Should drugs be legalized?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#301 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="Diophage"]Where does drinking and driving or going to a bar, tie in with murder and rape? toast_burner

Listen dude. Holy **** c'mere. You know a substantial amount of murders are drug related right? Not talking about people fighting over drug money per say, but that is a factor. Mostly that many drugs are mixed and laced these days to give a better high because the old **** don't work so good anymore. Now I believe alcohol should also be mostly illegal. But if there is ANYTHING that OT afvocates is that stupid people are dangerous. But stupid people get caught doing stupid things easily enough. Stupid people buying drugs from an informant or smoking it up in their car a block down from a dealer, get caught. So what happens when stupid people can legally get toxins that can make smart people stupid? You get sheer dumbass.

People get murdered and rape already cause of drug use. It is all relative. The bar and alcohol thing as symbolic to a current problem where something legal has a self regulatory limit where it becomes illegal. Most people cannot control themselves. They need enforcers to do that. That includes the felony factor. It helps keeps a few idiots away from doing what they already know they will over indulge. Same with drugs! If all of a sudden enforcers are removed then people will be more inclined to try something out for the lulz. You know.. duuuude.

How would legalising drugs make the problem worse? If anything it would lower crime because it take business away from dealers

Well dealers for sure will steal from non dealers and non users. That is a fact. But I find it hard that you do not acknowledge that such a large portion of thefts and murder still happen cause of people's addiction to drugs. If drugs were legalized then it would require a license to make and sell. It wouldnt ever be legal to make it all yourself just like how you cannot legally make your own distillery and sell it to people without regulatory fees and permits. So there will be a price. There will also be a well sized tax. If anything prices will go up compared to what they are now. You will think you will see rocks at the dollar general for 1 buck? So people will need more money for their addictions. Means more violence. But with no consenquence to buy them, and nothing to force people not to or get addicted, more people will have the issue. So it goes back to what I shouldn't of needed said again. Some rape and murder are established as drug related. More money needed, more people needng more money, and you compound the issues further.
Avatar image for ROFLCOPTER603
ROFLCOPTER603

2140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#304 ROFLCOPTER603
Member since 2010 • 2140 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"] Listen dude. Holy **** c'mere. You know a substantial amount of murders are drug related right? Not talking about people fighting over drug money per say, but that is a factor. Mostly that many drugs are mixed and laced these days to give a better high because the old **** don't work so good anymore. Now I believe alcohol should also be mostly illegal. But if there is ANYTHING that OT afvocates is that stupid people are dangerous. But stupid people get caught doing stupid things easily enough. Stupid people buying drugs from an informant or smoking it up in their car a block down from a dealer, get caught. So what happens when stupid people can legally get toxins that can make smart people stupid? You get sheer dumbass.

People get murdered and rape already cause of drug use. It is all relative. The bar and alcohol thing as symbolic to a current problem where something legal has a self regulatory limit where it becomes illegal. Most people cannot control themselves. They need enforcers to do that. That includes the felony factor. It helps keeps a few idiots away from doing what they already know they will over indulge. Same with drugs! If all of a sudden enforcers are removed then people will be more inclined to try something out for the lulz. You know.. duuuude.CreasianDevaili

How would legalising drugs make the problem worse? If anything it would lower crime because it take business away from dealers

Well dealers for sure will steal from non dealers and non users. That is a fact. But I find it hard that you do not acknowledge that such a large portion of thefts and murder still happen cause of people's addiction to drugs. If drugs were legalized then it would require a license to make and sell. It wouldnt ever be legal to make it all yourself just like how you cannot legally make your own distillery and sell it to people without regulatory fees and permits. So there will be a price. There will also be a well sized tax. If anything prices will go up compared to what they are now. You will think you will see rocks at the dollar general for 1 buck? So people will need more money for their addictions. Means more violence. But with no consenquence to buy them, and nothing to force people not to or get addicted, more people will have the issue. So it goes back to what I shouldn't of needed said again. Some rape and murder are established as drug related. More money needed, more people needng more money, and you compound the issues further.

I don't think the price will go up...

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#305 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
Your argument seems to hinge on the false premise that legalizing these drugs will increase their sustained use.thegerg
You're guilty of the same. Entirely. I see no further discussion since no matter how much you deny what I say you also use assumptions and gut feeling backed by nothing but your isolated view in contrast. Same as me. So where do we go from here? =p
Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#306 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
I don't think the price will go up...ROFLCOPTER603
I will simply ask that you explain why.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#307 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

[QUOTE="ROFLCOPTER603"] I don't think the price will go up...CreasianDevaili
I will simply ask that you explain why.

Drugs when sold illegally are passed around so much that it greatly effects the price. When legal it would be cutting out some of the middle men so the price would be more set and sound.

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#308 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="ROFLCOPTER603"] I don't think the price will go up...toast_burner

I will simply ask that you explain why.

Drugs when sold illegally are passed around so much that it greatly effects the price. When legal it would be cutting out some of the middle men so the price would be more set and sound.

Looking at cigarettes tells me that statement is an outlandish lie.
Avatar image for ROFLCOPTER603
ROFLCOPTER603

2140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#309 ROFLCOPTER603
Member since 2010 • 2140 Posts

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="ROFLCOPTER603"] I don't think the price will go up...toast_burner

I will simply ask that you explain why.

Drugs when sold illegally are passed around so much that it greatly effects the price. When legal it would be cutting out some of the middle men so the price would be more set and sound.

Exactly. Therecan literallybe dozens of middle men involved in getting just a gram of weed from the grower to whoever intends to use it. Also, if drugs were easier to get (because dealers wouldn't have to hide), the price would go down due to capitalism because people would just go to where it's cheapest. Most people don't know a ton of places they can safely get drugs, so they go to wherever it's safest, which is not necessarily cheapest.

Avatar image for ROFLCOPTER603
ROFLCOPTER603

2140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#310 ROFLCOPTER603
Member since 2010 • 2140 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"] I will simply ask that you explain why. CreasianDevaili

Drugs when sold illegally are passed around so much that it greatly effects the price. When legal it would be cutting out some of the middle men so the price would be more set and sound.

Looking at cigarettes tells me that statement is an outlandish lie.

Cigarettes (and even though you didn't mention it, alcohol)are incredibly cheap. I don't understand your point.

Avatar image for deactivated-597bb01c846a2
deactivated-597bb01c846a2

1495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: -3

#311 deactivated-597bb01c846a2
Member since 2011 • 1495 Posts
[QUOTE="thegerg"] Your argument seems to hinge on the false premise that legalizing these drugs will increase their sustained use.CreasianDevaili
You're guilty of the same. Entirely. I see no further discussion since no matter how much you deny what I say you also use assumptions and gut feeling backed by nothing but your isolated view in contrast. Same as me. So where do we go from here? =p

You're the one that made the assertion. Prove it. Burden is on you.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#312 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"] I will simply ask that you explain why. CreasianDevaili

Drugs when sold illegally are passed around so much that it greatly effects the price. When legal it would be cutting out some of the middle men so the price would be more set and sound.

Looking at cigarettes tells me that statement is an outlandish lie.

Cigarettes are very cheap, you sort of proved my point

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#314 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="thegerg"] Your argument seems to hinge on the false premise that legalizing these drugs will increase their sustained use.Diophage
You're guilty of the same. Entirely. I see no further discussion since no matter how much you deny what I say you also use assumptions and gut feeling backed by nothing but your isolated view in contrast. Same as me. So where do we go from here? =p

You're the one that made the assertion. Prove it. Burden is on you.

Incorrect. About 6 pages of you all saying the opposite. I don't need to read it all back to you right?
Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#317 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]Drugs when sold illegally are passed around so much that it greatly effects the price. When legal it would be cutting out some of the middle men so the price would be more set and sound.thegerg
Looking at cigarettes tells me that statement is an outlandish lie.

You seem to be very confused. We are unable to compare prices of cigarettes when they are criminalized to when they are legal, thus you can't draw such a conclusion.

Good. Actually was checking out Medical Marijuana and how heavily they went at it on license, fees, and taxes. The ciggerette was more so on cost to produce vs cost of the sell, along with how heavily it is taxed. More to the point I was doubting that 0.7 grams of weed will cost the same as 0.7 grams of tobacco. Especially if the goverment legalizes it to make money off it. Which many of you advocate.
Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#318 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="thegerg"] Your argument seems to hinge on the false premise that legalizing these drugs will increase their sustained use.thegerg
You're guilty of the same. Entirely. I see no further discussion since no matter how much you deny what I say you also use assumptions and gut feeling backed by nothing but your isolated view in contrast. Same as me. So where do we go from here? =p

No, I am not guilty of presenting an argument that hinges on the false premise that legalizing these drugs will increase their sustained use. You seem to be very confused. Anyway, here's a few links that will hopefully help you to understand your error in reasoning: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1893946,00.html http://norml.org/marijuana/personal/item/marijuana-decriminalization-its-impact-on-use-2 http://txfx.net/2009/04/08/drug-use-in-portugal-plunges-after-decriminalization/

That time article seems to present good counter arguments to using portugal as a one size fits all, and even made sure to bold that in the United States we have more cocaine use than they have weed use. So.. yeah. What the hell did you read in there?
Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#321 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"] Good. Actually was checking out Medical Marijuana and how heavily they went at it on license, fees, and taxes. The ciggerette was more so on cost to produce vs cost of the sell, along with how heavily it is taxed. thegerg
The cigarette was more so what? This sentence simply makes no sense.
More to the point I was doubting that 0.7 grams of weed will cost the same as 0.7 grams of tobacco. Especially if the goverment legalizes it to make money off it. Which many of you advocate. CreasianDevaili
You continue to post about what you think and how you feel, without backing it up with any evidence of studies done or basic economic or criminological understanding, yet you demand that others support their claims and ignore such evidence when it is provided.

Well you provided 3 links. 2 were for the same place and I didnt read the other. All I read in there was that the U.S. finds it interesting but not really a model for the difference in size and... culture I believe. So decriminalizing drugs there does not mean it would in the United States. Well that was said by someone who IS... as you say is so important, competent with the understandings you listed.
Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#323 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="thegerg"] No, I am not guilty of presenting an argument that hinges on the false premise that legalizing these drugs will increase their sustained use. You seem to be very confused. Anyway, here's a few links that will hopefully help you to understand your error in reasoning: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1893946,00.html http://norml.org/marijuana/personal/item/marijuana-decriminalization-its-impact-on-use-2 http://txfx.net/2009/04/08/drug-use-in-portugal-plunges-after-decriminalization/thegerg
That time article seems to present good counter arguments to using portugal as a one size fits all, and even made sure to bold that in the United States we have more cocaine use than they have weed use. So.. yeah. What the hell did you read in there?

At no point have I said that that model will work everywhere, I am simply helping you to understand that your claims that decriminalization will lead to increased use, rape, murder, etc. is baseless. You're right that the US has more cocaine use than Portugal has weed use, what's your point? Those numbers neither hinder my port nor aid yours.

But.. you just countered your own arguement with your own words. If it wont work everywhere, then it might not in the United States. As such, decriminalization could lead to the increases that I said. But you state boldly that it won't based on a model that you state boldly wouldnt always work everywhere. So If it does not lower it, then it would stay the same or possibly rise? "Points both index fingers to opposite sides, then point to point, then dances with them in the air"
Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#326 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="thegerg"] At no point have I said that that model will work everywhere, I am simply helping you to understand that your claims that decriminalization will lead to increased use, rape, murder, etc. is baseless. You're right that the US has more cocaine use than Portugal has weed use, what's your point? Those numbers neither hinder my port nor aid yours. thegerg

But.. you just countered your own arguement with your own words. If it wont work everywhere, then it might not in the United States. As such, decriminalization could lead to the increases that I said. But you state boldly that it won't based on a model that you state boldly wouldnt always work everywhere. So If it does not lower it, then it would stay the same or possibly rise? "Points both index fingers to opposite sides, then point to point, then dances with them in the air"

You seem to be very confused. At no point "state boldly that [decriminalization] won't [lead to increases]". I have simply stated that ther is no evidence that it will. You have stated, though, that decriminalization will cause an increase in abuse and other problems ( "If all of a sudden enforcers are removed then people will be more inclined to try something out for the lulz", " They will be the ones who go all out and get addicted. They will also be the ones who have a few more steps of stupid to act out before being caught.", "Well dealers for sure will steal from non dealers and non users. That is a fact.", " more people will have the issue. ", etc. ) .

You are now posting "As such, decriminalization could lead to the increases that I said." As evidenced, you were not talking about what COULD happen, but what WILL happen. You're the only one making claims about what WILL happen, not I. I have not countered my own argument at all. I never claimed that such a model will work everywhere.

"So If it does not lower it, then it would stay the same or possibly rise?" Yes, it would. But, neither of us know whether it would decrease, increase, or remain steady. Studies suggest, though, that decriminalization causes a reduction.

Well initially I poised a question not a statement. When someone snagged it I just went with the flow. I have a much earlier post in this thead that actually states what I am okay with. Also.. dealers do steal from non users. That kind of is a fact. Didn't see the words "steal more!". Another thing is that the country you listed also offered free rehabilitation. They is a very key aspect of what they did. So the enforcers removed still works. Jail or rehabilitation is an enforcer against the problem. Which case if they didn't offer rehabilitation at all there might have been a different outcome. Hell.. I really see nothing that I said as out of context. Anyhow I would factor the trading of jail for rehabilitation as one of the leading contributors. But no punishment nor any free and slightly FORCED help offered leaves me still saying all that I said.
Avatar image for unrealtron
unrealtron

3148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#328 unrealtron
Member since 2010 • 3148 Posts
Hell no.
Avatar image for z4twenny
z4twenny

4898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#329 z4twenny
Member since 2006 • 4898 Posts

[ Also.. dealers do steal from non users. That kind of is a fact. CreasianDevaili

I love when people say things are facts when they're not, like right here for instance.

Avatar image for SommeTheSomber
SommeTheSomber

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#330 SommeTheSomber
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts

Absolutely!

-Kills the power and money of cartels profiting off ruining the lives of people - less violence, drug wars, drug-related killings in Mexico

-Legalizing drugs won't make everyone start wanting to use them - increasing education and awareness is more important than telling what a person can or cannot do to his or her body. Some do drugs as a means of rebellion just because they are illegal

-Stops the unncessary waste from the DEA and the War on Drugs - less tax dollars wasted. Why should I pay the Federal Government so they can interfere with the lives of others?

-Alcohol Prohibition shows that if people want to use drugs then they will find some way to use drugs - which allows criminals to profit.The illegalization drugs is a short-sighted way to deal with the problem - human nature causes people to do drugs, not the fact that they are legal.

-Can be taxed - an additional source of revenue for the United States

-Purer forms of drugs - less dangerous and less harmful to people (Home-made whisky during Prohibition was known to cause deaths)

It should at least be up to the states. The Federal Government should get out of our business.

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#331 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
OK, so dealers steal from users. What's your point? If these drugs are decriminalized and regulated then such an issue would go away because users could purchase their drugs from a regulated source and not a shady dealer. I'm not sure what your first language is, but you seem to be having trouble with English. This jumble of words " Didn't see the words "steal more!". Another thing is that the country you listed also offered free rehabilitation. They is a very key aspect of what they did. So the enforcers removed still works. Jail or rehabilitation is an enforcer against the problem. Which case if they didn't offer rehabilitation at all there might have been a different outcome." really makes no sense and doesn't come to a point. Are you advocating that addiction treatment be increased? OK, I have never said that it shouldn't be. i never accused you of speaking out of context, simply being unable to support your claims.thegerg
There was one typo which was "they", which should of been "this". You mentioned enforcers removed, which I put enforcers removed still works since rehabilitation is what I would consider an enforcer, that wasn't part of my original posts. I could contend that free quality rehabilitation in the states might be a issue regardless of how much money they save from the criminal system. Finally that, in retrospect of what I just said, that without the rehabilitation there might of been a different outcome. Some age groups increased usage by the way, and the articles did not entirely list all age groups.

So we come back to where it all started. You say you have studies where decriminalization lowered crime, not increased it. I say it had much less to do with decriminalization as some age groups increased usage. The rehabilitation just outpaced the addictions. Which is great. However I couldnt find out the quality of that rehabilitation. Which is also key to your claim.

The effectiveness of quality rehabilitation is not questioned. The problem however with your article is that decriminalization and free quality rehabilitation are not by default the same course of action. As said already, the article states that some age group's usage actually increased with rehabilitation. So if a country just decriminalizes drugs but does not offer trained and solid quality medical assistance then one could actually use your listed articles against your stance. You may not agree but that is how it is. Since crimes are often linked to drugs and addiction if just making them legal increases usage then it is a bad thing. Rehabilitation in itself would reduce crime regardless of decriminalization but the reverse based on your article is not a reality.
Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#332 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][ Also.. dealers do steal from non users. That kind of is a fact. z4twenny

I love when people say things are facts when they're not, like right here for instance.

Dealers have never stolen from non users? Lotta innocent people went to jail then. Whole lot.
Avatar image for ROFLCOPTER603
ROFLCOPTER603

2140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#333 ROFLCOPTER603
Member since 2010 • 2140 Posts

[QUOTE="z4twenny"]

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][ Also.. dealers do steal from non users. That kind of is a fact. CreasianDevaili

I love when people say things are facts when they're not, like right here for instance.

Dealers have never stolen from non users? Lotta innocent people went to jail then. Whole lot.

Of course some drug dealers have stolen, but saying all of them would or have in the pastis ridiculous.

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#334 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
[QUOTE="ROFLCOPTER603"]

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="z4twenny"]

I love when people say things are facts when they're not, like right here for instance.

Dealers have never stolen from non users? Lotta innocent people went to jail then. Whole lot.

Of course some drug dealers have stolen, but saying all of them would or have in the pastis ridiculous.

Yes it would. Who said that?
Avatar image for mingmao3046
mingmao3046

2683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#335 mingmao3046
Member since 2011 • 2683 Posts
"Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one." - Ben Franklin Please go freedom haters. i hear china is looking for english speakers to teach their schools. their big government and little freedom should suit your desires
Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#337 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
"Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one." - Ben Franklin Please go freedom haters. i hear china is looking for english speakers to teach their schools. their big government and little freedom should suit your desiresmingmao3046
Freedom for farmer joe to marry betsy the dairy cow? "bites bottom lip"
Avatar image for ROFLCOPTER603
ROFLCOPTER603

2140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#338 ROFLCOPTER603
Member since 2010 • 2140 Posts

[QUOTE="ROFLCOPTER603"]

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"] Dealers have never stolen from non users? Lotta innocent people went to jail then. Whole lot. CreasianDevaili

Of course some drug dealers have stolen, but saying all of them would or have in the pastis ridiculous.

Yes it would. Who said that?

When you were listing reasons why legalizing drugs would be bad, you started off by saying "dealers steal from non-users", and said that that was a fact. So I think you said that.

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#340 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
[QUOTE="thegerg"] " Rehabilitation in itself would reduce crime regardless of decriminalization but the reverse based on your article is not a reality." WTF are you talking about? I never claimed that the reverse of "rehabilitation in itself would reduce crime regardless of decriminalization" is reality.

Yes you did. The moment you challenged my views when I never once mentioned rehabilitation as a factor by linking to an article where rehabilitation was more important than decriminalization to say I was baseless. You still have "nothing" to show that decriminalization in of itself does any good. The opposite actually.
Avatar image for deactivated-61cc564148ef4
deactivated-61cc564148ef4

10909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#341 deactivated-61cc564148ef4
Member since 2007 • 10909 Posts

No. If you have your drugs fine, do it. I don't mind marajuana, but if they made it legal, we would have a nation of potheads and morons. Keep it illegal

Avatar image for pygmahia5
pygmahia5

7428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#342 pygmahia5
Member since 2007 • 7428 Posts
yes to be regulated and kept out of the hands of children. i think ive put my 2 cents in on this subject about 200 times. maybe more.
Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#343 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
[QUOTE="ROFLCOPTER603"]

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="ROFLCOPTER603"]

Of course some drug dealers have stolen, but saying all of them would or have in the pastis ridiculous.

Yes it would. Who said that?

When you were listing reasons why legalizing drugs would be bad, you started off by saying "dealers steal from non-users", and said that that was a fact. So I think you said that.

But just said dealers. Sure more than one has stolen. Plural. Never said all dealers. You defending a dealer or are one?
Avatar image for ROFLCOPTER603
ROFLCOPTER603

2140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#344 ROFLCOPTER603
Member since 2010 • 2140 Posts

No. If you have your drugs fine, do it. I don't mind marajuana, but if they made it legal, we would have a nation of potheads and morons. Keep it illegal

OB-47

Marijuana doesn't make anyone stupid. Stupid people do it, but intelligent people do too.

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#345 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="mingmao3046"]"Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one." - Ben Franklin Please go freedom haters. i hear china is looking for english speakers to teach their schools. their big government and little freedom should suit your desiresthegerg
Freedom for farmer joe to marry betsy the dairy cow? "bites bottom lip"

I say go for it Joe.

Too many emotional people over their drugs I think. You make me feel like I trolled you when I never tried. Which is robbery.
Avatar image for mingmao3046
mingmao3046

2683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#347 mingmao3046
Member since 2011 • 2683 Posts

No. If you have your drugs fine, do it. I don't mind marajuana, but if they made it legal, we would have a nation of potheads and morons. Keep it illegal

OB-47
uhh what? if someone wants to smoke weed they will do it already. we wouldnt see much of an increase if at all if it was made legal
Avatar image for ROFLCOPTER603
ROFLCOPTER603

2140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#350 ROFLCOPTER603
Member since 2010 • 2140 Posts

[QUOTE="ROFLCOPTER603"]

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"] Yes it would. Who said that?CreasianDevaili

When you were listing reasons why legalizing drugs would be bad, you started off by saying "dealers steal from non-users", and said that that was a fact. So I think you said that.

But just said dealers. Sure more than one has stolen. Plural. Never said all dealers. You defending a dealer or are one?

First off, saying "dealers steal from non-users" implies that the normal dealer is going to steal from non-users, just like if I said "dogs have four legs"
it implies that normal dogs are going to have four legs.

As for your question, no, I'm not a dealer. I'm just pointing out that your statement about thieves was completely irrelevant to the topic. Tons of people steal things, whether they're a drug dealer or not.