Noted Arizona Sheriff raids Sizzler Restaurants for hiring illegals

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#251 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]... People desperate enough will always come ot the United States.. But they wouldn't do so in such great numbers if businesses weren't willing to hire them illegally.. The businesses should be the ones not punished, not the illegals whoa re often times risking their lives and are desperate.. This isn't to suggest that they should or should not be deported, but we wouldn't have this "supposed" problem if it weren't for businesses willing to brekat he law.. That being said I think entirelly too much is focused on this imo, there are far bigger fishes to fry that cost the nationf ar more money then illegals imo.LJS9502_basic
I totally agree the businesses should be targeted as well....

As do I.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#252 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
And as I've explained at least twice to you....the parents are NOT deported because the baby is legal. That is the concept I was referring to before dude...LJS9502_basic
The supreme court have said the exact opposite. Having a baby cannot qualify as a means of disqualifying you from deportation.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#253 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180194 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"] I think the facts are questionable to say the least. Like we've discussed, it just doesn't seem likely at all that that number of supposedly illegal immigrants are on welfare. There is no way to gain welfare as an illegal immigrant besides very well executed identity theft. That would be a fairly huge number of people who are incredibly effective at forgery. Ninja-Hippo

Well because you don't understand it....doesn't mean it isn't so.


New statistics from the Department of Public Social Services reveal that illegal aliens and their families in Los Angeles County collected over $37 million in welfare and food stamp allocations in November 2007 – up $3 million dollars from September, announced Los Angeles County Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich.

Twenty five percent of the all welfare and food stamps benefits is going directly to the children of illegal aliens. Illegals collected over $20 million in welfare assistance for November 2007 and over $16 million in monthly food stamp allocations for a projected annual cost of $444 million.

"This new information shows an alarming increase in the devastating impact Illegal immigration continues to have on Los Angeles County taxpayers," said Antonovich. "With $220 million for public safety $400 million for healthcare, and $444 million in welfare allocations, the total cost for illegal immigrants to County taxpayers far exceeds $1 billion a year – not including the millions of dollars for education."

I do understand it perfectly well, i'm merely asking questions. >_> My query is whether these people are actually still ILLEGAL are once were illegal immigrants but have since gained citizenship but are still referred to as illegal in these statistics as that is where they have been derived. I just don't see how any state could give welfare to someone who isn't even a legal citizen.

Did you notice the stat mentioned illegal?
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#254 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

[QUOTE="topsemag55"]

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"] I think the facts are questionable to say the least. Like we've discussed, it just doesn't seem likely at all that that number of supposedly illegal immigrants are on welfare. There is no way to gain welfare as an illegal immigrant besides very well executed identity theft. That would be a fairly huge number of people who are incredibly effective at forgery. Ninja-Hippo

Because babies are automatically given Social Security numbers.:?

Indeed but a baby cannot apply for welfare can it? The parents would have to expose themselves as illegal immigrants in making a welfare application.

LJS isn't pulling this out of a hat, it's happening.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#255 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180194 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]And as I've explained at least twice to you....the parents are NOT deported because the baby is legal. That is the concept I was referring to before dude...Ninja-Hippo
The supreme court have said the exact opposite. Having a baby cannot qualify as a means of disqualifying you from deportation.

Ah but what they say and what is done in practice are two different things....

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#256 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

LJS isn't pulling this out of a hat, it's happening.

topsemag55

I didn't say it wasn't happening, i was merely asking questions to better understand how these things work... >_> The problem is that what the law says is the case and what actually takes place in the real world are very often two different things.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#257 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
Did you notice the stat mentioned illegal?LJS9502_basic
Yes indeed and that's why i just asked are they STILL illegal or does the stat refer to people who were ONCE illegal? Because as i said, it doesn't make sense to me that a state would give welfare to a person they know is illegal if by very definition being illegal disqualifies you from welfare.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#258 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180194 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Did you notice the stat mentioned illegal?Ninja-Hippo
Yes indeed and that's why i just asked are they STILL illegal or does the stat refer to people who were ONCE illegal? Because as i said, it doesn't make sense to me that a state would give welfare to a person they know is illegal if by very definition being illegal disqualifies you from welfare.

