Stephen Hawking says afterlife is a fairytale...

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#101 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="J-man45"]

Wait, did Hawkings basically describe humans as the waste product of an infinitely more magnificent universe?

TommyWieseau81

Well one does have to admit that, given the scale and magnitude of the universe, humans do certainly seem certainly rather inconsequential.

Are you an atheist?

Does it matter? You're 5-6ft tall, there's 6.7 billion other people on the planet. There are billions of other stars, and each star has planets revolving around it. In the grand scheme of things, you're tiny and your death is like the death of an ant. Although i'm sure you will be missed.
Avatar image for AmazonTreeBoa
AmazonTreeBoa

16745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 AmazonTreeBoa
Member since 2011 • 16745 Posts

Don't care, really.

no_more_fayth

^this.

Why should I care what he thinks?

Avatar image for TommyWieseau81
TommyWieseau81

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 TommyWieseau81
Member since 2011 • 455 Posts

[QUOTE="TommyWieseau81"][QUOTE="GabuEx"]

Well one does have to admit that, given the scale and magnitude of the universe, humans do certainly seem certainly rather inconsequential.

Nibroc420

Are you an atheist?

Does it matter? You're 5-6ft tall, there's 6.7 billion other people on the planet. There are billions of other stars, and each star has planets revolving around it. In the grand scheme of things, you're tiny and your death is like the death of an ant. Although i'm sure you will be missed.

Just a general question is all, I respect the mans beliefs.

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#104 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="J-man45"]

Wait, did Hawkings basically describe humans as the waste product of an infinitely more magnificent universe?

TommyWieseau81

Well one does have to admit that, given the scale and magnitude of the universe, humans do certainly seem certainly rather inconsequential.

Are you an atheist?

No.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#105 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="TommyWieseau81"][QUOTE="GabuEx"]

Well one does have to admit that, given the scale and magnitude of the universe, humans do certainly seem certainly rather inconsequential.

GabuEx

Are you an atheist?

No.

Are you Agnostic?
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#106 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="TommyWieseau81"] Are you an atheist?Nibroc420

No.

Are you Agnostic?

I don't see how my personal religious beliefs are relevant to anything that's been said in this thread. :?

Avatar image for ManifestoJoe
ManifestoJoe

587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 ManifestoJoe
Member since 2009 • 587 Posts
Im just pointing this out because everyone keeps saying theres no facts about death. Your consciousness comes from your brain. When you die, your brain dies with you. Meaning its off. None of the functions it was previously operating are running. The only rational assumption of what happens after you die would be nothing. Exactly like before you were born, things were happening but you didn't even have a thought. A dead brain is the same as a non-existent brain in that sense.
Avatar image for joshrocks2245
joshrocks2245

11248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#108 joshrocks2245
Member since 2003 • 11248 Posts

I hate when people try to prove there is no afterlife, why would you even want to try and do that?? I mean if there was no afterlife then why are we even here?? If there is no afterlife then we shouldn't be smart enough to question if there is an afterlife. I believe there is some sort of an afterlife, I just really hate when people try to make it seem like there isn't one "Yeah your here for 80 years but when you die you don't go anywhere" seems like such a waste to even do anything if theres no afterlife.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#109 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Im just pointing this out because everyone keeps saying theres no facts about death. Your consciousness comes from your brain. When you die, your brain dies with you. Meaning its off. None of the functions it was previously operating are running. The only rational assumption of what happens after you die would be nothing. Exactly like before you were born, things were happening but you didn't even have a thought. A dead brain is the same as a non-existent brain in that sense. ManifestoJoe
But one cannot say for sure... it is an irrelevant line of inquiry since there is no way to answer it reasonably.
Avatar image for brandontwb
brandontwb

4325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 brandontwb
Member since 2008 • 4325 Posts

[QUOTE="J-man45"]

Wait, did Hawkings basically describe humans as the waste product of an infinitely more magnificent universe?

GabuEx

Well one does have to admit that, given the scale and magnitude of the universe, humans do certainly seem certainly rather inconsequential.

