Poll: You are President Harry S. Truman, do you drop the atomic bombs on Japan?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Overlord93
Overlord93

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 Overlord93
Member since 2007 • 12602 Posts

You're going to get a bunch of yes's because you're asking a bunch of Americans.percech
Not necessarily

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#102 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

It was the only way to end the war without absurd casualties to Americans. That's really all that matters during war.

Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

basically you are ASSUMING they would have put kids to fight so instead you go and kill them preventevely. that makes it OK!

Under no circunstance is ok to use nuclear weapons in a war, you may use any excuse you like, but hey better them than you no? not to mention the permanent effects on the area, but hey is not your country so its ok no?

btw there were more than a "few" kids, i doubt the 200 000 + deads in the bombings with only 20 k being soldiers were "just a few"

Nayef_shroof

Awesome, so you think that the children in Japan would have grown up and taken up the US cause against their own government

That's quite an interesting viewpoint

Ya, so is the viewpoint that killing civillians is alright :roll:. You people are just so naive when it comes to propaganda that its incredible...Women/Children were not raised/forced to fight in the war, and the death of troops is far more logical a predicament than the death of civillians, since soldiers knew what they were "in for". Its exactly as Krelian-co stated..

You do realize that millions upon millions of civilians and soldiers would have died due to a land invasion, right?

Avatar image for Zensword
Zensword

4511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#105 Zensword
Member since 2007 • 4511 Posts

No/No.

Why drop bomb to kill civilians to end the war ?

Avatar image for jedixman
JediXMan

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#106 JediXMan
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts

I would drop the bomb on Hiroshima. But dropping the bomb on Nagasaki was just unnecessary.

Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#108 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

[QUOTE="percech"]You're going to get a bunch of yes's because you're asking a bunch of Americans.Overlord93

Not necessarily

I'm afraid he's right just look at the results of the poll.

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#109 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts

It was the only way to end the war without absurd casualties to Americans. That's really all that matters during war.

airshocker
I wonder if the same could be said today.
Avatar image for Sunsha
Sunsha

20662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 Sunsha
Member since 2005 • 20662 Posts

No/No.

Why drop bomb to kill civilians to end the war ?

Zensword
Yeah I think the end result would have been better if we (the US) had not dropped the bombs. It was beyond overkill. To say that dropping the bombs saved lives in the end is ridiculous.
Avatar image for Zensword
Zensword

4511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#111 Zensword
Member since 2007 • 4511 Posts

OK here we go again.

American still believe the BS that the atomic bombing was necessary to end the war and to "save millions' of lives".

I quote Eisenhower again:

- Dwight Eisenhower, Mandate For Change, pg. 380

In a Newsweek interview, Eisenhower again recalled the meeting with Stimson:

"...the Japanese were ready to surrender and it wasn't necessary to hit them with that awful thing."

- Ike on Ike, Newsweek, 11/11/63

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#113 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

I wonder if the same could be said today.BranKetra

Maybe not so much in smaller conflicts, but in a World War setting I tend to think the end justifies the means. Of course I'm talking from an Allied perspective.

Avatar image for Sunsha
Sunsha

20662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 Sunsha
Member since 2005 • 20662 Posts
Ignorant Americans, please stop the BS of "The bomb saved lives". I'm really sick to hear this stupid statement again and again.Zensword
I'm American and I'm sick of hearing it too...
Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#116 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts

[QUOTE="BranKetra"]I wonder if the same could be said today.airshocker

Maybe not so much in smaller conflicts, but in a World War setting I tend to think the end justifies the means. Of course I'm talking from an Allied perspective.

