If you support the death penalty, tell me why now please!!!!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Trashface
Trashface

3534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#51 Trashface
Member since 2006 • 3534 Posts
[QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]

I don't support the death penalty mainly because it just doesn't work.

Marx_Brother

Because so many who are executed go back out on the street to offend again?

USA impose the death penalty... do they get low crime? I think not. It's idiotic to just kill people off, use your brain.

It depends on the city as far as crime rate. Different states have different laws. it's idiotic to not have a suitable punishment. Don't be so ironic while telling someone to "use their brain".
Avatar image for Taegukki
Taegukki

13241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 Taegukki
Member since 2005 • 13241 Posts
I believe it's the crimnals choice...atrain4
Did their victims get a choice? Anyway, I think that people should only be executed if the evidence pointing to their guilt is irrefutable. Sometimes they kill innocent men.
Avatar image for Marx_Brother
Marx_Brother

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Marx_Brother
Member since 2007 • 726 Posts
[QUOTE="Marx_Brother"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]

I don't support the death penalty mainly because it just doesn't work.

Trashface

Because so many who are executed go back out on the street to offend again?

USA impose the death penalty... do they get low crime? I think not. It's idiotic to just kill people off, use your brain.

It depends on the city as far as crime rate. Different states have different laws. it's idiotic to not have a suitable punishment. Don't be so ironic while telling someone to "use their brain".

Suitable punishment yes, killing them off, no. I'm not some guy that is soft on law and order, completely the opposite, but there are better ways than just executing them... we have moved on from the Middle Ages.

Avatar image for dommeus
dommeus

9433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#54 dommeus
Member since 2004 • 9433 Posts

It doesn't affect me here in England unless the BNP is miraculously voted in.

Avatar image for Taegukki
Taegukki

13241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 Taegukki
Member since 2005 • 13241 Posts
[QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]

I don't support the death penalty mainly because it just doesn't work.

Marx_Brother

Because so many who are executed go back out on the street to offend again?

USA impose the death penalty... do they get low crime? I think not. It's idiotic to just kill people off, use your brain.

It depends on the city as far as crime rate. Different states have different laws. it's idiotic to not have a suitable punishment. Don't be so ironic while telling someone to "use their brain".

Suitable punishment yes, killing them off, no. I'm not some guy that is soft on law and order, completely the opposite, but there are better ways of just executing them... we have moved on from the Middle Ages.

Better ways? Name one. The only other option is to keep them in the general populace of the prison system for the rest of their lives, in which case it creates more chances to kill (prison is hell) and costs the tax payer an arm and a leg. If the prisoners werent kept on death row for so long (some are there for 15 years or more) and just executed the same day as their sentence then the American government would save a lot of money. Killers deserve to die, plain and simple. If someone killed a member of your family I think you would want justice.
Avatar image for Marx_Brother
Marx_Brother

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Marx_Brother
Member since 2007 • 726 Posts
[QUOTE="Marx_Brother"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]

I don't support the death penalty mainly because it just doesn't work.

Taegukki

Because so many who are executed go back out on the street to offend again?

USA impose the death penalty... do they get low crime? I think not. It's idiotic to just kill people off, use your brain.

It depends on the city as far as crime rate. Different states have different laws. it's idiotic to not have a suitable punishment. Don't be so ironic while telling someone to "use their brain".

Suitable punishment yes, killing them off, no. I'm not some guy that is soft on law and order, completely the opposite, but there are better ways of just executing them... we have moved on from the Middle Ages.

Better ways? Name one. The only other option is to keep them in the general populace of the prison system for the rest of their lives, in which case it creates more chances to kill (prison is hell) and costs the tax payer an arm and a leg. If the prisoners werent kept on death row for so long (some are there for 15 years or more) and just executed the same day as their sentence then the American government would save a lot of money. Killers deserve to die, plain and simple. If someone killed a member of your family I think you would want justice.

I don't know other ways of punishment, life in prison maybe, gulags.. take your pick. Also, who cares if it costs the tax payer, the government should not kill somebody otherwise there would be a giant circle of execution - governments set examples and give people other chances. However, with your logic, rapists should be raped in turn by state funded rapists.... :|

Avatar image for Taegukki
Taegukki

13241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 Taegukki
Member since 2005 • 13241 Posts
[QUOTE="Taegukki"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]

I don't support the death penalty mainly because it just doesn't work.

Marx_Brother

Because so many who are executed go back out on the street to offend again?

