Tennessee Governor Signs Bill Overturning LGBT Nondiscrimination Ordinance

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#201 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

If churches would pay TAXES, than i would be all in favor of what your saying.. But they don't, and they are still given the services they are getting for free..

imetamonster

The State does not pay tithes. We have separation of Church and State, one paying the other violates that separation. Moreover "the power to tax is the power to destroy" and having rights does not depend on paying taxes. Also the Church is a non-profit and thus does not pay taxes and other non-profits do not pay taxes also.

Do you want Planned Parenthood to pay taxes?

I dont think they should

Why shouldn't Planned Parenthood pay taxes?

Avatar image for imetamonster
imetamonster

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#202 imetamonster
Member since 2008 • 793 Posts

[QUOTE="imetamonster"]

[QUOTE="whipassmt"] The State does not pay tithes. We have separation of Church and State, one paying the other violates that separation. Moreover "the power to tax is the power to destroy" and having rights does not depend on paying taxes. Also the Church is a non-profit and thus does not pay taxes and other non-profits do not pay taxes also.

Do you want Planned Parenthood to pay taxes?

whipassmt

I dont think they should

Why shouldn't Planned Parenthood pay taxes?

They are life savers

Help people who have stds, etc.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#203 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="imetamonster"]

I dont think they should

imetamonster

Why shouldn't Planned Parenthood pay taxes?

They are life savers

Help people who have stds, etc.

The Church operates many hospitals and other things that save lives. I bet they save more lives than Planned Parenthood which really only provides care for things related to the reproductive system (they won't help you if you're having a heart attack). And at least the Church doesn't kill innocent babies via abortion.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#204 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] you recently came out here right? it was about a month ago, and at that time you said you understood both ends of the debate going on at that time correct? let me ask you, what do you think breads more hate, is it the heavy hand of the law trying to bend people to its whim(see prohibition, traffic laws) or is it that of lone outliers in society who these laws are to protect you against? what is better for you in the long run to suppress others even ones who prior held no ill will even fellow gays from making light of their fancy as all people do, or letting those few people who might hold some form of prejudice against you have the same voice you do? im off of work now, you will have about an hr to think over an answer.

imetamonster

this question

Im having a hard time understnanding the question

what is better for society and those with your preference in the long run, to force others behaviors, an action we know always has ill backlashes, or to leave the outliers, the vast minority to their bigotry? do you feel it is better to make all people censor their actions because of a few, or is it better for everyone to be able to think how they like? mind you any sort of force exerted on you from another is already a crime, we are only talking about thoughts here.

and on a side note policies like this tend to have the opposite effect than what was intended, see the americans for disabilities act signed by bush Sr. it was intended to increase handicap employment and the number of disabled employed has dropped since it was signed into law, as it turns out people do not like to higher workers who come with extra liabilities, and the inability to fire them without being sued because the employee claims it is because he or she is of X protected class.

Avatar image for imetamonster
imetamonster

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#205 imetamonster
Member since 2008 • 793 Posts

[QUOTE="imetamonster"]

[QUOTE="whipassmt"] Why shouldn't Planned Parenthood pay taxes?

whipassmt

They are life savers

Help people who have stds, etc.

The Church operates many hospitals and other things that save lives. I bet they save more lives than Planned Parenthood which really only provides care for things related to the reproductive system (they won't help you if you're having a heart attack). And at least the Church doesn't kill innocent babies via abortion.

Its neccesarry they provide things like that. I dont see any churchs helping people with STDs. Church is mainly, church. And thats not a hosbital that saves lives

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#206 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

[QUOTE="imetamonster"]

[QUOTE="whipassmt"] Why shouldn't Planned Parenthood pay taxes?

whipassmt

They are life savers

Help people who have stds, etc.

The Church operates many hospitals and other things that save lives. I bet they save more lives than Planned Parenthood which really only provides care for things related to the reproductive system (they won't help you if you're having a heart attack). And at least the Church doesn't kill innocent babies via abortion.

