The Big Bang. (56k)

[QUOTE="psychobrew"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]This interpretation of the big bang is so bad it made me bleed out of my ears. :/

Funky_Llama

It was a point, not a question.

The big bang hasn't been proven at all, there's no evidence from the past telling us when it happened scientists just assumed that it did... so yeah, it's a theory.

-Russ93

Actually, there is evidence for the Big Bang Theory. :|

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="psychobrew"] Ok, mass was was never introduced in to this universe. What are we then?psychobrew

It was a point, not a question.

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="psychobrew"] Ok, mass was was never introduced in to this universe. What are we then?psychobrew

It was a point, not a question.

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]

[QUOTE="Crazyguy105"]

Then what was it?

I never looked into this.

Crazyguy105

Ah. I highly doubt that.

It seems very unlikely and just sounds weird.

I too believe it's bogus.

It is my clear belief that the world was created in exactly 7 days in which the skies and the earth were first to be created followed by a succession of other creations up until the seventh day when he rested. He then created man, Adam and then grew the garden of Eden which included the tree of the science of good and evil. He put the man in the garden for him to grow it and forbid the man to eat its fruits. Having noticed there was no creature that was similar to man, he created the woman, Eve. Then they disobey Elohim and eat the tree's fruits and are therefore expels both of them from the Garden.

That's it.

Also, DARWIN WAS WRONG.

Thank you.

[QUOTE="Captain_Swosh69"] and where was the space time take take place precedence of the singularity? one does not simply just happen to be there, present. what, the singularity jump from a void into a 'place' then explodes??? and yes, it explodes, thats how it expands. i cant believe some would even suggests that the particle didnt explode. oh i get it. it got fat, thus expanding time and space. it didnt explode. hahaha. it explodes.xaos

i see him making his grammar point just okay. what you dont want to read well thats your problem how you going to think if you dont but just excuses lol WOW. just WOW

[QUOTE="Anonymous_2"]

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]This interpretation of the big bang is so bad it made me bleed out of my ears. :/

Funky_Llama

Stop trying to act all so smart, the discussion on these things is not black and white.

How can the big bang even be discussed without questioning how the ingredients needed to make it happen got here in the first place?

I too believe it's bogus.

It is my clear belief that the world was created in exactly 7 days in which the skies and the earth were first to be created followed by a succession of other creations up until the seventh day when he rested. He then created man, Adam and then grew the garden of Eden which included the tree of the science of good and evil. He put the man in the garden for him to grow it and forbid the man to eat its fruits. Having noticed there was no creature that was similar to man, he created the woman, Eve. Then they disobey Elohim and eat the tree's fruits and are therefore expels both of them from the Garden.

That's it.

Also, DARWIN WAS WRONG.

Thank you.

flordeceres

. . .I'm getting the hell outta here. *Runs, door slams*

I too believe it's bogus.

It is my clear belief that the world was created in exactly 7 days in which the skies and the earth were first to be created followed by a succession of other creations up until the seventh day when he rested. He then created man, Adam and then grew the garden of Eden which included the tree of the science of good and evil. He put the man in the garden for him to grow it and forbid the man to eat its fruits. Having noticed there was no creature that was similar to man, he created the woman, Eve. Then they disobey Elohim and eat the tree's fruits and are therefore expels both of them from the Garden.

That's it.

Also, DARWIN WAS WRONG.

Thank you.

flordeceres

[spoiler] Although I do kind of hate myself for using a dumb Internet meme from a movie that I thought was severely overrated when most of the people who post this pic are major TDK fanboys >_> [/spoiler]

and where that original singularity came from has nothign to do with Big Bang Theory. Big Bang Theory posits only that matter and space/time began expanding from a hyperdense particle. This scientific theory came about as the evidences point in that direction. Hyperinflation of this early universe occurred in the first millionths of a second after the Bang occurred. Inflation of the universe is still occurring. Does this mean that matter travelled faster than light? No. Because space is travelling with it. The Einsteinian theory that matter can not travel faster than light only applies to matter travelling through space, not space travelling through a void.

it's quite apparent that my job here is done

GOOD

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Anonymous_2"]But he wasnt really interpretating the big bang was he? He was merely asking how did it happen to the response that "time didnt exist before the big bang".

Stop trying to act all so smart, the discussion on these things is not black and white.

psychobrew

How can the big bang even be discussed without questioning how the ingredients needed to make it happen got here in the first place?

it's quite apparent that my job here is done

GOOD

flordeceres

[QUOTE="Captain_Swosh69"] and where was the space time take take place precedence of the singularity? one does not simply just happen to be there, present. what, the singularity jump from a void into a 'place' then explodes??? and yes, it explodes, thats how it expands. i cant believe some would even suggests that the particle didnt explode. oh i get it. it got fat, thus expanding time and space. it didnt explode. hahaha. it explodes.xaos

I find it funny how 98% of people who talk about the big bang theory have not thoroughly researched it and understand it properly rofl. includes TC.

Dr_Brocoli

[QUOTE="flordeceres"]

I too believe it's bogus.

It is my clear belief that the world was created in exactly 7 days in which the skies and the earth were first to be created followed by a succession of other creations up until the seventh day when he rested. He then created man, Adam and then grew the garden of Eden which included the tree of the science of good and evil. He put the man in the garden for him to grow it and forbid the man to eat its fruits. Having noticed there was no creature that was similar to man, he created the woman, Eve. Then they disobey Elohim and eat the tree's fruits and are therefore expels both of them from the Garden.

That's it.

Also, DARWIN WAS WRONG.

Thank you.

Theokhoth

. . .I'm getting the hell outta here. *Runs, door slams*

Also, DARWIN WAS WRONG.

