Texas school to debate the teaching of evolution in schools...

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for HoldThePhone
HoldThePhone

3364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 HoldThePhone
Member since 2007 • 3364 Posts

[QUOTE="SegaGenesisfan"]

You do realise the evolution is a religion, it is a set of beliefs of the world. It does the same thing as religion in a sense, accept have any moral convictions, but it is idea on how we got here. So basically religion is being promoted in public schools:shock:. It does not matter if it is true or not, it is still religion. Plus it is not true science, you can't observe it, its a belief really. Creationist dont doubt science, we doubt that evolution is science.

Funky_Llama

Did you observe Jesus being crucified? No. For something to be science, we only need to observe the evidence for it - which we certainly have in the case of evolution.

Also are conservatism, gravity and general relativity religions?

You do realise the evolution is a religion, it is a set of beliefs of the world. It does the same thing as religion in a sense, accept have any moral convictions, but it is idea on how we got here. So basically religion is being promoted in public schools:shock:. It does not matter if it is true or not, it is still religion. Plus it is not true science, you can't observe it, its a belief really. Creationist dont doubt science, we doubt that evolution is science.

SegaGenesisfan

oh wow, that's almost sig worthy

Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#52 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KY5ArW3Ncfo&feature=dir

Are you sure these guys are right? Tell me scientist are those honest people who never lie....

SegaGenesisfan
Um... you do realise that's The Onion you're quoting , right? :lol: *facepalm*
Avatar image for LosDaddie
LosDaddie

10318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#53 LosDaddie
Member since 2006 • 10318 Posts

You do realise the evolution is a religion, it is a set of beliefs of the world. It does the same thing as religion in a sense, accept have any moral convictions, but it is idea on how we got here. So basically religion is being promoted in public schools:shock:. It does not matter if it is true or not, it is still religion. Plus it is not true science, you can't observe it, its a belief really. Creationist dont doubt science, we doubt that evolution is science.

SegaGenesisfan

:lol: Why am I not surprised SGF posted this?

Evolution is not a religion since it is not based on faith. And yes, you can observe evolution.

Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#54 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts

[QUOTE="nimatoad2000"][QUOTE="Famiking"] If they take a science course, they are essentially choosing to learn evolution. If they choose Christianity studies instead, they choose to learn creationism. They shouldn't be forced to learn either.

Famiking

creationism shouldnt be taught because its not a science, its not real. its a belief. on the other hand evolution is a science, it has been proved, many facts line up.. its been practiced for years and not proved wrong , but rather reinforced in its correctness .

Yes, I know - I don't believe in creationism myself. But you can't just force people to learn it if they don't want to, if they prefer to stay with creationism instead. Evolution AFAIK in the UK education isn't completely taught (to the point it contradicts creationism) until Year 10/11 and at that point they have a choice whether they want to continue to study science or not.

Nope. Science is compulsory in the UK in years 10/11 too.

Avatar image for nimatoad2000
nimatoad2000

7505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#55 nimatoad2000
Member since 2004 • 7505 Posts
contrarty to popular and INCORRECT belief, a theory isnt necisarily unproven, the definition of theory ( according to my anthropology teacher) is that it explains facts, thus is combines many facts toghether into an explanation. a fact is well... a proven thing.. so evolution is the theory that explains the facts of how we have evolved from different animals, the fact of net reproductive sucess, and the fact of alleles and w/e .. im late for class so i cant write this better sorry.
Avatar image for Famiking
Famiking

4879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Famiking
Member since 2009 • 4879 Posts
[QUOTE="Famiking"]Evolution AFAIK in the UK education isn't completely taught (to the point it contradicts creationism) until Year 10/11 and at that point they have a choice whether they want to continue to study science or not.T_P_O
Science is compulsory throughout primary and secondary school and at no point was evolution skipped over even a little.

Science is not compulsory in Y10/11/12/13 - where evolution to the point in actually affect your faith. Before Y10 it's pretty much "If your dad has black hair, chances are you have black hair!"
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
[QUOTE="T_P_O"][QUOTE="Famiking"]Evolution AFAIK in the UK education isn't completely taught (to the point it contradicts creationism) until Year 10/11 and at that point they have a choice whether they want to continue to study science or not.Famiking
Science is compulsory throughout primary and secondary school and at no point was evolution skipped over even a little.

Science is not compulsory in Y10/11/12/13 - where evolution to the point in actually affect your faith. Before Y10 it's pretty much "If your dad has black hair, chances are you have black hair!"

Eh... no, it remains compulsory in years 10 and 11. :|
Avatar image for ArmoredAshes
ArmoredAshes

4025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#58 ArmoredAshes
Member since 2005 • 4025 Posts

http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/03/25/texas.evolution.teaching/index.html

The Texas Board of Education this week will vote on science standards that critics say seek to cast doubt on the theory of evolution.

The board -- considering amendments passed in January -- will hear from the public on Wednesday. It will then take votes -- an initial one Thursday and the final vote Friday.

School board chairman Don McLeroy has wanted to tackle questions that highlight supposed weaknesses in the theory.

For example, skeptics of evolution point to what they contend are fossil record gaps casting doubt on the scientific evidence of common ancestry.

"I'm a skeptic. I'm an evolution skeptic. I don't think it's true," he said. "You need to present other ideas to the kids."

The issue reflects the strong feelings among representatives on the 15-member board, some of whom accept evolutionary theory and some of whom don't. The size of the textbook market in Texas gives it influence nationwide, as publishers adapt their material to its standards.

Thoughts?

mosdef_basic

Hahaha i would love to know what other "theories" they would like to teach. It's a science ****not a religion one. If you want to teach creationism, either create a religious ****in your school. Though in a sense i guess i agree. I think you need to present the kids with several "ideas" and allow for them to choose. Just don't try to pass off creationism as a theory.

Avatar image for Famiking
Famiking

4879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Famiking
Member since 2009 • 4879 Posts
Nope. Science is compulsory in the UK in years 10/11 too.Funky_Llama
Then my school got a free pass? :? The only compulsory subjects are English and Math, and they are debating whether to make English compulsory.
Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#60 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts
[QUOTE="T_P_O"][QUOTE="Famiking"]Evolution AFAIK in the UK education isn't completely taught (to the point it contradicts creationism) until Year 10/11 and at that point they have a choice whether they want to continue to study science or not.Famiking
Science is compulsory throughout primary and secondary school and at no point was evolution skipped over even a little.

Science is not compulsory in Y10/11/12/13 - where evolution to the point in actually affect your faith. Before Y10 it's pretty much "If your dad has black hair, chances are you have black hair!"

Ehhh, science is compulsory in years 10/11. I should know, I just got out of those years.
Avatar image for HoldThePhone
HoldThePhone

3364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 HoldThePhone
Member since 2007 • 3364 Posts
highschools teach evolution so poorly I'd rather they stop so it stops getting a bad name. you still have kids coming out of highschool claiming we came from apes.
Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KY5ArW3Ncfo&feature=dir

Are you sure these guys are right? Tell me scientist are those honest people who never lie....

SegaGenesisfan

You use The Onion to try to make a serious point? :lol:

Avatar image for SpaceMoose
SpaceMoose

10789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 SpaceMoose
Member since 2004 • 10789 Posts
Let's just make Bible studies a required class and call it a day. In case it isn't obvious, I'm being sarcastic.
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]Nope. Science is compulsory in the UK in years 10/11 too.Famiking
Then my school got a free pass? :? The only compulsory subjects are English and Math, and they are debating whether to make English compulsory.

Really? And you're in the UK? Huh. Weird. O_o
Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts

I can recall the exam board and everything for my science classes, it was OCR 21st century science, and it got put on my timetable without giving me an option. You're not in Scotland or anywhere are you?

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#66 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

If they take a science course, they are essentially choosing to learn evolution. If they choose Christianity studies instead, they choose to learn creationism. They shouldn't be forced to learn either.Famiking

Yes, yes they should. If they are forced to learn mathematics, language arts and social studies, they should be forced to learn science. Those four things round out the totality of a solid secular education. If you want a choice, go to a religious private school. Secular public schools are for teaching secular concepts and ideals. Without knowledge in science, we would be limiting children's possible future career choices by about half. With no education in science, you cannot be open to careers in medicine, pharmacy, engineering, architecture, geological studies, biology, botany, physics, entomology, etc.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="Famiking"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]Nope. Science is compulsory in the UK in years 10/11 too.Funky_Llama
Then my school got a free pass? :? The only compulsory subjects are English and Math, and they are debating whether to make English compulsory.

Really? And you're in the UK? Huh. Weird. O_o

When I was at school 2 years ago, science was compulsory.
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#68 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts

I can recall the exam board and everything for my science classes, it was OCR 21st century science, and it got put on my timetable without giving me an option. You're not in Scotland or anywhere are you?

T_P_O
I did that too. Awful GCSE. It's like the exam board sat in a room and said, 'how could we make them as unprepared for science A-levels possible?'
Avatar image for deactivated-5a79221380856
deactivated-5a79221380856

13125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 deactivated-5a79221380856
Member since 2007 • 13125 Posts

You do realise the evolution is a religion, it is a set of beliefs of the world. It does the same thing as religion in a sense, accept have any moral convictions, but it is idea on how we got here. So basically religion is being promoted in public schools:shock:. It does not matter if it is true or not, it is still religion. Plus it is not true science, you can't observe it, its a belief really. Creationist dont doubt science, we doubt that evolution is science.

SegaGenesisfan
You can't observe it, eh? Evolution is not a set of beliefs of the world. For it to be that, there would be remarkable agreement about evolutionary biologists among every portion of evolution, like Michael Behe, who accepts evolution by is skeptical of natural selection driving it.
Avatar image for Famiking
Famiking

4879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Famiking
Member since 2009 • 4879 Posts
[QUOTE="Famiking"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]Nope. Science is compulsory in the UK in years 10/11 too.Funky_Llama
Then my school got a free pass? :? The only compulsory subjects are English and Math, and they are debating whether to make English compulsory.

Really? And you're in the UK? Huh. Weird. O_o

Okay, not in the UK, but in a British school with a British Education system. Anyway - I support how my school doesn't make it compulsory *political correctness*.
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="T_P_O"]

I can recall the exam board and everything for my science classes, it was OCR 21st century science, and it got put on my timetable without giving me an option. You're not in Scotland or anywhere are you?

Funky_Llama
I did that too. Awful GCSE. It's like the exam board sat in a room and said, 'how could we make them as unprepared for science A-levels possible?'

We had AQA for our board.
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#72 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Famiking"] Then my school got a free pass? :? The only compulsory subjects are English and Math, and they are debating whether to make English compulsory.

Really? And you're in the UK? Huh. Weird. O_o

When I was at school 2 years ago, science was compulsory.

It was compulsory for me too, and that was last year.
Avatar image for deactivated-5a79221380856
deactivated-5a79221380856

13125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 deactivated-5a79221380856
Member since 2007 • 13125 Posts
As for me, I do want to see some scientific objections to flaws in the theory of evolution, but I don't want to see creationism because it shouldn't be considered a science. If a creationist can make sound scientific claims against any part of evolution, if not the sum of all parts, then I think students should listen, assuming it's relevant to the course. That being said, one of my weird fascinations would be to have schools teach both evolution and creationism as objectively as possible so that they can at least rule out primitive religion as one of their basis for scientific thought, but I think that would hurt religion rather than help it.
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
[QUOTE="Famiking"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Famiking"] Then my school got a free pass? :? The only compulsory subjects are English and Math, and they are debating whether to make English compulsory.

Really? And you're in the UK? Huh. Weird. O_o

Okay, not in the UK, but in a British school with a British Education system. Anyway - I support how my school doesn't make it compulsory *political correctness*.

Meh. I don't see why evolution should not be compulsory purely because of some people's religious beliefs. Anyone who disagrees with evolution is wrong; I fail to see why we should humour these people.
Avatar image for zakkro
zakkro

48823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#75 zakkro
Member since 2004 • 48823 Posts

[QUOTE="SegaGenesisfan"]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KY5ArW3Ncfo&feature=dir

Are you sure these guys are right? Tell me scientist are those honest people who never lie....

MattUD1

You use The Onion to try to make a serious point? :lol:

No way... nuh-uh... *follows link* This has made my day. :lol:
Avatar image for Famiking
Famiking

4879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Famiking
Member since 2009 • 4879 Posts

[QUOTE="Famiking"]If they take a science course, they are essentially choosing to learn evolution. If they choose Christianity studies instead, they choose to learn creationism. They shouldn't be forced to learn either.foxhound_fox


Yes, yes they should. If they are forced to learn mathematics, language arts and social studies, they should be forced to learn science. Those four things round out the totality of a solid secular education. If you want a choice, go to a religious private school. Secular public schools are for teaching secular concepts and ideals. Without knowledge in science, we would be limiting children's possible future career choices by about half. With no education in science, you cannot be open to careers in medicine, pharmacy, engineering, architecture, geological studies, biology, botany, physics, entomology, etc.

Where did I say we should have a complete ban on science?

And those things shouldn't be compulsory either - and I don't see why a secular nation should be the target, that's sounds very discriminatory to me, if I want to be religious, I should allowed to be religious so long it doesn't negatively affect someone. But your forced secularism, I'd find offensive (if I were religious).

And a choice to do science or not does not limit scientific knowledge of the populace, in fact I'd say forcing them to learn science is counter-productive - if people want a career in science then I won't stop them, science courses should obviously be available but not enforced.

Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#77 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]

[QUOTE="Famiking"]If they take a science course, they are essentially choosing to learn evolution. If they choose Christianity studies instead, they choose to learn creationism. They shouldn't be forced to learn either.Famiking


Yes, yes they should. If they are forced to learn mathematics, language arts and social studies, they should be forced to learn science. Those four things round out the totality of a solid secular education. If you want a choice, go to a religious private school. Secular public schools are for teaching secular concepts and ideals. Without knowledge in science, we would be limiting children's possible future career choices by about half. With no education in science, you cannot be open to careers in medicine, pharmacy, engineering, architecture, geological studies, biology, botany, physics, entomology, etc.

Where did I say we should have a complete ban on science?

And those things shouldn't be compulsory either - and I don't see why a secular nation should be the target, that's sounds very discriminatory to me, if I want to be religious, I should allowed to be religious so long it doesn't negatively affect someone. But your forced secularism, I'd find offensive (if I were religious).

And a choice to do science or not does not limit scientific knowledge of the populace, in fact I'd say forcing them to learn science is counter-productive - if people want a career in science then I won't stop them, science courses should obviously be available but not enforced.

:roll: You're welcome to be a creationist. But if you are, your belief is unscientific and wrong, and there's no reason any exception should be made for you. If a student beliefs that 2*2=5, should they have the option of whether to do maths?

Avatar image for Famiking
Famiking

4879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Famiking
Member since 2009 • 4879 Posts
Meh. I don't see why evolution should not be compulsory purely because of some people's religious beliefs. Anyone who disagrees with evolution is wrong; I fail to see why we should humour these people.Funky_Llama
It's different for a mostly-Christian society, it's not just "a" religious belief, it's a widespread one. (of course I'm not saying you can't be Christian and believe in evolution). And it's not only because of religious beliefs that it shouldn't be compulsory, to learn or not to learn evolution isn't really a life/death situation, I don't see the point in it being compulsory.
Avatar image for HoldThePhone
HoldThePhone

3364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 HoldThePhone
Member since 2007 • 3364 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]

[QUOTE="Famiking"]If they take a science course, they are essentially choosing to learn evolution. If they choose Christianity studies instead, they choose to learn creationism. They shouldn't be forced to learn either.Famiking


Yes, yes they should. If they are forced to learn mathematics, language arts and social studies, they should be forced to learn science. Those four things round out the totality of a solid secular education. If you want a choice, go to a religious private school. Secular public schools are for teaching secular concepts and ideals. Without knowledge in science, we would be limiting children's possible future career choices by about half. With no education in science, you cannot be open to careers in medicine, pharmacy, engineering, architecture, geological studies, biology, botany, physics, entomology, etc.

Where did I say we should have a complete ban on science?

And those things shouldn't be compulsory either - and I don't see why a secular nation should be the target, that's sounds very discriminatory to me, if I want to be religious, I should allowed to be religious so long it doesn't negatively affect someone. But your forced secularism, I'd find offensive (if I were religious).

And a choice to do science or not does not limit scientific knowledge of the populace, in fact I'd say forcing them to learn science is counter-productive - if people want a career in science then I won't stop them, science courses should obviously be available but not enforced.

oh my, time to go back to the dark ages

Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#80 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]Meh. I don't see why evolution should not be compulsory purely because of some people's religious beliefs. Anyone who disagrees with evolution is wrong; I fail to see why we should humour these people.Famiking
It's different for a mostly-Christian society, it's not just "a" religious belief, it's a widespread one. (of course I'm not saying you can't be Christian and believe in evolution). And it's not only because of religious beliefs that it shouldn't be compulsory, to learn or not to learn evolution isn't really a life/death situation, I don't see the point in it being compulsory.

I don't care how widespread creationism is. It's still wrong. Oh, and by the way, going to school isn't itself a matter of life or death. So I suppose there's no point bothering with education.

Avatar image for Famiking
Famiking

4879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Famiking
Member since 2009 • 4879 Posts
:roll: You're welcome to be a creationist. But if you are, your belief is unscientific and wrong, and there's no reason any exception should be made for you. If a student beliefs that 2*2=5, should they have the option of whether to do maths?Funky_Llama
Evolution does not contradict creationism, there is such a thing called "Evolution creationism" - saying creationism is unscientific may be correct, but whether it's wrong or not is disputable. Basic mathematics is almost a required skill in today's society, but I'm sure you won't have traumatic experiences if you're not too educated on evolution.
Avatar image for HoldThePhone
HoldThePhone

3364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 HoldThePhone
Member since 2007 • 3364 Posts
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]Meh. I don't see why evolution should not be compulsory purely because of some people's religious beliefs. Anyone who disagrees with evolution is wrong; I fail to see why we should humour these people.Famiking
It's different for a mostly-Christian society, it's not just "a" religious belief, it's a widespread one. (of course I'm not saying you can't be Christian and believe in evolution). And it's not only because of religious beliefs that it shouldn't be compulsory, to learn or not to learn evolution isn't really a life/death situation, I don't see the point in it being compulsory.

because the whole point of education is to create an intellectual, logical, and open-minded society. If we don't require people to learn where they may have come from, then history should be optional as well. why not just put the world in the dark and just teach them how to write and do math? but hey you didn't even use math past the algebra level. so what's the deal?
Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#83 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts
In science, they should teach science. While you don't have to necessarily state that evolution is real, it's important to know what the theory is, so the child can make the assumption on their own.DeathHeart95
I agree. And although Intelligent Design isn't necessarily "scientific", I see no problem in telling the kids what it is about.
Avatar image for EVOLV3
EVOLV3

12210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 EVOLV3
Member since 2008 • 12210 Posts

[QUOTE="EVOLV3"]

[QUOTE="legend26"]

to those people in texas

evolution = FACT

deal with it

Funky_Llama



Tehcnically its still a theory

Just out of interest, what's your definition of theory?



A concept or idea used to explain an occurence.

Avatar image for edo-tensei
edo-tensei

4581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 edo-tensei
Member since 2007 • 4581 Posts

lol just adds to the fact that this country will continue to decrease in the educational front around the world. Hopefully obama will change that.

Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#86 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]:roll: You're welcome to be a creationist. But if you are, your belief is unscientific and wrong, and there's no reason any exception should be made for you. If a student beliefs that 2*2=5, should they have the option of whether to do maths?Famiking
Evolution does not contradict creationism, there is such a thing called "Evolution creationism" - saying creationism is unscientific may be correct, but whether it's wrong or not is disputable. Basic mathematics is almost a required skill in today's society, but I'm sure you won't have traumatic experiences if you're not too educated on evolution.

I thought it was rather obvious that I was referring to the type of creationism that does contradict evolution. :roll:

Anyway... whether it's a required skill is irrelevant. The point still stands. Excising from education anything that won't help you in everyday life would hardly be a good thing.

Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#87 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]

[QUOTE="EVOLV3"]

Tehcnically its still a theory

EVOLV3

Just out of interest, what's your definition of theory?



A concept or idea used to explain an occurence.

Just checking. >_>

Avatar image for deactivated-5a79221380856
deactivated-5a79221380856

13125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 deactivated-5a79221380856
Member since 2007 • 13125 Posts

Evolution does not contradict creationism, there is such a thing called "Evolution creationism" - saying creationism is unscientific may be correct, but whether it's wrong or not is disputable.Famiking
I don't know entirely where you were going with that, but I suspect that you want evolutionary creationism taught in schools (correct me if I'm wrong). That being said, I'll have to disagree, because biology is a natural science. It intentionally does not take into consideration the acts of any supernatural force whether it be ghosts or gods unless it can be tested, in which case it stretches the definition of supernatural because knowledge of such lies outside human intellect. Therefore, teaching evolutionary creationism, no matter how miraculous evolution may seem to be, is still integrating unnecessary religion into a natural science.

Avatar image for Famiking
Famiking

4879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Famiking
Member since 2009 • 4879 Posts

oh my, time to go back to the dark ages

HoldThePhone

Constructive argument, I'm convinced. I don't see how my argument relates to the dark ages :| In the Dark Ages, secularism would get your burnt, forced secularism is overdoing it.
]I don't care how widespread creationism is. It's still wrong. Oh, and by the way, going to school isn't itself a matter of life or death. So I suppose there's no point bothering with education.

Funky_Llama

You seem to be misinterpreting my views. When I say voluntary, I don't mean absence. Voluntary science doesn't science classes are outlawed.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#90 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="legend26"]

to those people in texas

evolution = FACT

deal with it

EVOLV3



Tehcnically its still a theory

No. Technically it;s a scientific theory which has been seen and studied and is factual.

Avatar image for HoldThePhone
HoldThePhone

3364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 HoldThePhone
Member since 2007 • 3364 Posts

[QUOTE="HoldThePhone"] oh my, time to go back to the dark ages

Famiking

Constructive argument, I'm convinced. I don't see how my argument relates to the dark ages :| In the Dark Ages, secularism would get your burnt, forced secularism is overdoing it.
]I don't care how widespread creationism is. It's still wrong. Oh, and by the way, going to school isn't itself a matter of life or death. So I suppose there's no point bothering with education.

Funky_Llama

You seem to be misinterpreting my views. When I say voluntary, I don't mean absence. Voluntary science doesn't science classes are outlawed.

it might as well be 0_o. if you make science optional it won't get any funding because not enough people will take it. it's not practical at all.
Avatar image for Famiking
Famiking

4879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Famiking
Member since 2009 • 4879 Posts
[QUOTE="HoldThePhone"] because the whole point of education is to create an intellectual, logical, and open-minded society. If we don't require people to learn where they may have come from, then history should be optional as well. why not just put the world in the dark and just teach them how to write and do math? but hey you didn't even use math past the algebra level. so what's the deal?

If it's so open-minded, then why does it refuse to allow options? :lol: History IS an option, so I don't know what you're on about. Again, you are also confusing voluntary and absence. And what are you on about on your last point? I'm doing AS Math which is not exactly a walk in the park :|
Avatar image for Famiking
Famiking

4879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Famiking
Member since 2009 • 4879 Posts

I thought it was rather obvious that I was referring to the type of creationism that does contradict evolution. :roll:

Anyway... whether it's a required skill is irrelevant. The point still stands. Excising from education anything that won't help you in everyday life would hardly be a good thing.

Funky_Llama

And which type of creationism would that be? And it's not excising, it's giving an option, if we're suppose to learn something that would benefit us, even it's in the slightest, why don't we just teach everything there is to know in school?

Avatar image for Famiking
Famiking

4879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Famiking
Member since 2009 • 4879 Posts
[QUOTE="HoldThePhone"] it might as well be 0_o. if you make science optional it won't get any funding because not enough people will take it. it's not practical at all.

Science is not compulsory in my school and 95-98% of the people still take it (except Physics, which I guess is more like 85%) at GCSE level. And 50-80% still take it at AS level.
Avatar image for Hoobinator
Hoobinator

6899

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#95 Hoobinator
Member since 2006 • 6899 Posts

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

I believe the probability basis and uncertainty which is attached to Quantum theory and Quantum Mechanics should be taught in schools to replace the mere aproximation of Newtonian Physics, which as we all know, does not provide the answers we seek, but is mere approximations on those we already have.

BumFluff122

What does Quantum Mechanics have to do with Newtonian Physics? They deal with completely different aspects of nature.

Not necessarily. Quantum physics is a better approximation of nature at the sub-atomic level, which is where Newtonian physics starts to fall apart. In this regard Quantum physics is more "accurate", but Newton still has his place in regards to simplicity and approximation of phenomena.
Avatar image for HoldThePhone
HoldThePhone

3364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 HoldThePhone
Member since 2007 • 3364 Posts
[QUOTE="Famiking"][QUOTE="HoldThePhone"] it might as well be 0_o. if you make science optional it won't get any funding because not enough people will take it. it's not practical at all.

Science is not compulsory in my school and 95-98% of the people still take it (except Physics, which I guess is more like 85%) at GCSE level. And 50-80% still take it at AS level.

are we talking about college? because that changes everything.
Avatar image for p2rus
p2rus

2859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 p2rus
Member since 2005 • 2859 Posts

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]I thought it was rather obvious that I was referring to the type of creationism that does contradict evolution. :roll:

Anyway... whether it's a required skill is irrelevant. The point still stands. Excising from education anything that won't help you in everyday life would hardly be a good thing.

Famiking

And which type of creationism would that be? And it's not excising, it's giving an option, if we're suppose to learn something that would benefit us, even it's in the slightest, why don't we just teach everything there is to know in school?

There is no proof for creationism... no scientific process has been used to verify this creationist "theory" which, like i said, isnt considered to be a scientific theory
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#98 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

I believe the probability basis and uncertainty which is attached to Quantum theory and Quantum Mechanics should be taught in schools to replace the mere aproximation of Newtonian Physics, which as we all know, does not provide the answers we seek, but is mere approximations on those we already have.

Hoobinator

What does Quantum Mechanics have to do with Newtonian Physics? They deal with completely different aspects of nature.

Not necessarily. Quantum physics is a better approximation of nature at the sub-atomic level, which is where Newtonian physics starts to fall apart. In this regard Quantum physics is more "accurate", but Newton still has his place in regards to simplicity and approximation of phenomena.

Quantum physics explains the Quantum world while Newtoninan physics/General Relativity doesn't. They are not compatible which is why scientists and physicsts are currently searching for a TOE (Theory of Everything)

Avatar image for Famiking
Famiking

4879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Famiking
Member since 2009 • 4879 Posts
[QUOTE="Famiking"]

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]I thought it was rather obvious that I was referring to the type of creationism that does contradict evolution. :roll:

Anyway... whether it's a required skill is irrelevant. The point still stands. Excising from education anything that won't help you in everyday life would hardly be a good thing.

p2rus

And which type of creationism would that be? And it's not excising, it's giving an option, if we're suppose to learn something that would benefit us, even it's in the slightest, why don't we just teach everything there is to know in school?

There is no proof for creationism... no scientific process has been used to verify this creationist "theory" which, like i said, isnt considered to be a scientific theory

Oh...kay, so teaching of creationism even in religious studies should be outlawed, simply because non-Christians deem it "wrong"? Btw, I didn't say I support teaching creationism within the science classroom.
Avatar image for Sajo7
Sajo7

14049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#100 Sajo7
Member since 2005 • 14049 Posts
You know, I've never understood the fuss about this. So what if we evolved? How does that make one's faith any less valid? How many people think Noah fit two of every animal into a boat? That'd be pretty difficult.