I don't understand how anyone can view the world in this way... In what world would be all important? What is this perfect world of human importance people are referring to? We are only as consequential as your point of reference. Why can't we be amazing super-giants? To bacteria we are!
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#111 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

Im just pointing this out because everyone keeps saying theres no facts about death. Your consciousness comes from your brain. When you die, your brain dies with you. Meaning its off. None of the functions it was previously operating are running. The only rational assumption of what happens after you die would be nothing. Exactly like before you were born, things were happening but you didn't even have a thought. A dead brain is the same as a non-existent brain in that sense. ManifestoJoe

Does one's consciousness come from one's brain, or is one's brain simply a client accessed from something external to it, much as a computer terminal is a conduit to the computer's contents? What even is consciousness; what does it mean to be conscious? If one's consciousness is solely a product of one's brain, then what if an exact replica of one's brain were created and put into another human. Would one perceive oneself as being conscious in both bodies at the same time? If not, then how could it be said that the physical structure of the brain is the only thing that gives rise to consciousness?

There have been many times in reality where an incorrect conclusion was made based on an incomplete set of observations.

Avatar image for ManifestoJoe
ManifestoJoe

587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 ManifestoJoe
Member since 2009 • 587 Posts
[QUOTE="ManifestoJoe"]Im just pointing this out because everyone keeps saying theres no facts about death. Your consciousness comes from your brain. When you die, your brain dies with you. Meaning its off. None of the functions it was previously operating are running. The only rational assumption of what happens after you die would be nothing. Exactly like before you were born, things were happening but you didn't even have a thought. A dead brain is the same as a non-existent brain in that sense. foxhound_fox
But one cannot say for sure... it is an irrelevant line of inquiry since there is no way to answer it reasonably.

I think so. We can make inferences based on what we know about our biology. That, and then there is the amazing lack of evidence for an after life.
Avatar image for kev_stevens67
kev_stevens67

616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 kev_stevens67
Member since 2010 • 616 Posts

Reading Karen Armstrong's "A History of God" I find it kind of surprising how even after the Council of Nicaea, there is yet no mention of "heaven" or "hell" as literal places in either scripture or debate. What is most important to these early Christians is developing the theology surrounding the nature of God, and whether or not Jesus is OF divine essence, or caused by it, and what it means to be a Christian (at that early point, it was to imitate Christ perfectly, not gain favour and go to Heaven). It is kind of amazing how different Christianity of today is to that of the pre-Catholic Church and pre-Reformation forms.foxhound_fox

There are Church's out there who believe what you described (to imitate Jesus Christ or to live as Jesus Christ lived and be like Him). One is the Church is Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#114 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="J-man45"]

Wait, did Hawkings basically describe humans as the waste product of an infinitely more magnificent universe?

brandontwb

Well one does have to admit that, given the scale and magnitude of the universe, humans do certainly seem certainly rather inconsequential.

I don't understand how anyone can view the world in this way... In what world would be all important? What is this perfect world of human importance people are referring to? We are only as consequential as your point of reference. Why can't we be amazing super-giants? To bacteria we are!

Compared to the size of the universe, humans are tiny, insignificant specks. If an asteroid were to cause the extinction of humanity, the universe and the world would carry on as it always has, oblivious either to our existence or nonexistence - just as it did upon the extinction of the dinosaurs, and indeed upon the extinction of the 99% of species that have ever lived on this planet. I don't understand how anyone can not view the world in this way. That one does not like a conclusion is no reason to reject it.

Avatar image for kulmiye
kulmiye

12094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 kulmiye
Member since 2004 • 12094 Posts
I'm surprised that one man's opinion can spark such a long thread.
Avatar image for kev_stevens67
kev_stevens67

616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 kev_stevens67
Member since 2010 • 616 Posts

[QUOTE="brandontwb"][QUOTE="GabuEx"]

Well one does have to admit that, given the scale and magnitude of the universe, humans do certainly seem certainly rather inconsequential.

GabuEx

I don't understand how anyone can view the world in this way... In what world would be all important? What is this perfect world of human importance people are referring to? We are only as consequential as your point of reference. Why can't we be amazing super-giants? To bacteria we are!

Compared to the size of the universe, humans are tiny, insignificant specks. If an asteroid were to cause the extinction of humanity, the universe and the world would carry on as it always has, oblivious either to our existence or nonexistence - just as it did upon the extinction of the dinosaurs, and indeed upon the extinction of the 99% of species that have ever lived on this planet. I don't understand how anyone can not view the world in this way. That one does not like a conclusion is no reason to reject it.