So am I. I was just curious.
Avatar image for Zensword
Zensword

4511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#117 Zensword
Member since 2007 • 4511 Posts
~~~GENERAL DOUGLAS MacARTHUR

MacArthur biographer William Manchester has described MacArthur's reaction to the issuance by the Allies of the Potsdam Proclamation to Japan: "...the Potsdam declaration in July, demand[ed] that Japan surrender unconditionally or face 'prompt and utter destruction.' MacArthur was appalled. He knew that the Japanese would never renounce their emperor, and that without him an orderly transition to peace would be impossible anyhow, because his people would never submit to Allied occupation unless he ordered it. Ironically, when the surrender did come, it was conditional, and the condition was a continuation of the imperial reign. Had the General's advice been followed, the resort to atomic weapons at Hiroshima and Nagasaki might have been unnecessary."

William Manchester, American Caesar: Douglas MacArthur 1880-1964, pg. 512.

Norman Cousins was a consultant to General MacArthur during the American occupation of Japan. Cousins writes of his conversations with MacArthur, "MacArthur's views about the decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were starkly different from what the general public supposed." He continues, "When I asked General MacArthur about the decision to drop the bomb, I was surprised to learn he had not even been consulted. What, I asked, would his advice have been? He replied that he saw no military justification for the dropping of the bomb. The war might have ended weeks earlier, he said, if the United States had agreed, as it later did anyway, to the retention of the institution of the emperor."

Norman Cousins, The Pathology of Power, pg. 65, 70-71.

Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#118 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts

Yes/Yes

The massive casualties caused by the bombs were meant to break the will of the people. Dropping the bombs on less populated cities wouldn't have had as much of an effect.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#119 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Ignorant Americans, please stop the BS of "The bomb saved lives". I'm really sick to hear this stupid statement again and again.

Zensword

Because calling us ignorant is a sure-fire way of getting us to see your point. :roll:

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#120 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

There's a difference between answering a poll and being President on the U.S. during a World War being faced with this difficult decesion.

For this reason, I can't say I would not. It's easy to say no and all that...65 years after it has happened.

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#121 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

Ignorant Americans, please stop the BS of "The bomb saved lives". I'm really sick to hear this stupid statement again and again.

~~~ADMIRAL WILLIAM D. LEAHY

(Chief of Staff to Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman)

"It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons.

"The lethal possibilities of atomic warfare in the future are frightening. My own feeling was that in being the first to use it, we had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children."

- William Leahy, I Was There, pg. 441.

Zensword

The idea that you think we were only trying to beat Japan shows that more research is needed from you

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#123 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

Americans who voted Yes/Yes need to learn WWII history.

That's why I called them ignorant Sorry not offense but the truth need to be told :D

Zensword
It's easy to say no...65 years after the event has happened.
Avatar image for Zensword
Zensword

4511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#125 Zensword
Member since 2007 • 4511 Posts

So, nobody has any comments of what the Generals Eisenhower, Learly and Mac Arthur said about the dropping ? :D

Let's face it: the bombing was unecessary according to these men. The US decided to drop the bomb just to intimidate Japan and Soviet Union.

Avatar image for Qixote
Qixote

10843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#126 Qixote
Member since 2002 • 10843 Posts

Imagine if we were not first in the nuclear arms race. Russia and Germany were right behind us. Which country would have been the first to get nuked if it were not Japan? I'm not saying it is better that any country was the first to get nuked. I am just making us think how differently history may have played out if we were not the first to do it. Rather than blame a country's leader, maybe we should blame the scientist that made it all possible. Sorry Einstein.

Avatar image for KeitekeTokage
KeitekeTokage

770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 KeitekeTokage
Member since 2011 • 770 Posts
[QUOTE="Zensword"]

Americans who voted Yes/Yes need to learn WWII history.

That's why I called them ignorant Sorry not offense but the truth need to be told :D

DroidPhysX
It's easy to say no...65 years after the event has happened.

If I'm understanding you correctly, that's the entire reason why the poll has an option for the choice you would make, and your feelings about it with hindsight. So "Yes/No" would indicate you would have done it, but 65 years later with the hindsight you now have, you think it wasn't the right decision.
Avatar image for yahtzo900
yahtzo900

1173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 yahtzo900
Member since 2003 • 1173 Posts

OK lets pretend we didn't drop the nuke and Japan surrenders peacefully. Then we get to the cold war and Russia decides to test out its Nuke on the US since nobody has any clue what kind of destruction it can cause. So Russia nukes the US, US retaliates and Nukes Russia and now we have far more deaths than we did with the Hiroshima/Nagasaki bombings.

