If murder is illegal, why isn't abortion?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#701 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

"Pro-choice individuals often do not consider themselves "pro-abortion" because they consider abortion an issue of bodily autonomy, and find forced abortion to be as legally indefensible as the outlawing of abortion."

"Some who argue from a philosophical viewpoint believe that an embryo has no rights as it is only a potential and not an actual being and that it should not have rights that override those of the pregnant woman until it is born"

"Some people who are pro-choice see abortion as a last resort and focus on a number of situations where they feel abortion is a necessary option. Among these situations are those where the woman was raped"

"On the issue of abortion, pro-life campaigners are opposed bypro-choicecampaigners, who generally advocate for what they see as women'sreproductive rights."

Wow, they're all the same. It's apparently an endless cycle that will never end. There will ALWAYS be someone to oppose the Pro-Life, or in the "Pro-Choicers" case "Reproductive Rights" movement.

All these quotes were taken from Wikipedia.

Teenaged

And what do these show exactly?

These quotes show that your Arguments are all the same. Fighting about it is pointless because I will not change my opinion on the subject neither will you.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#702 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="GazaAli"] the fact is the world is black and white, at least for me.

Doesn't that make it an opinion?
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#703 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

"Pro-choice individuals often do not consider themselves "pro-abortion" because they consider abortion an issue of bodily autonomy, and find forced abortion to be as legally indefensible as the outlawing of abortion."

"Some who argue from a philosophical viewpoint believe that an embryo has no rights as it is only a potential and not an actual being and that it should not have rights that override those of the pregnant woman until it is born"

"Some people who are pro-choice see abortion as a last resort and focus on a number of situations where they feel abortion is a necessary option. Among these situations are those where the woman was raped"

"On the issue of abortion, pro-life campaigners are opposed bypro-choicecampaigners, who generally advocate for what they see as women'sreproductive rights."

Wow, they're all the same. It's apparently an endless cycle that will never end. There will ALWAYS be someone to oppose the Pro-Life, or in the "Pro-Choicers" case "Reproductive Rights" movement.

All these quotes were taken from Wikipedia.

Snipes_2

And what do these show exactly?

These quotes show that your Arguments are all the same. Fighting about it is pointless because I will not change my opinion on the subject neither will you.

I didnt want you to change your opinion and become pro-choice; I just wanted you to realise you were wrong in your assumptions about the intetnions of people that are pro-choice.

Avatar image for iginlawasup
iginlawasup

1514

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#704 iginlawasup
Member since 2008 • 1514 Posts

It's the same thing, only different circumstances.

megahaloman64

:i Because the baby is only like a cell. Murder is when you kill a breathing human who has experienced life. How can you relate killing someone to killing a unwanted baby who has barely developed at all.

Avatar image for Ed_Cetera
Ed_Cetera

373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#705 Ed_Cetera
Member since 2009 • 373 Posts
[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

[QUOTE="GazaAli"] no morality is not ambiguous, people just make it so. abortion: to stop a human being of being born, which means you actually stopped a life, which eventually is the same as murder.GazaAli

I wish the world was black and white, too!

the fact is the world is black and white, at least for me.

lol moral absolutism
Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#706 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]And what do these show exactly?

Teenaged

These quotes show that your Arguments are all the same. Fighting about it is pointless because I will not change my opinion on the subject neither will you.

I didnt want you to change your opinion and become pro-choice; I just wanted you to realise you were wrong in your assumptions about the intetnions of people that are pro-choice.

In my eyes I'm not wrong about them. How were my assumptions incorrect? You support the choice for women to have an abortion. I find abortion wrong and unnecessary. That's just me though.

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#707 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

These quotes show that your Arguments are all the same. Fighting about it is pointless because I will not change my opinion on the subject neither will you.

Snipes_2

I didnt want you to change your opinion and become pro-choice; I just wanted you to realise you were wrong in your assumptions about the intetnions of people that are pro-choice.

In my eyes I'm not wrong about them. How were my assumptions incorrect? You support the choice for women to have an abortion. I find abortion wrong and unnecessary. That's just me though.

I wont debate this further. At least the red parts are spot on.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#708 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

[QUOTE="GazaAli"][QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

I wish the world was black and white, too!

Ed_Cetera

the fact is the world is black and white, at least for me.

lol moral absolutism

which im 100% proud of.

Avatar image for LODisapproval
LODisapproval

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#709 LODisapproval
Member since 2009 • 98 Posts

[QUOTE="Ed_Cetera"][QUOTE="GazaAli"] the fact is the world is black and white, at least for me.GazaAli

lol moral absolutism

which im 100% proud of.

Do you think that lying is wrong even if by lying you save a child's life?
Avatar image for lerfish
lerfish

629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#710 lerfish
Member since 2008 • 629 Posts

because it's not the same thing o_O

problem solved, end of discussion.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#711 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts
[QUOTE="GazaAli"]

[QUOTE="Ed_Cetera"] lol moral absolutismLODisapproval

which im 100% proud of.

Do you think that lying is wrong even if by lying you save a child's life?

Obviously in that case you have to lie. >_>
Avatar image for LODisapproval
LODisapproval

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#712 LODisapproval
Member since 2009 • 98 Posts
[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] Obviously in that case you have to lie. >_>

In which case, so much for moral absolutism.
Avatar image for Ed_Cetera
Ed_Cetera

373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#713 Ed_Cetera
Member since 2009 • 373 Posts
[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] Obviously in that case you have to lie. >_>

GazaAli wouldn't agree. If he's a real moral absolutist, that is.
Avatar image for danwallacefan
danwallacefan

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#714 danwallacefan
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

"Pro-choice individuals often do not consider themselves "pro-abortion" because they consider abortion an issue of bodily autonomy, and find forced abortion to be as legally indefensible as the outlawing of abortion."

"Some who argue from a philosophical viewpoint believe that an embryo has no rights as it is only a potential and not an actual being and that it should not have rights that override those of the pregnant woman until it is born"

"Some people who are pro-choice see abortion as a last resort and focus on a number of situations where they feel abortion is a necessary option. Among these situations are those where the woman was raped"

"On the issue of abortion, pro-life campaigners are opposed bypro-choicecampaigners, who generally advocate for what they see as women'sreproductive rights."

Wow, they're all the same. It's apparently an endless cycle that will never end. There will ALWAYS be someone to oppose the Pro-Life, or in the "Pro-Choicers" case "Reproductive Rights" movement.

All these quotes were taken from Wikipedia.

Snipes_2

And what do these show exactly?

These quotes show that your Arguments are all the same. Fighting about it is pointless because I will not change my opinion on the subject neither will you.

TRANSLATION: you can't teach me anything. That's all it shows. If you admit that "I will not change my mind", then you admit that you can't be taught.

Now, that being said, a fetus is not a part of a woman's body. A substance's parts are what they are in virtue of the role they play in the substance. A heart is a heart because it pumps blood throughout the body.

A Fetus however does not play a role in a woman's body, its final cause is outside the woman's body, and it can still continue to be even if it is outside the body and has no capacity to play a role in the woman's body.

To sum up, a fetus isn't part of a woman's body.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#715 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

[QUOTE="danwallacefan"] Both of them, sleeping persons and fetuses, have merely the *potential* to percieve. The sleeping person just has a lower order capacity while the fetus has a higher order capacity.

Still the same sort of substance.

danwallacefan

*sigh* in the sense that we're made up of cells, yes... in early development, a fetus is not similar to a human being... I don't see that statement as anything more than an appeal to emotion...

no no no, I dont mean substance as in the same atoms or cells, I mean the same inner nature, or essense rather. Surely you are aware of the traditional view of substance and the debate surrounding it no?

Ah, okay, thanks for clarifying what you were referring to. And, I don't agree with that view of substance, so yeah...

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#716 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
and it can still continue to be even if it is outside the body and has no capacity to play a role in the woman's bodydanwallacefan
Then excise the fetus from the body. The right to life is not the same thing as right to a host.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#717 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="Ed_Cetera"][QUOTE="GazaAli"] the fact is the world is black and white, at least for me.GazaAli

lol moral absolutism

which im 100% proud of.

I find that tremendously nieve.. Life is never that simple.