Where is that one Video which shows Earth and then expands to show the many stars and sizes - it really shows the magnitude of the Universe and how small we really are.

Avatar image for Jolt_counter119
Jolt_counter119

4226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#117 Jolt_counter119
Member since 2010 • 4226 Posts

Its pretty much well known that Stephen Hawking is an athiest, and pretty much most of the brightest minds are.

Avatar image for brandontwb
brandontwb

4325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 brandontwb
Member since 2008 • 4325 Posts

[QUOTE="ManifestoJoe"]Im just pointing this out because everyone keeps saying theres no facts about death. Your consciousness comes from your brain. When you die, your brain dies with you. Meaning its off. None of the functions it was previously operating are running. The only rational assumption of what happens after you die would be nothing. Exactly like before you were born, things were happening but you didn't even have a thought. A dead brain is the same as a non-existent brain in that sense. GabuEx

Does one's consciousness come from one's brain, or is one's brain simply a client accessed from something external to it, much as a computer terminal is a conduit to the computer's contents? What even is consciousness; what does it mean to be conscious? If one's consciousness is solely a product of one's brain, then what if an exact replica of one's brain were created and put into another human. Would one perceive oneself as being conscious in both bodies at the same time? If not, then how could it be said that the physical structure of the brain is the only thing that gives rise to consciousness?

There have been many times in reality where an incorrect conclusion was made based on an incomplete set of observations.

I have been questioning myself with this. I thought of the idea that everything is conscious in some way or form. The process of the brain itself is consciousness- there are multiple ways to view that though. I said the cause and effect of the process of the brain IS you. You are the cause and effect of the brain. So I also suggested that computers are conscious.. *in a sense*. Remember I said everything was conscious. But then the issue that you touched on... We can FEEL. If you replicate a machine similar to the human being, how can it FEEL pain ect? It can't just be the communication of meaningful information, there has to be has to be more... Then the other issue you brought up being separatism. How come I am separate? I think that the more you analyze something like this, the more you get the question, how can anything exist? When I emotionally understand that concept it's veerrry weird to think about.

Avatar image for brandontwb
brandontwb

4325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 brandontwb
Member since 2008 • 4325 Posts

[QUOTE="brandontwb"][QUOTE="GabuEx"]

Well one does have to admit that, given the scale and magnitude of the universe, humans do certainly seem certainly rather inconsequential.

GabuEx

I don't understand how anyone can view the world in this way... In what world would be all important? What is this perfect world of human importance people are referring to? We are only as consequential as your point of reference. Why can't we be amazing super-giants? To bacteria we are!

Compared to the size of the universe, humans are tiny, insignificant specks. If an asteroid were to cause the extinction of humanity, the universe and the world would carry on as it always has, oblivious either to our existence or nonexistence - just as it did upon the extinction of the dinosaurs, and indeed upon the extinction of the 99% of species that have ever lived on this planet. I don't understand how anyone can not view the world in this way. That one does not like a conclusion is no reason to reject it.

Again, in what world would we be significant?

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#120 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

I hate when people try to prove there is no afterlife, why would you even want to try and do that?? I mean if there was no afterlife then why are we even here?? If there is no afterlife then we shouldn't be smart enough to question if there is an afterlife. I believe there is some sort of an afterlife, I just really hate when people try to make it seem like there isn't one "Yeah your here for 80 years but when you die you don't go anywhere" seems like such a waste to even do anything if theres no afterlife.

joshrocks2245
I'd say the exact opposite is true. If this is all we get, we should be extremely motivated to do absolutely everything we can with what we get. Hawking himself said he still has "so much to do." If there is nothing after death, then we have nothing to worry about, and can live this life to its fullest, and more importantly, make sure it is lived to its fullest for others as well. If there is an afterlife, then one has to determine what that life is like, and what it requires in order to fulfill. Which throughout life, only causes unneeded stress and anxiety. "Am I going to hell?" "Am I following the correct religion?" "What if my choices in life were wrong?" If we live not worrying about the future, living only in the present moment, we can follow where life takes us, and try our best to help others do it as well. Even Jesus did this. He worried only about other people around him, not whether or not his actions would lead him to the afterlife in favourable form. To early Christians, the afterlife wasn't a priority... it was living like Christ and continuing his works, allowing one to become one with God, and in this life, not after death (a continuation of the Platonist ideal).
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#121 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="brandontwb"]I don't understand how anyone can view the world in this way... In what world would be all important? What is this perfect world of human importance people are referring to? We are only as consequential as your point of reference. Why can't we be amazing super-giants? To bacteria we are!brandontwb

Compared to the size of the universe, humans are tiny, insignificant specks. If an asteroid were to cause the extinction of humanity, the universe and the world would carry on as it always has, oblivious either to our existence or nonexistence - just as it did upon the extinction of the dinosaurs, and indeed upon the extinction of the 99% of species that have ever lived on this planet. I don't understand how anyone can not view the world in this way. That one does not like a conclusion is no reason to reject it.

Again, in what world would we be significant?

Any world in which our impact on it is greater than the one in which we currently live. :P

This has no implied bearing on the way in which one ought to look at oneself or humanity. It's just stating a fact.

Avatar image for ManifestoJoe
ManifestoJoe

587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 ManifestoJoe
Member since 2009 • 587 Posts

[QUOTE="ManifestoJoe"]Im just pointing this out because everyone keeps saying theres no facts about death. Your consciousness comes from your brain. When you die, your brain dies with you. Meaning its off. None of the functions it was previously operating are running. The only rational assumption of what happens after you die would be nothing. Exactly like before you were born, things were happening but you didn't even have a thought. A dead brain is the same as a non-existent brain in that sense. GabuEx

Does one's consciousness come from one's brain, or is one's brain simply a client accessed from something external to it, much as a computer terminal is a conduit to the computer's contents? What even is consciousness; what does it mean to be conscious? If one's consciousness is solely a product of one's brain, then what if an exact replica of one's brain were created and put into another human. Would one perceive oneself as being conscious in both bodies at the same time? If not, then how could it be said that the physical structure of the brain is the only thing that gives rise to consciousness?

There have been many times in reality where an incorrect conclusion was made based on an incomplete set of observations.

I would assume it comes from the brain as I have no reason to believe otherwise.

Definition of CONSCIOUSNESS

1 a : the quality or state of being aware especially of something within oneself b : the state or fact of being conscious of an external object, state, or fact c : awareness; especially : concern for some social or political cause
2 : the state of being characterized by sensation, emotion, volition, and thought : mind

And what you're talking about is a clone I believe. And that type of clone is fiction but i'll answer it. It would be two seperate entites having their own experiences. Everything about the brain, and the person the brain in essense creates, is the same. It is now just two seperate individuals. They wouldn't share what the other percieves anymore then you percieving my experiences. Once you take the brain, and even if its and exact replica, it will change based on the experiences it percieves. It will not stay the same as brains change and develope.

Avatar image for XCyberForceX
XCyberForceX

1223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 61

User Lists: 1

#123 XCyberForceX
Member since 2008 • 1223 Posts

To answer the original question, Stephen will find out one way or another when he dies. Everyone is entitled to their opinion but as for me I really don't put much weight on his babbling.:o

Avatar image for Half-Way
Half-Way

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 Half-Way
Member since 2010 • 5001 Posts

when it comes to questions like this, its all about perspective.

Avatar image for CaveJohnson1
CaveJohnson1

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 CaveJohnson1
Member since 2011 • 1714 Posts

[QUOTE="CaveJohnson1"]

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

Intelligence is basically at its heart a measure of one's ability to use knowledge to create real-world results or applications, or to discover new knowledge. Considering that there is effectively no knowledge surrounding the topic of an afterlife, one's intelligence is basically irrelevant when it comes to one's thoughts about that subject.

GabuEx

there's logic, he explained his.

I don't see the logic of believing in something without any evidence though.

The logic is entirely philosophical in nature; there's no hard evidence that it's based on.

simply because there's no evidence does not mean that there is not any logic behind it. Equating a human to a computer and it's shutting off would be a logical way of looking at it, I mean when a computer dies, it doesn't go to heaven does it?