Just a hypothetical situation, but I believe something worse would have happened if we didn't show the world how powerful nukes were or at least revealed that we had nukes to begin with so Russia wouldn't launch their own at us.

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#129 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts

Imagine if we were not first in the nuclear arms race. Russia and Germany were right behind us. Which country would have been the first to get nuked if it were not Japan? I'm not saying it is better that any country was the first to get nuked. I am just making us think how differently history may have played out if we were not the first to do it. Rather than blame a country's leader, maybe we should blame the scientist that made it all possible. Sorry Einstein.

Qixote
Then, we should also blame his parents for having him, and on and on.
Avatar image for Qixote
Qixote

10843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#130 Qixote
Member since 2002 • 10843 Posts

[QUOTE="Qixote"]

Imagine if we were not first in the nuclear arms race. Russia and Germany were right behind us. Which country would have been the first to get nuked if it were not Japan? I'm not saying it is better that any country was the first to get nuked. I am just making us think how differently history may have played out if we were not the first to do it. Rather than blame a country's leader, maybe we should blame the scientist that made it all possible. Sorry Einstein.

BranKetra

Then, we should also blame his parents for having him, and on and on.

Don't be silly. Einstein knew how dangerous his discovery was before he shared it. His parents on the other hand. . .. is this discussion even necessary?

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#131 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts

[QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="Qixote"]

Imagine if we were not first in the nuclear arms race. Russia and Germany were right behind us. Which country would have been the first to get nuked if it were not Japan? I'm not saying it is better that any country was the first to get nuked. I am just making us think how differently history may have played out if we were not the first to do it. Rather than blame a country's leader, maybe we should blame the scientist that made it all possible. Sorry Einstein.

Qixote

Then, we should also blame his parents for having him, and on and on.

Don't be silly. Einstein knew how dangerous his discovery was before he shared it. His parents on the other hand. . .. is this discussion even necessary?

No. That's my point. I've read that the Germans splitting the uranium atom is what caused Einstein to act.
Avatar image for deactivated-58df4522915cb
deactivated-58df4522915cb

5527

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#132 deactivated-58df4522915cb
Member since 2007 • 5527 Posts

[QUOTE="Neo-ganon"]

Yes i would. strategically speaking, alot more people would have died (soldiers and civilians) if we continued the war the conventional way. we needed to end the war in one move, and we did

to quote flash gordon: "its a rational transaction"

40,000+ lives lost, or millions

JasonDarksavior

The bombings had much more than 40,000 casualties.

whatever, you get the idea. the casualties on both sides of the war would have been 10, if not 100 times the casualties of hiroshima and nagasaki.

Avatar image for dkrustyklown
dkrustyklown

2387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#133 dkrustyklown
Member since 2009 • 2387 Posts

They started it, and we finished it. They were completely out of their minds to think that they could start a completely unprovoked war against the United States and win. They were out of their minds at the start of the war and they were out of their minds at the end of the war. Let's not forget that even as Japan was losing the war in the Pacific, they continued to slaughter millions of Chinese and Korean people without mercy.

Those who say no are asking mercy for the merciless. I don't play that.

Avatar image for dontshackzmii
dontshackzmii

6026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#134 dontshackzmii
Member since 2009 • 6026 Posts

the a bomb has let japan play victim

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180302 Posts
Had to be done.....
Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

Yes and yes.

Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#137 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts
...well I'm pretty sure japan wasn't stupid back then apparently Truman warned the Japs about the bomb and to surrender, I'm sorry but if japan had any kind of intel they'd know what the bomb was capable of and surrendered. I mean if theey were smart enough to take over most of east asia I'm pretty sure they'd be smart enough to know when they were beat, and even then 2 bombs? as if they would've needed a second taste of complete economic, militaristic and falt out physical destruction. I call BS on the "NO we refuse to surrender" then the "lack" of reply after the 2 bomb was dropped. so if I were in Truman's shoes, the bomb wouldn't have been dropped because there wouldn't have been any reason to. You'll tout me as crazy, but why do you trust a text book so willingly without question? even if its been proven that facts in text books tend to be stretched as the years go on?
Avatar image for Stavrogin_
Stavrogin_

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 Stavrogin_
Member since 2011 • 804 Posts
Brainwashing at its finest...
Avatar image for The_Gaming_Baby
The_Gaming_Baby

6425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 117

User Lists: 52

#139 The_Gaming_Baby
Member since 2010 • 6425 Posts

I wouldn't have. Dropping the atomic bomb was meant to kill so many civilians that Japan would surrender. I just could never do that.