USA impose the death penalty... do they get low crime? I think not. It's idiotic to just kill people off, use your brain.

It depends on the city as far as crime rate. Different states have different laws. it's idiotic to not have a suitable punishment. Don't be so ironic while telling someone to "use their brain".

Suitable punishment yes, killing them off, no. I'm not some guy that is soft on law and order, completely the opposite, but there are better ways of just executing them... we have moved on from the Middle Ages.

Better ways? Name one. The only other option is to keep them in the general populace of the prison system for the rest of their lives, in which case it creates more chances to kill (prison is hell) and costs the tax payer an arm and a leg. If the prisoners werent kept on death row for so long (some are there for 15 years or more) and just executed the same day as their sentence then the American government would save a lot of money. Killers deserve to die, plain and simple. If someone killed a member of your family I think you would want justice.

I don't know other ways of punishment, life in prison maybe, gulags.. take your pick. Also, who cares if it costs the tax payer, the government should not kill somebody otherwise there would be a giant circle of execution - governments set examples and give people other chances. However, with your logic, rapists should be raped in turn by state funded rapists.... :|

No, they should be chemically castrated.
Avatar image for Marx_Brother
Marx_Brother

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Marx_Brother
Member since 2007 • 726 Posts
[QUOTE="Marx_Brother"][QUOTE="Taegukki"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]

I don't support the death penalty mainly because it just doesn't work.

Taegukki

Because so many who are executed go back out on the street to offend again?

USA impose the death penalty... do they get low crime? I think not. It's idiotic to just kill people off, use your brain.

It depends on the city as far as crime rate. Different states have different laws. it's idiotic to not have a suitable punishment. Don't be so ironic while telling someone to "use their brain".

Suitable punishment yes, killing them off, no. I'm not some guy that is soft on law and order, completely the opposite, but there are better ways of just executing them... we have moved on from the Middle Ages.

Better ways? Name one. The only other option is to keep them in the general populace of the prison system for the rest of their lives, in which case it creates more chances to kill (prison is hell) and costs the tax payer an arm and a leg. If the prisoners werent kept on death row for so long (some are there for 15 years or more) and just executed the same day as their sentence then the American government would save a lot of money. Killers deserve to die, plain and simple. If someone killed a member of your family I think you would want justice.

I don't know other ways of punishment, life in prison maybe, gulags.. take your pick. Also, who cares if it costs the tax payer, the government should not kill somebody otherwise there would be a giant circle of execution - governments set examples and give people other chances. However, with your logic, rapists should be raped in turn by state funded rapists.... :|

No, they should be chemically castrated.

:lol:

Avatar image for chip_money
chip_money

2748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#59 chip_money
Member since 2006 • 2748 Posts

It costs $22,000, if I remember correctly, to house one inmate per year.

RoyTheViking

but yet overall it costs more for the death penalty...

why? because they aren't willing to settle in court for a death penalty so their trials drag on and on and on and end up costing more then if they would of recieved a life sentence
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180106 Posts
USA impose the death penalty... do they get low crime? I think not. It's idiotic to just kill people off, use your brain.Marx_Brother
Not all crimes are punishable by the death penalty. So, of course, it wouldn't be a deterrant to all crime.:roll:
Avatar image for Marx_Brother
Marx_Brother

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Marx_Brother
Member since 2007 • 726 Posts

[QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]USA impose the death penalty... do they get low crime? I think not. It's idiotic to just kill people off, use your brain.LJS9502_basic
Not all crimes are punishable by the death penalty. So, of course, it wouldn't be a deterrant to all crime.:roll:

I'm talking about murderers and rapists, most states within the US have installed the death penalty for these crimes, but still they aren't exactly short on them, are they?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180106 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]USA impose the death penalty... do they get low crime? I think not. It's idiotic to just kill people off, use your brain.Marx_Brother

Not all crimes are punishable by the death penalty. So, of course, it wouldn't be a deterrant to all crime.:roll:

I'm talking about murderers and rapists, most states within the US have installed the death penalty for these crimes, but still they aren't exactly short on them, are they?

No...rape is not punished by death.  And only specific types of murder are.
Avatar image for Marx_Brother
Marx_Brother

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Marx_Brother
Member since 2007 • 726 Posts
[QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]USA impose the death penalty... do they get low crime? I think not. It's idiotic to just kill people off, use your brain.LJS9502_basic

Not all crimes are punishable by the death penalty. So, of course, it wouldn't be a deterrant to all crime.:roll:

I'm talking about murderers and rapists, most states within the US have installed the death penalty for these crimes, but still they aren't exactly short on them, are they?

