[QUOTE="-Chimera-"]This thread is just WOW. just WOWPBSnipes
I smell a meme...
Oh god, we've created a horrible meme from this turrible thread.This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="PBSnipes"][QUOTE="-Chimera-"]This thread is just WOW. just WOW-Chimera-
I smell a meme...
Oh god, we've created a horrible meme from this turrible thread.At least it's better than 'touch her shoulder', I guess.the universe is not in time and space would explain part of the big bang, but still where was the singularity in the universe, and how it came to be, no one can explain that.[QUOTE="Captain_Swosh69"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]
The newer theories of the Big Bang are excellent and use quantum mechanics to be explained.
Here's the real kicker. Our universe is actually 2d. Think of a point of a balloon. When it expands, all area around that point moves further from the balloon. We see the same thing in our universe. Everything is moving away from us at a certain speed.
Also the Universe itself doesn't have to obay time and space laws because the Universe is not in time and space. It is time and space. We cannot look outside of our own Universe because of it.
Its all really cool stuff.
Wasdie
I'm not trying to explain how it came to be. What happened before is unknown, what made the universe expand is also unknown. With our present knowledge of our own universe we can come to a conclusion backed by years of scientific study that has seen many thousands of different, testable theories to say that our Universe expanded about 13.7 billion years years ago and about 400,000 years after that the Universe had cooled enough for the formation of matter beyond a single proton.
The Universe as we describe it today is actually all of space and time. Space and time expand with the Universe.
You should research a bit of Albert Einstein's work on the Theory of Relativity and Alexander Friendmann's on deriving the expanding universe equation from the Theory of Relativity and general relativity.
i know you're not explaining how it came to be. im not taking a hit at you. im just repeating the FACT that nobody can explain that, thus the flaw in the grand scheme.[QUOTE="-Chimera-"][QUOTE="PBSnipes"]Oh god, we've created a horrible meme from this turrible thread.At least it's better than 'touch her shoulder', I guess. No it isn't. 'Wow, just wow' was annoying way before this thread was made. :/I smell a meme...
Funky_Llama
At least it's better than 'touch her shoulder', I guess. No it isn't. 'Wow, just wow' was annoying way before this thread was made. :/ Maybe this thread can reclaim it, i mean come on, WOW, just WOW[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="-Chimera-"] Oh god, we've created a horrible meme from this turrible thread.super_mario_128
the universe is not in time and space would explain part of the big bang, but still where was the singularity in the universe, and how it came to be, no one can explain that.Captain_Swosh69
I'm not trying to explain how it came to be. What happened before is unknown, what made the universe expand is also unknown. With our present knowledge of our own universe we can come to a conclusion backed by years of scientific study that has seen many thousands of different, testable theories to say that our Universe expanded about 13.7 billion years years ago and about 400,000 years after that the Universe had cooled enough for the formation of matter beyond a single proton.
The Universe as we describe it today is actually all of space and time. Space and time expand with the Universe.
You should research a bit of Albert Einstein's work on the Theory of Relativity and Alexander Friendmann's on deriving the expanding universe equation from the Theory of Relativity and general relativity.
i know you're not explaining how it came to be. im not taking a hit at you. im just repeating the FACT that nobody can explain that, thus the flaw in the grand scheme. So wait what your trying to tell me is if we saw a tree branch fall from high up from a tree, but didn't see from where.. I couldn't prove that the branch fell?At least it's better than 'touch her shoulder', I guess.Funky_LlamaNo it isn't. 'Wow, just wow' was annoying way before this thread was made. :/ Maybe this thread can reclaim it, i mean come on, WOW, just WOW I hope you have a stroke. :x >_>
At least it's better than 'touch her shoulder', I guess. No it isn't. 'Wow, just wow' was annoying way before this thread was made. :/You actually prefer 'touch her shoulder'? WOW. just WOW.[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="-Chimera-"] Oh god, we've created a horrible meme from this turrible thread.super_mario_128
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="super_mario_128"] No it isn't. 'Wow, just wow' was annoying way before this thread was made. :/Maybe this thread can reclaim it, i mean come on, WOW, just WOW I hope you have a stroke. :x >_>Oh God quick put the :P smiley in there before you get suspended for trolling D:super_mario_128
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="super_mario_128"] No it isn't. 'Wow, just wow' was annoying way before this thread was made. :/super_mario_128Maybe this thread can reclaim it, i mean come on, WOW, just WOW I hope you have a stroke. :x >_>Wish granted
i know you're not explaining how it came to be. im not taking a hit at you. im just repeating the FACT that nobody can explain that, thus the flaw in the grand scheme.Captain_Swosh69
So basically with that logic, because of that flaw, what we know and can pretty much proove is irrelevant?