Scientifically and lawfully, fetuses are not babies
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#207 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="imetamonster"]

They are life savers

Help people who have stds, etc.

imetamonster

The Church operates many hospitals and other things that save lives. I bet they save more lives than Planned Parenthood which really only provides care for things related to the reproductive system (they won't help you if you're having a heart attack). And at least the Church doesn't kill innocent babies via abortion.

Its neccesarry they provide things like that. I dont see any churchs helping people with STDs. Church is mainly, church. And thats not a hosbital that saves lives

I already said the Church runs many hospitals and other thinks that save lives. Plus allowing the Gov't to tax them could be unconstitutional since "the power to tax is the power to destroy" and Churches are necessary for people to have their right to Free Exercise of their religion.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#208 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="imetamonster"]

They are life savers

Help people who have stds, etc.

DroidPhysX

The Church operates many hospitals and other things that save lives. I bet they save more lives than Planned Parenthood which really only provides care for things related to the reproductive system (they won't help you if you're having a heart attack). And at least the Church doesn't kill innocent babies via abortion.

Scientifically and lawfully, fetuses are not babies

Lawfully depends on what law you are talking about. But if you insist, at least the Church doesn't kill Human Beings through abortion. Is that better.

Avatar image for imetamonster
imetamonster

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#209 imetamonster
Member since 2008 • 793 Posts

[QUOTE="imetamonster"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] this questionsurrealnumber5

Im having a hard time understnanding the question

what is better for society and those with your preference in the long run, to force others behaviors, an action we know always has ill backlashes, or to leave the outliers, the vast minority to their bigotry? do you feel it is better to make all people censor their actions because of a few, or is it better for everyone to be able to think how they like? mind you any sort of force exerted on you from another is already a crime, we are only talking about thoughts here.

and on a side note policies like this tend to have the opposite effect than what was intended, see the americans for disabilities act signed by bush Sr. it was intended to increase handicap employment and the number of disabled employed has dropped since it was signed into law, as it turns out people do not like to higher workers who come with extra liabilities, and the inability to fire them without being sued because the employee claims it is because he or she is of X protected class.

I see...

Though i see this as a respect thing. Being told you were not hired because of your sexuality just does not seem right to me. At all. I doubt this would cause a uprising on homophobia.

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#210 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="whipassmt"] The Church operates many hospitals and other things that save lives. I bet they save more lives than Planned Parenthood which really only provides care for things related to the reproductive system (they won't help you if you're having a heart attack). And at least the Church doesn't kill innocent babies via abortion.

whipassmt

Scientifically and lawfully, fetuses are not babies

Lawfully depends on what law you are talking about. But if you insist, at least the Church doesn't kill Human Beings through abortion. Is that better.

The majority opinion in Row v. Wade already set guidelines. A fetus is not a person/human being/baby.
Avatar image for imetamonster
imetamonster

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211 imetamonster
Member since 2008 • 793 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="whipassmt"] The Church operates many hospitals and other things that save lives. I bet they save more lives than Planned Parenthood which really only provides care for things related to the reproductive system (they won't help you if you're having a heart attack). And at least the Church doesn't kill innocent babies via abortion.

whipassmt

Scientifically and lawfully, fetuses are not babies

Lawfully depends on what law you are talking about. But if you insist, at least the Church doesn't kill Human Beings through abortion. Is that better.

Wow... I find this ignorant

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#212 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] Scientifically and lawfully, fetuses are not babiesDroidPhysX

Lawfully depends on what law you are talking about. But if you insist, at least the Church doesn't kill Human Beings through abortion. Is that better.

The majority opinion in Row v. Wade already set guidelines. A fetus is not a person/human being/baby.

Roe v. Wade only applies in the United States. And the Supreme Court cannot make scientific determinations. And yes a fetus is a human being, it has human DNA and two human parents, it is not a dog or a leaf it is a human.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#213 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] Scientifically and lawfully, fetuses are not babiesimetamonster

Lawfully depends on what law you are talking about. But if you insist, at least the Church doesn't kill Human Beings through abortion. Is that better.

Wow... I find this ignorant

What do you find so "ignorant" and why must you use such insulting language there Spidey?

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#214 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51609 Posts

And nothing of value was lost...

CHOASXIII
This is true.
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#215 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51609 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="whipassmt"] Lawfully depends on what law you are talking about. But if you insist, at least the Church doesn't kill Human Beings through abortion. Is that better.

whipassmt

The majority opinion in Row v. Wade already set guidelines. A fetus is not a person/human being/baby.

Roe v. Wade only applies in the United States. And the Supreme Court cannot make scientific determinations. And yes a fetus is a human being, it has human DNA and two human parents, it is not a dog or a leaf it is a human.

You sir, are awesome.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#216 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="whipassmt"] Lawfully depends on what law you are talking about. But if you insist, at least the Church doesn't kill Human Beings through abortion. Is that better.

whipassmt

The majority opinion in Row v. Wade already set guidelines. A fetus is not a person/human being/baby.

Roe v. Wade only applies in the United States. And the Supreme Court cannot make scientific determinations. And yes a fetus is a human being, it has human DNA and two human parents, it is not a dog or a leaf it is a human.

If a fetus is a human being, where can apply for food programs for my unborn child? I mean, it is a human being right? Where do you get your view that a fetus is a human being?
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#217 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="imetamonster"]

Im having a hard time understnanding the question

imetamonster

what is better for society and those with your preference in the long run, to force others behaviors, an action we know always has ill backlashes, or to leave the outliers, the vast minority to their bigotry? do you feel it is better to make all people censor their actions because of a few, or is it better for everyone to be able to think how they like? mind you any sort of force exerted on you from another is already a crime, we are only talking about thoughts here.

and on a side note policies like this tend to have the opposite effect than what was intended, see the americans for disabilities act signed by bush Sr. it was intended to increase handicap employment and the number of disabled employed has dropped since it was signed into law, as it turns out people do not like to higher workers who come with extra liabilities, and the inability to fire them without being sued because the employee claims it is because he or she is of X protected class.

I see...

Though i see this as a respect thing. Being told you were not hired because of your sexuality just does not seem right to me. At all. I doubt this would cause a uprising on homophobia.

i have never been told why i did not get a job and i have had around 20 interviews in my life... i am one of the nicest people you'll meet, my circle of friends is filled with all sorts of perversions, and i mean that in the technical since, people who would not be seen as "normal" but if i ever get a citation from an officer because i was calling one of my gay friends gay that would be enough for me to turn into a vindictive bastard. i'd still love my current gay friends but i'd treat the rest of you as if it were your fault.
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#218 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51609 Posts
[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] The majority opinion in Row v. Wade already set guidelines. A fetus is not a person/human being/baby.DroidPhysX

Roe v. Wade only applies in the United States. And the Supreme Court cannot make scientific determinations. And yes a fetus is a human being, it has human DNA and two human parents, it is not a dog or a leaf it is a human.

If a fetus is a human being, where can apply for food programs for my unborn child? I mean, it is a human being right? Where do you get your view that a fetus is a human being?

From science.
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#219 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] The majority opinion in Row v. Wade already set guidelines. A fetus is not a person/human being/baby.DroidPhysX

Roe v. Wade only applies in the United States. And the Supreme Court cannot make scientific determinations. And yes a fetus is a human being, it has human DNA and two human parents, it is not a dog or a leaf it is a human.

If a fetus is a human being, where can apply for food programs for my unborn child? I mean, it is a human being right? Where do you get your view that a fetus is a human being?

If it is not a human being than what is it, an Ewok?

Avatar image for ROFLCOPTER603
ROFLCOPTER603

2140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#220 ROFLCOPTER603
Member since 2010 • 2140 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="whipassmt"] Roe v. Wade only applies in the United States. And the Supreme Court cannot make scientific determinations. And yes a fetus is a human being, it has human DNA and two human parents, it is not a dog or a leaf it is a human.

whipassmt

If a fetus is a human being, where can apply for food programs for my unborn child? I mean, it is a human being right? Where do you get your view that a fetus is a human being?