No...rape is not punished by death.

Murderers then.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180106 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]USA impose the death penalty... do they get low crime? I think not. It's idiotic to just kill people off, use your brain.Marx_Brother

Not all crimes are punishable by the death penalty. So, of course, it wouldn't be a deterrant to all crime.:roll:

I'm talking about murderers and rapists, most states within the US have installed the death penalty for these crimes, but still they aren't exactly short on them, are they?

No...rape is not punished by death.

Murderers then.

Specific murders as I stated.....not all.
Avatar image for Vampyronight
Vampyronight

3933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#65 Vampyronight
Member since 2002 • 3933 Posts
[QUOTE="cool_baller"]They should live their entire life in prison randomly being tortured by the guards and sexually harassed by the other inmates.Theguywithshirt
Amen to that brother. I don't support the death penalty at all and find it a barbaric method of crime and unjust to all offenders.

You are clearly the barbaric one here- you would sentence a person with the intention of having a horrible crime committed upon them. Thankfully, people who share your beliefs are not in control. But it's ok if they get sexually assaulted because they're bad people, right? :roll:
Avatar image for Marx_Brother
Marx_Brother

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Marx_Brother
Member since 2007 • 726 Posts
[QUOTE="Marx_Brother"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]USA impose the death penalty... do they get low crime? I think not. It's idiotic to just kill people off, use your brain.LJS9502_basic

Not all crimes are punishable by the death penalty. So, of course, it wouldn't be a deterrant to all crime.:roll:

I'm talking about murderers and rapists, most states within the US have installed the death penalty for these crimes, but still they aren't exactly short on them, are they?

No...rape is not punished by death.

Murderers then.

Specific murders as I stated.....not all.

Whatever, I'm just saying the death penalty isn't a fantastic deterrent. The state shouldn't fund or endorse crap like that. Period.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180106 Posts
]

Whatever, I'm just saying the death penalty isn't a fantastic deterrent. The state shouldn't fund or endorse crap like that. Period.

Marx_Brother
You can have whatever opinion on the death penalty you want.....your logic, however, for your reasoning is flawed. The fact that there isn't a lot of death penalty cases belies your basis.
Avatar image for OODALOOP
OODALOOP

36350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#68 OODALOOP
Member since 2004 • 36350 Posts
Whatever, I'm just saying the death penalty isn't a fantastic deterrent. The state shouldn't fund or endorse crap like that. Period.Marx_Brother
Who cares if it's a deterrent? That's a pointless line of argument. It stops the criminal from committing another crime.
Avatar image for bastards12345
bastards12345

7194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 bastards12345
Member since 2005 • 7194 Posts
I support it 100%. We should not pay for murderers' comfort.
Avatar image for Marx_Brother
Marx_Brother

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Marx_Brother
Member since 2007 • 726 Posts
[QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]]

Whatever, I'm just saying the death penalty isn't a fantastic deterrent. The state shouldn't fund or endorse crap like that. Period.

LJS9502_basic

You can have whatever opinion on the death penalty you want.....your logic, however, for your reasoning is flawed. The fact that there isn't a lot of death penalty cases belies your basis.

What's your opinion on the death penalty. You argue but at the same time, never post your opinions.. it's like arguing with a news presenter.

Avatar image for -Karayan-
-Karayan-

6713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 -Karayan-
Member since 2006 • 6713 Posts
[QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]]

Whatever, I'm just saying the death penalty isn't a fantastic deterrent. The state shouldn't fund or endorse crap like that. Period.

LJS9502_basic
You can have whatever opinion on the death penalty you want.....your logic, however, for your reasoning is flawed. The fact that there isn't a lot of death penalty cases belies your basis.

His point is that it doesn't stop anyone from doing anything any more than a life sentence would do.
Avatar image for Marx_Brother
Marx_Brother

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Marx_Brother
Member since 2007 • 726 Posts

[QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]Whatever, I'm just saying the death penalty isn't a fantastic deterrent. The state shouldn't fund or endorse crap like that. Period.bt_the_great_78
Who cares if it's a deterrent? That's a pointless line of argument. It stops the criminal from committing another crime.

And life imprisonment doesn't stop the guy from committing another offence to the public? :roll:

Avatar image for kyleali11
kyleali11

11820

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 kyleali11
Member since 2006 • 11820 Posts
You kill, you should be killed.
Avatar image for OODALOOP
OODALOOP

36350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#74 OODALOOP
Member since 2004 • 36350 Posts

[QUOTE="bt_the_great_78"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]Whatever, I'm just saying the death penalty isn't a fantastic deterrent. The state shouldn't fund or endorse crap like that. Period.Marx_Brother

Who cares if it's a deterrent? That's a pointless line of argument. It stops the criminal from committing another crime.

And life imprisonment doesn't stop the guy from committing another offence to the public? :roll:

Life imprisonment is generally about 25-35 years. In that period, not only can the prisoner kill again in prison, but can make appeals for release, can make deals for early release, can obtain a lawyer and find ways to get the case thrown out, can escape, or can simply serve his sentence and return to society. I know there are hundreds, if not thousands, of cases where men (and women) who have served life sentences have returned to society only to commit more violent crimes. I have a friend who was raped and killed by just such a person. So, yeah, you don't really know what you're talking about.
Avatar image for -Karayan-
-Karayan-

6713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 -Karayan-
Member since 2006 • 6713 Posts
[QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]

[QUOTE="bt_the_great_78"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]Whatever, I'm just saying the death penalty isn't a fantastic deterrent. The state shouldn't fund or endorse crap like that. Period.bt_the_great_78

Who cares if it's a deterrent? That's a pointless line of argument. It stops the criminal from committing another crime.

And life imprisonment doesn't stop the guy from committing another offence to the public? :roll:

Life imprisonment is generally about 25-35 years. In that period, not only can the prisoner kill again in prison, but can make appeals for release, can make deals for early release, can obtain a lawyer and find ways to get the case thrown out, can escape, or can simply serve his sentence and return to society. I know there are hundreds, if not thousands, of cases where men (and women) who have served life sentences have returned to society only to commit more violent crimes. I have a friend who was raped and killed by just such a person. So, yeah, you don't really know what you're talking about.

Maybe if prison wasn't such a horrible place, that stuff doesn't happen in the Netherlands. Anyway, I'm sure when they are 70 and get out of jail they go back to their old gang in the nursing home and make the nurses fall over with their walking sticks.
Avatar image for Marx_Brother
Marx_Brother

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Marx_Brother
Member since 2007 • 726 Posts
[QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]

[QUOTE="bt_the_great_78"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]Whatever, I'm just saying the death penalty isn't a fantastic deterrent. The state shouldn't fund or endorse crap like that. Period.bt_the_great_78

Who cares if it's a deterrent? That's a pointless line of argument. It stops the criminal from committing another crime.

And life imprisonment doesn't stop the guy from committing another offence to the public? :roll:

Life imprisonment is generally about 25-35 years. In that period, not only can the prisoner kill again in prison, but can make appeals for release, can make deals for early release, can obtain a lawyer and find ways to get the case thrown out, can escape, or can simply serve his sentence and return to society. I know there are hundreds, if not thousands, of cases where men (and women) who have served life sentences have returned to society only to commit more violent crimes. I have a friend who was raped and killed by just such a person. So, yeah, you don't really know what you're talking about.

With repsect, your talking out of your ass. Death penalty doesn't make streets any safer than prison, Europe is a safer place than America and all countries within the EU do not impose the death penalty. Maybe it is about the causes of crime and not just killing them off... it's pathetic and mindless.

Avatar image for Flaming_Ape
Flaming_Ape

3246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#77 Flaming_Ape
Member since 2007 • 3246 Posts
Because it's a deserving punishment for criminals who've killed many thousands of people (example: Saddam Hussein).
Avatar image for OODALOOP
OODALOOP

36350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#78 OODALOOP
Member since 2004 • 36350 Posts
[QUOTE="bt_the_great_78"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]

[QUOTE="bt_the_great_78"][QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]Whatever, I'm just saying the death penalty isn't a fantastic deterrent. The state shouldn't fund or endorse crap like that. Period.Marx_Brother

Who cares if it's a deterrent? That's a pointless line of argument. It stops the criminal from committing another crime.

And life imprisonment doesn't stop the guy from committing another offence to the public? :roll:

Life imprisonment is generally about 25-35 years. In that period, not only can the prisoner kill again in prison, but can make appeals for release, can make deals for early release, can obtain a lawyer and find ways to get the case thrown out, can escape, or can simply serve his sentence and return to society. I know there are hundreds, if not thousands, of cases where men (and women) who have served life sentences have returned to society only to commit more violent crimes. I have a friend who was raped and killed by just such a person. So, yeah, you don't really know what you're talking about.

