This topic is locked from further discussion.
Having errors posting? Turn off your WYSIWYG editor.shadowchroniclethank you based ranger what would we all do without you so helpful
[QUOTE="shadowchronicle"]Having errors posting? Turn off your WYSIWYG editor.cheese_game619thank you based ranger what would we all do without you so helpful You're so smart.
[QUOTE="cheese_game619"][QUOTE="shadowchronicle"]Having errors posting? Turn off your WYSIWYG editor.shadowchroniclethank you based ranger what would we all do without you so helpful You're so smart.you're so raven
Freddie was awesome....but MJ put on a Spectacular Show, not just music and dancing, but sets, effects etc.
No, in terms of live peformance, no one is even close to Freddie Mercury.
V4LENT1NE
[QUOTE="V4LENT1NE"]Freddie was awesome....but MJ put on a Spectacular Show, not just music and dancing, but sets, effects etc. The music should always surpass special effects and sets, dancing etc.
No, in terms of live peformance, no one is even close to Freddie Mercury.
FelipeInside
[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="V4LENT1NE"]Freddie was awesome....but MJ put on a Spectacular Show, not just music and dancing, but sets, effects etc. The music should always surpass special effects and sets, dancing etc. That was what was great about the King of Pop. His music, his dancing, his shows, effects everything was top quality. A TOTAL package.
No, in terms of live peformance, no one is even close to Freddie Mercury.
V4LENT1NE
InEMpleaseFerenec/Franz Liszt made anti-semitic statments he should not be mentioned in a topic like this. He was a bitter man who belittled the Jewish people. "The day will come when all nations amidst which the Jews are dwelling will have to raise the question of their wholesale expulsion, a question which will be one of life or death, good health or chronic disease, peaceful existence or perpetual social fever." Yeah **** him, his music is decent but I could never listen to him perform it because how bigoted he is (well was). So I love his music but I would not pay for a concert if he was still alive.
Op, you barely know about performers. MJ was as overated as chocolate milk, he wasnt bad but he wasnt near as good as you people make him sound. I ve seen him live so i know what i m talking about.Solid_Tango
No. That doesn't mean anything.
Op, you barely know about performers. MJ was as overated as chocolate milk, he wasnt bad but he wasnt near as good as you people make him sound. I ve seen him live so i know what i m talking about.Solid_TangoI like chocolate milk. :cry:
[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="V4LENT1NE"] The music should always surpass special effects and sets, dancing etc.V4LENT1NEThat was what was great about the King of Pop. His music, his dancing, his shows, effects everything was top quality. A TOTAL package. Doesnt really matter though, if I go to a concert I go for amazing music, it shouldnt have to be hightened by effects and dancing. Look at Queen at Live Aid, just a band and a stage and Queen got 70,000 people to clap at Radio Gaga even at the far back, that is what a concert is all about. If we go by your logic that means Britney Spears was better than Queen and Elvis becuase she dances and has fancy lighting...
I think that stuff does matter at a concert. Even so, take all that away and MJ is still the greatest! Absolute greatest!
Doesnt really matter though, if I go to a concert I go for amazing music, it shouldnt have to be hightened by effects and dancing. Look at Queen at Live Aid, just a band and a stage and Queen got 70,000 people to clap at Radio Gaga even at the far back, that is what a concert is all about. If we go by your logic that means Britney Spears was better than Queen and Elvis becuase she dances and has fancy lighting...[QUOTE="V4LENT1NE"][QUOTE="FelipeInside"] That was what was great about the King of Pop. His music, his dancing, his shows, effects everything was top quality. A TOTAL package.sayyy-gaa
I think that stuff does matter at a concert. Even so, take all that away and MJ is still the greatest! Absolute greatest!
That "matters" at concerts where the performance itself isn't strong. Anyway on topic...no he wasn't. That's just your opinion. Hell I don't even think his music was that interesting. Just basic pop music....*yawn*[QUOTE="sayyy-gaa"][QUOTE="V4LENT1NE"] Doesnt really matter though, if I go to a concert I go for amazing music, it shouldnt have to be hightened by effects and dancing. Look at Queen at Live Aid, just a band and a stage and Queen got 70,000 people to clap at Radio Gaga even at the far back, that is what a concert is all about. If we go by your logic that means Britney Spears was better than Queen and Elvis becuase she dances and has fancy lighting...LJS9502_basic
I think that stuff does matter at a concert. Even so, take all that away and MJ is still the greatest! Absolute greatest!
That "matters" at concerts where the performance itself isn't strong. Anyway on topic...no he wasn't. That's just your opinion. Hell I don't even think his music was that interesting. Just basic pop music....*yawn* what you mean is MJ was an entertainer more than a musicianPlease Log In to post.
Log in to comment