It happened. We dont know what, we don't know how, but we do know it happened. This "grand scheme" your talking about is actually false. We just haven't figured out all the pieces of the puzzle, that doesn't mean what we have found so far is false.
If your trying to prove the existence of a God within this whole thing it STILL can be done. We don't know what the catalyst was for the Big Bang. Several theories include a higher power, all of which have just as much plausibility as that of a random occurrence.
Though to say what we have is false becuase we don't know how it started is a invalid argument.
very funny. i cant see any of you explaining how the singularity came to be. the big bang doesnt explain that, so what? where's the logic on how it came to be? nobody can explain that, and for the big bang theory to rely on that BS, totally improbable.
That. Is. Not. Part. Of. The. Theory. Just as the Big Bang Theory doesn't explain why there are four dimensions, why the color blue exists or why people cannot understand the simple concept of a scientific theory, it does not account for the creation event itself. It is strictly a description of the early evolution of the universe AFTER the creation event. There is no simpler way to put it.very funny. i cant see any of you explaining how the singularity came to be. the big bang doesnt explain that, so what? where's the logic on how it came to be? nobody can explain that, and for the big bang theory to rely on that BS, totally improbable.
Captain_Swosh69
So sense we don't know why Kennedy was shot, that means he wasn't shot? Or if we didn't know how volcanos worked why they exploded, that ment that we could never prove that they explode? Do you know how ridiculous yoru logic is.. The Big Bang isn't a creationist idea, its merely the earlier point they have made forming how the Universe it is today.. KEY WORD FORMING, not CREATING.very funny. i cant see any of you explaining how the singularity came to be. the big bang doesnt explain that, so what? where's the logic on how it came to be? nobody can explain that, and for the big bang theory to rely on that BS, totally improbable.
Captain_Swosh69
[QUOTE="Captain_Swosh69"]i know you're not explaining how it came to be. im not taking a hit at you. im just repeating the FACT that nobody can explain that, thus the flaw in the grand scheme.Wasdie
So basically with that logic, because of that flaw, what we know and can pretty much proove is irrelevant?
It happened. We dont know what, we don't know how, but we do know it happened. This "grand scheme" your talking about is actually false. We just haven't figured out all the pieces of the puzzle, that doesn't mean what we have found so far is false.
If your trying to prove the existence of a God within this whole thing it STILL can be done. We don't know what the catalyst was for the Big Bang. Several theories include a higher power, all of which have just as much plausibility as that of a random occurrence.
Though to say what we have is false becuase we don't know how it started is a invalid argument.
thats true, what you found so far doesnt mean its false. but you also cant take it as a fact.[QUOTE="Wasdie"][QUOTE="Captain_Swosh69"]i know you're not explaining how it came to be. im not taking a hit at you. im just repeating the FACT that nobody can explain that, thus the flaw in the grand scheme.Captain_Swosh69
So basically with that logic, because of that flaw, what we know and can pretty much proove is irrelevant?
It happened. We dont know what, we don't know how, but we do know it happened. This "grand scheme" your talking about is actually false. We just haven't figured out all the pieces of the puzzle, that doesn't mean what we have found so far is false.
If your trying to prove the existence of a God within this whole thing it STILL can be done. We don't know what the catalyst was for the Big Bang. Several theories include a higher power, all of which have just as much plausibility as that of a random occurrence.
Though to say what we have is false becuase we don't know how it started is a invalid argument.
thats true, what you found so far doesnt mean its false. but you also cant take it as a fact. I feel like this is progress =D No, other than data points, science does not deal in facts. Any theory (gravity, relativity, evolution, etc) is subject to revision, or much more rarely, replacement... if empirical evidence requiring that change is found.The Big Bang Theory?
Yeah, it's a decent show, but I don't understand why we need a four page discussion of it...
[QUOTE="Captain_Swosh69"]So sense we don't know why Kennedy was shot, that means he wasn't shot? Or if we didn't know how volcanos worked why they exploded, that ment that we could never prove that they explode? Do you know how ridiculous yoru logic is.. The Big Bang isn't a creationist idea, its merely the earlier point they have made forming how the Universe it is today.. KEY WORD FORMING, not CREATING. everything fits becoz the big bang explain how the universe is form. ohh? and that theory is based on the singularity which nobody can explain how it came to be. thats rubbish. you theorized that since the universe is expanding, thus it all had to start somewhere, like the balloon. yet nobody can say what created the balloon. who cares. the big bang doesnt concern itself with that. thats rubbish. there's even been studies that the universe is expanding at a slower rate. and what happens if the universe wont expand infinitely??? yea doomsday. happy birthday people. yea right.very funny. i cant see any of you explaining how the singularity came to be. the big bang doesnt explain that, so what? where's the logic on how it came to be? nobody can explain that, and for the big bang theory to rely on that BS, totally improbable.
sSubZerOo
[QUOTE="Wasdie"][QUOTE="Captain_Swosh69"]i know you're not explaining how it came to be. im not taking a hit at you. im just repeating the FACT that nobody can explain that, thus the flaw in the grand scheme.Captain_Swosh69
So basically with that logic, because of that flaw, what we know and can pretty much proove is irrelevant?
It happened. We dont know what, we don't know how, but we do know it happened. This "grand scheme" your talking about is actually false. We just haven't figured out all the pieces of the puzzle, that doesn't mean what we have found so far is false.
If your trying to prove the existence of a God within this whole thing it STILL can be done. We don't know what the catalyst was for the Big Bang. Several theories include a higher power, all of which have just as much plausibility as that of a random occurrence.
Though to say what we have is false becuase we don't know how it started is a invalid argument.
thats true, what you found so far doesnt mean its false. but you also cant take it as a fact.This is science. It may not be 100% fact, but 99% of it is the truth and the reason we have our current world today is because of our ideas and theories that work perfectly in the real world.
Nothing is fact really. Nothing is. To say that you cannot prove something wrong is also incorrect. Its just science, the nature of the beast.
This is why religion is not a science. Religion is based upon answers and our faith in those answers. Anybody who puts Religion in a scientific cagetory misses the whole point of science.
[QUOTE="psychobrew"]The big band theory is far from perfect. Some say that somehow mass was moving faster than the speed of light (perhaps the first warp drive? Hyperspace? Giant worm holes?). What I don't understand is why there are no theories that discuss what happened before the big bang.bean-with-baconThere was no 'before the big bang' time and space didn't exist until the big bang. So if time didn't exist, how did the event happen? Somehow, a blob of mass got in to the universe (without space, it wouldn't fit. Without time, it didn't happen). Somehow, an event was triggered (without time, the event would never start).
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="Captain_Swosh69"]So sense we don't know why Kennedy was shot, that means he wasn't shot? Or if we didn't know how volcanos worked why they exploded, that ment that we could never prove that they explode? Do you know how ridiculous yoru logic is.. The Big Bang isn't a creationist idea, its merely the earlier point they have made forming how the Universe it is today.. KEY WORD FORMING, not CREATING. everything fits becoz the big bang explain how the universe is form. ohh? and that theory is based on the singularity which nobody can explain how it came to be. thats rubbish. you theorized that since the universe is expanding, thus it all had to start somewhere, like the balloon. yet nobody can say what created the balloon.Backslide! You don't have to know where the balloon came from to observe its behavior :\very funny. i cant see any of you explaining how the singularity came to be. the big bang doesnt explain that, so what? where's the logic on how it came to be? nobody can explain that, and for the big bang theory to rely on that BS, totally improbable.
