Russia could take over America right now.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for no-scoped_jfk
no-scoped_jfk

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 no-scoped_jfk
Member since 2007 • 417 Posts

I was just playing the demo of "World In Conflict" (great demo, download it now and you'll understand what im talking bout)

Anyway, russia breaches one of the beaches in America and starts destroying buildings and everything, and the thing is, America is having a hard time killing the russians(they are taking over). Is this possible or would America easily destroy anyone who tried to take over.

Avatar image for Sexy_Pirate
Sexy_Pirate

3298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Sexy_Pirate
Member since 2006 • 3298 Posts
I hope they "don't" have their way with me when they do come!
Avatar image for Rhythmic_
Rhythmic_

484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Rhythmic_
Member since 2007 • 484 Posts
With our military stretched thin, we couldn't invade another country, but we could certainly still kick anybody's ass if they actually tried to storm our beaches, except maybe China...however, China's economy would pretty much disappear if we somehow lost the capacity to trade with them, so they would never do it.
Avatar image for Sexy_Pirate
Sexy_Pirate

3298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Sexy_Pirate
Member since 2006 • 3298 Posts

With out military stretched thin, we couldn't invade another country, but we could certainly still kick anybody's ass if they actually tried to storm our beaches, except maybe China...however, China's economy would pretty much disappear if we somehow lost the capacity to trade with them, so they would never do it.Rhythmic_

yeah about that china stuff...

Merry Christmas indeed though. :)

Avatar image for kdt55
kdt55

2525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 kdt55
Member since 2004 • 2525 Posts
Us Americans like to believe that we are the almighty, powerful, ass-kicking nation, but they think the same thing over in China and Russia. All I know is that it would be hell, and a lot of people would die, and there would probably be some nuke action.
Avatar image for yuna707
yuna707

562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 yuna707
Member since 2004 • 562 Posts

Reality check, it takes a navy to deploy an armed force on enemy soil. Guess who has the largest navy in the world... A certain country's naval forces exceeds the rest of the world combined. Who has the largest air force... and the largest fleet of aircraft carriers to do it. Get it into your heads, china can't invade america. It would cripple their economy into the stone age, and they'd fail as badly as me trying to sing ' I wil always love you'

Avatar image for HostileEffect
HostileEffect

2491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 HostileEffect
Member since 2006 • 2491 Posts

If they storm Texas, then they better be ready for a red neck rampage, cause I ante moving from this piece of land for some russian tank or Chinese ninja.

I'm sure plenty other people feel the same way.

Also, I doubt I could carry all my computers, so I would rather die here anyways. With all the Mexicans pouring into Texas, a Mexican takeover isn't such an odd ball thought.

Another though about someone trying to invade America, we need less gun control... I doubt a well armed population would take too kindy to an invasion force, if 75% of the population owned a weapon, that going through a soldier's head would be a little unsettling... IMHO.

Yuna707, the idea is if, somehow, another powerful country ever invaded, say... 30 years from now, the president downsized our military and another country beefed theirs up and picked a fight over whatever the great issue of the day is, when the enemy is at the gates, the people will fight.

I'm going by the idea of *poof* enemy is here, what do we do? Obviously it wouldn't work like that but then again, is this really a serious thread?

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts

It wasn't even feasible as the game described it. Some cargo ships "sneak" in and suddenly the Russian army piles out of them. You'd need a TON of ships, and even then how would they keep a large force like that properly supplied?

Anyway Russia seems content to let their military rot and rather show their force in economic ways using their natural resources as tolls that unlike armies you can actually use on a day to day basis.

Avatar image for HostileEffect
HostileEffect

2491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 HostileEffect
Member since 2006 • 2491 Posts
btw... Russians are no light weight people to start screwing with, they might be letting their military age but the people are still hardasses.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=tTbygxIQI7A
Avatar image for MeanQuestion
MeanQuestion

4456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 MeanQuestion
Member since 2004 • 4456 Posts
Uh-huh... time for a preemptive strike!
Avatar image for thisishowtowin
thisishowtowin

239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 thisishowtowin
Member since 2007 • 239 Posts
Russia could seriously screw america using biowarfare... america has great conditions for bacteria and virii, while microorganisms find the cold in russia very hard.
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#12 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
From what I've learnt, Russia have always been absolutely useless when it comes to fighting in a war.
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts

From what I've learnt, Russia have always been absolutely useless when it comes to fighting in a war.SolidSnake35

Useless? Nah...

Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts

The only ones capable of invading the US properly is the EU...and that's not likely to happen.

Avatar image for kdt55
kdt55

2525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#15 kdt55
Member since 2004 • 2525 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]From what I've learnt, Russia have always been absolutely useless when it comes to fighting in a war.jointed

Useless? Nah...