Avatar image for brandontwb
brandontwb

4325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 brandontwb
Member since 2008 • 4325 Posts

[QUOTE="brandontwb"]

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

Compared to the size of the universe, humans are tiny, insignificant specks. If an asteroid were to cause the extinction of humanity, the universe and the world would carry on as it always has, oblivious either to our existence or nonexistence - just as it did upon the extinction of the dinosaurs, and indeed upon the extinction of the 99% of species that have ever lived on this planet. I don't understand how anyone can not view the world in this way. That one does not like a conclusion is no reason to reject it.

GabuEx

Again, in what world would we be significant?

Any world in which our impact on it is greater than the one in which we currently live. :P

This has no implied bearing on the way in which one ought to look at oneself or humanity. It's just stating a fact.

What I mean is, a world in which we are significant doesn't make any sense. You may be confused because there are different ways of looking at this. I'm looking at it from a point like: Okay, so we are insignificant because we are so tiny look at us *perspective against universe*. I'm saying that you could look at the other way too, we are giants. In conclusion, there is no real definition for importance or value, or significance, and it doesn't matter in the eyes of say a god.

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#127 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

I would assume it comes from the brain as I have no reason to believe otherwise.

Definition of CONSCIOUSNESS

1 a : the quality or state of being aware especially of something within oneself b : the state or fact of being conscious of an external object, state, or fact c : awareness; especially : concern for some social or political cause
2 : the state of being characterized by sensation, emotion, volition, and thought : mind

And what you're talking about is a clone I believe. And that type of clone is fiction but i'll answer it. It would be two seperate entites having their own experiences. Everything about the brain, and the person the brain in essense creates, is the same. It is now just two seperate individuals. They wouldn't share what the other percieves anymore then you percieving my experiences. Once you take the brain, and even if its and exact replica, it will change based on the experiences it percieves. It will not stay the same as brains change and develope.

ManifestoJoe

Yes, but that's just it. If one's consciousness is entirely determined by one's physical brain, then an identical physical brain should give rise to an identical consciousness. Of course the example is fiction. It's a thought experiment.

Avatar image for joshrocks2245
joshrocks2245

11248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#128 joshrocks2245
Member since 2003 • 11248 Posts

[QUOTE="joshrocks2245"]

I hate when people try to prove there is no afterlife, why would you even want to try and do that?? I mean if there was no afterlife then why are we even here?? If there is no afterlife then we shouldn't be smart enough to question if there is an afterlife. I believe there is some sort of an afterlife, I just really hate when people try to make it seem like there isn't one "Yeah your here for 80 years but when you die you don't go anywhere" seems like such a waste to even do anything if theres no afterlife.

foxhound_fox

I'd say the exact opposite is true. If this is all we get, we should be extremely motivated to do absolutely everything we can with what we get. Hawking himself said he still has "so much to do." If there is nothing after death, then we have nothing to worry about, and can live this life to its fullest, and more importantly, make sure it is lived to its fullest for others as well. If there is an afterlife, then one has to determine what that life is like, and what it requires in order to fulfill. Which throughout life, only causes unneeded stress and anxiety. "Am I going to hell?" "Am I following the correct religion?" "What if my choices in life were wrong?" If we live not worrying about the future, living only in the present moment, we can follow where life takes us, and try our best to help others do it as well. Even Jesus did this. He worried only about other people around him, not whether or not his actions would lead him to the afterlife in favourable form. To early Christians, the afterlife wasn't a priority... it was living like Christ and continuing his works, allowing one to become one with God, and in this life, not after death (a continuation of the Platonist ideal).

It really doesn't make sense to me to do so much here if we don't go anywhere when we die. Helping people doesn't really matter to me if they are all just going to die anyways and not end up in an afterlife. I can't live life to the fullest if theres not an afterlife, whats the point?? Whats the point of even being healthy or caring about anything at all?? If theres no afterlife then every single thing that has happened on this earth has been a complete waste.

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#129 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="CaveJohnson1"]there's logic, he explained his.

I don't see the logic of believing in something without any evidence though.

CaveJohnson1

The logic is entirely philosophical in nature; there's no hard evidence that it's based on.

simply because there's no evidence does not mean that there is not any logic behind it. Equating a human to a computer and it's shutting off would be a logical way of looking at it, I mean when a computer dies, it doesn't go to heaven does it?

When did I say it had no logic behind it?

The fact remains that there is no evidence that his conclusion is based on. It's based entirely on analogy and other philosophical tools.

Avatar image for ManifestoJoe
ManifestoJoe

587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 ManifestoJoe
Member since 2009 • 587 Posts

[QUOTE="ManifestoJoe"]

I would assume it comes from the brain as I have no reason to believe otherwise.

Definition of CONSCIOUSNESS

1 a : the quality or state of being aware especially of something within oneself b : the state or fact of being conscious of an external object, state, or fact c : awareness; especially : concern for some social or political cause
2 : the state of being characterized by sensation, emotion, volition, and thought : mind

And what you're talking about is a clone I believe. And that type of clone is fiction but i'll answer it. It would be two seperate entites having their own experiences. Everything about the brain, and the person the brain in essense creates, is the same. It is now just two seperate individuals. They wouldn't share what the other percieves anymore then you percieving my experiences. Once you take the brain, and even if its and exact replica, it will change based on the experiences it percieves. It will not stay the same as brains change and develope.

GabuEx

Yes, but that's just it. If one's consciousness is entirely determined by one's physical brain, then an identical physical brain should give rise to an identical consciousness. Of course the example is fiction. It's a thought experiment.

It would be identical, until the two brain copies have differing experiences.

Avatar image for CaveJohnson1
CaveJohnson1

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 CaveJohnson1
Member since 2011 • 1714 Posts

[QUOTE="CaveJohnson1"]

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

The logic is entirely philosophical in nature; there's no hard evidence that it's based on.

GabuEx

simply because there's no evidence does not mean that there is not any logic behind it. Equating a human to a computer and it's shutting off would be a logical way of looking at it, I mean when a computer dies, it doesn't go to heaven does it?

When did I say it had no logic behind it?

The fact remains that there is no evidence that his conclusion is based on. It's based entirely on analogy and other philosophical tools.

k

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#132 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="ManifestoJoe"]

I would assume it comes from the brain as I have no reason to believe otherwise.

Definition of CONSCIOUSNESS

1 a : the quality or state of being aware especially of something within oneself b : the state or fact of being conscious of an external object, state, or fact c : awareness; especially : concern for some social or political cause
2 : the state of being characterized by sensation, emotion, volition, and thought : mind

And what you're talking about is a clone I believe. And that type of clone is fiction but i'll answer it. It would be two seperate entites having their own experiences. Everything about the brain, and the person the brain in essense creates, is the same. It is now just two seperate individuals. They wouldn't share what the other percieves anymore then you percieving my experiences. Once you take the brain, and even if its and exact replica, it will change based on the experiences it percieves. It will not stay the same as brains change and develope.

ManifestoJoe

Yes, but that's just it. If one's consciousness is entirely determined by one's physical brain, then an identical physical brain should give rise to an identical consciousness. Of course the example is fiction. It's a thought experiment.

It would be identical, until the two brain copies have differing experiences.

And if they didn't (again, a thought experiment), then would you perceive yourself as being conscious in both bodies? If not, why not? What would make you "you" and your clone a different entity?

Avatar image for Hatiko
Hatiko

4669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 Hatiko
Member since 2006 • 4669 Posts

I think steven hawkings is now the dumbest man alive because he has used the reasoning of a 10 year old and said that the afterlife is for people who fear death.

Do I fear death? No. Ya, I do think that there is a heaven but it's not because I fear death. It is because that is what I truly believe. And when there is doubt in my mind and I think that there is none, I really don't care, because I shoudln't be afraid of something that I wont even get to experience.

I'm afraid of meeting an angry wolf in the forest of night because I will have to experience it's attack. I'm afraid of falling because I will have to experience the fall. I am not afraid of death and no afterlife because I will simply not have a spirit/soul to care.

Avatar image for ManifestoJoe
ManifestoJoe

587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 ManifestoJoe
Member since 2009 • 587 Posts

[QUOTE="ManifestoJoe"]

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

Yes, but that's just it. If one's consciousness is entirely determined by one's physical brain, then an identical physical brain should give rise to an identical consciousness. Of course the example is fiction. It's a thought experiment.

GabuEx

It would be identical, until the two brain copies have differing experiences.

And if they didn't (again, a thought experiment), then would you perceive yourself as being conscious in both bodies? If not, why not? What would make you "you" and your clone a different entity?

I would be me with my brain and my clone would be themselves with a copy of my brain. It is now receiving his perceptions of the world, not mine.
Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts
I actually agree with him on pretty much everything he said, however he knows just as much as anybody else on the afterlife. It's something we'll never know the answer too.
Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#136 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts
hmm, I disagree with his conclusion that the size of the universe makes God impossible. You could say improbable if you wish, but impossible implies a proof for that claim, to which he has none.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#137 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
It really doesn't make sense to me to do so much here if we don't go anywhere when we die. Helping people doesn't really matter to me if they are all just going to die anyways and not end up in an afterlife. I can't live life to the fullest if theres not an afterlife, whats the point?? Whats the point of even being healthy or caring about anything at all?? If theres no afterlife then every single thing that has happened on this earth has been a complete waste.joshrocks2245
Your logic is that life is meaningless without an afterlife, correct? Then wouldn't it be also logical that you are just wasting your time here, so expediting the process of going to this afterlife would beneficial, no? What is keeping you alive here on Earth if nothing of it is any meaning? What is motivating you to do anything at all if all of what you do amounts to nothing anyways? This idea had never made sense to me. I find the life-denying attitude as a whole to be completely irrational. Even if there is a God, and a Heaven... why would that God not want you to live the life he gifted you to its fullest, and do the same for all others?
Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#138 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Whether or not there is an afterlife, what matters most is what we do here and now, since this is the only life we "know" we get. Hoping for an afterlife is as detrimental as hoping for non-existence after death... what we really should hope for is our ability to make the best of what we have and don't just throw it away or make other people suffer because of it.JJ_Productions
exactly. I don't believe in any afterlife or soul, I personally think it was created by early humans seeking to live past their already short lives. Enjoy what you have here while it lasts, it's the only time you get it.

Its one thing to speculate, its another thing to flat out claim a bunch of humans sat around a fireplace and made a story up. Your logic fails

can you explain to me then why there are so many religions if only one is "true" and how did the greeks, romans etc came up with some "gods"

Avatar image for joshrocks2245
joshrocks2245

11248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#139 joshrocks2245
Member since 2003 • 11248 Posts

[QUOTE="joshrocks2245"]It really doesn't make sense to me to do so much here if we don't go anywhere when we die. Helping people doesn't really matter to me if they are all just going to die anyways and not end up in an afterlife. I can't live life to the fullest if theres not an afterlife, whats the point?? Whats the point of even being healthy or caring about anything at all?? If theres no afterlife then every single thing that has happened on this earth has been a complete waste.foxhound_fox
Your logic is that life is meaningless without an afterlife, correct? Then wouldn't it be also logical that you are just wasting your time here, so expediting the process of going to this afterlife would beneficial, no? What is keeping you alive here on Earth if nothing of it is any meaning? What is motivating you to do anything at all if all of what you do amounts to nothing anyways? This idea had never made sense to me. I find the life-denying attitude as a whole to be completely irrational. Even if there is a God, and a Heaven... why would that God not want you to live the life he gifted you to its fullest, and do the same for all others?

Well the only things that are keeping me here is my enjoyment for things like video games or hanging out with friends, I don't care about having people remember me or things like that, I don't really care about going to college or waste my time working 8 hours a day for everyday of my life. I mean if theres no afterlife then why should I bother doing anything that is boring?? People might think it's stupid but seriously whats the point of wasting your time doing these things and trying to be such a great person if none of this matters when we die, pointless.

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#140 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="joshrocks2245"]It really doesn't make sense to me to do so much here if we don't go anywhere when we die. Helping people doesn't really matter to me if they are all just going to die anyways and not end up in an afterlife. I can't live life to the fullest if theres not an afterlife, whats the point?? Whats the point of even being healthy or caring about anything at all?? If theres no afterlife then every single thing that has happened on this earth has been a complete waste.joshrocks2245

Your logic is that life is meaningless without an afterlife, correct? Then wouldn't it be also logical that you are just wasting your time here, so expediting the process of going to this afterlife would beneficial, no? What is keeping you alive here on Earth if nothing of it is any meaning? What is motivating you to do anything at all if all of what you do amounts to nothing anyways? This idea had never made sense to me. I find the life-denying attitude as a whole to be completely irrational. Even if there is a God, and a Heaven... why would that God not want you to live the life he gifted you to its fullest, and do the same for all others?

