Should drugs be legalized?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#201 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"] No way, huh? Think again: http://www.vancouversun.com/story_print.html?id=5341224&sponsor=escapes.cadsmccracken

I'm sure the bus driver was also wearing underwear. Should we ban boxer shorts while we're at it?

also from the article you posted:"The TTC found no evidence of impairment on the part of the operator," the transit commission stated.

Yes. Because underwear is just as likely as an intoxicant is to cause impaired driving. That is an early article just after the incident. Things have progressed: http://www.examiner.com/crime-in-toronto/toronto-bus-driver-charged-fatal-crash

Well I think we're in agreement, lets ban buses.

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#202 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

[QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="thegerg"] Raise your hand if you think 100 people playing basketball is worth one getting hurt. Should we outlaw basketball, many people are injured playing that sport. It's quite selfish not to do so.toast_burner

Because basketball and using drugs is equatable.

Withdsmccracken's logic it is. Basketball is just a game for fun, is one person getting harmed really worth it just so you can play a game?

An accident in a game is just that: an accident. A traffic accident is usually quite similar, without fault or criminal charges. But add impairment, and charges are laid... hmm, wonder why?
Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#203 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]I'm sure the bus driver was also wearing underwear. Should we ban boxer shorts while we're at it?

also from the article you posted:"The TTC found no evidence of impairment on the part of the operator," the transit commission stated.

toast_burner

Yes. Because underwear is just as likely as an intoxicant is to cause impaired driving. That is an early article just after the incident. Things have progressed: http://www.examiner.com/crime-in-toronto/toronto-bus-driver-charged-fatal-crash

Well I think we're in agreement, lets ban buses.

? Is this straw man day?
Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#205 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
[QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="thegerg"] Raise your hand if you think 100 people playing basketball is worth one getting hurt. Should we outlaw basketball, many people are injured playing that sport. It's quite selfish not to do so.

Because basketball and using drugs is equatable.

People partaking in recreation resulting in injury is equitable with people partaking in recreation resulting in injury.

Most people taking part in a game are willing and knowing participants.
Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#206 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts

[QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="thegerg"] Raise your hand if you think 100 people playing basketball is worth one getting hurt. Should we outlaw basketball, many people are injured playing that sport. It's quite selfish not to do so.toast_burner

Because basketball and using drugs is equatable.

Withdsmccracken's logic it is. Basketball is just a game for fun, is one person getting harmed really worth it just so you can play a game?

EDIT:

Depends on who you ask. It's recreation for most and a profession for some. Likewise, many people take drugs to feel good. Others experiment their bodies. An even fewer number of scientists have studied the effects of drugs like DMT in a professional setting. Basically, I'm asking why should they be legalized and in what way. People have and will continue to say that all drugs should be legal simply because they exist a.k.a. basically the vs basketball argument.

This situation is a reason why I like countries where majority vote wins.

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#207 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
[QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="thegerg"] Raise your hand if you think 100 people playing basketball is worth one getting hurt. Should we outlaw basketball, many people are injured playing that sport. It's quite selfish not to do so.

Everyone playing a game knows the risks. I doubt someone injured in a traffic incident related to impairment was a willing or knowing participant like a ball player is.

What about the poor kid walking by the court who is accidentally hit in the head by the ball? He is hardly a willing participant.

Was that kid hit by a ball hit by (and because) someone who was impaired?
Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#209 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"] Yes. Because underwear is just as likely as an intoxicant is to cause impaired driving. That is an early article just after the incident. Things have progressed: http://www.examiner.com/crime-in-toronto/toronto-bus-driver-charged-fatal-crashdsmccracken

Well I think we're in agreement, lets ban buses.

? Is this straw man day?

No your arguement is just so poor I can't help but laugh at it.

I'll play along anyway. If pot becomes legal, what makes you think everyone will smoke it while driving? you don't see everyone constantly drunk because alcohol is illegal.

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#210 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
To those equating people hurt by those under the influence with those hurt in the course of normal mundane daily activities (e.g. during recreational sports)... there is a reason that charges are rarely laid in the wake of pure chance accidents, while they are universally laid in cases of accident due to impairment. Do I really need to explain why?
Avatar image for Paco8byu
Paco8byu

522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#211 Paco8byu
Member since 2010 • 522 Posts

Heck no!

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#212 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
[QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="BranKetra"] Because basketball and using drugs is equatable.thegerg

Withdsmccracken's logic it is. Basketball is just a game for fun, is one person getting harmed really worth it just so you can play a game?

An accident in a game is just that: an accident. A traffic accident is usually quite similar, without fault or criminal charges. But add impairment, and charges are laid... hmm, wonder why?

You live in a place where the police charge for fender-benders?
Avatar image for the_last_ride
The_Last_Ride

76371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 122

User Lists: 2

#214 The_Last_Ride
Member since 2004 • 76371 Posts
No, why should it be?
Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#216 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

Dsmccracken, we know that cellphone use while driving causes thousands of traffic collisions and injuries every year. Should cellphones be outlawed?thegerg
It already is illegal to use the phone and drive at the same time.But that further backs up my point on why can't drugs be legal but treated the same way we treat alcohol

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#217 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]Well I think we're in agreement, lets ban buses.

toast_burner

? Is this straw man day?

No your arguement is just so poor I can't help but laugh at it.

I'll play along anyway. If pot becomes legal, what makes you think everyone will smoke it while driving? you don't see everyone constantly drunk because alcohol is illegal.

Try making a real argument instead of making cracks about underwear and banning buses. You say that my argument is horrible, but have done zero to actually, you know, prove it. More strawman. At what point did I say that EVERYONE would be smoking and driving? Does it really require 100% participation to make it dangerous? And btw, alcohol should not be legal either.
Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#218 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

[QUOTE="thegerg"]Dsmccracken, we know that cellphone use while driving causes thousands of traffic collisions and injuries every year. Should cellphones be outlawed?toast_burner

It already is illegal to use the phone and drive at the same time.But that further backs up my point on why can't drugs be legal but treated the same way we treat alcohol

See below. Alcohol should be no more legal than pot is. You just can't help yourself, pointing out the foibles of booze as if this scores a point FOR pot, rather than AGAINST alcohol.
Avatar image for ToastRider11
ToastRider11

2573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#219 ToastRider11
Member since 2010 • 2573 Posts

Are you aware of all the side effects and causes that some hard drugs do? Drugs are addictive (duh) and can be extremely dangerous and can kill people. There are people in this world that be stupid enough to give cocaine or meth to their infant if all drugs were legal. This is just insane and never gonna happen. You might as well encourage to murder while you're at this too.

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#221 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="thegerg"] An accident in a game is just that: an accident. A traffic accident is usually quite similar, without fault or criminal charges. But add impairment, and charges are laid... hmm, wonder why?thegerg

You live in a place where the police charge for fender-benders?

Yes, I do. it is a criminal act to damage the property of another.

Where in the world do you live? Surely there's no place in the States where every motor vehicle incident is criminal?
Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#222 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

And btw, alcohol should not be legal either.dsmccracken
I'm sorry but my mind just blew up:lol:

Can you please just justify in a civil manner why they should be illegal without bringing up traffic accident (because driving is tottaly irrelevent to drug use)

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#223 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
Dsmccracken, we know that cellphone use while driving causes thousands of traffic collisions and injuries every year. Should cellphones be outlawed?thegerg
Driving under the influence of cellphones, blackberries, etc. is illegal where I come from. Where are you from, again?
Avatar image for scouttrooperbob
scouttrooperbob

2439

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#225 scouttrooperbob
Member since 2008 • 2439 Posts

I don't just mean marijuana, I mean ALL (cocaine, heroin etc.). I say yes, the war on drugs doesn't do anything it just distracts police officers from doing police work that matters. People are going to do drugs no matter what and this shouldn't mean they should be placed on the same level of rapists and robbers. Also if we move all drug trafficing to certain areas of a city we can attempt to sanitize drug use and help the users instead of throwing them away as "scum of society." But hey that's just me.

lex_in_the_moon

NO!!!

I can understand marijuana, but cocain and heroin are extremy addictive and deadly. Once you try heroin your addicted for life not to mention kill you.

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#227 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"]And btw, alcohol should not be legal either.toast_burner

I'm sorry but my mind just blew up:lol:

Can you please just justify in a civil manner why they should be illegal without bringing up traffic accident (because driving is tottaly irrelevent to drug use)

If booze (or cigarettes, for that matter) were invented TODAY, and not entrenched by thousands of years of social history, and presented to the FDA for approval, they wouldn't pass the laugh test. Zero medicinal benefits while destroying the liver, causing intoxication (booze) and causing cancer (smokes). I could go on, if you like.
Avatar image for ROFLCOPTER603
ROFLCOPTER603

2140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#228 ROFLCOPTER603
Member since 2010 • 2140 Posts

I think all hard drugs should be banned (Meth, cocaine, heroin, etc), but alcohol and tobacco should remain legal and marijuana should become legalized. Alcohol and marijuana are only dangerous if you act stupid with them. Tobacco is bad for your health, but too many people are addicted and there's too big an industry to ban it. It would be like prohibition again. I also believe that the age for all three should be set at 18.

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#229 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="thegerg"]Dsmccracken, we know that cellphone use while driving causes thousands of traffic collisions and injuries every year. Should cellphones be outlawed?thegerg

Driving under the influence of cellphones, blackberries, etc. is illegal where I come from. Where are you from, again?

But those devices are not outlawed, as marijuana is in the US. Why outlaw marijuana because it can cause injuries due to impairment but not outlaw cellphones for the same reason?

Why does it matter where I come from?

Intoxicants don't just impair driving. They impair your ability to even judge that you ARE impaired, before you even step foot in the vehicle. Cellphones don't impair judgement, so to be truly analogous, you'd need to ask whether idiots who WITHOUT impairment use cellphones while driving should be banned from life, rather than the cellphones themselves.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#231 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"]And btw, alcohol should not be legal either.dsmccracken

I'm sorry but my mind just blew up:lol:

Can you please just justify in a civil manner why they should be illegal without bringing up traffic accident (because driving is tottaly irrelevent to drug use)

If booze (or cigarettes, for that matter) were invented TODAY, and not entrenched by thousands of years of social history, and presented to the FDA for approval, they wouldn't pass the laugh test. Zero medicinal benefits while destroying the liver, causing intoxication (booze) and causing cancer (smokes). I could go on, if you like.

That didn't answer my question

Avatar image for ROFLCOPTER603
ROFLCOPTER603

2140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#233 ROFLCOPTER603
Member since 2010 • 2140 Posts

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]I'm sorry but my mind just blew up:lol:

Can you please just justify in a civil manner why they should be illegal without bringing up traffic accident (because driving is tottaly irrelevent to drug use)

thegerg

If booze (or cigarettes, for that matter) were invented TODAY, and not entrenched by thousands of years of social history, and presented to the FDA for approval, they wouldn't pass the laugh test. Zero medicinal benefits while destroying the liver, causing intoxication (booze) and causing cancer (smokes). I could go on, if you like.

You seem to be very confused. There are a number of known health benefits to alcohol. It's becoming more and more clear that you have no idea what you're talking about.

I'm on the side of legalizing certain drugs... but let's get real. The health benefits come from having a few sips of low alcohol content drinks. Who just has a few sips?

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#234 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="thegerg"] Yes, I do. it is a criminal act to damage the property of another.

thegerg

Where in the world do you live? Surely there's no place in the States where every motor vehicle incident is criminal?

No, not every collision is illegal. However, most of the time, operating a vehicle in a public area in a manner which causes it to collide with another object is criminal. Why do you want to keep it criminal for a man to get high in his own house, but don't feel that damaging someone's car should be criminal?

I think it depends on the circumstances of the traffic accident. I would never claim that zero (non-intoxicant related) traffic accidents are not the result in possibly criminal negligence.

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#235 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]I'm sorry but my mind just blew up:lol:

Can you please just justify in a civil manner why they should be illegal without bringing up traffic accident (because driving is tottaly irrelevent to drug use)

thegerg

If booze (or cigarettes, for that matter) were invented TODAY, and not entrenched by thousands of years of social history, and presented to the FDA for approval, they wouldn't pass the laugh test. Zero medicinal benefits while destroying the liver, causing intoxication (booze) and causing cancer (smokes). I could go on, if you like.

You seem to be very confused. There are a number of known health benefits to alcohol. It's becoming more and more clear that you have no idea what you're talking about.

Health benefits? Like what? Reduced heart disease from red wine is a result of the same components that occur in any dark grape juice, and are non-alcohol related.

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#236 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]I'm sorry but my mind just blew up:lol:

Can you please just justify in a civil manner why they should be illegal without bringing up traffic accident (because driving is tottaly irrelevent to drug use)

toast_burner

If booze (or cigarettes, for that matter) were invented TODAY, and not entrenched by thousands of years of social history, and presented to the FDA for approval, they wouldn't pass the laugh test. Zero medicinal benefits while destroying the liver, causing intoxication (booze) and causing cancer (smokes). I could go on, if you like.

That didn't answer my question

I completely answered you. And it's a little disingenuous asking me to be civil when you are the only one being uncivil here.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#237 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

A lot of people bring up addiction but what about LSD, Ecstasy and quite a few other illegal drugs that aren't addictive?

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#239 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

A lot of people bring up addiction but what about LSD, Ecstasy and quite a few other illegal drugs that aren't addictive?

toast_burner
Ecstasy is addictive... as are the substance(s) people actually get when they think they are buying MDMA. It's incredibly common for people to get cuts including Crank when they ask for Ecstasy.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#241 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

A lot of people bring up addiction but what about LSD, Ecstasy and quite a few other illegal drugs that aren't addictive?

dsmccracken

Ecstasy is addictive... as are the substance(s) people actually get when they think they are buying MDMA. It's incredibly common for people to get cuts including Crank when they ask for Ecstasy.

What about LSD and MDMA then?

Also if you buy ecstasy thinking it's going to be pure than you are an idiot.

Avatar image for omus101
omus101

1392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#243 omus101
Member since 2006 • 1392 Posts

It's nice to see this thread still going. If only we could actually convince the government to legalize some great drugs.

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#244 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="thegerg"] But those devices are not outlawed, as marijuana is in the US. Why outlaw marijuana because it can cause injuries due to impairment but not outlaw cellphones for the same reason?

Why does it matter where I come from?

thegerg

Intoxicants don't just impair driving. They impair your ability to even judge that you ARE impaired, before you even step foot in the vehicle. Cellphones don't impair judgement, so to be truly analogous, you'd need to ask whether idiots who WITHOUT impairment use cellphones while driving should be banned from life, rather than the cellphones themselves.

Again, you seem to be very confused. Not all intoxicants impair judgement (caffeine and nicotine for example). Marijuana is one of those that does not impair judgement. Again, please try to answer the question: Why outlaw marijuana because it can cause injuries due to impairment but not outlaw cellphones for the same reason?

It's really childish to keep calling me confused. You're protecting yourself from the TOU, using confused as a euphemism for stupid. I assure you, I am neither. Debate me if you like, and keep the personal attacks out of it.

If, however, you are 5 years old, then this is acceptable behavior, and proceed as normal.

Anyway, I've already answered your last question. Cellphones impair driving due to their acting as a distraction, not due to any impairing influence they have over human cognitive function or critical thinking skills, unlike marijuana, despite your incorrect assertion to the contrary.

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#246 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]

A lot of people bring up addiction but what about LSD, Ecstasy and quite a few other illegal drugs that aren't addictive?

toast_burner

Ecstasy is addictive... as are the substance(s) people actually get when they think they are buying MDMA. It's incredibly common for people to get cuts including Crank when they ask for Ecstasy.

What about LSD and MDMA then?

Also if you buy ecstasy thinking it's going to be pure than you are an idiot.

Ecstasy is MDMA. And I've been witness to a pretty terrible LSD fueled accident, so don't tell me that it can do no wrong.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#247 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"] Ecstasy is addictive... as are the substance(s) people actually get when they think they are buying MDMA. It's incredibly common for people to get cuts including Crank when they ask for Ecstasy.dsmccracken

What about LSD and MDMA then?

Also if you buy ecstasy thinking it's going to be pure than you are an idiot.

Ecstasy is MDMA. And I've been witness to a pretty terrible LSD fueled accident, so don't tell me that it can do no wrong.

Ecstasy isn't MDMA, thats like saying Cola is caffeine. I've seen accidents done by completely sober people dong incredibly stupid things, what of it?

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#249 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
[QUOTE="dsmccracken"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] You seem to be very confused. There are a number of known health benefits to alcohol. It's becoming more and more clear that you have no idea what you're talking about.thegerg

Health benefits? Like what? Reduced heart disease from red wine is a result of the same components that occur in any dark grape juice, and are non-alcohol related.

http://www2.potsdam.edu/hansondj/AlcoholAndHealth.html You really do have no clue what you're talking about, huh?

That's interesting (see, insults are not required in GS). But it would seem to me that the relevance is reduced since it is dependent on responsible alcohol use, something that is an oxymoron to many. There may be a small health benefit to moderate drinking, but that quickly becomes catastrophic to health when that line is crossed.
Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#250 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]What about LSD and MDMA then?

Also if you buy ecstasy thinking it's going to be pure than you are an idiot.

toast_burner

Ecstasy is MDMA. And I've been witness to a pretty terrible LSD fueled accident, so don't tell me that it can do no wrong.

Ecstasy isn't MDMA, thats like saying Cola is caffeine. I've seen accidents done by completely sober people dong incredibly stupid things, what of it?

Ecstasy isn't MDMA? Then what is it? Ecstasy isn't MDMA? This says it is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MDMA Don't like wiki sources? How about this: http://www.drugabuse.gov/infofacts/ecstasy.html And this: http://mdma.net/ Comments?