Thank you.

flordeceres

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="Captain_Swosh69"] and where was the space time take take place precedence of the singularity? one does not simply just happen to be there, present. what, the singularity jump from a void into a 'place' then explodes??? and yes, it explodes, thats how it expands. i cant believe some would even suggests that the particle didnt explode. oh i get it. it got fat, thus expanding time and space. it didnt explode. hahaha. it explodes.psychobrew

[QUOTE="flordeceres"]

Also, DARWIN WAS WRONG.

Thank you.

BumFluff122

Calm down.

[QUOTE="flordeceres"]

it's quite apparent that my job here is done

GOOD

-Chimera-

were you and Funky the only ones to get it D:

'cause i think you were >:

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Anonymous_2"]But he wasnt really interpretating the big bang was he? He was merely asking how did it happen to the response that "time didnt exist before the big bang".

Stop trying to act all so smart, the discussion on these things is not black and white.

psychobrew

How can the big bang even be discussed without questioning how the ingredients needed to make it happen got here in the first place?

[QUOTE="-Chimera-"]

[QUOTE="flordeceres"]

it's quite apparent that my job here is done

GOOD

flordeceres

were you and Funky the only ones to get it D:

'cause i think you were >:

Hey, I at least posted the "Not sure if serious" pic >_>

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="flordeceres"]

Also, DARWIN WAS WRONG.

Thank you.

-Chimera-

Calm down.

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="flordeceres"]

Also, DARWIN WAS WRONG.

Thank you.

-Chimera-

Calm down.

[QUOTE="-Chimera-"]

[QUOTE="flordeceres"]

it's quite apparent that my job here is done

GOOD

flordeceres

were you and Funky the only ones to get it D:

'cause i think you were >:

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="flordeceres"]

Also, DARWIN WAS WRONG.

Thank you.

-Chimera-

Calm down.

Poe's law (thank god it isn't called Poe's theory).

Oh God he really is angry, there are even ragetypos D:

Funky_Llama

Oh God he really is angry, there are even ragetypos D:

Funky_Llama

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]

Oh God he really is angry, there are even ragetypos D:

BumFluff122

[QUOTE="-Chimera-"]

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]What an absolutely amazing argument you have there. If you are arguign against evolution may I suggest you click on the link on my sig caleld the Genesis union? There is a plethora of information there and we need more creationists. The main point of that union is debatign evolution and creation.

PBSnipes

Calm down.

Poe's law (thank god it isn't called Poe's theory).

THE LACK OF WINKING SMILEY CAUSED ALL THIS

i'm ashamed now D:

You can learn how to judge the age of the universe your self, its not a secret...

Science is open source, go and make a difference.

Are you happy now, Flor? ARE YOU HAPPY?? D:

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]

Oh God he really is angry, there are even ragetypos D:

Funky_Llama

what the big bang is since the universe is expanding, it had to come from a single point but you cant even tell where that point came from. ohh the big bang doesnt care about that. well, a single point doesnt make a universe, i'll tell you that. they have a term for that particle. its very dense obviously. and it explodes. but where it came from? nobody knows. whats the point of the big bang? where and how the universe came about? ohh b4 the particle is b4 space and time. cant help you there. ohh the big bang relies on something it cant explain. this particle had to come from somewhere. just had when people thought we and the universe had to come from somewhere.

[QUOTE="PBSnipes"]

[QUOTE="-Chimera-"] Dude, she's joking.

Calm down.

flordeceres

Poe's law (thank god it isn't called Poe's theory).

THE LACK OF WINKING SMILEY CAUSE ALL THIS

i'm ashamed now D:

I like how he keeps on repeating himself without actually taking people's responses into consideration.-Chimera-

[...] With our present knowledge of our own universe we can come to a conclusion backed by years of scientific study that has seen many thousands of different, testable theories to say that our Universe expanded about 13.7 billion years years ago and about 400,000 years after that the Universe had cooled enough for the formation of matter beyond a single proton. [...]Wasdie

[QUOTE="-Chimera-"]I like how he keeps on repeating himself without actually taking people's responses into consideration.Funky_Llama

what the big bang is since the universe is expanding, it had to come from a single point but you cant even tell where that point came from. ohh the big bang doesnt care about that. well, a single point doesnt make a universe, i'll tell you that. they have a term for that particle. its very dense obviously. and it explodes. but where it came from? nobody knows. whats the point of the big bang? where and how the universe came about? ohh b4 the particle is b4 space and time. cant help you there. ohh the big bang relies on something it cant explain. this particle had to come from somewhere. just had when people thought we and the universe had to come from somewhere.

Captain_Swosh69

what the big bang is since the universe is expanding, it had to come from a single point but you cant even tell where that point came from. ohh the big bang doesnt care about that. well, a single point doesnt make a universe, i'll tell you that. they have a term for that particle. its very dense obviously. and it explodes. but where it came from? nobody knows. whats the point of the big bang? where and how the universe came about? ohh b4 the particle is b4 space and time. cant help you there. ohh the big bang relies on something it cant explain. this particle had to come from somewhere. just had when people thought we and the universe had to come from somewhere.

Captain_Swosh69

I usually don't post this but:

[QUOTE="psychobrew"]

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]The big bang was the topic at hand. That was what he took it to mean. :/Funky_Llama

How can the big bang even be discussed without questioning how the ingredients needed to make it happen got here in the first place?

No matter how you look at it, the ingredients are part of it. Without them, it doesn't happen. Understanding the ingredients would help with the understanding of the big bang. If the ingredients can't be explained, the foundation for the big bang theory itself is on shaky grounds and it needs to be re-evaluated.

We do not know that the universe started with a big bang. Evidence may point to that, but it's still circumstantial.

This is my evolutionism vs creationism argument.

DISCUSS