Avatar image for danwallacefan
danwallacefan

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#718 danwallacefan
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts

[QUOTE="danwallacefan"]

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

*sigh* in the sense that we're made up of cells, yes... in early development, a fetus is not similar to a human being... I don't see that statement as anything more than an appeal to emotion...

chessmaster1989

no no no, I dont mean substance as in the same atoms or cells, I mean the same inner nature, or essense rather. Surely you are aware of the traditional view of substance and the debate surrounding it no?

Ah, okay, thanks for clarifying what you were referring to. And, I don't agree with that view of substance, so yeah...

then how do you account for individuation or predication?

Avatar image for danwallacefan
danwallacefan

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#719 danwallacefan
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts

[QUOTE="danwallacefan"] and it can still continue to be even if it is outside the body and has no capacity to play a role in the woman's bodyVandalvideo
Then excise the fetus from the body. The right to life is not the same thing as right to a host.

because any attempt to do so before viability would destroy the fetus, ergo destroying the person, ergo murder.

Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#720 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]And what do these show exactly?

danwallacefan

These quotes show that your Arguments are all the same. Fighting about it is pointless because I will not change my opinion on the subject neither will you.

TRANSLATION: you can't teach me anything. That's all it shows. If you admit that "I will not change my mind", then you admit that you can't be taught.

Now, that being said, a fetus is not a part of a woman's body. A substance's parts are what they are in virtue of the role they play in the substance. A heart is a heart because it pumps blood throughout the body.

A Fetus however does not play a role in a woman's body, its final cause is outside the woman's body, and it can still continue to be even if it is outside the body and has no capacity to play a role in the woman's body.

To sum up, a fetus isn't part of a woman's body.

The Fetus obviously is not part of a Woman's body. Its a separate Human Being. And by stating that I will not change my mind does not mean "I can't be taught", IT means I firmly believe in what I believe.

Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#721 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]I didnt want you to change your opinion and become pro-choice; I just wanted you to realise you were wrong in your assumptions about the intetnions of people that are pro-choice.

Teenaged

In my eyes I'm not wrong about them. How were my assumptions incorrect? You support the choice for women to have an abortion. I find abortion wrong and unnecessary. That's just me though.

I wont debate this further. At least the red parts are spot on.

Ok...?

Avatar image for smc91352
smc91352

7786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#722 smc91352
Member since 2009 • 7786 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

In my eyes I'm not wrong about them. How were my assumptions incorrect? You support the choice for women to have an abortion. I find abortion wrong and unnecessary. That's just me though.

Snipes_2

I wont debate this further. At least the red parts are spot on.

Ok...?

you lose. Any other confusion you have?
Avatar image for danwallacefan
danwallacefan

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#723 danwallacefan
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts
[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]I wont debate this further. At least the red parts are spot on.

smc91352

Ok...?

you lose. Any other confusion you have?

smc, that's not for you to decide.
Avatar image for smc91352
smc91352

7786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#724 smc91352
Member since 2009 • 7786 Posts
[QUOTE="smc91352"][QUOTE="Snipes_2"]Ok...? danwallacefan
you lose. Any other confusion you have?

smc, that's not for you to decide.

I was just making a joke. I didn't really mean anything
Avatar image for carlandcarl
carlandcarl

1251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#725 carlandcarl
Member since 2004 • 1251 Posts

One reason why people don't see it as murder, is because before the baby has reached three months of being inside the womb it isn't considered a fetus yet, so it's just a "thing". Some countries abortion laws abide to this, that after a certain time carrying the child you can no longer ask for abortion

Avatar image for starfox15
starfox15

3988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#726 starfox15
Member since 2006 • 3988 Posts

Zygote does not = Human therefore abortion does not = murder.

If you really care about it then strive for it. Don't try and get people to change their minds because you don't agree with them.

Avatar image for danwallacefan
danwallacefan

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#727 danwallacefan
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts

Zygote does not = Human therefore abortion does not = murder.

If you really care about it then strive for it. Don't try and get people to change their minds because you don't agree with them.

starfox15

why is a zygote not a human?

Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#728 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

Zygote does not = Human therefore abortion does not = murder.

If you really care about it then strive for it. Don't try and get people to change their minds because you don't agree with them.

starfox15

What's funny is that people starting analyzing my opinion and then continued to try and change MY Mind. Not the other way around.

Avatar image for smc91352
smc91352

7786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#729 smc91352
Member since 2009 • 7786 Posts

[QUOTE="starfox15"]

Zygote does not = Human therefore abortion does not = murder.

If you really care about it then strive for it. Don't try and get people to change their minds because you don't agree with them.

Snipes_2

What's funny is that people starting analyzing my opinion and then continued to try and change MY Mind. Not the other way around.

He didn't quote you. You give yourself too much credit.
Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#730 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

[QUOTE="starfox15"]

Zygote does not = Human therefore abortion does not = murder.

If you really care about it then strive for it. Don't try and get people to change their minds because you don't agree with them.

smc91352

What's funny is that people starting analyzing my opinion and then continued to try and change MY Mind. Not the other way around.

He didn't quote you. You give yourself too much credit.

Who was he referring to then? I thought it was based upon anyone who thought otherwise?

"You give yourself too much credit." - That is "LoL" worthy. Any other inane remarks?

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#731 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="danwallacefan"] why does sentience=personhood?

danwallacefan

Because that is what the article stated. I myself have never heard of the word 'personhood' but if that's what they want to call it then so be it. Do you think something without sentience can have personhood? If so what exactly makes that non-sentient thing a person?

a sleeping person, a person in a temporary coma, etc.

And why do you not think a person in a coma has person? A person in a coma still has sentience.

Avatar image for smc91352
smc91352

7786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#732 smc91352
Member since 2009 • 7786 Posts

[QUOTE="smc91352"][QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

What's funny is that people starting analyzing my opinion and then continued to try and change MY Mind. Not the other way around.

Snipes_2

He didn't quote you. You give yourself too much credit.

Who was he referring to then? I thought it was based upon anyone who thought otherwise?

"You give yourself too much credit." - That is "LoL" worthy. Any other inane remarks?

who says he was referring to anyone? :?
Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#733 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

[QUOTE="smc91352"] He didn't quote you. You give yourself too much credit.smc91352

Who was he referring to then? I thought it was based upon anyone who thought otherwise?

"You give yourself too much credit." - That is "LoL" worthy. Any other inane remarks?

who says he was referring to anyone? :?

I'm assuming he referred to someone specific given your response to my post.

Avatar image for danwallacefan
danwallacefan

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#734 danwallacefan
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts

[QUOTE="danwallacefan"]

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]Because that is what the article stated. I myself have never heard of the word 'personhood' but if that's what they want to call it then so be it. Do you think something without sentience can have personhood? If so what exactly makes that non-sentient thing a person?

BumFluff122

a sleeping person, a person in a temporary coma, etc.

And why do you not think a person in a coma has person? A person in a coma still has sentience.

I didn't say that they dont have personhood, I'm saying that they DO have personhood despite being in a coma.

and no, they dont have sentience. They are not aware of anything.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#735 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="danwallacefan"] a sleeping person, a person in a temporary coma, etc.

danwallacefan

And why do you not think a person in a coma has person? A person in a coma still has sentience.

I didn't say that they dont have personhood, I'm saying that they DO have personhood despite being in a coma.

and no, they dont have sentience. They are not aware of anything.

Let me tell you a story. When I was 8 years old I was in a horrible car accident after which I was in a coma for 2 months. Durign the time I was in a coma my mother and grandmother woudl spend long days at my bedside. They knew exactly what I reacted to. Every time they played my favourite song on the radio I woudl always get a small smile. You are wrong.

Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#736 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts
because abortion isnt murder
Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#737 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

You still have Brain FUnction when you're in a Coma. Just because you can't express it doesn't mean you're not alive/sentient.

Avatar image for deactivated-60f8966fb59f5
deactivated-60f8966fb59f5

1719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#738 deactivated-60f8966fb59f5
Member since 2008 • 1719 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

because abortion isn't murder. To murder that thing you are murdering has to be a sentient being. A bunch of cells in a womb does not a sentient being make.

megahaloman64

Abortion is ending the life of another living being, is that not murder?

Murder is the unlawful killing of one human being by another... since abortion isn't illegal, it isn't murder.
Avatar image for -DirtySanchez-
-DirtySanchez-

32760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#739 -DirtySanchez-
Member since 2003 • 32760 Posts
because something needs to be alive in order to be murdered
Avatar image for smc91352
smc91352

7786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#740 smc91352
Member since 2009 • 7786 Posts
because something needs to be alive in order to be murdered-DirtySanchez-
define "alive"
Avatar image for -DirtySanchez-
-DirtySanchez-

32760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#741 -DirtySanchez-
Member since 2003 • 32760 Posts
[QUOTE="-DirtySanchez-"]because something needs to be alive in order to be murderedsmc91352
define "alive"

born
Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#742 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

because something needs to be alive in order to be murdered-DirtySanchez-

Cells are alive and so is a Fetus. Therefore, killing them would be murder. By your definition.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#743 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23333 Posts
[QUOTE="smc91352"][QUOTE="-DirtySanchez-"]because something needs to be alive in order to be murdered-DirtySanchez-
define "alive"

born

I bring forth the chicken example. :P
Avatar image for -DirtySanchez-
-DirtySanchez-

32760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#744 -DirtySanchez-
Member since 2003 • 32760 Posts
[QUOTE="-DirtySanchez-"][QUOTE="smc91352"] define "alive"mattbbpl
born

I bring forth the chicken example. :P

and whats that have to do with this? and last i checked a fetus and cells arent considered a baby, it needs to be born to be a baby therefor its not alive untill born
Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#745 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23333 Posts
[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="-DirtySanchez-"] born-DirtySanchez-
I bring forth the chicken example. :P

and whats that have to do with this? and last i checked a fetus and cells arent considered a baby, it needs to be born to be a baby therefor its not alive untill born

It's just a jab at all the absolutes based on definitions being thrown around in this thread. You're definition of life here would technically exclude chickens since they are never born, but rather hatched.
Avatar image for -DirtySanchez-
-DirtySanchez-

32760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#746 -DirtySanchez-
Member since 2003 • 32760 Posts
[QUOTE="-DirtySanchez-"][QUOTE="mattbbpl"] I bring forth the chicken example. :Pmattbbpl
and whats that have to do with this? and last i checked a fetus and cells arent considered a baby, it needs to be born to be a baby therefor its not alive untill born

It's just a jab at all the absolutes based on definitions being thrown around in this thread. You're definition of life here would technically exclude chickens since they are never born, but rather hatched.

well chickens are delicious if we considered them born it would be murder and that wouldnt be a delicious :P lol sorry i had to say that, but yes you have a point, but they are still born in there own manner
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#747 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
because any attempt to do so before viability would destroy the fetus, ergo destroying the person, ergo murder.danwallacefan
Even if you wanted to make that case, the most you could say was that it was manslaughter. Murder requires mens rea. Fact. Abortion does not necessarily require mens rea. Therefore, abortion is not necessarily murder. Besides, if you want to take a categorical imperative approach to the right to life, then there are tons of counter examples I could bring up. Let us say that I break into your house, kidnap you, and hook you up to my dieing grandmother. You cannot dishook yourself because that would kill her. Therefore, manslaughter. Or better yet, I need a kidney and I am on life support. I kidnap you, remove the kidney, and place you on life support. However, if you try to take my kidney back, I will die. Therefore, manslaughter. The right to life does NOT necessitate a right to a host. The right to bodily autonomy, as illustrated by the examples I've given, may override a right to life. If a fetus wants to live, let it do it outside the womb. Its the woman's womb.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#748 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="-DirtySanchez-"]because something needs to be alive in order to be murderedSnipes_2

Cells are alive and so is a Fetus. Therefore, killing them would be murder. By your definition.

You're confusing sufficiency with necessity. Merely because something needs to be alive to be murdered does NOT mean that being alive is sufficient to establish that it was murder.
Avatar image for CommonFable
CommonFable

884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#749 CommonFable
Member since 2009 • 884 Posts

Im gonna write what I wrote earlier and got modded for it in a nicer tone. Maybe if people would use proper protection we would not have this argument.