I've answered that but here...I highlighted it for you....

New statistics from the Department of Public Social Services reveal that illegal aliens and their families in Los Angeles County

Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#259 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

LJS, looks like Arizona might add an anchor baby amendment to their new law, to invalidate the citizenship. Link

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#260 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180194 Posts

LJS, looks like Arizona might add an anchor baby amendment to their new law, to invalidate the citizenship.

topsemag55

Good now if the rest of the states follow Arizona's example...we might not need the feds to handle the problem...since they refuse to do so.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#261 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23350 Posts
[QUOTE="topsemag55"]

LJS, looks like Arizona might add an anchor baby amendment to their new law, to invalidate the citizenship. Link

I don't think that can be done at the state level. Perhaps they're trying to thrust the issue into the spotlight in an attempt to force the federal government to address it?
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#262 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

Ok, I'm seriously going offline now, but the study specifically referred to tax payments vs. government services.

"A new study from the Center for Immigration Studies is one of the first to estimate the impact of illegal immigration on the federal budget. Based on Census Bureau data, the study estimates that households headed by illegal aliens used $10 billion more in government services than they paid in taxes in 2002. These figures are only for the federal government; costs at the state and local level are also likely to be significant. The study also finds that if illegals were given amnesty, the fiscal deficit at the federal level would grow to nearly $29 billion."

Link to CIS page

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#263 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Did you notice the stat mentioned illegal?LJS9502_basic

Yes indeed and that's why i just asked are they STILL illegal or does the stat refer to people who were ONCE illegal? Because as i said, it doesn't make sense to me that a state would give welfare to a person they know is illegal if by very definition being illegal disqualifies you from welfare.

I've answered that but here...I highlighted it for you....

New statistics from the Department of Public Social Services reveal that illegal aliens and their families in Los Angeles County

Yes but for the third time my question was whether they STILL ARE illegal or whether the study is of people who arrived in America as illegal immigrants, as other studies have taken that approach. Never mind. >_>
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#264 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="topsemag55"]

LJS, looks like Arizona might add an anchor baby amendment to their new law, to invalidate the citizenship. Link

I don't think that can be done at the state level. Perhaps they're trying to thrust the issue into the spotlight in an attempt to force the federal government to address it?

I think this is definitely their approach to be honest, and it makes sense. The government typically take much too long to get anything done, and therefore forcing an issue into the media can often be an effective tool in enacting some decent change. I don't think Arizona is completely happy with the measures they're taking, but if it gets the federal government to take notice and do something to help it's a worthy strategy.
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#265 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

[QUOTE="topsemag55"]

LJS, looks like Arizona might add an anchor baby amendment to their new law, to invalidate the citizenship. Link

mattbbpl

I don't think that can be done at the state level. Perhaps they're trying to thrust the issue into the spotlight in an attempt to force the federal government to address it?

Individual states maintain birth records, not the federal government. Your own birth certificate is in the courthouse in the state you were born in, that's why you have to apply at the state level to get a certified copy with a state seal.

Thus, a state should be able to invalidate births within their own jurisdiction.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#266 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="topsemag55"]

LJS, looks like Arizona might add an anchor baby amendment to their new law, to invalidate the citizenship. Link

topsemag55

I don't think that can be done at the state level. Perhaps they're trying to thrust the issue into the spotlight in an attempt to force the federal government to address it?

Individual states maintain birth records, not the federal government. Your own birth certificate is in the courthouse in the state you were born in, that's why you have to apply at the state level to get a certified copy with a state seal.

Thus, a state should be able to invalidate births within their own jurisdiction.

Because it pertains to immigration however i think it's inevitable that the federal government will intervene at some point along the line.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#267 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180194 Posts

Ok, I'm seriously going offline now, but the study specifically referred to tax payments vs. government services.