Avatar image for pero2008
pero2008

2969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 pero2008
Member since 2005 • 2969 Posts

Yes, if he wouldn't of dropped the bombs a lot of lives would of been lost on both sides.

Avatar image for nitekids2004
nitekids2004

2981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 nitekids2004
Member since 2005 • 2981 Posts

[QUOTE="Zensword"]

Americans who voted Yes/Yes need to learn WWII history.

That's why I called them ignorant Sorry not offense but the truth need to be told :D

DroidPhysX

It's easy to say no...65 years after the event has happened.

It's also easy to say yes...considering you're not affected.

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#143 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="Zensword"]

Americans who voted Yes/Yes need to learn WWII history.

That's why I called them ignorant Sorry not offense but the truth need to be told :D

nitekids2004

It's easy to say no...65 years after the event has happened.

It's also easy to say yes...considering you're not affected.

Same could be said for the opposite argument.
Avatar image for one_plum
one_plum

6825

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 one_plum
Member since 2009 • 6825 Posts

...well I'm pretty sure japan wasn't stupid back then apparently Truman warned the Japs about the bomb and to surrender, I'm sorry but if japan had any kind of intel they'd know what the bomb was capable of and surrendered. I mean if theey were smart enough to take over most of east asia I'm pretty sure they'd be smart enough to know when they were beat, and even then 2 bombs? as if they would've needed a second taste of complete economic, militaristic and falt out physical destruction. I call BS on the "NO we refuse to surrender" then the "lack" of reply after the 2 bomb was dropped. so if I were in Truman's shoes, the bomb wouldn't have been dropped because there wouldn't have been any reason to. You'll tout me as crazy, but why do you trust a text book so willingly without question? even if its been proven that facts in text books tend to be stretched as the years go on? mayceV

History books would attempt to explain ten a-bomb drops if it needed to; just saying.

Avatar image for bacon_is_sweet
bacon_is_sweet

3112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 bacon_is_sweet
Member since 2006 • 3112 Posts

Brainwashing at its finest...Stavrogin_

If you're referring to the Japanese brainwashing of its own people, then I'd agree. Leading up to the supposed invasion of Japan, Japanese citizens were told of how barbaric the Americans would be when we invaded. They were told to fight to the last breath and never surrender. Projected casualties would have been much higher. We saw similar occurrences in the battle of Okinawa and Iwo Jima.

Avatar image for Jamiemydearx3
Jamiemydearx3

4062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 Jamiemydearx3
Member since 2008 • 4062 Posts

Probably wouldn't have dropped the second one

Avatar image for Microsteve
Microsteve

1244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#147 Microsteve
Member since 2010 • 1244 Posts

Yes, I have a new weapon and I want to see how bad-ass it is, simple as. Presidents/Kings/Emporers/etc. don't give 2 **** about killing civillians

Avatar image for cee1gee
cee1gee

2042

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 cee1gee
Member since 2008 • 2042 Posts

No i would not drop the bomb.. bombs are cowardly and gun on gun combat is the way to go...if you cant win in close quarter combat then you shouldnt fight period.

Avatar image for Stavrogin_
Stavrogin_

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 Stavrogin_
Member since 2011 • 804 Posts

No i would not drop the bomb.. bombs are cowardly and gun on gun combat is the way to go...if you cant win in close quarter combat then you shouldnt fight period.

cee1gee
I wouldn't drop it either, but one might argue that guns are cowardly too and the only fair way to go is hand-to-hand combat with no armor or equipment. Everything else is cowardly.
Avatar image for CHOASXIII
CHOASXIII

14716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#150 CHOASXIII
Member since 2009 • 14716 Posts

Yes I would do it.