Sure it doesn't represent the state, but it represents the platform of the dominant party in both houses of our state legislature, as well as the idiots heading the education agency. That's the real problem here.[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]
Texas is very big and diverse, this is just a small thing at best and doesn't represent the entire state. Of couse people on here have little real life experience and have probably never even left their state, let alone their house on a regular basis. So I expect lot's of generalisations.
Go to Dallas or Austin, you will see a ton of people from all walks of life including many liberal democrats. Just some of the small towns in Texas are supportive of things like this as they haven't changed much. They are a bit isolated, but to generalise everyone in Texas is naive and ignorant.
Blood-Scribe
The GOP has become very partisan now, if you are not a hardcore super conservative fanboy then you are deemed a socialist and black listed from the party pretty much. It's evident when non radical Republicans like Hunstmen (was my personal main candidate of choice) were ignored and glossed over, despite having the best chance at appealing to voters on both sides and having the most sound and realisitc policies.
I just don't like it when people generalise an entire population of people. I've been to Texas before, it's so diverse it's really hard to pin down. Sure some places may be very conservative and may be in favor of actions like the one being discussed, but there are plenty of other places there that are not like that. Another example is Florida for example, people on here assume it's a red state, but it's not, it's actually a swing state. It's voting demographic is too diverse to pin down.
There is nothing wrong with having some conservative views mind you, nor is there anything wrong with having some liberal ones. It's only bad when you take it too far.
Log in to comment