"A new study from the Center for Immigration Studies is one of the first to estimate the impact of illegal immigration on the federal budget. Based on Census Bureau data, the study estimates that households headed by illegal aliens used $10 billion more in government services than they paid in taxes in 2002. These figures are only for the federal government; costs at the state and local level are also likely to be significant. The study also finds that if illegals were given amnesty, the fiscal deficit at the federal level would grow to nearly $29 billion."

coolbeans90

Which means they cost tax payers...and are not contributing enough money to cover their expenses...yes. That is not good for the economy...but I await your proof. to the contrary....still.

Avatar image for Alter_Echo
Alter_Echo

10724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#268 Alter_Echo
Member since 2003 • 10724 Posts

Not really that amazing. Back when i worked for Tyson Foods they had ONE processing plant that got busted with over 200 illegals working there....at that one spot...and they have hundreds of locations nationwide.

The breeder farm my father ran? Close to 15 employees. How many of them were legal? Zero.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#269 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

Not really that amazing. Back when i worked for Tyson Foods they had ONE processing plant that got busted with over 200 illegals working there....at that one spot...and they have hundreds of locations nationwide.

The breeder farm my father ran? Close to 15 employees. How many of them were legal? Zero.

Alter_Echo
There have been five chinese restaurants where i live which have all been busted for hiring illegals. Also did you mean to say ILLEGAL or did your father employ illegal immigrants? :o
Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#270 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts
Oh man, its no wonder that almost all the other countries in America hate the U.S. I don't like to get into problems but I think the only country that is completely ally to the United States is Canada, the others just hate it, especially Mexico and possibly Colombia.
Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#271 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23350 Posts
[QUOTE="topsemag55"]

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="topsemag55"]

LJS, looks like Arizona might add an anchor baby amendment to their new law, to invalidate the citizenship. Link

I don't think that can be done at the state level. Perhaps they're trying to thrust the issue into the spotlight in an attempt to force the federal government to address it?

Individual states maintain birth records, not the federal government. Your own birth certificate is in the courthouse in the state you were born in, that's why you have to apply at the state level to get a certified copy with a state seal.

Thus, a state should be able to invalidate births within their own jurisdiction.

So, to play devil's advocate here, a state could choose to invalidate the births of an ethnic group (for example) and thereby deny them federal citizenship? I would think that the issuance and mainenance of birth records at the state level would pertain to just that - the procedures involved with issuing and maintaining them. I wouldn't think they would be able to deny birth certificates on the grounds that they don't like the circumstances under which the individuals were born.
Avatar image for Alter_Echo
Alter_Echo

10724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#272 Alter_Echo
Member since 2003 • 10724 Posts
[QUOTE="Alter_Echo"]

Not really that amazing. Back when i worked for Tyson Foods they had ONE processing plant that got busted with over 200 illegals working there....at that one spot...and they have hundreds of locations nationwide.

The breeder farm my father ran? Close to 15 employees. How many of them were legal? Zero.

Ninja-Hippo
There have been five chinese restaurants where i live which have all been busted for hiring illegals. Also did you mean to say ILLEGAL or did your father employ illegal immigrants? :o

He had nothing to do with hiring. He just managed the farm. Tyson supplied the labor. The illegal labor.
Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#273 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23350 Posts
Oh man, its no wonder that almost all the other countries in America hate the U.S. I don't like to get into problems but I think the only country that is completely ally to the United States is Canada, the others just hate it, especially Mexico and possibly Colombia. Miroku32
Doesn't Mexico treat it's illegal immigrants much harsher? I don't see why other countries would despise the US on the grounds of deporting illegal immigrants back to their home countries.
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#274 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

So, to play devil's advocate here, a state could choose to invalidate the births of an ethnic group (for example) and thereby deny them federal citizenship? I would think that the issuance and mainenance of birth records at the state level would pertain to just that - the procedures involved with issuing and maintaining them. I wouldn't think they would be able to deny birth certificates on the grounds that they don't like the circumstances under which the individuals were born.mattbbpl

No, the intent of the 14th amendment was for recently-freed African-Americans. Laws were passed later to include Native Americans, Eskimos, etc.

Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#275 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts
[QUOTE="Miroku32"]Oh man, its no wonder that almost all the other countries in America hate the U.S. I don't like to get into problems but I think the only country that is completely ally to the United States is Canada, the others just hate it, especially Mexico and possibly Colombia. mattbbpl
Doesn't Mexico treat it's illegal immigrants much harsher? I don't see why other countries would despise the US on the grounds of deporting illegal immigrants back to their home countries.

Panama has alot of colombians illegal inmigrants and we don't kick them out unless they do a crime (something that they usually do sadly). Don't know about the Mexicans because I don't live there but enter in any forum of the hispanicamericans and when you mention the United States I can assure you it isn't something nice.
Avatar image for xhellcatx
xhellcatx

9015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#276 xhellcatx
Member since 2006 • 9015 Posts
I am glad they busted them. They were here illegally. Therefore, because they were here illegally, they should be removed. Illegal aliens take jobs that legal citizens could have, and in a very tough job market, every job opportunity is a precious commodity. Illegal is illegal. Thats all there is too it. Break the law, suffer the consequences.
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#277 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

I am glad they busted them. They were here illegally. Therefore, because they were here illegally, they should be removed. Illegal aliens take jobs that legal citizens could have, and in a very tough job market, every job opportunity is a precious commodity. Illegal is illegal. Thats all there is too it. Break the law, suffer the consequences. xhellcatx

You go, hellcat.:P

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#278 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50149 Posts
That's great news.
Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#279 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23350 Posts
[QUOTE="topsemag55"]

No, the intent of the 14th amendment was for recently-freed African-Americans. Laws were passed later to include Native Americans, Eskimos, etc.

I was referring to your comment, "Thus, a state should be able to invalidate births within their own jurisdiction." I think being able to deny birth certificates and citizenship at the state level gives the states far too much power at the federal level.
Avatar image for xhellcatx
xhellcatx

9015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#280 xhellcatx
Member since 2006 • 9015 Posts

[QUOTE="xhellcatx"]I am glad they busted them. They were here illegally. Therefore, because they were here illegally, they should be removed. Illegal aliens take jobs that legal citizens could have, and in a very tough job market, every job opportunity is a precious commodity. Illegal is illegal. Thats all there is too it. Break the law, suffer the consequences. topsemag55

You go, hellcat.:P

:oops: hehe thanks. Your ava freaks me out btw. ^_^ *gives the half horse a cookie* >_> *whispers* please dont eat me!
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#281 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180194 Posts

[QUOTE="topsemag55"]

No, the intent of the 14th amendment was for recently-freed African-Americans. Laws were passed later to include Native Americans, Eskimos, etc.

mattbbpl

I was referring to your comment, "Thus, a state should be able to invalidate births within their own jurisdiction." I think being able to deny birth certificates and citizenship at the state level gives the states far too much power at the federal level.

Ah and now the states rights argument commences. For the record....the federal level was never supposed to have as much power as they've given themselves.

Avatar image for Alter_Echo
Alter_Echo

10724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#282 Alter_Echo
Member since 2003 • 10724 Posts

I would have a bit more compassion ( ie any at all ) for illegals if it werent so hilariously easy to get legal citizenship here.

They dont want that though. They just want to come work here, under the table, tax free and then send their money back to mexico without putting any of it back into the economy.

Its just too easy for them to get construction or landscaping jobs on a daily basis that pay cash. And then every friday when i go to the gas station i see 20 of them at the western union kiosk sending it all back to mexico via money orders.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#283 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23350 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="topsemag55"]

No, the intent of the 14th amendment was for recently-freed African-Americans. Laws were passed later to include Native Americans, Eskimos, etc.

I was referring to your comment, "Thus, a state should be able to invalidate births within their own jurisdiction." I think being able to deny birth certificates and citizenship at the state level gives the states far too much power at the federal level.

Ah and notwthe states rights argument commences. For the record....the federal level was never supposed to have as much power as they've given themselves.

I'm confused... Why would it be a good idea to allow states to deny/suppply federal citizenship based on their own criteria?
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#284 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="topsemag55"]

No, the intent of the 14th amendment was for recently-freed African-Americans. Laws were passed later to include Native Americans, Eskimos, etc.

LJS9502_basic

I was referring to your comment, "Thus, a state should be able to invalidate births within their own jurisdiction." I think being able to deny birth certificates and citizenship at the state level gives the states far too much power at the federal level.

Ah and now the states rights argument commences. For the record....the federal level was never supposed to have as much power as they've given themselves.

Correct LJS, and we have an amendment covering rights to the states that are not federal, do we not?:P

Avatar image for xhellcatx
xhellcatx

9015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#285 xhellcatx
Member since 2006 • 9015 Posts

I would have a bit more compassion ( ie any at all ) for illegals if it werent so hilariously easy to get legal citizenship here.

They dont want that though. They just want to come work here, under the table, tax free and then send their money back to mexico without putting any of it back into the economy.

Its just too easy for them to get construction or landscaping jobs on a daily basis that pay cash. And then every friday when i go to the gas station i see 20 of them at the western union kiosk sending it all back to mexico via money orders.

Alter_Echo
... its not easy to get legal citizenship here.... trust me.
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#286 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

[QUOTE="topsemag55"]

[QUOTE="xhellcatx"]I am glad they busted them. They were here illegally. Therefore, because they were here illegally, they should be removed. Illegal aliens take jobs that legal citizens could have, and in a very tough job market, every job opportunity is a precious commodity. Illegal is illegal. Thats all there is too it. Break the law, suffer the consequences. xhellcatx

You go, hellcat.:P

:oops: hehe thanks. Your ava freaks me out btw. ^_^ *gives the half horse a cookie* >_> *whispers* please dont eat me!

*horse enjoys his cookie* Nope, horses like hellcats.:oops:

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#287 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180194 Posts

I'm confused... Why would it be a good idea to allow states to deny/suppply federal citizenship based on their own criteria?mattbbpl
I merely pointed out what the argument was devolving into and did mention the feds took more control from the states. I didn't actually address the issue here...but if enough states pushed for it...the feds would have to handle it. Remember that cushy job they have? They really really don't want to lose it.

Avatar image for Elephant_Couple
Elephant_Couple

1404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#288 Elephant_Couple
Member since 2010 • 1404 Posts

Good. I hope they do this daily. After all the uproar, the boycotting, and the rhetoric, the federal government STILL hasn't done anything; they are utterly incompetent.

Arizona has my absolute, full support.

Avatar image for xhellcatx
xhellcatx

9015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#289 xhellcatx
Member since 2006 • 9015 Posts

[QUOTE="xhellcatx"][QUOTE="topsemag55"]

You go, hellcat.:P

topsemag55

:oops: hehe thanks. Your ava freaks me out btw. ^_^ *gives the half horse a cookie* >_> *whispers* please dont eat me!

*horse enjoys his cookie* Nope, horses like hellcats.:oops:

*doesnt know if she should :oops: or be :shock: and run away... so freezes and :shock: :oops: 's* ...
Avatar image for Elephant_Couple
Elephant_Couple

1404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#290 Elephant_Couple
Member since 2010 • 1404 Posts

[QUOTE="topsemag55"]

Joe Arpaio is an Italian-American, so this defeats any bias arguments.:P

weezyfb

italian americans can still be bias

Do you mean 'biased'? Bias is not an adjective.

Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#291 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

[QUOTE="topsemag55"]

[QUOTE="xhellcatx"] :oops: hehe thanks. Your ava freaks me out btw. ^_^ *gives the half horse a cookie* >_> *whispers* please dont eat me!xhellcatx

*horse enjoys his cookie* Nope, horses like hellcats.:oops:

*doesnt know if she should :oops: or be :shock: and run away... so freezes and :shock: :oops: 's* ...

You got me good with that post.:lol: My horse would protect you from your mortal enemy, all those barking dogs. He'll stomp them for you.:P

Besides, you were the very first after me to give him anything, so he likes you.:)

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#292 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180194 Posts

[QUOTE="xhellcatx"][QUOTE="topsemag55"]

*horse enjoys his cookie* Nope, horses like hellcats.:oops:

topsemag55

*doesnt know if she should :oops: or be :shock: and run away... so freezes and :shock: :oops: 's* ...