Captain_Swosh69
Somehow, a blob of mass got in to the universepsychobrewThis interpretation of the big bang is so bad it made me bleed out of my ears. :/
This interpretation of the big bang is so bad it made me bleed out of my ears. :/ It's a red letter day for OT![QUOTE="psychobrew"]Somehow, a blob of mass got in to the universeFunky_Llama
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]This interpretation of the big bang is so bad it made me bleed out of my ears. :/ It's a red letter day for OT!Eh, it's not without precedent. A few pages back this thread made my face explode.[QUOTE="psychobrew"]Somehow, a blob of mass got in to the universexaos
[QUOTE="Crazyguy105"]It wasn't an explosion.I really doubt an explosion created the entire universe.
-Chimera-
Then what was it?
I never looked into this.
It wasn't an explosion.[QUOTE="-Chimera-"][QUOTE="Crazyguy105"]
I really doubt an explosion created the entire universe.
Crazyguy105
Then what was it?
I never looked into this.
A rapid expansion of the universe. When something explodes, it explodes into existing space, but with the big bang space itself expanded.Everybody is qualified to have a theory.Just a hunch, but something tells me absolutely no one on GS is qualified to discuss theoretical astrophysics.
PBSnipes
[QUOTE="Captain_Swosh69"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"] So sense we don't know why Kennedy was shot, that means he wasn't shot? Or if we didn't know how volcanos worked why they exploded, that ment that we could never prove that they explode? Do you know how ridiculous yoru logic is.. The Big Bang isn't a creationist idea, its merely the earlier point they have made forming how the Universe it is today.. KEY WORD FORMING, not CREATING.xaoseverything fits becoz the big bang explain how the universe is form. ohh? and that theory is based on the singularity which nobody can explain how it came to be. thats rubbish. you theorized that since the universe is expanding, thus it all had to start somewhere, like the balloon. yet nobody can say what created the balloon.Backslide! You don't have to know where the balloon came from to observe its behavior :\ its the mere presence of the balloon that got me. even if it explains how this universe came to be, before then, there was only...that. improbable. unless there are other universes. anyway, if the universe is really gonna collapse upon itself, where will it end. is there even an end. is so, whats the point of the big bang just to end up being...end. the universe doesnt work that way. to bang then to end. life is not like that. thats rubbish. then time itself would end, which is rubbish. now, if the universe really ended, and time cease as well as space, whats gonna heppen next? too much for human brains that can only ponder when only time and space is present. HA. rubbish.
[QUOTE="Crazyguy105"]
[QUOTE="-Chimera-"] It wasn't an explosion.Funky_Llama
Then what was it?
I never looked into this.
A rapid expansion of the universe. When something explodes, it explodes into existing space, but with the big bang space itself expanded.Ah. I highly doubt that.
It seems very unlikely and just sounds weird.
[QUOTE="Captain_Swosh69"][QUOTE="xaos"]Backslide! You don't have to know where the balloon came from to observe its behavior :\Funky_Llamaits the mere presence of the balloon that got me. even if it explains how this universe came to be, before then, there was only...that. improbable. unless there are other universes. anyway, if the universe is really gonna collapse upon itself, where will it end. is there even an end. is so, whats the point of the big bang just to end up being...end. the universe doesnt work that way. to bang then to end. life is not like that. thats rubbish.'what's the point of the big bang'? Eh... yeah, stuff doesn't really work that way :\ if the universe really collapse and everything went back to zero, yea everything becomes a lie. happy now?
A rapid expansion of the universe. When something explodes, it explodes into existing space, but with the big bang space itself expanded.[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]
[QUOTE="Crazyguy105"]
Then what was it?
I never looked into this.
Crazyguy105
Ah. I highly doubt that.
It seems very unlikely and just sounds weird.
Thats because it is outside our experience; everything we have ever known is within the bounds of spacetime. As far as we know, the creation of spacetime is a one-off event,. However, the inflationary form of the Big Bang theory completely accounts for observed properties of the universe, including Hubble's Law, the uniformity of the microwave background radiation and the formation of large scale superclusters. That explanatory power trumps your sense of incredulity, at least as far as the scientific process goes.This interpretation of the big bang is so bad it made me bleed out of my ears. :/ Ok, mass was was never introduced in to this universe. What are we then?[QUOTE="psychobrew"]Somehow, a blob of mass got in to the universeFunky_Llama
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Captain_Swosh69"] its the mere presence of the balloon that got me. even if it explains how this universe came to be, before then, there was only...that. improbable. unless there are other universes. anyway, if the universe is really gonna collapse upon itself, where will it end. is there even an end. is so, whats the point of the big bang just to end up being...end. the universe doesnt work that way. to bang then to end. life is not like that. thats rubbish.Captain_Swosh69'what's the point of the big bang'? Eh... yeah, stuff doesn't really work that way :\ if the universe really collapse and everything went back to zero, yea everything becomes a lie. happy now?I wasn't aware that nihilism was one of the effects of the big crunch >_>
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]This interpretation of the big bang is so bad it made me bleed out of my ears. :/ Ok, mass was was never introduced in to this universe. What are we then?What are we? Em, could you clarify that question?[QUOTE="psychobrew"]Somehow, a blob of mass got in to the universepsychobrew
This interpretation of the big bang is so bad it made me bleed out of my ears. :/But he wasnt really interpretating the big bang was he? He was merely asking how did it happen to the response that "time didnt exist before the big bang".[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]
[QUOTE="psychobrew"]Somehow, a blob of mass got in to the universeAnonymous_2
Stop trying to act all so smart, the discussion on these things is not black and white.
The big bang was the topic at hand. That was what he took it to mean. :/[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]A rapid expansion of the universe. When something explodes, it explodes into existing space, but with the big bang space itself expanded.
Ah. I highly doubt that.
It seems very unlikely and just sounds weird.
Thats because it is outside our experience; everything we have ever known is within the bounds of spacetime. As far as we know, the creation of spacetime is a one-off event,. However, the inflationary form of the Big Bang theory completely accounts for observed properties of the universe, including Hubble's Law, the uniformity of the microwave background radiation and the formation of large scale superclusters. That explanatory power trumps your sense of incredulity, at least as far as the scientific process goes. This is what I want to know -- how do things opperate outside of spacetime?[QUOTE="Crazyguy105"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]A rapid expansion of the universe. When something explodes, it explodes into existing space, but with the big bang space itself expanded.
xaos
Ah. I highly doubt that.
It seems very unlikely and just sounds weird.
Thats because it is outside our experience; everything we have ever known is within the bounds of spacetime. As far as we know, the creation of spacetime is a one-off event,. However, the inflationary form of the Big Bang theory completely accounts for observed properties of the universe, including Hubble's Law, the uniformity of the microwave background radiation and the formation of large scale superclusters. That explanatory power trumps your sense of incredulity, at least as far as the scientific process goes. and where was the space time take take place precedence of the singularity? one does not simply just happen to be there, present. what, the singularity jump from a void into a 'place' then explodes??? and yes, it explodes, thats how it expands. i cant believe some would even suggests that the particle didnt explode. oh i get it. it got fat, thus expanding time and space. it didnt explode. hahaha. it explodes.Ah. I highly doubt that.
It seems very unlikely and just sounds weird.
Thats because it is outside our experience; everything we have ever known is within the bounds of spacetime. As far as we know, the creation of spacetime is a one-off event,. However, the inflationary form of the Big Bang theory completely accounts for observed properties of the universe, including Hubble's Law, the uniformity of the microwave background radiation and the formation of large scale superclusters. That explanatory power trumps your sense of incredulity, at least as far as the scientific process goes. This is what I want to know -- how do things opperate outside of spacetime? It's impossible for us to form any meaningful, coherent theories about that, since it is by definition unobservable :(Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment