He can see the future.
And you thought he was too optimistic!
princeofshapeir
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I feel bad for Romney he looked really sad and it doesn't help how Diane Sawyer keeps saying how he's spent 7 years up to this moment and throwing it in his face.:cry:
TwistedShade
I don't feel bad for him at all. He was very slimy in this campaign.
Anyway, I'm glad that Obama won not only because I like the man and thought he deserved 4 more years, but because the Republicans bad behavior has come unrewarded.
I'll admit Romney handled that with class.
Agreed. I wish that was the man we saw throughout this campaign. He was very humble and dignified, accepted the defeat like a man, and issues a bipartisan message of hopefulness. The problem with campaigns is we very rarely actually get to meet the real person behind the image. We almost always have to deal with his party first and foremost. and the republicans seem to just be getting crazier and crazier, atleast Romney was one of their more sane choices.I feel bad for Romney he looked really sad and it doesn't help how Diane Sawyer keeps saying how he's spent 7 years up to this moment and throwing it in his face.:cry:
TwistedShade
Yeah, Ik even as someone who's never been a Romney supporter, you can't help but feel a little sorrow for the man.
[QUOTE="TwistedShade"]
I feel bad for Romney he looked really sad and it doesn't help how Diane Sawyer keeps saying how he's spent 7 years up to this moment and throwing it in his face.:cry:
GreySeal9
I don't feel bad for him at all. He was very slimy in this campaign.
Anyway, I'm glad that Obama won not only because I like the man and thought he deserved 4 more years, but because the Republicans bad behavior has come unrewarded.
ditto.[QUOTE="TwistedShade"]
I feel bad for Romney he looked really sad and it doesn't help how Diane Sawyer keeps saying how he's spent 7 years up to this moment and throwing it in his face.:cry:
TacticalDesire
Yeah, Ik even as someone who's never been a Romney supporter, you can't help but feel a little sorrow for the man.
Personally, I felt more sorry for McCain in 2008. Romney was never a solid politician. McCain was. We saw in both 2008 and 2012 a Republican candidate transformed by radical elements of his party, forced to betray their principles, and for me seeing McCain do that was painful.[QUOTE="TacticalDesire"][QUOTE="TwistedShade"]
I feel bad for Romney he looked really sad and it doesn't help how Diane Sawyer keeps saying how he's spent 7 years up to this moment and throwing it in his face.:cry:
princeofshapeir
Yeah, Ik even as someone who's never been a Romney supporter, you can't help but feel a little sorrow for the man.
Personally, I felt more sorry for McCain in 2008. Romney was never a solid politician. McCain was. We saw in both 2008 and 2012 a Republican candidate transformed by radical elements of his party, forced to betray their principles, and for me seeing McCain do that was painful. I would've felt more sorry for McCain of 2000, not 2008. I don't get why one should feel sorry for a political person if the person lost fairly.[QUOTE="TacticalDesire"][QUOTE="TwistedShade"]
I feel bad for Romney he looked really sad and it doesn't help how Diane Sawyer keeps saying how he's spent 7 years up to this moment and throwing it in his face.:cry:
princeofshapeir
Yeah, Ik even as someone who's never been a Romney supporter, you can't help but feel a little sorrow for the man.
Personally, I felt more sorry for McCain in 2008. Romney was never a solid politician. McCain was. We saw in both 2008 and 2012 a Republican candidate transformed by radical elements of his party, forced to betray their principles, and for me seeing McCain do that was painful. Defo, McCain was gangsta. If only he didnt make the mistake that was Palin.[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="TacticalDesire"]Personally, I felt more sorry for McCain in 2008. Romney was never a solid politician. McCain was. We saw in both 2008 and 2012 a Republican candidate transformed by radical elements of his party, forced to betray their principles, and for me seeing McCain do that was painful. I would've felt more sorry for McCain of 2000, not 2008. I don't get why one should feel sorry for a political person if the person lost fairly.Yeah, Ik even as someone who's never been a Romney supporter, you can't help but feel a little sorrow for the man.
Ring_of_fire
1. 2000 McCain should have won the nomination.
2. 2008 McCain was forced by the Republican party to choose a rightwing lunatic as his running mate.
3. 2008 McCain was forced to 180 all of his principles in an effort to appeal tot he base.
4. There was no chance of McCain winning 2008 at all simply because Dubya goofed hard and Obama was the sure favorite.
I would've felt more sorry for McCain of 2000, not 2008. I don't get why one should feel sorry for a political person if the person lost fairly.[QUOTE="Ring_of_fire"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] Personally, I felt more sorry for McCain in 2008. Romney was never a solid politician. McCain was. We saw in both 2008 and 2012 a Republican candidate transformed by radical elements of his party, forced to betray their principles, and for me seeing McCain do that was painful. princeofshapeir
1. 2000 McCain should have won the nomination.
2. 2008 McCain was forced by the Republican party to choose a rightwing lunatic as his running mate.
3. 2008 McCain was forced to 180 all of his principles in an effort to appeal tot he base.
4. There was no chance of McCain winning 2008 at all simply because Dubya goofed hard and Obama was the sure favorite.
Not denying #1. But #2-3 was his own fault. He didn't have to sell his soul. #4, can't feel sorry for someone fairly losing a campaign, especially when he contributed to said loss (Sarah Palin)[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="Ring_of_fire"] I would've felt more sorry for McCain of 2000, not 2008. I don't get why one should feel sorry for a political person if the person lost fairly.Ring_of_fire
1. 2000 McCain should have won the nomination.
2. 2008 McCain was forced by the Republican party to choose a rightwing lunatic as his running mate.
3. 2008 McCain was forced to 180 all of his principles in an effort to appeal tot he base.
4. There was no chance of McCain winning 2008 at all simply because Dubya goofed hard and Obama was the sure favorite.
Not denying #1. But #2-3 was his own fault. He didn't have to sell his soul. #4, can't feel sorry for someone fairly losing a campaign, especially when he contributed to said loss (Sarah Palin) #2 and #3 was the Republican party's fault. He had no chance of winning the nomination if he retained his moderate stances. Ann Coulter was threatening to vote for Hilary if McCain won the nomination. (as an aside, it is delicious that her idol Mitt Romney has lost)[QUOTE="Ring_of_fire"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]Not denying #1. But #2-3 was his own fault. He didn't have to sell his soul. #4, can't feel sorry for someone fairly losing a campaign, especially when he contributed to said loss (Sarah Palin) #2 and #3 was the Republican party's fault. He had no chance of winning the nomination if he retained his moderate stances. Ann Coulter was threatening to vote for Hilary if McCain won the nomination. (as an aside, it is delicious that her idol Mitt Romney has lost) Ann Coulter would never have voted for Hilary. The republican base would always vote for a republican. Why should anyone feel sorry for any politician who loses fairly?1. 2000 McCain should have won the nomination.
2. 2008 McCain was forced by the Republican party to choose a rightwing lunatic as his running mate.
3. 2008 McCain was forced to 180 all of his principles in an effort to appeal tot he base.
4. There was no chance of McCain winning 2008 at all simply because Dubya goofed hard and Obama was the sure favorite.
princeofshapeir
[QUOTE="TacticalDesire"][QUOTE="TwistedShade"]
I feel bad for Romney he looked really sad and it doesn't help how Diane Sawyer keeps saying how he's spent 7 years up to this moment and throwing it in his face.:cry:
princeofshapeir
Yeah, Ik even as someone who's never been a Romney supporter, you can't help but feel a little sorrow for the man.
Personally, I felt more sorry for McCain in 2008. Romney was never a solid politician. McCain was. We saw in both 2008 and 2012 a Republican candidate transformed by radical elements of his party, forced to betray their principles, and for me seeing McCain do that was painful.Don't get me wrong, I'm not wishing Romney had won the election, but it's years of his life that are essentially wasted.
[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="TacticalDesire"]Personally, I felt more sorry for McCain in 2008. Romney was never a solid politician. McCain was. We saw in both 2008 and 2012 a Republican candidate transformed by radical elements of his party, forced to betray their principles, and for me seeing McCain do that was painful. I would've felt more sorry for McCain of 2000, not 2008. I don't get why one should feel sorry for a political person if the person lost fairly.Yeah, Ik even as someone who's never been a Romney supporter, you can't help but feel a little sorrow for the man.
Ring_of_fire
Well, maybe it's because I'm a high school senior applying to some highly competitive universities, but I liken it to the admission process. Someone could get denied admission at a top tier institute, and have fantastic GPA, SAT, Extracurriculars, etc, and have dedicated the past 3-4 years of their life to trying to reach said university. They got denied completely fairly, and someone else got in, but that doesn't mean you don't feel bad for the denied person, especially when they've put in so much.
I'm glad Obama won, but I honestly feel kind of bad for Romney. You devote years and put in so much effort, just to lose. Must be tough to admit defeat to millions of people.
He can see the future.[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]
And you thought he was too optimistic!
dreman999
That's not really true. He predicted a strong Obama win in Ohio, but it's currently less than 100,000. Other than Florida (which still hasn't been called for whatever reason), he and RealClearPolitics have the same map.
Which brings me to my question. Considering how close it is/was in Ohio, Virginia, and Florida, do you, OT, think Romney could have won those states if the the 47% thing never happened?
Places to move: Minnesota of the listVoting yes to ban gay marriage in Minnesota is now winning. :(
c'mon don't...please....
:cry:
SaudiFury
So can we all agree that the current Republican party is just an absolutely poisonous climate to be in right now?
On one hand you need to appeal to the moderates in order to garner the support from outside the strictly Republican demographic, but on the other hand the party has just become so infested with crazies that you also have to appeal to these insane people who basically want a theocracy to get the support of YOUR OWN PARTY!
While I do feel Mitt was a bit slimy and would have certainly put the upper class first before the rest of the population, I do feel that prior to the election he had been alot more sane on stances than he was with this campaign. He DID do a major healthcare reform that was the BASIS for Obamacare and seemed ALOT more moderate in previous interviews.
IDK, I just feel like the Republican party at this point is hurting it's own candidates. There really needs to be some major change in the party...
Has anyone posted about Puerto Rico? I really do not think they should become a state. I'm sure if anything happens the bill will get held up in Congress.
He can see the future.[QUOTE="dreman999"]
[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]
And you thought he was too optimistic!
homegirl2180
That's not really true. He predicted a strong Obama win in Ohio, but it's currently less than 100,000. Other than Florida (which still hasn't been called for whatever reason), he and RealClearPolitics have the same map.
Which brings me to my question. Considering how close it is/was in Ohio, Virginia, and Florida, do you, OT, think Romney could have won those states if the the 47% thing never happened?
I've been watching those states...No he would not. In florida the area left that still needs counting are voteing democrate...Same for Ohio.Seems like this story comes around once a decade. I don't think it should become a state either. Just leave it as is.Has anyone posted about Puerto Rico? I really do not think they should become a state. I'm sure if anything happens the bill will get held up in Congress.
limpbizkit818
He can see the future.[QUOTE="dreman999"]
[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]
And you thought he was too optimistic!
homegirl2180
That's not really true. He predicted a strong Obama win in Ohio, but it's currently less than 100,000. Other than Florida (which still hasn't been called for whatever reason), he and RealClearPolitics have the same map.
Which brings me to my question. Considering how close it is/was in Ohio, Virginia, and Florida, do you, OT, think Romney could have won those states if the the 47% thing never happened?
He's not making a prediction it's odds.
He running computer simulations based on state polls and calculating the probability of a candidate winning. It has nothing to do with the margin of votes. If he runs 10,000 simulations and every single instance of Romney winning included the capture of Ohio, then it's safe to project that Romney cannot win without Ohio. The chances he's posting refer the amount time these scenarios happened in his simulations. i.e. 50% win in FL and not how many votes they'll receive.
Does this mean Jim will be running in 2016?Ring_of_fireI think by then he will have done away with elections.
[QUOTE="Ring_of_fire"]Does this mean Jim will be running in 2016?dave123321I think by then he will have done away with elections. That facist, communist, nazi secret muslim!
That's not really true. He predicted a strong Obama win in Ohio, but it's currently less than 100,000. Other than Florida (which still hasn't been called for whatever reason), he and RealClearPolitics have the same map.
Which brings me to my question. Considering how close it is/was in Ohio, Virginia, and Florida, do you, OT, think Romney could have won those states if the the 47% thing never happened?
homegirl2180
That's not really true either: Silver's model predicted ahigh probability of Obama winning Ohio, but that doesn't speak to the margin of victory. Silver's projected vote share for Ohio was 51.3% Obama to 47.7% Romney with a 2.7% margin of error, which is in line with the results.
And why is that?Has anyone posted about Puerto Rico? I really do not think they should become a state.
limpbizkit818
[QUOTE="limpbizkit818"]Just leave it as is. Well, maybe WE don't want to "just leave it as it is". Self determination.Has anyone posted about Puerto Rico? I really do not think they should become a state. I'm sure if anything happens the bill will get held up in Congress.
soulless4now
[QUOTE="homegirl2180"]
[QUOTE="dreman999"] He can see the future.
Blue-Sky
That's not really true. He predicted a strong Obama win in Ohio, but it's currently less than 100,000. Other than Florida (which still hasn't been called for whatever reason), he and RealClearPolitics have the same map.
Which brings me to my question. Considering how close it is/was in Ohio, Virginia, and Florida, do you, OT, think Romney could have won those states if the the 47% thing never happened?
He's not making a prediction it's odds.
He running computer simulations based on state polls and calculating the probability of a candidate winning. It has nothing to do with the margin of votes. If he runs 10,000 simulations and every single instance of Romney winning included the capture of Ohio, then it's safe to project that Romney cannot win without Ohio. The chances he's posting refer the amount time these scenarios happened in his simulations. i.e. 50% win in FL and not how many votes they'll receive.
I know what Nate Silver does, but in reference to his battlegrounds, this is where he was specifically lauded back in '08, not only in that he accurately guessed 49 of the 50 states, but that his battlegrounds percentages were representative of the final results. He is also sort of making predictions, because he adds his own arbitrary weights to each of the polls, so he is predicting which are more correct.Wow lots of good news so far. In my home state, they restricted the use of eminent domain, Colorodo and Washington legalized recretional marijuana, Washington legalized gay marriage, and Obama won (expected and I did vote for him instead of Romney or Gary Johnson).
So any bad news? :P
gay marriage might be banned in Minnesota, Michelle Bachmann will likely still be around. don't know about the Voter ID amendment, which while i voted no on it, am really sort of ambivalent on the topic. that's it for my state of Minnesota right now. for bad news at least.Wow lots of good news so far. In my home state, they restricted the use of eminent domain, Colorodo and Washington legalized recretional marijuana, Washington legalized gay marriage, and Obama won (expected and I did vote for him instead of Romney or Gary Johnson).
So any bad news? :P
leviathan91
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment