This topic is locked from further discussion.
I do not support the death penalty. I don't think it serves as effective punishment or an effective deterrent. On top of that I'm in total disagreement with the whole "Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth" philosophy. That only works until the whole world is blind and toothless.
And cliche-less :P(it is true, though)I do not support the death penalty. I don't think it serves as effective punishment or an effective deterrent. On top of that I'm in total disagreement with the whole "Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth" philosophy. That only works until the whole world is blind and toothless.
Schwah
If a person has murdered someone, they deserve to die and suffer in hell.snrsmith23Well I'm guessing your a Christian...... that statement goes against what the bible says.
If a person has murdered someone, they deserve to die and suffer in hell.snrsmith23Same feeling here as well. If the murder is on purpose and under no truly exceptional conditions.
I believe it's the crimnals choice...atrain4I hope you don't mean that in the literal sense, but rather the fact that he/she made a choice and must accept his/her fate.
Imagine a scenario where a person murders the primary source of income for a working class family. Is there justice if the murderer gets life in prison? Is it really justice if that person is guaranteed the right to free medical treatment, food, and shelter meanwhile the family of the victim are guaranteed none of these things and even need to provide tax money to fund the murderer's life.bobwill1
I see that as revenge, not justice.
in california, which has the largest death row population, the death penalty costs taxpayers $114 million per year past what it costs to keep killers in prison for life without parole.romocop33Are you really saying that it costs more to be dead than alive? Cause that's more than just a stretch
Some criminals, like child molestors, cannot be rehabilitated. This means if they are ever released, then they will commit the crime again. There are also numerous worthless individuals who have repeatedly committed violent offenses (robbery, assault, rape), and go immediately back to this type of lifestyle whenever they are released from prison.
It costs a tremendous amount of money to keep someone incarcerated for their entire lives. If they can never be a productive citizen, and will always be a danger to innocent people, then the death penalty is the only logical choice.
in california, which has the largest death row population, the death penalty costs taxpayers $114 million per year past what it costs to keep killers in prison for life without parole.romocop33
Sadly, this is correct. In California, Death Row inmates are actually treated better than other inmates. It got to the point where organized gang members encouraged their members to try and kill police if thjey were caught commiting a smaller offense. The logic was that killing a police officer was a capital offense, putting you on Death Row. If burglarizing a vehicle was your third strike, you were going to spend the rest of your life in prison anyway, so you might as well get the better treatment from Death Row.
Of course, the only reason this ever happened is becasue California doesn't use the death penalty. Prisoners know that the California Penal System hasn't executed anyone in over 20 years, and criminals in that state see a death penalty the same as they view any life sentence.
If it costs California that much to keep these guy alive, it's their own fault. There is no reason these guys should be treated better by the system than other prisoners, and there is no reason why someon sentenced to death 30 years ago ahould still be living well in prison.
in california, which has the largest death row population, the death penalty costs taxpayers $114 million per year past what it costs to keep killers in prison for life without parole.romocop33Because California is stupid and takes like 50 years to execute somebody after they have been sentenced to death.
They should live their entire life in prison randomly being tortured by the guards and sexually harassed by the other inmates.cool_ballerAmen to that brother. I don't support the death penalty at all and find it a barbaric method of crime and unjust to all offenders.
[QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]I don't support the death penalty mainly because it just doesn't work.
wmg1299
I can't agree with you on this one. I think it's safe to say that no one who has actually ever had the Death Penalty imposed on them has ever committed another crime.
... Obviously... but I'm talking about crime in general, texas impose the death penalty (more than any other state) but has that reduced crime? Also, the court can sometimes sentence the wrong person to death... happened in the UK to Timothy Evans in the 50's.
What's the point in sentencing the guy to death... when you can make him work? :twisted:
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment