Tennessee Republican candidate now threatens secesion from the US

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#201 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

[QUOTE="lordreaven"]

Wait, isin'twhat this guy saidconsidered treason? What is the punishment for treason in the US?

lordreaven

Wouldn't it be protected by free speech....?

Isin't there a limit to freedom of speech in the US though (example: its illegal to threaten the president)?

Yes, but I have never seen "it is not protected by free speech to have disagreements with the government or want to no longer be associated with said government". You can't incite immediate violence (you can't threaten the president, but you also cannot threaten me.), you can't slander (I guess....Media seems to do it constantly.)

If this is treason and not protected by free speech, then thats worrying since most tea partiers, many republicans, and basically anyone who is in disagreement with the current government could be taken as being "treasonous".

I mean, weren't we given the right to bare arms exactly so we could plan revolt if our government got bad? It seems counter intuitive to things.

I don't agree with the tea partiers or this candidate, but I'll still defend his right to say whatever stupidity he wants.

Avatar image for _BlueDuck_
_BlueDuck_

11986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#202 _BlueDuck_
Member since 2003 • 11986 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="_BlueDuck_"]

So the money the federal goverments spends that contributes to the debt does not effect the individual states at all?

rawsavon

nope the federal and state governments are different entities

The equivalent would be your parent spending money to raise you and then expecting you to pay them back

Which is what the federal goverment would do. Much like in Canada, Quebec is expected to pay back it's portion of the national debt (I think it was like, 25%) if it left to federation (which won't happen but that's a different story), though obviously Quebec and the feds disagree on how much should be paid back.

Avatar image for zeorshadow19
zeorshadow19

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#203 zeorshadow19
Member since 2007 • 1471 Posts

I want to see them do it.

Avatar image for buldog300
buldog300

2152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#204 buldog300
Member since 2003 • 2152 Posts
While I stand by my previous post, I don't think people fully realize what it would mean as a nation if countries seceded. Not since the civil war had we been divided by such physical boundaries; we would literally be a divided country. That would make a statement that America is breakable, that given time we could and might disperse ourselves, and that people can no longer trust in the union.
Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#205 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts
The big difference between him and the texan governor is that the governor of Texas can actually succeed. It's their constitutional right.
Avatar image for buldog300
buldog300

2152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#206 buldog300
Member since 2003 • 2152 Posts
The big difference between him and the texan governor is that the governor of Texas can actually succeed. It's their constitutional right. ferrari2001
And what would the government do if Tennessee seceded? If they declare war on one of their own states that won't go over well. People can joke and say good riddance to Tennessee all they want, but are the actually going to use force if the state secedes? You can't tax an entity that has already declared independence from you, so that's out, and an embargo would be just as much an act of war as a show of force.
Avatar image for Former_Slacker
Former_Slacker

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#208 Former_Slacker
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

Eh, go head. At this point the country is very polarized politically and split into two camps, I really wouldn't mind if it were to happen.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#209 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

The big difference between him and the texan governor is that the governor of Texas can actually succeed. It's their constitutional right. ferrari2001

No they can't, no it isn't. Texas sold their right to independance when they joined the United States so that the US would pick up their debt.

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts
[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

[QUOTE="lordreaven"][QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

Wouldn't it be protected by free speech....?

Isin't there a limit to freedom of speech in the US though (example: its illegal to threaten the president)?

Yes, but I have never seen "it is not protected by free speech to have disagreements with the government or want to no longer be associated with said government". You can't incite immediate violence (you can't threaten the president, but you also cannot threaten me.), you can't slander (I guess....Media seems to do it constantly.)

If this is treason and not protected by free speech, then thats worrying since most tea partiers, many republicans, and basically anyone who is in disagreement with the current government could be taken as being "treasonous".

I mean, weren't we given the right to bare arms exactly so we could plan revolt if our government got bad? It seems counter intuitive to things.

I don't agree with the tea partiers or this candidate, but I'll still defend his right to say whatever stupidity he wants.

ah, i see.
Avatar image for poptart
poptart

7298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#212 poptart
Member since 2003 • 7298 Posts

[QUOTE="Same_Jeans_On"][QUOTE="GabuEx"]

At least Texas is not surrounded by other US states; how would the secession of Tennessee even work?

l4dak47

Not being funny or trying to be nasty or anything, but what you said was kind of stupid. Plenty of countries in the World are surrounded by other countries. It wouldn't be any different for Tennessee, they'd just be surrounded by one country.

I think he means since Tennessee is surrounded, they can't trade or defend their borders since they're surrounded by their enemy. Texas is the only state that has the highest chance of success aganist the U.S. Even then, it's damn near impossible.

If you look at the country of Lesotho it's oddly bang right in the middle of South Africa. It's not impossible...

Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#213 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts
The big difference between him and the texan governor is that the governor of Texas can actually succeed. It's their constitutional right. ferrari2001
Where in the constitution does it say that there it is a Right of the State to be able to secede from the Union?
Avatar image for bachilders
bachilders

1430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#214 bachilders
Member since 2005 • 1430 Posts

Zack Wamp ftw he's a family friend of ours. Also, he does not support secession, article takes his words out of context. This was already a big political scandal in Tennessee and we had a full article in the Knoxville News Sentinel devoted to giving candidates the opportunity to defend themselves against this kind of mudslinging. Our other candidates had worse things to defend themselves from than a few words.

As a side note secession should always be left on the table or else the sovereignty of the state and people is compromised to the whims of the federal government that was created by sovereign states only to serve their own interests.

After reading through the whole thread I would like to make a few comments.

1. Just because we support a Republican for governor does not mean we supported the Iraq War, the PATRIOT act, etc. I happen to dislike most Republicans because they brutalize the constitution, but so do Democrats. The parties aren't as different as you might think.

2. Tennessee is actually well off financially. As long as you stay in the big four (Memphis, Nashville, Knoxville, Chattanooga) you will find that Tennessee is pretty much just like your beloved home towns, only better. (Except for Memphis) This is coming from someone who has been to over 30 states and most major cities in the U.S. We have been hit a lot less harshly than most states by the recession because of our fast-growing economy, livable cities, low cost of living, and low taxes (no state income tax).

3. As to the question about what our economy consists of: Moon Pies are made here. 'nuff said

4. As for the myth that Tennesseans are homophobic, racist, backwards, etc. It just isn't true. I have never heard any kind of racism here. Racism is far, far worse in big cities in the north like Baltimore (was called a few interesting names in the projects there a few weeks back).

People need to grow up and realize that the country is pretty much the same everywhere. every state has its share of hicks, businessmen, bums, and rich people.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#215 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

I mean, weren't we given the right to bare arms exactly so we could plan revolt if our government got bad? It seems counter intuitive to things.Pixel-Pirate

No, we were given the right to bear arms so that we would be able to defend our land from foreign invaders. A lot of people seem to forget that at the time the US didn't have much in the way of a standing army, and we were a fledgling nation trying to get on our feet. It was conceivable that Britain might try to reclaim her lost colonies, or that some other foreign nation might try to expand theirs. In the event of an invasion it would largely be up to the populace to fight off such invaders. We're are given the power to peacebly remove our government. Unfortunately many people don't seem to appreciate this power enough to use it, or to use it wisely.

Avatar image for dagreenfish
dagreenfish

1818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#216 dagreenfish
Member since 2010 • 1818 Posts

I highly doubt if any state tried to leave again it would be peaceful. it wouldn't be like:

Texas: "Well, It's getting kinda late. It's been real, but I gotta get going."

Uncle Sam: "Ok, Texas. Thanks for coming by. Call me later."

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#217 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="dagreenfish"]

I highly doubt if any state tried to leave again it would be peaceful. it wouldn't be like:

Texas: "Well, It's getting kinda late. It's been real, but I gotta get going."

Uncle Sam: "Ok, Texas. Thanks for coming by. Call me later."

Congrats sir...you made me :lol: