also see: they hate us for our freefoms)"

You believe Iranians have no issue killing millions of Jews and you can site the history of: ..................

I'm not going to argue this point with you. If you dont understand, it is likly because you are not a Muslim.

Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#463 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="Redinko"]You're right, when has Zionism ever been used as a justification to take more land from the Palestinians.. silly me.

BossPerson

First of all it hasn't. Second of all we were talking about whether or not anti-zionism was anti-semitic and not when it has "been used as a justification".

It hasnt? Have you watched Netanyahu's speech at Washington last year where he called the west bank Judea and Sumeria essentially saying that they are jewish historical lands and that they are not engaging in an occupation?

I have seen this issue largely objectively on this board pointing out the bad sides of both parties in the conflict, yet you have never admitted Israel has done anything wrong at all. Is that really fair? Israel is not perfect, and they have done wrongthings, can you at least admit that?

of course Israel is not perfect, ask 99% of Israelies and they would tell you that (not just regarding this issue), thats true for every country. that said, what Netanyahu said about Judea and Samaria wasn't religion, it was heritage, in that, they were part of the Jewish kingdom , on that notion it is historical Jewish land. that doesn't mean I think Israel should annex them or anything, its pretty obvious there are around 1.5 to 2 million Arabs there, and they are not going away, so one has to deal with reality.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#464 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="Redinko"]You're right, when has Zionism ever been used as a justification to take more land from the Palestinians.. silly me.

BossPerson

First of all it hasn't. Second of all we were talking about whether or not anti-zionism was anti-semitic and not when it has "been used as a justification".

It hasnt? Have you watched Netanyahu's speech at Washington last year where he called the west bank Judea and Sumeria essentially saying that they are jewish historical lands and that they are not engaging in an occupation?

I have seen this issue largely objectively on this board pointing out the bad sides of both parties in the conflict, yet you have never admitted Israel has done anything wrong at all. Is that really fair? Israel is not perfect, and they have done wrongthings, can you at least admit that?

That's not using Zionism as a justifaction. Zionism=right for Jews to self-determination. What you're saying is using historical borders as justification.

Yes I believe they do many thing wrongs, it's just not the things that get attention in media. Also I tend to shift back and forth alot. But for example I think they should recognize the unrecognized bedouin villages in Israel.

Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#465 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts

[QUOTE="xscrapzx"][QUOTE="themajormayor"]

I don't think you understand what Zionism is. And BTW Jews are a people. Israel was founded as the home for the Jewish PEOPLE not the Jewish religion. So if you are against the existence of a state for the Jewish people but at the same time support the existence of a state for the Palestinian people for example then yes I think you're anti-semitic.

Darkman2007

I agree with pretty much all of that you post, but really I cannot stand when people say that a jew is a race. It's not, it is based off religon, they have no common ancestory to tie in with eachother, it's like saying that christians are a race, they aren't. They are called that because they believe in christianity, not because their blood is christian. No such thing.

I can assure you us Jews do have a common ancestry, all Jews started in the same area , as one people, and frankly conversion was never a big thing in the Jewish world.

No they don't. That is completely false. Jews are called jews because their religion is Judaism. Because I convert from catholic to Judaism, I am therefore a Jew, but that still doesn't take away that I'm of Irish, and Polish decent, in other words part of the caucasion race.

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#466 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="xscrapzx"] I agree with pretty much all of that you post, but really I cannot stand when people say that a jew is a race. It's not, it is based off religon, they have no common ancestory to tie in with eachother, it's like saying that christians are a race, they aren't. They are called that because they believe in christianity, not because their blood is christian. No such thing.xscrapzx

I can assure you us Jews do have a common ancestry, all Jews started in the same area , as one people, and frankly conversion was never a big thing in the Jewish world.

No they don't. That is completely false. Jews are called jews because their religion is Judaism. Because I convert from catholic to Judaism, I am therefore a Jew, but that still doesn't take away that I'm of Irish, and Polish decent, in other words part of the caucasion race.

Well I respect that and you should think what feels good for you. But in a Jewish person's eye you're part of the Jewish people. Now I don't think that takes away the Irish or Polish decent in any way. But as I said think of it as Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are now your adopted forefather.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#467 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="Redinko"]If the 1979 revolution was so bad for the Jews you can partially thank Americans for helping spur it on.

So wait let me get this right, Iran is willing to live with thousands of Jews but is a few short years away from nukeing millions of jews without being provoked. LOL do you really believe that? You do know that once they nuke Tel Aviv, Tehran will be the next city to go. A city with around 16 million Irianians.

The Mosque in Jersalem is Islam's third holiest site. No one can call themselves a Muslim and not care if that mosque gets damaged.

Redinko

1) common trick to blame the US for something the Mullahs did, and it wasn't just the revolution , alot of the Jews left after the revolution. 2) yes I believe the Iranians have no issue with killing millions of Jews, wheter the policy of MAD works is something else. 3) that may well be, but the fact is, Muslims have destroyed mosques before, Iraq is just one example.

Notice I used the word "partial" I think it's historically pretty sound and goes back to something called blow back. But I can see how the concept of blow back can be a touchy subject because it would imply that the actions of countries in the West, including Israel, doesn't simply happen in a vacuum. It would assume that some of the actions of gonverments in the West have lead to reactions. It would also weaken the argument of "OMG all muslims are Jew hating terrorits and uncivilized. This gives us the justification to bomb them whenever we feel like it. (also see: they hate us for our freefoms)"

You believe Iranians have no issue killing millions of Jews and you can site the history of: ..................

I'm not going to argue this point with you. If you dont understand, it is likly because you are not a Muslim.

I never said the west hasn't done bad things, but it goes both ways, we both know that. I cite the history of Iran and the fact that it had its share of Jew killing/hating, although I suppose one could say that about almost every country in the Middle East and Europe. I understand it perfectly, its taboo in Judaism to destroy a synagouge, but that doesn't change the fact that there are Muslims who were willing to destroy mosques. also Tel Aviv is not exactly right next to Jerusalem.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#468 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="xscrapzx"] I agree with pretty much all of that you post, but really I cannot stand when people say that a jew is a race. It's not, it is based off religon, they have no common ancestory to tie in with eachother, it's like saying that christians are a race, they aren't. They are called that because they believe in christianity, not because their blood is christian. No such thing.xscrapzx

I can assure you us Jews do have a common ancestry, all Jews started in the same area , as one people, and frankly conversion was never a big thing in the Jewish world.

No they don't. That is completely false. Jews are called jews because their religion is Judaism. Because I convert from catholic to Judaism, I am therefore a Jew, but that still doesn't take away that I'm of Irish, and Polish decent, in other words part of the caucasion race.

I could convert to Hinduism , but that doesn't change the fact that most Hindus are of an Indian or south Asian origin.

its really no different, you can't take the minority and apply it to the majority, and most Jews are decended from a single ethnic group

you can deny Jewish history all you want, but thats the truth.

Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#469 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts
[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="xscrapzx"]

I can assure you us Jews do have a common ancestry, all Jews started in the same area , as one people, and frankly conversion was never a big thing in the Jewish world.Darkman2007
No they don't. That is completely false. Jews are called jews because their religion is Judaism. Because I convert from catholic to Judaism, I am therefore a Jew, but that still doesn't take away that I'm of Irish, and Polish decent, in other words part of the caucasion race.

Well I respect that and you should think what feels good for you. But in a Jewish person's eye you're part of the Jewish people. Now I don't think that takes away the Irish or Polish decent in any way. But as I said think of it as Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are now your adopted forefather.

I'm not saying I disagree with you in that aspect, I'm just saying that it is not a species of human being. I guess that is really where I'm going with this. I think that too many people try to make them like a race, in which they are not. I think really at the end of the day if people stopped seeing they jewish people as a race of people, then maybe their outlook on them wouldn't be the way it is.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#470 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="xscrapzx"] No they don't. That is completely false. Jews are called jews because their religion is Judaism. Because I convert from catholic to Judaism, I am therefore a Jew, but that still doesn't take away that I'm of Irish, and Polish decent, in other words part of the caucasion race.

xscrapzx

Well I respect that and you should think what feels good for you. But in a Jewish person's eye you're part of the Jewish people. Now I don't think that takes away the Irish or Polish decent in any way. But as I said think of it as Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are now your adopted forefather.

I'm not saying I disagree with you in that aspect, I'm just saying that it is not a species of human being. I guess that is really where I'm going with this. I think that too many people try to make them like a race, in which they are not. I think really at the end of the day if people stopped seeing they jewish people as a race of people, then maybe their outlook on them wouldn't be the way it is.

no one said race, I said ethnicity, which is different. Jews are not a distict race, but are an ethnic group (for the most part).

Avatar image for Redinko
Redinko

133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#471 Redinko
Member since 2011 • 133 Posts

[QUOTE="Redinko"]

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"] 1) common trick to blame the US for something the Mullahs did, and it wasn't just the revolution , alot of the Jews left after the revolution. 2) yes I believe the Iranians have no issue with killing millions of Jews, wheter the policy of MAD works is something else. 3) that may well be, but the fact is, Muslims have destroyed mosques before, Iraq is just one example.Darkman2007

Notice I used the word "partial" I think it's historically pretty sound and goes back to something called blow back. But I can see how the concept of blow back can be a touchy subject because it would imply that the actions of countries in the West, including Israel, doesn't simply happen in a vacuum. It would assume that some of the actions of gonverments in the West have lead to reactions. It would also weaken the argument of "OMG all muslims are Jew hating terrorits and uncivilized. This gives us the justification to bomb them whenever we feel like it. (also see: they hate us for our freefoms)"

You believe Iranians have no issue killing millions of Jews and you can site the history of: ..................

I'm not going to argue this point with you. If you dont understand, it is likly because you are not a Muslim.

I never said the west hasn't done bad things, but it goes both ways, we both know that. I cite the history of Iran and the fact that it had its share of Jew killing/hating, although I suppose one could say that about almost every country in the Middle East and Europe. I understand it perfectly, its taboo in Judaism to destroy a synagouge, but that doesn't change the fact that there are Muslims who were willing to destroy mosques. also Tel Aviv is not exactly right next to Jerusalem.

To your second point: the fact that it was so weak already proves my point. The reality is there is NO justfication for why Iran would suddly want to kill millions of Jews while also knowing millions of Iranians will die as well. Of course your prime minister is going with the clever argument of "OMG they are all Jew-hating, anti-civilized Muslims!! We have to attack. Oh and if you aren't on my side yet: Hitler Hitler Hitler"

It is believed that the Prohept visited the Mosque in Jerusalem. To say that this makes the Al-Aqsa Mosque a little more important than other ones is an understatment. To say that every Muslim country in the world would be against Iran if this happens is an understatment.

Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#472 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts

[QUOTE="LastRambo341"]Israel just loves war. Look at the mass-murder it committed, its just like/or even worse than the Holocaust thingthemajormayor

wtf is this a joke??

No, read up on what the Palestinians have to endure because of Zionist tyranny.
Avatar image for Xx_Socrates_xX
Xx_Socrates_xX

3604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#473 Xx_Socrates_xX
Member since 2012 • 3604 Posts
^^ troll
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#474 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="xscrapzx"] No they don't. That is completely false. Jews are called jews because their religion is Judaism. Because I convert from catholic to Judaism, I am therefore a Jew, but that still doesn't take away that I'm of Irish, and Polish decent, in other words part of the caucasion race.

xscrapzx

Well I respect that and you should think what feels good for you. But in a Jewish person's eye you're part of the Jewish people. Now I don't think that takes away the Irish or Polish decent in any way. But as I said think of it as Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are now your adopted forefather.

I'm not saying I disagree with you in that aspect, I'm just saying that it is not a species of human being. I guess that is really where I'm going with this. I think that too many people try to make them like a race, in which they are not. I think really at the end of the day if people stopped seeing they jewish people as a race of people, then maybe their outlook on them wouldn't be the way it is.

I can guarantee you it's much more than a religion. From what I heard it's mostly called a people, nation or ethnicity. I don't know about race though. What is race anyway?

That's why the religion is talking about the people of Israel, the chosen people etc. Also, I might be wrong on this since I am no adherent of Judaism, but from what I know you can be non-Jewish and believe Judaism is the true religion. Then you only follow 7 laws instead of 613. Point is it's more than a religion.

Anyway I think it's cool that you converted to Judaism. It's not very common at all.

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#475 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

^^ trollXx_Socrates_xX
yup for sure. This is not the first time drtrafalgar law shows what a hateful and idiotic person he/she is

Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#476 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts
[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="xscrapzx"]

I can assure you us Jews do have a common ancestry, all Jews started in the same area , as one people, and frankly conversion was never a big thing in the Jewish world.Darkman2007
No they don't. That is completely false. Jews are called jews because their religion is Judaism. Because I convert from catholic to Judaism, I am therefore a Jew, but that still doesn't take away that I'm of Irish, and Polish decent, in other words part of the caucasion race.

I could convert to Hinduism , but that doesn't change the fact that most Hindus are of an Indian or south Asian origin. its really no different, you can't take the minority and apply it to the majority. you can deny Jewish history all you want, but thats the truth.

I'm not denying any of the Jewish History at all. How is what I said denying the history of the Jewish people. Jews are not an ethicity. Jews could be black, white, asian, middle eastern, or indian, but a jew is not part of that class. It is solely based on the religon of Judaism. Its not like a jew is a different kind of human being, because they are not. It's not like I can say, "Hey I want to be black today", or "Hey I want to be Asian", and actually believe I am either of those.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#477 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="Redinko"]Notice I used the word "partial" I think it's historically pretty sound and goes back to something called blow back. But I can see how the concept of blow back can be a touchy subject because it would imply that the actions of countries in the West, including Israel, doesn't simply happen in a vacuum. It would assume that some of the actions of gonverments in the West have lead to reactions. It would also weaken the argument of "OMG all muslims are Jew hating terrorits and uncivilized. This gives us the justification to bomb them whenever we feel like it. (also see: they hate us for our freefoms)"

You believe Iranians have no issue killing millions of Jews and you can site the history of: ..................

I'm not going to argue this point with you. If you dont understand, it is likly because you are not a Muslim.

Redinko

I never said the west hasn't done bad things, but it goes both ways, we both know that. I cite the history of Iran and the fact that it had its share of Jew killing/hating, although I suppose one could say that about almost every country in the Middle East and Europe. I understand it perfectly, its taboo in Judaism to destroy a synagouge, but that doesn't change the fact that there are Muslims who were willing to destroy mosques. also Tel Aviv is not exactly right next to Jerusalem.

To your second point: the fact that it was so weak already proves my point. The reality is there is NO justfication for why Iran would suddly want to kill millions of Jews while also knowing millions of Iranians will die as well. Of course your prime minister is going with the clever argument of "OMG they are all Jew-hating, anti-civilized Muslims!! We have to attack. Oh and if you aren't on my side yet: Hitler Hitler Hitler"

It is believed that the Prohept visited the Mosque in Jerusalem. To say that this makes the Al-Aqsa Mosque a little more important than other ones is an understatment. To say that every Muslim country in the world would be against Iran if this happens is an understatment.

as far as I remember , several of the mosques bombed in Iraq were very holy to Shias , now I know the ones who destoryed them were Sunni , but still , it shows disrespect. and again , its not about justification , its about wheter or not there is a percieved threat.
Avatar image for WiiMan21
WiiMan21

8191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#478 WiiMan21
Member since 2007 • 8191 Posts

Wow some of the stupidity in this thread is baffeling.

I don't think the US would shoot down Isreal planes due to the US having to fund attacks, but saying they supported it wouldn't be said in the media, rather they would keep it secret.

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#479 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="xscrapzx"] No they don't. That is completely false. Jews are called jews because their religion is Judaism. Because I convert from catholic to Judaism, I am therefore a Jew, but that still doesn't take away that I'm of Irish, and Polish decent, in other words part of the caucasion race.

xscrapzx

I could convert to Hinduism , but that doesn't change the fact that most Hindus are of an Indian or south Asian origin. its really no different, you can't take the minority and apply it to the majority. you can deny Jewish history all you want, but thats the truth.

I'm not denying any of the Jewish History at all. How is what I said denying the history of the Jewish people. Jews are not an ethicity. Jews could be black, white, asian, middle eastern, or indian, but a jew is not part of that class. It is solely based on the religon of Judaism. Its not like a jew is a different kind of human being, because they are not. It's not like I can say, "Hey I want to be black today", or "Hey I want to be Asian", and actually believe I am either of those.

I think the first paragraph of Wikipedia says this very well:

"The Jews, also known as the Jewish people, are a nation and an ethnoreligious group, originating in the Israelites or Hebrews of the Ancient Near East. The Jewish ethnicity, nationality, and religion are strongly interrelated, as Judaism is the traditional faith of the Jewish nation. Converts to Judaism, whose status as Jews within the Jewish ethnos is equal to those born into it, have been absorbed into the Jewish people throughout the millennia."

And then a different page just to explain what a nation is: "A nation may refer to a community of people who share a common language, culture, ethnicity, descent, and/or history"

Avatar image for Xx_Socrates_xX
Xx_Socrates_xX

3604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#480 Xx_Socrates_xX
Member since 2012 • 3604 Posts
It was the TC's Dad, not him.
Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#481 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts

[QUOTE="xscrapzx"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] Well I respect that and you should think what feels good for you. But in a Jewish person's eye you're part of the Jewish people. Now I don't think that takes away the Irish or Polish decent in any way. But as I said think of it as Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are now your adopted forefather. Darkman2007

I'm not saying I disagree with you in that aspect, I'm just saying that it is not a species of human being. I guess that is really where I'm going with this. I think that too many people try to make them like a race, in which they are not. I think really at the end of the day if people stopped seeing they jewish people as a race of people, then maybe their outlook on them wouldn't be the way it is.

no one said race, I said ethnicity, which is different. Jews are not a distict race, but are an ethnic group (for the most part).

I never claimed someone was speaking of race, I was just making a statement on how a lot of people see them as a race of people as you would see Asians, or Africans etc. and that is simply not true. My opinion is if people would stop seeing them in that light, that maybe they would stop looking at them in the way that they do. They are simply a group of people who live by the Jewish way of life. That is all.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#482 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="xscrapzx"] No they don't. That is completely false. Jews are called jews because their religion is Judaism. Because I convert from catholic to Judaism, I am therefore a Jew, but that still doesn't take away that I'm of Irish, and Polish decent, in other words part of the caucasion race.

xscrapzx

I could convert to Hinduism , but that doesn't change the fact that most Hindus are of an Indian or south Asian origin. its really no different, you can't take the minority and apply it to the majority. you can deny Jewish history all you want, but thats the truth.

I'm not denying any of the Jewish History at all. How is what I said denying the history of the Jewish people. Jews are not an ethicity. Jews could be black, white, asian, middle eastern, or indian, but a jew is not part of that class. It is solely based on the religon of Judaism. Its not like a jew is a different kind of human being, because they are not. It's not like I can say, "Hey I want to be black today", or "Hey I want to be Asian", and actually believe I am either of those.

you are denying Jewish history, because its plain fact, Jews all started as a single ethnic group , and for the most part , still are.

yes, you can become a Jew of the Jewish faith , but you cannot be a Jew of the ethnic element (and both are there ). again , taking a few converts and applying them to the other 90% is silly.

I think youre failing to understand the connection between ethnicity and religion in Judaism , Id have to imagine its because you are used to a more universal religion like Christianity , where the modern population is indeed the result of conversions.

in Judaism , most of the adherents are part of the same ethnic group , and conversions and intermarriage were not a huge factor in Jewish history.

and no one said a thing about different human being,

Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#483 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts

[QUOTE="xscrapzx"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"] I could convert to Hinduism , but that doesn't change the fact that most Hindus are of an Indian or south Asian origin. its really no different, you can't take the minority and apply it to the majority. you can deny Jewish history all you want, but thats the truth.themajormayor

I'm not denying any of the Jewish History at all. How is what I said denying the history of the Jewish people. Jews are not an ethicity. Jews could be black, white, asian, middle eastern, or indian, but a jew is not part of that class. It is solely based on the religon of Judaism. Its not like a jew is a different kind of human being, because they are not. It's not like I can say, "Hey I want to be black today", or "Hey I want to be Asian", and actually believe I am either of those.

I think the first paragraph of Wikipedia says this very well:

"The Jews, also known as the Jewish people, are a nation and an ethnoreligious group, originating in the Israelites or Hebrews of the Ancient Near East. The Jewish ethnicity, nationality, and religion are strongly interrelated, as Judaism is the traditional faith of the Jewish nation. Converts to Judaism, whose status as Jews within the Jewish ethnos is equal to those born into it, have been absorbed into the Jewish people throughout the millennia."

And then a different page just to explain what a nation is: "A nation may refer to a community of people who share a common language, culture, ethnicity, descent, and/or history"

Oh and I agree with that. I think where I'm going with this is at the end of the day it all comes down to religion, and if people would just seprate government from religion especially in the middle east, it would be a lot better off.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#484 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts
[QUOTE="Darkman2007"]

[QUOTE="xscrapzx"] I'm not saying I disagree with you in that aspect, I'm just saying that it is not a species of human being. I guess that is really where I'm going with this. I think that too many people try to make them like a race, in which they are not. I think really at the end of the day if people stopped seeing they jewish people as a race of people, then maybe their outlook on them wouldn't be the way it is.xscrapzx

no one said race, I said ethnicity, which is different. Jews are not a distict race, but are an ethnic group (for the most part).

I never claimed someone was speaking of race, I was just making a statement on how a lot of people see them as a race of people as you would see Asians, or Africans etc. and that is simply not true. My opinion is if people would stop seeing them in that light, that maybe they would stop looking at them in the way that they do. They are simply a group of people who live by the Jewish way of life. That is all.

then people have a wrong view, Jews are not a race, they are an ethnicity, which are 2 different things. you have to distinguish between Judaism and Jews, its 2 different things in a sense.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#485 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="xscrapzx"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"] I could convert to Hinduism , but that doesn't change the fact that most Hindus are of an Indian or south Asian origin. its really no different, you can't take the minority and apply it to the majority. you can deny Jewish history all you want, but thats the truth.Darkman2007

I'm not denying any of the Jewish History at all. How is what I said denying the history of the Jewish people. Jews are not an ethicity. Jews could be black, white, asian, middle eastern, or indian, but a jew is not part of that class. It is solely based on the religon of Judaism. Its not like a jew is a different kind of human being, because they are not. It's not like I can say, "Hey I want to be black today", or "Hey I want to be Asian", and actually believe I am either of those.

you are denying Jewish history, because its plain fact, Jews all started as a single ethnic group , and for the most part , still are.

yes, you can become a Jew of the Jewish faith , but you cannot be a Jew of the ethnic element (and both are there ). again , taking a few converts and applying them to the other 90% is silly.