You got me good with that post.:lol: My horse would protect you from your mortal enemy, all those barking dogs. He'll stomp them for you.:P

He's only got two legs....he'll fall over...:o

Oh..and ten yard penalty for over use of emoticons you two.....

Avatar image for Sp4rtan_3
Sp4rtan_3

3495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#293 Sp4rtan_3
Member since 2010 • 3495 Posts
Good job Hopefully the are deported and never allowed back in this country again.
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#294 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

He's only got two legs....he'll fall over...:o

Oh..and ten yard penalty for over use of emoticons you two.....

LJS9502_basic

:lol:

That's why he doesn't stop running, to maintain his balance. He's a running kicker (or stomper).:P

Avatar image for xhellcatx
xhellcatx

9015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#295 xhellcatx
Member since 2006 • 9015 Posts

[QUOTE="xhellcatx"][QUOTE="topsemag55"] *doesnt know if she should :oops: or be :shock: and run away... so freezes and :shock: :oops: 's* ... topsemag55

You got me good with that post.:lol: My horse would protect you from your mortal enemy, all those barking dogs. He'll stomp them for you.:P

He's only got two legs....he'll fall over...:o

:shock: ... i would assume that even 1/2 a horse is still really heavy ..... being squsheded is not on my list of fun activities to do with your friends :( ... so ill just ride on the horses.. um.. neck I guess.. lol. That may protect me ^_^
Avatar image for xhellcatx
xhellcatx

9015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#296 xhellcatx
Member since 2006 • 9015 Posts

[QUOTE="topsemag55"]

[QUOTE="xhellcatx"] *doesnt know if she should :oops: or be :shock: and run away... so freezes and :shock: :oops: 's* ... LJS9502_basic

You got me good with that post.:lol: My horse would protect you from your mortal enemy, all those barking dogs. He'll stomp them for you.:P

He's only got two legs....he'll fall over...:o

Oh..and ten yard penalty for over use of emoticons you two.....

:cry: :( *offers vodka*... canni has points back plz? *gives.. .. more vodka. and sexy cookie?* Its in the shape of a corset......
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#297 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

:cry: :( *offers vodka*... canni has points back plz? *gives.. .. more vodka. and sexy cookie?* Its in the shape of a corset......xhellcatx

*Jealous*:cry: wants sexy cookie too.:x

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#298 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180194 Posts

:cry: :( *offers vodka*... canni has points back plz? *gives.. .. more vodka. and sexy cookie?* Its in the shape of a corset......xhellcatx
If it's Three Olives and black....anyway...don't want to get too off topic...teh mods they are everywhere so I will conclude by saying I do agree with your stance on illegal immigration based on what I've read. Is that okay Ninja?;)

Avatar image for xhellcatx
xhellcatx

9015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#299 xhellcatx
Member since 2006 • 9015 Posts
Oh, and Illegal aliens are a drain on the economy in more then just the job market aspect. They do take advantage of the welfare system. Now those who say they dont drain cause they are on welfare, would you say the same for single mothers on welfare? ... cause its the same thing btw. It costs taxpayer money to fund welfare. Another drain on legal citizens is the room they may take up in shelters, and food and clothing they take from food shelves, and aid from local organizations. Now, coming to america the legal way is hard. It really truly is hard. It costs a LOT of money (and yes.. it is a hell of a lot of money to those who want to come here BECAUSE of their poverty), and finding a sponsor for a work visa is more then difficult. There are no other options cept marriage... and like we want that :|
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#300 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"]I'm confused... Why would it be a good idea to allow states to deny/suppply federal citizenship based on their own criteria?LJS9502_basic

I merely pointed out what the argument was devolving into and did mention the feds took more control from the states. I didn't actually address the issue here...but if enough states pushed for it...the feds would have to handle it. Remember that cushy job they have? They really really don't want to lose it.

10th Amendment: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."