[QUOTE="sonicmj1"]The McCain campaign could never have gotten all the Hillary supporters without sacrificing the conservative vote. But that doesn't mean that courting some of them is impossible. Part of Obama's mission at the convention was to demonstrate himself as a supporter of women's rights, declaring that he would fight for equal pay for equal work, to attract the women who voted for Hillary because they believed in women's rights and a female president. This pick is a counter to that move, an attempt to tell women who voted for Hillary because of that 'glass ceiling' that she was putting cracks in that a vote for McCain would be a vote for the future of women's rights, solely on the virtue of putting a female in the White House, in a position to become President.
I'm sure the McCain campaign was aware of the obstacles, but they were also aware of the upsides despite them, and that's why they made the choice they did.
Theokhoth
I think that the McCain party would be more focused on appealing to Conservatives rather than Hillary supporters, as
1. There are many more of them, and
2. They've been complaining about McCain's moderation since the beginning.
Palin's Conservative views are more right-wing than McCain's, so her position as VP might have pissed off Conservatives rethinking their position on voting for McCain, and it would also rake in more potential voters than appealing to the Hillary fanbase. And let's not forget the new voters: college students tend to criticise McCain's age, but now that a young and attractive woman is his VP, he may become more aesthetically pleasing to younger voters who believe looks mean everything. Not to mention college feminists.
I just think you're being way too black-and-white about it.
Is Sarah Palin really the only conservative choice out there?
He definitely had to pick a conservative voice. If he picked someone like Mitt Romney, he might have alienated a large portion of the Republican party. Choosing Palin does more than just appeal to conservatives, though, and as I said before, a large part of why she won out over other candidates has to do with her gender. It's not sexist or anything, it's just politics, like picking a VP candidate from a different region to get better appeal in that area.
It's a risky choice, but it could pay off for them. There are definitely large potential upsides. A lot will depend on what she says and does in the coming weeks, though, because she really is an unknown, and if she doesn't appear informed, she will get hammered.
Log in to comment