With repsect, your talking out of your ass. Death penalty doesn't make streets any safer than prison, Europe is a safer place than America and all countries within the EU do not impose the death penalty. Maybe it is about the causes of crime and not just killing them off... it's pathetic and mindless.

It doesn't appear you know what is going on in the discussion. I'm curious, are you reading, or just repeating your last response when you're not sure what to say?
Avatar image for greeneye59
greeneye59

1079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 greeneye59
Member since 2003 • 1079 Posts

The punishment should fit the crime. 

There's nothing worse than a murderer spending some odd years in prison only to be released and free to live their life.  Or to spend the rest of their life in prison playing basketball and games everyday and laughing it up with their buddies and having a seemingly jolly time.  And their victim can't do a damn thing.

Avatar image for leeveeu
leeveeu

3405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#80 leeveeu
Member since 2003 • 3405 Posts
Some people simply do not deserve to live. Life is not only a right, we all have tons of obligations. And why should the tax payers feed criminals???
Avatar image for swamprat_basic
swamprat_basic

9145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#81 swamprat_basic
Member since 2002 • 9145 Posts
I think the death penalty is used too often, but I don't disagree with it completely. There are some people in the world who are monsters, and they will continue to do monstrous things unless society takes action against them. There are some crimes so horrible that for anybody to commit them shows a twisted pathology from which there really is no recovery or redemption. Some people will continue to kill and rape no matter what, and not only do they not deserve to live, it is a waste of time and money to keep them alive when they will most likely continue their ways in prison.

Personally, I don't think premeditated murder is the worst possible crime, though it seems to be the one most likely to result in the death penalty. I think that acts of sexual violence and anything involving the molestation of children are the worst possible crimes, and people who commit those crimes are not really capable of change.
Avatar image for Taxpaying_Acorn
Taxpaying_Acorn

4952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#82 Taxpaying_Acorn
Member since 2004 • 4952 Posts
I believe it's the crimnals choice...atrain4
Once they're convicted of a crime, criminals shouldn't have any rights or any choice in anything. I think it's up to the victims closest living relative.
Avatar image for ROLFCHANK
ROLFCHANK

1085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 ROLFCHANK
Member since 2006 • 1085 Posts
i doubt the death penalty is an effective deterrent to murder. i'd imagine the number of people we have on death row in the first place isn't staggeringly high at all, and the number of people we actually do execute is probably miniscule. i believe there have been studies to this effect. that seems to leave the "eye for an eye" justification. i'm not too big on that, but that's just me.
Avatar image for snrsmith23
snrsmith23

1833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#84 snrsmith23
Member since 2004 • 1833 Posts
Timothy McVeigh killed 168 people (19 of which were children) in the Oklahoma City bombing and was executed for it on June 11, 2001. I would like to know how anyone doesn't think he deserved to get executed.
Avatar image for Marx_Brother
Marx_Brother

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Marx_Brother
Member since 2007 • 726 Posts

Timothy McVeigh killed 168 people (19 of which were children) in the Oklahoma City bombing and was executed for it on June 11, 2001. I would like to know how anyone doesn't think he deserved to get executed.snrsmith23

I would rather see killers like that spend their entire life in prison or hard labor because that is a lot worse than getting the death sentence.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#86 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
Some people don't deserve to live. It's as simple as that.
Avatar image for daniel52587
daniel52587

3028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#87 daniel52587
Member since 2005 • 3028 Posts
It is an efficient way of getting rid of the scum that live on this earth. And it saves us money if we kill a criminal, rather than keep him alive and pay for his food and what not. 
Avatar image for daniel52587
daniel52587

3028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#88 daniel52587
Member since 2005 • 3028 Posts

[QUOTE="snrsmith23"]Timothy McVeigh killed 168 people (19 of which were children) in the Oklahoma City bombing and was executed for it on June 11, 2001. I would like to know how anyone doesn't think he deserved to get executed.Marx_Brother

I would rather see killers like that spend their entire life in prison or hard labor because that is a lot worse than getting the death sentence.

But that costs us money. It wastes our tax money we give up to the government. They waste it as it is on foreign crap, the last thing we need is for it to be wasted on a bunch of low life criminals.
Avatar image for BadAndy642
BadAndy642

1069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 BadAndy642
Member since 2006 • 1069 Posts

Some people are monsters and don't deserve to live and have food and shelter on our money.  The death penalty should be called for the most horrible crimes only, but they should speed up the process,  because we waste so much of our tax money to keep these fiends alive.  Some people will call me barbaric, but it would cost less than $30 to put a bullet in their head and incinerate the body.  A lot better than wasting thousands on lethal injection if you ask me.

Avatar image for Taxpaying_Acorn
Taxpaying_Acorn

4952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#90 Taxpaying_Acorn
Member since 2004 • 4952 Posts
It is an efficient way of getting rid of the scum that live on this earth. And it saves us money if we kill a criminal, rather than keep him alive and pay for his food and what not. daniel52587
I think I read somewhere that the cost is about the same for either option. But don't quote me on that.
Avatar image for Marx_Brother
Marx_Brother

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Marx_Brother
Member since 2007 • 726 Posts
[QUOTE="Marx_Brother"]

[QUOTE="snrsmith23"]Timothy McVeigh killed 168 people (19 of which were children) in the Oklahoma City bombing and was executed for it on June 11, 2001. I would like to know how anyone doesn't think he deserved to get executed.daniel52587

I would rather see killers like that spend their entire life in prison or hard labor because that is a lot worse than getting the death sentence.

But that costs us money. It wastes our tax money we give up to the government. They waste it as it is on foreign crap, the last thing we need is for it to be wasted on a bunch of low life criminals.

... It costs you a lot of money to have them executed as well... either way it costs money. Plus, it's not about the money in your pocket, idiot, it's about the criminal.

Avatar image for romocop33
romocop33

2755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 romocop33
Member since 2005 • 2755 Posts
[QUOTE="romocop33"]in california, which has the largest death row population, the death penalty costs taxpayers $114 million per year past what it costs to keep killers in prison for life without parole.PercivalCox
Are you really saying that it costs more to be dead than alive? Cause that's more than just a stretch

you can believe whatever you want, but the fact is that is does. research some numbers for yourself. do you know how much it costs for all the appeals that death row inmates go through? as far as prison overcrowding, why don't we let the 500,000+ people in for drug offenses out and worry about the real criminals.
Avatar image for ROLFCHANK
ROLFCHANK

1085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 ROLFCHANK
Member since 2006 • 1085 Posts
[QUOTE="PercivalCox"][QUOTE="romocop33"] as far as prison overcrowding, why don't we let the 500,000+ people in for drug offenses out and worry about the real criminals.romocop33
Avatar image for yoshi-lnex
yoshi-lnex

5442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 yoshi-lnex
Member since 2007 • 5442 Posts
No, it's wrong for anybody to take the life of another.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#95 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
I don't generally support it.  Only in extreme cases.
Avatar image for ROLFCHANK
ROLFCHANK

1085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 ROLFCHANK
Member since 2006 • 1085 Posts
No, it's wrong for anybody to take the life of another.yoshi-lnex
this is far too broad a statement. killing someone in self defense is "taking the life of another". i assume you dont mean to say that we should discard the self defense justification for killing someone.
Avatar image for dhyce
dhyce

5609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 dhyce
Member since 2003 • 5609 Posts
I don't see the point in keeping people alive that are of no value to society or mankind in general. Taking up space in jail where they can do more harm to those that actually can better themselves seems pointless. The death penalty makes perfect sense in my eyes.
Avatar image for romocop33
romocop33

2755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 romocop33
Member since 2005 • 2755 Posts
[QUOTE="dhyce"]I don't see the point in keeping people alive that are of no value to society or mankind in general. Taking up space in jail where they can do more harm to those that actually can better themselves seems pointless. The death penalty makes perfect sense in my eyes.

so we should probably kill all the invalids too then? people in a vegetative state that cannot move or talk or do anything don't really have a value to society.
Avatar image for dhyce
dhyce

5609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 dhyce
Member since 2003 • 5609 Posts

so we should probably kill all the invalids too then? people in a vegetative state that cannot move or talk or do anything don't really have a value to society. romocop33

....

If there's a prospect for recovery then of course they should be kept alive. If there's no hope then it's a healthy move for the family to just let go. Comatose patients who can potentially recover and live a happy life =/= crazed maniac who slaughters and rapes people.

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#100 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts
We kill the criminals to show criminals not to kill people, apparently. :?