If it is not a human being than what is it, an Ewok?

No, it's a wookie.

Avatar image for imetamonster
imetamonster

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#221 imetamonster
Member since 2008 • 793 Posts

I dont mean to use any offending language. Im just trying to stand up for what i believe in.

When i first heard of abortion, i thought it was the saddest thing in the world. As i actually talked to teenage girls who thought about/ or have acted uponit my thoughts on it changed.

And still i dont know if i agree with abortion or not. But i would rather have women get it done proffesionaly than at home or somewhere else. And i see that many women would use unsafe ways if it were'nt for proffessional doctors who do it.

I try to extend my thoughts and put my self in other peoples shoes. And that goes with the whole discriminating against gays and color of skin

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#222 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

I dont mean to use any offending language. Im just trying to stand up for what i believe in.

When i first heard of abortion, i thought it was the saddest thing in the world. As i actually talked to teenage girls who thought about/ or have acted uponit my thoughts on it changed.

And still i dont know if i agree with abortion or not. But i would rather have women get it done proffesionaly than at home or somewhere else. And i see that many women would use unsafe ways if it were'nt for proffessional doctors who do it.

I try to extend my thoughts and put my self in other peoples shoes. And that goes with the whole discriminating against gays and color of skin

imetamonster

do you also try to put yourself into the shoes of racists or "homophobes". Or for that matter in the shoes of the babies that are aborted (yes I know they don't wear shoes).

Avatar image for imetamonster
imetamonster

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#223 imetamonster
Member since 2008 • 793 Posts

[QUOTE="imetamonster"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] what is better for society and those with your preference in the long run, to force others behaviors, an action we know always has ill backlashes, or to leave the outliers, the vast minority to their bigotry? do you feel it is better to make all people censor their actions because of a few, or is it better for everyone to be able to think how they like? mind you any sort of force exerted on you from another is already a crime, we are only talking about thoughts here.

and on a side note policies like this tend to have the opposite effect than what was intended, see the americans for disabilities act signed by bush Sr. it was intended to increase handicap employment and the number of disabled employed has dropped since it was signed into law, as it turns out people do not like to higher workers who come with extra liabilities, and the inability to fire them without being sued because the employee claims it is because he or she is of X protected class.

surrealnumber5

I see...

Though i see this as a respect thing. Being told you were not hired because of your sexuality just does not seem right to me. At all. I doubt this would cause a uprising on homophobia.

i have never been told why i did not get a job and i have had around 20 interviews in my life... i am one of the nicest people you'll meet, my circle of friends is filled with all sorts of perversions, and i mean that in the technical since, people who would not be seen as "normal" but if i ever get a citation from an officer because i was calling one of my gay friends gay that would be enough for me to turn into a vindictive bastard. i'd still love my current gay friends but i'd treat the rest of you as if it were your fault.

I see your point on this. Even still, not everyone is going to be happy about it. If someone gets upset at the whole gay community just because a gay person did something, thats being very prejudice.

I would hate to see a uprising on homophobia because of this. People need to understand that there are certain people in our society you have to accept.

I hate to bring the mentioning of gay suicides into this but that is what im thinking about. I have met so many gays in my life. And i have come to realize how not being accepted in our society can be torture. Im sticking by them. Having witnissed a suicide of a loved one, im going to always stick up for anyone who feels overwhelmed enough to do such a thing. And our society isgetting better, but gays still are not treated equally. Ill keep fighting untill they do.

Avatar image for imetamonster
imetamonster

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#224 imetamonster
Member since 2008 • 793 Posts

[QUOTE="imetamonster"]

I dont mean to use any offending language. Im just trying to stand up for what i believe in.

When i first heard of abortion, i thought it was the saddest thing in the world. As i actually talked to teenage girls who thought about/ or have acted uponit my thoughts on it changed.

And still i dont know if i agree with abortion or not. But i would rather have women get it done proffesionaly than at home or somewhere else. And i see that many women would use unsafe ways if it were'nt for proffessional doctors who do it.

I try to extend my thoughts and put my self in other peoples shoes. And that goes with the whole discriminating against gays and color of skin

whipassmt

do you also try to put yourself into the shoes of racists or "homophobes". Or for that matter in the shoes of the babies that are aborted (yes I know they don't wear shoes).

I do. Theres no reason to be racist!! Or homophobic! Some used to say being gay was a disease. Being homophobic is the disease.

Im not going to stick up for people that love to hate.
Im sticking by people who love to love.

Give me any reasons someone should be racist or homophobic?

Its so different!!

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#225 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="imetamonster"]

I see...

Though i see this as a respect thing. Being told you were not hired because of your sexuality just does not seem right to me. At all. I doubt this would cause a uprising on homophobia.

imetamonster

i have never been told why i did not get a job and i have had around 20 interviews in my life... i am one of the nicest people you'll meet, my circle of friends is filled with all sorts of perversions, and i mean that in the technical since, people who would not be seen as "normal" but if i ever get a citation from an officer because i was calling one of my gay friends gay that would be enough for me to turn into a vindictive bastard. i'd still love my current gay friends but i'd treat the rest of you as if it were your fault.

I see your point on this. Even still, not everyone is going to be happy about it. If someone gets upset at the whole gay community just because a gay person did something, thats being very prejudice.

I would hate to see a uprising on homophobia because of this. People need to understand that there are certain people in our society you have to accept.

I hate to bring the mentioning of gay suicides into this but that is what im thinking about. I have met so many gays in my life. And i have come to realize how not being accepted in our society can be torture. Im sticking by them. Having witnissed a suicide of a loved one, im going to always stick up for anyone who feels overwhelmed enough to do such a thing. And our society isgetting better, but gays still are not treated equally. Ill keep fighting untill they do.

when has peaceful acceptance ever come from a gun? and if you want the government to step in you are asking for force, that is not acceptance that is coercion and it only makes people mad.
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#226 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="imetamonster"]

I dont mean to use any offending language. Im just trying to stand up for what i believe in.

When i first heard of abortion, i thought it was the saddest thing in the world. As i actually talked to teenage girls who thought about/ or have acted uponit my thoughts on it changed.

And still i dont know if i agree with abortion or not. But i would rather have women get it done proffesionaly than at home or somewhere else. And i see that many women would use unsafe ways if it were'nt for proffessional doctors who do it.

I try to extend my thoughts and put my self in other peoples shoes. And that goes with the whole discriminating against gays and color of skin

imetamonster

do you also try to put yourself into the shoes of racists or "homophobes". Or for that matter in the shoes of the babies that are aborted (yes I know they don't wear shoes).

I do. Theres no reason to be racist!! Or homophobic! Some used to say being gay was a disease. Being homophobic is the disease.

Im not going to stick up for people that love to hate.
Im sticking by people who love to love.

Give me any reasons someone should be racist or homophobic?

Its so different!!

"homophobia" is not a "disease".

Avatar image for imetamonster
imetamonster

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#227 imetamonster
Member since 2008 • 793 Posts

[QUOTE="imetamonster"]

[QUOTE="whipassmt"] do you also try to put yourself into the shoes of racists or "homophobes". Or for that matter in the shoes of the babies that are aborted (yes I know they don't wear shoes).

whipassmt

I do. Theres no reason to be racist!! Or homophobic! Some used to say being gay was a disease. Being homophobic is the disease.

Im not going to stick up for people that love to hate.
Im sticking by people who love to love.

Give me any reasons someone should be racist or homophobic?

Its so different!!

"homophobia" is not a "disease".

If your homophobic you need help.

For being gay you dont need help.

Im done. I wonder if everything you have posted was just a joke. I have never seen someone stand up for racism and homophobia so openly.

Its nice to know this type of hate is not common

Avatar image for imetamonster
imetamonster

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#228 imetamonster
Member since 2008 • 793 Posts

[QUOTE="imetamonster"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] i have never been told why i did not get a job and i have had around 20 interviews in my life... i am one of the nicest people you'll meet, my circle of friends is filled with all sorts of perversions, and i mean that in the technical since, people who would not be seen as "normal" but if i ever get a citation from an officer because i was calling one of my gay friends gay that would be enough for me to turn into a vindictive bastard. i'd still love my current gay friends but i'd treat the rest of you as if it were your fault.surrealnumber5

I see your point on this. Even still, not everyone is going to be happy about it. If someone gets upset at the whole gay community just because a gay person did something, thats being very prejudice.

I would hate to see a uprising on homophobia because of this. People need to understand that there are certain people in our society you have to accept.

I hate to bring the mentioning of gay suicides into this but that is what im thinking about. I have met so many gays in my life. And i have come to realize how not being accepted in our society can be torture. Im sticking by them. Having witnissed a suicide of a loved one, im going to always stick up for anyone who feels overwhelmed enough to do such a thing. And our society isgetting better, but gays still are not treated equally. Ill keep fighting untill they do.

when has peaceful acceptance ever come from a gun? and if you want the government to step in you are asking for force, that is not acceptance that is coercion and it only makes people mad.

letting people walk all over you is not the answer either. So many people still think being gay is a choice anyone can make over night. Which is completely false. You cannot choose who you are attracted too.

People need to realize they cannot discriminate because unfortunely, its costing lives. No problem is going away unless you fight back.

Im not talking about any harm of course. But by awareness and acceptance.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#229 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51609 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="imetamonster"]

I do. Theres no reason to be racist!! Or homophobic! Some used to say being gay was a disease. Being homophobic is the disease.

Im not going to stick up for people that love to hate.
Im sticking by people who love to love.

Give me any reasons someone should be racist or homophobic?

Its so different!!

imetamonster

"homophobia" is not a "disease".

If your homophobic you need help.

For being gay you dont need help.

Im done. I wonder if everything you have posted was just a joke. I have never seen someone stand up for racism and homophobia so openly.

Its nice to know this type of hate is not common

People don't need help with homophobia. It's something they choose, like being gay :)

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#230 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="imetamonster"]

[QUOTE="whipassmt"] do you also try to put yourself into the shoes of racists or "homophobes". Or for that matter in the shoes of the babies that are aborted (yes I know they don't wear shoes).

whipassmt

I do. Theres no reason to be racist!! Or homophobic! Some used to say being gay was a disease. Being homophobic is the disease.

Im not going to stick up for people that love to hate.
Im sticking by people who love to love.

Give me any reasons someone should be racist or homophobic?

Its so different!!

"homophobia" is not a "disease".

Indeed it isn't; calling it a disease gives it an excuse. There is no excuse for homophobia; a rational, morally decent human being simply is not a homophobe.

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#231 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="imetamonster"]

[QUOTE="whipassmt"] "homophobia" is not a "disease".

Chutebox

If your homophobic you need help.

For being gay you dont need help.

Im done. I wonder if everything you have posted was just a joke. I have never seen someone stand up for racism and homophobia so openly.

Its nice to know this type of hate is not common

People don't need help with homophobia. It's something they choose, like being gay :)

Like you chose to be straight, amirite?
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#232 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

ITT people need to relax and loosen up a bit.

[spoiler] Shall I call xaos? [/spoiler]

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#233 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="imetamonster"]

I see your point on this. Even still, not everyone is going to be happy about it. If someone gets upset at the whole gay community just because a gay person did something, thats being very prejudice.

I would hate to see a uprising on homophobia because of this. People need to understand that there are certain people in our society you have to accept.