I think youre failing to understand the connection between ethnicity and religion in Judaism , Id have to imagine its because you are used to a more universal religion like Christianity , where the modern population is indeed the result of conversions.

in Judaism , most of the adherents are part of the same ethnic group , and conversions and intermarriage were not a huge factor in Jewish history.

and no one said a thing about different human being,

You're wrong ALL Jews are part of the same ethnic group. Converted Jews are treated as part of the Jewish ethnicity just as much as people born as Jews.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#486 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts
[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

[QUOTE="xscrapzx"] I'm not denying any of the Jewish History at all. How is what I said denying the history of the Jewish people. Jews are not an ethicity. Jews could be black, white, asian, middle eastern, or indian, but a jew is not part of that class. It is solely based on the religon of Judaism. Its not like a jew is a different kind of human being, because they are not. It's not like I can say, "Hey I want to be black today", or "Hey I want to be Asian", and actually believe I am either of those.xscrapzx

I think the first paragraph of Wikipedia says this very well:

"The Jews, also known as the Jewish people, are a nation and an ethnoreligious group, originating in the Israelites or Hebrews of the Ancient Near East. The Jewish ethnicity, nationality, and religion are strongly interrelated, as Judaism is the traditional faith of the Jewish nation. Converts to Judaism, whose status as Jews within the Jewish ethnos is equal to those born into it, have been absorbed into the Jewish people throughout the millennia."

And then a different page just to explain what a nation is: "A nation may refer to a community of people who share a common language, culture, ethnicity, descent, and/or history"

Oh and I agree with that. I think where I'm going with this is at the end of the day it all comes down to religion, and if people would just seprate government from religion especially in the middle east, it would be a lot better off.

but thats not what youre saying, apparently the Jews today, are a collection of ethnic groups, which is not true, they are an ethnic group, for the most part, the amount of converts was always quite small outside of the original population.
Avatar image for Redinko
Redinko

133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#487 Redinko
Member since 2011 • 133 Posts

[QUOTE="Redinko"]

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"] I never said the west hasn't done bad things, but it goes both ways, we both know that. I cite the history of Iran and the fact that it had its share of Jew killing/hating, although I suppose one could say that about almost every country in the Middle East and Europe. I understand it perfectly, its taboo in Judaism to destroy a synagouge, but that doesn't change the fact that there are Muslims who were willing to destroy mosques. also Tel Aviv is not exactly right next to Jerusalem.Darkman2007

To your second point: the fact that it was so weak already proves my point. The reality is there is NO justfication for why Iran would suddly want to kill millions of Jews while also knowing millions of Iranians will die as well. Of course your prime minister is going with the clever argument of "OMG they are all Jew-hating, anti-civilized Muslims!! We have to attack. Oh and if you aren't on my side yet: Hitler Hitler Hitler"

It is believed that the Prohept visited the Mosque in Jerusalem. To say that this makes the Al-Aqsa Mosque a little more important than other ones is an understatment. To say that every Muslim country in the world would be against Iran if this happens is an understatment.

as far as I remember , several of the mosques bombed in Iraq were very holy to Shias , now I know the ones who destoryed them were Sunni , but still , it shows disrespect. and again , its not about justification , its about wheter or not there is a percieved threat.

Are you really trying to make the argument that the damage/destruction of a Mosque that Muslims believe the Prohept visited is not important to Muslims? I mean really, where are you going with this? Whenever a Mosque is destroyed it is deeply saddening. But for a Muslim country to intentionally destory/damage the Al-Aqsa Mosque is inconceivable. I will not say another word about it.

Okay, so how do Israelies percive a threat? Because they are being told over and over again that Ahmandinejad = Hitler I guess the Hitler card is still going strong, huh?

Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#488 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts
[QUOTE="Darkman2007"]

[QUOTE="xscrapzx"] I'm not denying any of the Jewish History at all. How is what I said denying the history of the Jewish people. Jews are not an ethicity. Jews could be black, white, asian, middle eastern, or indian, but a jew is not part of that class. It is solely based on the religon of Judaism. Its not like a jew is a different kind of human being, because they are not. It's not like I can say, "Hey I want to be black today", or "Hey I want to be Asian", and actually believe I am either of those.themajormayor

you are denying Jewish history, because its plain fact, Jews all started as a single ethnic group , and for the most part , still are.

yes, you can become a Jew of the Jewish faith , but you cannot be a Jew of the ethnic element (and both are there ). again , taking a few converts and applying them to the other 90% is silly.

I think youre failing to understand the connection between ethnicity and religion in Judaism , Id have to imagine its because you are used to a more universal religion like Christianity , where the modern population is indeed the result of conversions.

in Judaism , most of the adherents are part of the same ethnic group , and conversions and intermarriage were not a huge factor in Jewish history.

and no one said a thing about different human being,

You're wrong ALL Jews are part of the same ethnic group. Converted Jews are treated as part of the Jewish ethnicity just as much as people born as Jews.

yes and no. from a religious standpoint, yes, they are very much equal to Jews, and at the end of the day, thats the ultimate authority. at the same time, if someone converts to Judaism , that doesn't mean he has the same ancestry as me, so its not the same. that doesn't mean they are treated differently of course, in fact, Rabbi Akiva's parents were converts, and he was one of the most revered Rabbis in history.
Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#489 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts

[QUOTE="xscrapzx"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"] I could convert to Hinduism , but that doesn't change the fact that most Hindus are of an Indian or south Asian origin. its really no different, you can't take the minority and apply it to the majority. you can deny Jewish history all you want, but thats the truth.Darkman2007

I'm not denying any of the Jewish History at all. How is what I said denying the history of the Jewish people. Jews are not an ethicity. Jews could be black, white, asian, middle eastern, or indian, but a jew is not part of that class. It is solely based on the religon of Judaism. Its not like a jew is a different kind of human being, because they are not. It's not like I can say, "Hey I want to be black today", or "Hey I want to be Asian", and actually believe I am either of those.

you are denying Jewish history, because its plain fact, Jews all started as a single ethnic group , and for the most part , still are.

yes, you can become a Jew of the Jewish faith , but you cannot be a Jew of the ethnic element (and both are there ). again , taking a few converts and applying them to the other 90% is silly.

I think youre failing to understand the connection between ethnicity and religion in Judaism , Id have to imagine its because you are used to a more universal religion like Christianity , where the modern population is indeed the result of conversions.

in Judaism , most of the adherents are part of the same ethnic group , and conversions and intermarriage were not a huge factor in Jewish history.

and no one said a thing about different human being,

You are killing me... Again I never claimed that anyone said anything about Jews being a particular race or species of human being in this thread. I simply made a reply to major that the Jewish people are not a race of people. They may all live by the same laws and ways of life and might be related in some way or another, but at the end of the day they aren't like Asians, Africans, Causcasions or Indians. They are middle eastern people from that region. Their way of life is Judaism. Thats all. That is not denying anything, that is not taking anything away from the Jewish history. I just simply made a comment. My whole point was the Jewish people live strongly by their religion and thats how they live their lives, and if people saw them in that view instead of a race of people who are trying to TAKE OVER TEH WHOLE world they probably would see them in a different light. The people I'm referring to are the people who dislike them. Maybe I'm using the wrong words and no explaining myself thoroughly.

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#490 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

[QUOTE="xscrapzx"] I'm not denying any of the Jewish History at all. How is what I said denying the history of the Jewish people. Jews are not an ethicity. Jews could be black, white, asian, middle eastern, or indian, but a jew is not part of that class. It is solely based on the religon of Judaism. Its not like a jew is a different kind of human being, because they are not. It's not like I can say, "Hey I want to be black today", or "Hey I want to be Asian", and actually believe I am either of those.xscrapzx

I think the first paragraph of Wikipedia says this very well:

"The Jews, also known as the Jewish people, are a nation and an ethnoreligious group, originating in the Israelites or Hebrews of the Ancient Near East. The Jewish ethnicity, nationality, and religion are strongly interrelated, as Judaism is the traditional faith of the Jewish nation. Converts to Judaism, whose status as Jews within the Jewish ethnos is equal to those born into it, have been absorbed into the Jewish people throughout the millennia."

And then a different page just to explain what a nation is: "A nation may refer to a community of people who share a common language, culture, ethnicity, descent, and/or history"

Oh and I agree with that. I think where I'm going with this is at the end of the day it all comes down to religion, and if people would just seprate government from religion especially in the middle east, it would be a lot better off.

Well I see what you meant from the beginning when you said that if people stopped viewing Jews as a race then it would stop some of the hatred out there right? And yes I agree to an extent but Jews shouldn't have to hide who they really are imo. Also just so you know when you're in Israel you see there's separation of religion and government to a big extent. Unlike alot of the surrounding countries. And btw there you'll see what I mean. There are 6 million Jews in Israel yet not all believe in Judaism. Alot of them are secular, some are Buddhists, some even muslim & christians. And most of them still see themselves as Jews. I don't want to speak for them but I think it's like that.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#491 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="Redinko"]To your second point: the fact that it was so weak already proves my point. The reality is there is NO justfication for why Iran would suddly want to kill millions of Jews while also knowing millions of Iranians will die as well. Of course your prime minister is going with the clever argument of "OMG they are all Jew-hating, anti-civilized Muslims!! We have to attack. Oh and if you aren't on my side yet: Hitler Hitler Hitler"

It is believed that the Prohept visited the Mosque in Jerusalem. To say that this makes the Al-Aqsa Mosque a little more important than other ones is an understatment. To say that every Muslim country in the world would be against Iran if this happens is an understatment.

Redinko

as far as I remember , several of the mosques bombed in Iraq were very holy to Shias , now I know the ones who destoryed them were Sunni , but still , it shows disrespect. and again , its not about justification , its about wheter or not there is a percieved threat.

Are you really trying to make the argument that the damage/destruction of a Mosque that Muslims believe the Prohept visited is not important to Muslims? I mean really, where are you going with this? Whenever a Mosque is destroyed it is deeply saddening. But for a Muslim country to intentionally destory/damage the Al-Aqsa Mosque is inconceivable. I will not say another word about it.

Okay, so how do Israelies percive a threat? Because they are being told over and over again that Ahmandinejad = Hitler I guess the Hitler card is still going strong, huh?

well like I said, he doesn't even need to touch Jerusalem , Tel Aviv is not near Jerusalem per se (its about a 60 minute drive), and there are plenty of other cities which are nowhere near it. Israelies percieve Iran to be genocidal pretty much , and honestly, you can't blame us either, last time we were told "don't worry, hes just bluffing" we know what happened.
Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#492 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"]

you are denying Jewish history, because its plain fact, Jews all started as a single ethnic group , and for the most part , still are.

yes, you can become a Jew of the Jewish faith , but you cannot be a Jew of the ethnic element (and both are there ). again , taking a few converts and applying them to the other 90% is silly.

I think youre failing to understand the connection between ethnicity and religion in Judaism , Id have to imagine its because you are used to a more universal religion like Christianity , where the modern population is indeed the result of conversions.

in Judaism , most of the adherents are part of the same ethnic group , and conversions and intermarriage were not a huge factor in Jewish history.

and no one said a thing about different human being,

Darkman2007

You're wrong ALL Jews are part of the same ethnic group. Converted Jews are treated as part of the Jewish ethnicity just as much as people born as Jews.

yes and no. from a religious standpoint, yes, they are very much equal to Jews, and at the end of the day, thats the ultimate authority. at the same time, if someone converts to Judaism , that doesn't mean he has the same ancestry as me, so its not the same. that doesn't mean they are treated differently of course, in fact, Rabbi Akiva's parents were converts, and he was one of the most revered Rabbis in history.

What is your ancestory?

Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#493 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"]

[QUOTE="xscrapzx"] I'm not denying any of the Jewish History at all. How is what I said denying the history of the Jewish people. Jews are not an ethicity. Jews could be black, white, asian, middle eastern, or indian, but a jew is not part of that class. It is solely based on the religon of Judaism. Its not like a jew is a different kind of human being, because they are not. It's not like I can say, "Hey I want to be black today", or "Hey I want to be Asian", and actually believe I am either of those.xscrapzx

you are denying Jewish history, because its plain fact, Jews all started as a single ethnic group , and for the most part , still are.

yes, you can become a Jew of the Jewish faith , but you cannot be a Jew of the ethnic element (and both are there ). again , taking a few converts and applying them to the other 90% is silly.

I think youre failing to understand the connection between ethnicity and religion in Judaism , Id have to imagine its because you are used to a more universal religion like Christianity , where the modern population is indeed the result of conversions.

in Judaism , most of the adherents are part of the same ethnic group , and conversions and intermarriage were not a huge factor in Jewish history.

and no one said a thing about different human being,

You are killing me... Again I never claimed that anyone said anything about Jews being a particular race or species of human being in this thread. I simply made a reply to major that the Jewish people are not a race of people. They may all live by the same laws and ways of life and might be related in some way or another, but at the end of the day they aren't like Asians, Africans, Causcasions or Indians. They are middle eastern people from that region. Their way of life is Judaism. Thats all. That is not denying anything, that is not taking anything away from the Jewish history. I just simply made a comment. My whole point was the Jewish people live strongly by their religion and thats how they live their lives, and if people saw them in that view instead of a race of people who are trying to TAKE OVER TEH WHOLE world they probably would see them in a different light. The people I'm referring to are the people who dislike them. Maybe I'm using the wrong words and no explaining myself thoroughly.

you said Jews have no relation to each other in terms of ancestry, that means the same thing, and that is denying history. and actually, there are plenty of Jews who are secular, some are even athiests, but are still Jews because of ancestry.
Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#494 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts

[QUOTE="xscrapzx"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] I think the first paragraph of Wikipedia says this very well:

"The Jews, also known as the Jewish people, are a nation and an ethnoreligious group, originating in the Israelites or Hebrews of the Ancient Near East. The Jewish ethnicity, nationality, and religion are strongly interrelated, as Judaism is the traditional faith of the Jewish nation. Converts to Judaism, whose status as Jews within the Jewish ethnos is equal to those born into it, have been absorbed into the Jewish people throughout the millennia."

And then a different page just to explain what a nation is: "A nation may refer to a community of people who share a common language, culture, ethnicity, descent, and/or history"

themajormayor

Oh and I agree with that. I think where I'm going with this is at the end of the day it all comes down to religion, and if people would just seprate government from religion especially in the middle east, it would be a lot better off.

Well I see what you meant from the beginning when you said that if people stopped viewing Jews as a race then it would stop some of the hatred out there right? And yes I agree to an extent but Jews shouldn't have to hide who they really are imo. Also just so you know when you're in Israel you see there's separation of religion and government to a big extent. Unlike alot of the surrounding countries. And btw there you'll see what I mean. There are 6 million Jews in Israel yet not all believe in Judaism. Alot of them are secular, some are Buddhists, some even muslim & christians. And most of them still see themselves as Jews. I don't want to speak for them but I think it's like that.

Yes and I see that as well. Just like I'm from America so I'm seen as an American, but an American is not a race, which was I was trying to get across to Darkman.

Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#495 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] You're wrong ALL Jews are part of the same ethnic group. Converted Jews are treated as part of the Jewish ethnicity just as much as people born as Jews.xscrapzx

yes and no. from a religious standpoint, yes, they are very much equal to Jews, and at the end of the day, thats the ultimate authority. at the same time, if someone converts to Judaism , that doesn't mean he has the same ancestry as me, so its not the same. that doesn't mean they are treated differently of course, in fact, Rabbi Akiva's parents were converts, and he was one of the most revered Rabbis in history.

What is your ancestory?

Jewish of course.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#496 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"]

you are denying Jewish history, because its plain fact, Jews all started as a single ethnic group , and for the most part , still are.

yes, you can become a Jew of the Jewish faith , but you cannot be a Jew of the ethnic element (and both are there ). again , taking a few converts and applying them to the other 90% is silly.

I think youre failing to understand the connection between ethnicity and religion in Judaism , Id have to imagine its because you are used to a more universal religion like Christianity , where the modern population is indeed the result of conversions.

in Judaism , most of the adherents are part of the same ethnic group , and conversions and intermarriage were not a huge factor in Jewish history.

and no one said a thing about different human being,

Darkman2007

You're wrong ALL Jews are part of the same ethnic group. Converted Jews are treated as part of the Jewish ethnicity just as much as people born as Jews.

yes and no. from a religious standpoint, yes, they are very much equal to Jews, and at the end of the day, thats the ultimate authority. at the same time, if someone converts to Judaism , that doesn't mean he has the same ancestry as me, so its not the same. that doesn't mean they are treated differently of course, in fact, Rabbi Akiva's parents were converts, and he was one of the most revered Rabbis in history.

Well see it like this. Think of Abraham as his adopted forefather and him having the same adopted ancestry as you. From the religious Jews I've talked to they made it clear you're not only converting to the Jewish religion but are also absorbed into the Jewish people. Otherwise you should follow the Noahide laws.

Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#497 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts
[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="xscrapzx"]

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"]

you are denying Jewish history, because its plain fact, Jews all started as a single ethnic group , and for the most part , still are.

yes, you can become a Jew of the Jewish faith , but you cannot be a Jew of the ethnic element (and both are there ). again , taking a few converts and applying them to the other 90% is silly.

I think youre failing to understand the connection between ethnicity and religion in Judaism , Id have to imagine its because you are used to a more universal religion like Christianity , where the modern population is indeed the result of conversions.

in Judaism , most of the adherents are part of the same ethnic group , and conversions and intermarriage were not a huge factor in Jewish history.

and no one said a thing about different human being,

You are killing me... Again I never claimed that anyone said anything about Jews being a particular race or species of human being in this thread. I simply made a reply to major that the Jewish people are not a race of people. They may all live by the same laws and ways of life and might be related in some way or another, but at the end of the day they aren't like Asians, Africans, Causcasions or Indians. They are middle eastern people from that region. Their way of life is Judaism. Thats all. That is not denying anything, that is not taking anything away from the Jewish history. I just simply made a comment. My whole point was the Jewish people live strongly by their religion and thats how they live their lives, and if people saw them in that view instead of a race of people who are trying to TAKE OVER TEH WHOLE world they probably would see them in a different light. The people I'm referring to are the people who dislike them. Maybe I'm using the wrong words and no explaining myself thoroughly.

you said Jews have no relation to each other in terms of ancestry, that means the same thing, and that is denying history. and actually, there are plenty of Jews who are secular, some are even athiests, but are still Jews because of ancestry.

Well then we will have to agree to disagress because there is no blood of Judaism. Just because a tribe way back in the day had this way of life all of sudden makes them a different kind of human. It doesn't work that way. I'm caucasion. I am a white person. That is what my race is. Jewish people don't have a different type of body that would distinguish them as a race. Every country known to man at one time had tribes. Great Britian way back when, were all tribes, just because one tribe lived a different kind of life and believed in different views are not all of a sudden a different kind of caucasion human being. They are still causion or a white person. Thats my point.
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#498 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] You're wrong ALL Jews are part of the same ethnic group. Converted Jews are treated as part of the Jewish ethnicity just as much as people born as Jews.themajormayor

yes and no. from a religious standpoint, yes, they are very much equal to Jews, and at the end of the day, thats the ultimate authority. at the same time, if someone converts to Judaism , that doesn't mean he has the same ancestry as me, so its not the same. that doesn't mean they are treated differently of course, in fact, Rabbi Akiva's parents were converts, and he was one of the most revered Rabbis in history.

Well see it like this. Think of Abraham as his adopted forefather and him having the same adopted ancestry as you. From the religious Jews I've talked to they made it clear you're not only converting to the Jewish religion but are also absorbed into the Jewish people. Otherwise you should follow the Noahide laws.

oh and they are indeed right, a convert is every bit the Jew as someone who is born a Jew in the religious sense. and funny enough , from the Rabbis Ive heard , they do say that when deciding who is a Jew and who isn't . ancestry is actually a better way to determine things than conversions.
Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#499 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts
[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="xscrapzx"]

yes and no. from a religious standpoint, yes, they are very much equal to Jews, and at the end of the day, thats the ultimate authority. at the same time, if someone converts to Judaism , that doesn't mean he has the same ancestry as me, so its not the same. that doesn't mean they are treated differently of course, in fact, Rabbi Akiva's parents were converts, and he was one of the most revered Rabbis in history.Darkman2007
What is your ancestory?

Jewish of course.

What area on earth did Jewish people originate from?
Avatar image for Darkman2007
Darkman2007

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#500 Darkman2007
Member since 2007 • 17926 Posts

[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="xscrapzx"]

You are killing me... Again I never claimed that anyone said anything about Jews being a particular race or species of human being in this thread. I simply made a reply to major that the Jewish people are not a race of people. They may all live by the same laws and ways of life and might be related in some way or another, but at the end of the day they aren't like Asians, Africans, Causcasions or Indians. They are middle eastern people from that region. Their way of life is Judaism. Thats all. That is not denying anything, that is not taking anything away from the Jewish history. I just simply made a comment. My whole point was the Jewish people live strongly by their religion and thats how they live their lives, and if people saw them in that view instead of a race of people who are trying to TAKE OVER TEH WHOLE world they probably would see them in a different light. The people I'm referring to are the people who dislike them. Maybe I'm using the wrong words and no explaining myself thoroughly.

xscrapzx

you said Jews have no relation to each other in terms of ancestry, that means the same thing, and that is denying history. and actually, there are plenty of Jews who are secular, some are even athiests, but are still Jews because of ancestry.

Well then we will have to agree to disagress because there is no blood of Judaism. Just because a tribe way back in the day had this way of life all of sudden makes them a different kind of human. It doesn't work that way. I'm caucasion. I am a white person. That is what my race is. Jewish people don't have a different type of body that would distinguish them as a race. Every country known to man at one time had tribes. Great Britian way back when, were all tribes, just because one tribe lived a different kind of life and believed in different views are not all of a sudden a different kind of caucasion human being. They are still causion or a white person. Thats my point.

thing is, youre looking at it in a purely universalist religious sense, when its not that simple.

here is a way to explain it, how did Christianity and Islam spread?