Well, they did blow it in Afghanistan years back.

Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
[QUOTE="jointed"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]From what I've learnt, Russia have always been absolutely useless when it comes to fighting in a war.kdt55

Useless? Nah...

Well, they did blow it in Afghanistan years back.

Yeah, but you can hardly call them useless. Just look athow they managed to beat both Napoleon and the Nazis.

Avatar image for borris_1
borris_1

7181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 borris_1
Member since 2003 • 7181 Posts

Us Americans like to believe that we are the almighty, powerful, ass-kicking nation, but they think the same thing over in China and Russia. All I know is that it would be hell, and a lot of people would die, and there would probably be some nuke action.kdt55

There will never be nuke action unless it's caused by a rogue state (one, perhaps two weak nukes). In that case, most countries wouldn't even think of firing back.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#18 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
[QUOTE="kdt55"][QUOTE="jointed"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]From what I've learnt, Russia have always been absolutely useless when it comes to fighting in a war.jointed

Useless? Nah...

Well, they did blow it in Afghanistan years back.

Yeah, but you can hardly call them useless. Just look athow they managed to beat both Napoleon and the Nazis.

Didn't Napoleon traipse through Europe and just run out of steam? As far as I know, he took over Moscow but was then driven out and it wasn't exactly Russian brilliance that led to it.
Avatar image for borris_1
borris_1

7181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 borris_1
Member since 2003 • 7181 Posts

The only ones capable of invading the US properly is the EU...and that's not likely to happen.

jointed

You would need to stop them squabbling first.

Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
[QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="kdt55"][QUOTE="jointed"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]From what I've learnt, Russia have always been absolutely useless when it comes to fighting in a war.SolidSnake35

Useless? Nah...

Well, they did blow it in Afghanistan years back.

Yeah, but you can hardly call them useless. Just look athow they managed to beat both Napoleon and the Nazis.

Didn't Napoleon traipse through Europe and just run out of steam? As far as I know, he took over Moscow but was then driven out and it wasn't exactly Russian brilliance that led to it.

Yeah, but I wouldn't call them useless. Just look at the Russo-swedish war for example...

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#21 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
Yeah, but I wouldn't call them useless. Just look at the Russo-swedish war for example...jointed
Okay, I was way too harsh. v_v
Avatar image for kulmiye
kulmiye

12094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 kulmiye
Member since 2004 • 12094 Posts
Any country can take over the USA.. its just a matter of how they do it...
Avatar image for borris_1
borris_1

7181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 borris_1
Member since 2003 • 7181 Posts

Any country can take over the USA.. its just a matter of how they do it...kulmiye

Togo?

Avatar image for NaiKoN9293
NaiKoN9293

4102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 NaiKoN9293
Member since 2004 • 4102 Posts
wow, you sure make a lot of crazy posts man. Russia could not take over the US, because if they invaded it would most definately turn into a nuclear war, and nobody wants that.
Avatar image for Kritical_Strike
Kritical_Strike

4123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Kritical_Strike
Member since 2006 • 4123 Posts

There is no question mark at the end of that last sentence, and that confuses me.:|

To answer your question, no, I don't think there is a nation on the planet that could successfully invade the US.

Avatar image for AlternatingCaps
AlternatingCaps

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 AlternatingCaps
Member since 2007 • 1714 Posts
[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="kdt55"][QUOTE="jointed"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]From what I've learnt, Russia have always been absolutely useless when it comes to fighting in a war.jointed

Useless? Nah...

Well, they did blow it in Afghanistan years back.

Yeah, but you can hardly call them useless. Just look athow they managed to beat both Napoleon and the Nazis.

Didn't Napoleon traipse through Europe and just run out of steam? As far as I know, he took over Moscow but was then driven out and it wasn't exactly Russian brilliance that led to it.

Yeah, but I wouldn't call them useless. Just look at the Russo-swedish war for example...

I'm not familar with my Russian history, being an American and all, but I'm pretty sure that guerilla warfare (revolutionary at the time) along with the winter defeated Poland and the winter and determination (basically the entire population turned into an army and rushing at the Germans, maybe a third had guns) defeated the Axis. That Russian winter can make it a pain to invade them. My French teacher actually said that she ate ice cream to keep warm during her stay in the USSR in the 70s. After waiting in line for to get it, if there was any left of course.