Well the only things that are keeping me here is my enjoyment for things like video games or hanging out with friends, I don't care about having people remember me or things like that, I don't really care about going to college or waste my time working 8 hours a day for everyday of my life. I mean if theres no afterlife then why should I bother doing anything that is boring?? People might think it's stupid but seriously whats the point of wasting your time doing these things and trying to be such a great person if none of this matters when we die, pointless.

Why would it matter if there were an afterlife?

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#141 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Gabu stole my next question.
Avatar image for Bloodseeker23
Bloodseeker23

8338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#142 Bloodseeker23
Member since 2008 • 8338 Posts

Stephen Hawking is the most brilliant mind of our generation, but I don't see what makes his thoughts on the afterlife bear any more weight than anyone else's. This kind of reminds me of this comic strip.

GabuEx
I agree with Mr. Gabu on this one.
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#143 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

Gabu stole my next question.foxhound_fox

Sorry. :oops:

Avatar image for KiIIyou
KiIIyou

27204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 KiIIyou
Member since 2006 • 27204 Posts
He says a lot of things I don't understand.
Avatar image for arbitor365
arbitor365

2726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#145 arbitor365
Member since 2009 • 2726 Posts

I can tell you all exactly what awaits us after death. think of what you remember before you were born. think of what you experieinced before you were born. that is what death will be akin to.

Avatar image for Necrifer
Necrifer

10629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 Necrifer
Member since 2010 • 10629 Posts

I can tell you all exactly what awaits us after death. think of what you remember before you were born. think of what you experieinced before you were born. that is what death will be akin to.

arbitor365

Okay then...

Avatar image for arbitor365
arbitor365

2726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#147 arbitor365
Member since 2009 • 2726 Posts

[QUOTE="arbitor365"]

I can tell you all exactly what awaits us after death. think of what you remember before you were born. think of what you experieinced before you were born. that is what death will be akin to.

Necrifer

Okay then...

the answer is nothing. total lack of consciousness.

Avatar image for Hatiko
Hatiko

4669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 Hatiko
Member since 2006 • 4669 Posts

He says a lot of things I don't understand.KiIIyou

Like the pic in your sig. How does a person bend like that?

Avatar image for KiIIyou
KiIIyou

27204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 KiIIyou
Member since 2006 • 27204 Posts

[QUOTE="KiIIyou"]He says a lot of things I don't understand.Hatiko

Like the pic in your sig. How does a person bend like that?

Just like that one song, she's got no bones.
Avatar image for joshrocks2245
joshrocks2245

11248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#150 joshrocks2245
Member since 2003 • 11248 Posts

[QUOTE="joshrocks2245"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"] Your logic is that life is meaningless without an afterlife, correct? Then wouldn't it be also logical that you are just wasting your time here, so expediting the process of going to this afterlife would beneficial, no? What is keeping you alive here on Earth if nothing of it is any meaning? What is motivating you to do anything at all if all of what you do amounts to nothing anyways? This idea had never made sense to me. I find the life-denying attitude as a whole to be completely irrational. Even if there is a God, and a Heaven... why would that God not want you to live the life he gifted you to its fullest, and do the same for all others? GabuEx

Well the only things that are keeping me here is my enjoyment for things like video games or hanging out with friends, I don't care about having people remember me or things like that, I don't really care about going to college or waste my time working 8 hours a day for everyday of my life. I mean if theres no afterlife then why should I bother doing anything that is boring?? People might think it's stupid but seriously whats the point of wasting your time doing these things and trying to be such a great person if none of this matters when we die, pointless.

Why would it matter if there were an afterlife?

Because if there was one I could do all that stuff, like go to college and have a family and then I could celebrate what I did here in the afterlife, and I would celebrate the good things I did and that would pay off in the afterlife. Thats why it matters, I could do all the boring stuff on this life and then have a great afterlife.