[QUOTE="Makhaidos"]Her strength is in her storytelling moreso than her writing. From a technical perspective, her writing is very mediocre.AdrianWerner
Uhh..not really. She has pretty damn good writing style. It was simple in Harry Potter, because that's what's necessary for children/YA novel. But even there it was descriptive, fluid and very concrete. The simplicity and directness was obviously an concious choice, because her adult books have very different and much richer style.
"Very mediocre writing" would cause children to stop reading after chapter or two. A book like that wouldn't be able to pull kids through hundreds of pages, no matter how good the actual story would be. Writing for children is the hardest form of writing from technical perspective.
Simplicity is not the same as mediocre writing. Her adult books reflect the same technical styles as her Harry Potter books: strong story, sketchy technique.Children don't care about the writing--they don't know the difference. They care about the story, which, as I said, is Rowling's greatest strength--hence her popularity. Are children looking at this big magical world where kids can go to learn how to cast spells in a fun and sometimes terrifying manner, or are they looking at the frequent and unnecessary use of adverbs and gerunds?
And writing does not need to be overly simplified or technically mediocre for children to enjoy--as shown by books like the Chronicles of Narnia and the works of John Green.
Log in to comment