I hate to bring the mentioning of gay suicides into this but that is what im thinking about. I have met so many gays in my life. And i have come to realize how not being accepted in our society can be torture. Im sticking by them. Having witnissed a suicide of a loved one, im going to always stick up for anyone who feels overwhelmed enough to do such a thing. And our society isgetting better, but gays still are not treated equally. Ill keep fighting untill they do.

imetamonster

when has peaceful acceptance ever come from a gun? and if you want the government to step in you are asking for force, that is not acceptance that is coercion and it only makes people mad.

letting people walk all over you is not the answer either. So many people still think being gay is a choice anyone can make over night. Which is completely false. You cannot choose who you are attracted too.

People need to realize they cannot discriminate because unfortunely, its costing lives. No problem is going away unless you fight back.

Im not talking about any harm of course. But by awareness and acceptance.

so your intent is vindictive, that is also not peaceful or accepting.
Avatar image for imetamonster
imetamonster

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#234 imetamonster
Member since 2008 • 793 Posts

A gay person chooses to be gay as much as a straight person chooses to be straight.

Who would choose to be gay Do you think gays enjoy the fact they are unaccepted, bullied, killed, and hated by many because of there sexuality?

Oh yes. Im sure that all sounds very lovely to everyone

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#235 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="whipassmt"] Roe v. Wade only applies in the United States. And the Supreme Court cannot make scientific determinations. And yes a fetus is a human being, it has human DNA and two human parents, it is not a dog or a leaf it is a human.

Chutebox

If a fetus is a human being, where can apply for food programs for my unborn child? I mean, it is a human being right? Where do you get your view that a fetus is a human being?

If it is not a human being than what is it, an Ewok?

So can i apply for social security for it?

Avatar image for imetamonster
imetamonster

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#236 imetamonster
Member since 2008 • 793 Posts

[QUOTE="imetamonster"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] when has peaceful acceptance ever come from a gun? and if you want the government to step in you are asking for force, that is not acceptance that is coercion and it only makes people mad. surrealnumber5

letting people walk all over you is not the answer either. So many people still think being gay is a choice anyone can make over night. Which is completely false. You cannot choose who you are attracted too.

People need to realize they cannot discriminate because unfortunely, its costing lives. No problem is going away unless you fight back.

Im not talking about any harm of course. But by awareness and acceptance.

so your intent is vindictive, that is also not peaceful or accepting.

Maybe from the churchs prespective.

I dont really give if thats the case. They are partly the cause of so much of the anti-gay protests that appear from time to time.

Not to mention the west babtist church holding up signs saying "God hates Gays" Actually usingthe f word that ends with oggot.

Thats peaceful isnt it?

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#237 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51609 Posts

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] If a fetus is a human being, where can apply for food programs for my unborn child? I mean, it is a human being right? Where do you get your view that a fetus is a human being?DroidPhysX

If it is not a human being than what is it, an Ewok?

So can i apply for social security for it?

I never said that lol, you quoted wrong. And no you can't, but what the hell does the government matter in this?
Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#238 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

Forcing people to accept gays isn't going to actually make people accept them. That's not how you get real change...

Might as well try punching every racist in the face. Like that's going to change their mind...

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#239 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51609 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="imetamonster"]

letting people walk all over you is not the answer either. So many people still think being gay is a choice anyone can make over night. Which is completely false. You cannot choose who you are attracted too.

People need to realize they cannot discriminate because unfortunely, its costing lives. No problem is going away unless you fight back.

Im not talking about any harm of course. But by awareness and acceptance.

imetamonster

so your intent is vindictive, that is also not peaceful or accepting.

Maybe from the churchs prespective.

I dont really give if thats the case. They are partly the cause of so much of the anti-gay protests that appear from time to time.

Not to mention the west babtist church holding up signs saying "God hates Gays" Actually usingthe f word that ends with oggot.

Thats peaceful isnt it?

That's more of a cult than a church. Actually, I don't think it's a church at all.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#240 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

A gay person chooses to be gay as much as a straight person chooses to be straight.

Who would choose to be gay Do you think gays enjoy the fact they are unaccepted, bullied, killed, and hated by many because of there sexuality?

Oh yes. Im sure that all sounds very lovely to everyone

imetamonster
you wish to punish society for what few have done in the name of a cause you have made your own, in these guides many men have done many unspeakable evils
Avatar image for alexside1
alexside1

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#241 alexside1
Member since 2006 • 4412 Posts

Shall I call xaos?

Teenaged

Yes, call Mr. Satan himself. And had him give us some lawls.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#242 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="imetamonster"]

letting people walk all over you is not the answer either. So many people still think being gay is a choice anyone can make over night. Which is completely false. You cannot choose who you are attracted too.

People need to realize they cannot discriminate because unfortunely, its costing lives. No problem is going away unless you fight back.

Im not talking about any harm of course. But by awareness and acceptance.

imetamonster

so your intent is vindictive, that is also not peaceful or accepting.

Maybe from the churchs prespective.

I dont really give if thats the case. They are partly the cause of so much of the anti-gay protests that appear from time to time.

Not to mention the west babtist church holding up signs saying "God hates Gays" Actually usingthe f word that ends with oggot.

Thats peaceful isnt it?

till a person calls for action it is a peaceful demonstration even if you do not like it. we have many rights and freedoms but we do not have a right to force our wills on others, we do not have a freedom from disagreement
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#243 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

Shall I call xaos?

alexside1

Yes, call Mr. Satan himself. And had him give us some lawls.

I am sure he'll be glad to give us some... -what, lawls? Oh.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#244 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"] If it is not a human being than what is it, an Ewok?

Chutebox

So can i apply for social security for it?

I never said that lol, you quoted wrong. And no you can't, but what the hell does the government matter in this?

Hmmm, i think you got my stance wrong. I'm stating that a fetus cannot be considered a person. So i interchange the words person and human. I'm assuming you're actually talking about the human species? Thats not what i was talking about.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#245 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

Shall I call xaos?

alexside1

Yes, call Mr. Satan himself. And had him give us some lawls.

youre not the first person who has called him that, its weird that i like xaos the poster even though i dont have his particular cardinal desires
Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#246 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

Forcing people to accept gays isn't going to actually make people accept them. That's not how you get real change...

Might as well try punching every racist in the face. Like that's going to change their mind...

SpartanMSU
If they aren't allowed to spread their racist and homophobic views then eventually all racists and homophobes would die out
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#247 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="alexside1"]

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

Shall I call xaos?

surrealnumber5

Yes, call Mr. Satan himself. And had him give us some lawls.

youre not the first person who has called him that, its weird that i like xaos the poster even though i dont have his particular cardinal desires

Why would it be weird? It would only be weird for a homophobe.

And you said that you do have gay friends.

Avatar image for imetamonster
imetamonster

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#248 imetamonster
Member since 2008 • 793 Posts

[QUOTE="imetamonster"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] so your intent is vindictive, that is also not peaceful or accepting. surrealnumber5

Maybe from the churchs prespective.

I dont really give if thats the case. They are partly the cause of so much of the anti-gay protests that appear from time to time.

Not to mention the west babtist church holding up signs saying "God hates Gays" Actually usingthe f word that ends with oggot.

Thats peaceful isnt it?

till a person calls for action it is a peaceful demonstration even if you do not like it. we have many rights and freedoms but we do not have a right to force our wills on others, we do not have a freedom from disagreement

So every action is not neccasary? When there is a crime, you need action to stop it or for justice. You dont let it be.

Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#249 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="SpartanMSU"]

Forcing people to accept gays isn't going to actually make people accept them. That's not how you get real change...

Might as well try punching every racist in the face. Like that's going to change their mind...

toast_burner

If they aren't allowed to spread their racist and homophobic views then eventually all racists and homophobes would die out

No.

Avatar image for alexside1
alexside1

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#250 alexside1
Member since 2006 • 4412 Posts
[QUOTE="SpartanMSU"]

Forcing people to accept gays isn't going to actually make people accept them. That's not how you get real change...

Might as well try punching every racist in the face. Like that's going to change their mind...

toast_burner
If they aren't allowed to spread their racist and homophobic views then eventually all racists and homophobes would die out

That would violate freedom of speech if that would happen.