Also, any attempt to invade the US would basically be throwing away the Navy. WiC would be impossible because the logistics would be awful. So they get their unmarked cargo ships and release their thousands of troops, win in Seatle, then what? They'd need to defeat the Pacific Fleet to maintain a supply line and support their men. They could take food and fuel (if foreign military hardware can run on regular) sure, but I'm almost certain that the airport doesn't have missiles for their Hinds or that Costco doesn't carry sabots or HEAT rounds (though you'd probably be able to get 40 for $80 if they did). Then they have to maintain their vehicles and I'm prettu sure that your average autoshop isn't equipped to handle a BMP or T-80.

Still a great game though.

Avatar image for kulmiye
kulmiye

12094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 kulmiye
Member since 2004 • 12094 Posts

[QUOTE="kulmiye"]Any country can take over the USA.. its just a matter of how they do it...borris_1

Togo?

Oopps I mean any country with a miltary force...

Avatar image for --Anna--
--Anna--

4636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 --Anna--
Member since 2007 • 4636 Posts
No, unless they use nukes. Their just too far away, and don't have the naval power, to get enough troop here. Plus, they would be spotted, long before they got here.
Avatar image for borris_1
borris_1

7181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 borris_1
Member since 2003 • 7181 Posts
[QUOTE="borris_1"]

[QUOTE="kulmiye"]Any country can take over the USA.. its just a matter of how they do it...kulmiye

Togo?

Oopps I mean any country with a miltary force...

Togo has a military

Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts
Russia's military is crap. For the most part they are still using outdated tech for the training of their airforce, and most of the time it doesn't work.
Avatar image for nomadph
nomadph

705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 nomadph
Member since 2007 • 705 Posts
i don't know why any country would even bother invading america...they'd just gain a country whose gun-to-people ratio is the highest in the world.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts
Not at all...
Avatar image for nomadph
nomadph

705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 nomadph
Member since 2007 • 705 Posts
[QUOTE="kulmiye"][QUOTE="borris_1"]

[QUOTE="kulmiye"]Any country can take over the USA.. its just a matter of how they do it...borris_1

Togo?

Oopps I mean any country with a miltary force...

Togo has a military

PFFT no army/military in the world can take on chuck norris
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts

[QUOTE="MattUD1"]Russia's military is crap. For the most part they are still using outdated tech for the training of their airforce, and most of the time it doesn't work.nomadph

yes, and america's military is 3 inches longer than any army in the world combined. happy? is that how you wish the world to be? to focus billions in money on military and war?

Or the flip...billions on the ability to defend and not be invaded...and the answer to that is yes.

Avatar image for Brainkiller05
Brainkiller05

28954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Brainkiller05
Member since 2005 • 28954 Posts
I don't like where this is going
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhythmic_"]With our military stretched thin, we couldn't invade another country, but we could certainly still kick anybody's ass if they actually tried to storm our beaches, except maybe China...however, China's economy would pretty much disappear if we somehow lost the capacity to trade with them, so they would never do it.nomadph

china's economy will be intact. it's not like they ask for america's permission to trade with the rest of the world.

sure it'll take a hit from losing trading with america (and its would-be allies), but not from the rest of the world. however, america will take a huge hit from losing trade with china also. guess how many things in your household item parts are made in china?

it is this thinking that makes the world hate america...they think they "own" the world and need to control everything. pfft.

Or we could actually import from other countries....:o

Avatar image for nomadph
nomadph

705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 nomadph
Member since 2007 • 705 Posts
[QUOTE="nomadph"]

[QUOTE="MattUD1"]Russia's military is crap. For the most part they are still using outdated tech for the training of their airforce, and most of the time it doesn't work.LJS9502_basic

yes, and america's military is 3 inches longer than any army in the world combined. happy? is that how you wish the world to be? to focus billions in money on military and war?

Or the flip...billions on the ability to defend and not be invaded...and the answer to that is yes.

billions on the ability to defend from what? recent history has shown that america has been the one invading so far...

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="nomadph"]

[QUOTE="MattUD1"]Russia's military is crap. For the most part they are still using outdated tech for the training of their airforce, and most of the time it doesn't work.nomadph

yes, and america's military is 3 inches longer than any army in the world combined. happy? is that how you wish the world to be? to focus billions in money on military and war?

Or the flip...billions on the ability to defend and not be invaded...and the answer to that is yes.

billions on the ability to defend from what? recent history has shown that america has been the one invading so far...

And that proves my point.:)

Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts

[QUOTE="MattUD1"]Russia's military is crap. For the most part they are still using outdated tech for the training of their airforce, and most of the time it doesn't work.nomadph

yes, and america's military is 3 inches longer than any army in the world combined. happy? is that how you wish the world to be? to focus billions in money on military and war?

Or the ability to defend ourselves... Just a thought...
Avatar image for nomadph
nomadph

705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 nomadph
Member since 2007 • 705 Posts
[QUOTE="nomadph"]

[QUOTE="Rhythmic_"]With our military stretched thin, we couldn't invade another country, but we could certainly still kick anybody's ass if they actually tried to storm our beaches, except maybe China...however, China's economy would pretty much disappear if we somehow lost the capacity to trade with them, so they would never do it.LJS9502_basic

china's economy will be intact. it's not like they ask for america's permission to trade with the rest of the world.

sure it'll take a hit from losing trading with america (and its would-be allies), but not from the rest of the world. however, america will take a huge hit from losing trade with china also. guess how many things in your household item parts are made in china?

it is this thinking that makes the world hate america...they think they "own" the world and need to control everything. pfft.

Or we could actually import from other countries....:o

that wouldn't work...most other countries (that are not allies from US) also have huge tradings with china (almost everything now is made in china...)

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts

that wouldn't work...most other countries (that are not allies from US) also have huge tradings with china (almost everything now is made in china...)

nomadph
Not true...and China couldn't do anything about it.
Avatar image for nomadph
nomadph

705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 nomadph
Member since 2007 • 705 Posts
[QUOTE="nomadph"]

[QUOTE="MattUD1"]Russia's military is crap. For the most part they are still using outdated tech for the training of their airforce, and most of the time it doesn't work.MattUD1

yes, and america's military is 3 inches longer than any army in the world combined. happy? is that how you wish the world to be? to focus billions in money on military and war?

Or the ability to defend ourselves... Just a thought...

you guys say ability to defend your own country, but america has more WMD (nukes) than other countries (russia has nukes also). why can't we invade america because it has WMD? why can america invade iraq because of (the never found) WMD?

see, building a military for defense can also be used for war. depends on who you guys vote. so saying that wasting billions for military defense, isn't really "defense"...it's more of making a military, then depends on your government/president, it can be war or "defense.

Avatar image for nomadph
nomadph

705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 nomadph
Member since 2007 • 705 Posts
[QUOTE="nomadph"]

that wouldn't work...most other countries (that are not allies from US) also have huge tradings with china (almost everything now is made in china...)

LJS9502_basic

Not true...and China couldn't do anything about it.

so you mean to say, america will take the slack when china cuts off its trading with the rest of the world? can america compete with what china has been offering for years now? (low cost output of products / hiring for workers)

and how would you know it's not true? please elaborate. are you saying america has a right to influence or tell other neutral countries not to trade with another country in times of war?

america will take the bigger hit in the economy. go to your mall. check out how many things there are made from china.

Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
[QUOTE="nomadph"]

that wouldn't work...most other countries (that are not allies from US) also have huge tradings with china (almost everything now is made in china...)

LJS9502_basic

Not true...and China couldn't do anything about it.

So you would ban corporations from getting involved with China? Good luck with that...

Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="nomadph"]

that wouldn't work...most other countries (that are not allies from US) also have huge tradings with china (almost everything now is made in china...)

jointed

Not true...and China couldn't do anything about it.

So you would ban corporations from getting involved with China? Good luck with that...

We could boycott... but that'd be a really stupid move.
Avatar image for muppet1010
muppet1010

5812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 muppet1010
Member since 2006 • 5812 Posts

i doubt russia could invade and take over America just like that :/

In all honesty the only other place on the world who would Give america a run for there money in an Invasion is the EU cause we like America have the right balance between naval, air and man power. But the day Europe feels the need to attempt an invasion on America will be a bad day.

and the one thing I always think about is how alot of you americans all have guns so the insurgenycy for the invading army would be a living hell.

From what I've learnt, Russia have always been absolutely useless when it comes to fighting in a war.SolidSnake35

im not sure whether thats sarcasm or not :?

but its the russians who pushed germany back to there borders in WW2...

Avatar image for nomadph
nomadph

705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 nomadph
Member since 2007 • 705 Posts
[QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="nomadph"]

that wouldn't work...most other countries (that are not allies from US) also have huge tradings with china (almost everything now is made in china...)

MattUD1

Not true...and China couldn't do anything about it.

So you would ban corporations from getting involved with China? Good luck with that...

We could boycott... but that'd be a really stupid move.

indeed. which only means that america's economy is the one who will have a larger impact...

Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts
[QUOTE="MattUD1"][QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="nomadph"]

that wouldn't work...most other countries (that are not allies from US) also have huge tradings with china (almost everything now is made in china...)

nomadph

Not true...and China couldn't do anything about it.

So you would ban corporations from getting involved with China? Good luck with that...

We could boycott... but that'd be a really stupid move.

indeed. which only means that america's economy is the one who will have a larger impact...

I assume you are talking about a negative impact? China would also be impacted, since we buy a good amount of stuff from them. Personally, I think economics is boring, so I know nothing other than the obvious.