The Daily Show Vs. Islamaphobia

  • 173 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#101 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"][QUOTE="cobrax25"]

Really? your going to deny thepogroms in eastern Europe? The Spanish Inquisition? The massive war agaist the Protestant Faith?

cobrax25

Spanish Inquisition was based on the Monarchy, Are you referring to the Protestant Reformation? And what are "Theprogroms"?

You keep saying that, but the reality of it is all the same, its Christians targeting non-christians for being non-christistians. Im not reffering to the Protestant Reformation, im reffering to what happened after, when entire wars were fought agaist protestants.

Pogroms were widespread violence towards jews in Eastern Europe (jews were pretty much kicked out of everywhere else).

Hopeless pretty much asnwered your question sufficiently. The Spanish inquisition was ruled by the Monarchy, not Christians.
Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts
[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"][QUOTE="taj7575"]

Where did i try to come off as an expert again :lol:..?Xx_Hopeless_xX

When you say you have read some passages and you feel you understand what the religion is about.

Reading the proceeding passages gives MORE THEN ENOUGH context...do you read the lines before a the sentence you are quoting in regards to statements made by political members and so forth?..Or do you just believe you don't have an understanding of anything he is talking about and forget it entirely because you feel that reading what he has to say does not give you enough of an idea?..

Give the passage again, I want to see what it says.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988

5396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
Member since 2008 • 5396 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"][QUOTE="taj7575"]

I'm going to pull the crusade card here and say, once upon a time, your beloved religion had no problem with killing people in the name of religion.

heysharpshooter

Actually that's false..the head of the religion..i.e the pope did not in any way call for the crusades..in fact, when they got out of hand bishops and Christians hid those being persecuted from the Crusaders..in addition to the fact that they Muslims took land viewed by Christians as Holy...so they were the aggressors..the first Crusade was an attempt to take back the lands originally taken by the Muslims..

It was there Holy Land too... and Christians did not allow them to pray there... what choice did they have?

And explain pre-Inquisition Spain... controlled by Muslims, they alllowed all religions to worship there... until a couple of Christian rulers decided to torture and murder millions.

Eh wasn't it only controlled by Muslims because Spain was invaded by the Moors?

Sorry if my history is waaaaaaaaaaaaaay off.

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"][QUOTE="taj7575"]

When you say you have read some passages and you feel you understand what the religion is about.

gaming25

Reading the proceeding passages gives MORE THEN ENOUGH context...do you read the lines before a the sentence you are quoting in regards to statements made by political members and so forth?..Or do you just believe you don't have an understanding of anything he is talking about and forget it entirely because you feel that reading what he has to say does not give you enough of an idea?..

the passage again, I want to see what it says.

You can go and read back in the thread..im not re-posting it for you..

Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"] I still have yet to see documented support for this "mass murder"..the fact is, the teachings of Christianity revolve around peace..nowhere is violence promoted..whereas in the Quran there are SEVERAL sections that promote undiscriminated violence towards non believers..Xx_Hopeless_xX

Really? your going to deny thepogroms in eastern Europe? The Spanish Inquisition? The massive war agaist the Protestant Faith?

Oh you mean the wars conducted by the monarchy?..You do realize that protestants are a christian denomination right?..Regardless..that war was waged by both sides..neither of which could be called the aggressor definitively as both instigated and so on..and you mean..the pogroms that were not exclusively waged by Christians?.. "The 11th century, however, saw several Muslim pogroms against Jews; those that occurred in Cordoba in 1011 and in Granada in 1066. In the 1066 Granada massacre, a Muslim mob crucified the Jewish vizier Joseph ibn Naghrela and massacred about 4,000 Jews In 1033 about 6,000 Jews were killed in Fez, Morocco by Muslim mobs.Mobs in Fez murdered thousands of Jews, leaving only 11 alive, in 1465." Also, not exclusive to Jews.."Jews, Poles, and Catholics were massacred during the Khmelnytsky Uprising of Ukrainian Cossacks in retaliation for Polish colonialism in 1648–1654 and during the Koliyivshchyna in 1768-1769."

you lost when you started pulling quotes from Wikipedia. The Word "Pogrom" reffers to any mob violence agaist an group. But the word came from anti-jewish violence in eastern Europe, where it occured on a regular basis.

Your point on Protestants doesnt even make sense, the war was started by the Catholics, its not exacly a big secret. (Martin Luther, the founder of the Protestant faith was persecuted by the Catholic Church.)

Your Monarchy claim doesnt hold much ground either, the monarchy was all christians.

Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts

[QUOTE="gaming25"][QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"] Reading the proceeding passages gives MORE THEN ENOUGH context...do you read the lines before a the sentence you are quoting in regards to statements made by political members and so forth?..Or do you just believe you don't have an understanding of anything he is talking about and forget it entirely because you feel that reading what he has to say does not give you enough of an idea?.. Xx_Hopeless_xX

Give the passage again, I want to see what it says.

You can go and read back in the thread..im not re-posting it for you..

I couldnt find what you said.
Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"] Spanish Inquisition was based on the Monarchy, Are you referring to the Protestant Reformation? And what are "Theprogroms"? Snipes_2

You keep saying that, but the reality of it is all the same, its Christians targeting non-christians for being non-christistians. Im not reffering to the Protestant Reformation, im reffering to what happened after, when entire wars were fought agaist protestants.

Pogroms were widespread violence towards jews in Eastern Europe (jews were pretty much kicked out of everywhere else).

Hopeless pretty much asnwered your question sufficiently. The Spanish inquisition was ruled by the Monarchy, not Christians.

The Monarchy was all Chrisitians....

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

Really? your going to deny thepogroms in eastern Europe? The Spanish Inquisition? The massive war agaist the Protestant Faith?

cobrax25

Oh you mean the wars conducted by the monarchy?..You do realize that protestants are a christian denomination right?..Regardless..that war was waged by both sides..neither of which could be called the aggressor definitively as both instigated and so on..and you mean..the pogroms that were not exclusively waged by Christians?.. "The 11th century, however, saw several Muslim pogroms against Jews; those that occurred in Cordoba in 1011 and in Granada in 1066. In the 1066 Granada massacre, a Muslim mob crucified the Jewish vizier Joseph ibn Naghrela and massacred about 4,000 Jews In 1033 about 6,000 Jews were killed in Fez, Morocco by Muslim mobs.Mobs in Fez murdered thousands of Jews, leaving only 11 alive, in 1465." Also, not exclusive to Jews.."Jews, Poles, and Catholics were massacred during the Khmelnytsky Uprising of Ukrainian Cossacks in retaliation for Polish colonialism in 1648–1654 and during the Koliyivshchyna in 1768-1769."

you lost when you started pulling quotes from Wikipedia. The Word "Pogrom" reffers to any mob violence agaist an group. But the word came from anti-jewish violence in eastern Europe, where it occured on a regular basis.

Your point on Protestants doesnt even make sense, the war was started by the Catholics, its not exacly a big secret. (Martin Luther, the founder of the Protestant faith was persecuted by the Catholic Church.)

Your Monarchy claim doesnt hold much ground either, the monarchy was all christians.

:lol: "You lost"..what are we in 5th grade here?.. And martin Luther WAS NOT persecuted by the Catholic church..have you ever take a history course?..HE was following the philosophical system of solving problems in regards to religion at the time nad he came across some proofs in the bible he culd not prove using the methods of the time... hence he posted his "99 theses" or whatever number there were on church doors and so forth in the form of pamphlets..this would not have been possible had the invention of the printing press not come about a few years before..the theses were then blown out of proportion and hence the protestant reformation is born.. But did they do it in the name of Chrsitianity..? No they didn't..
Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts
[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

[QUOTE="gaming25"]Give the passage again, I want to see what it says.gaming25

You can go and read back in the thread..im not re-posting it for you..

I couldnt find what you said.

It's there...
Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts

[QUOTE="gaming25"][QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

You can go and read back in the thread..im not re-posting it for you.. Xx_Hopeless_xX

I couldnt find what you said.

It's there...

Wow youre a jerk.

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="heysharpshooter"]

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"] Actually that's false..the head of the religion..i.e the pope did not in any way call for the crusades..in fact, when they got out of hand bishops and Christians hid those being persecuted from the Crusaders..in addition to the fact that they Muslims took land viewed by Christians as Holy...so they were the aggressors..the first Crusade was an attempt to take back the lands originally taken by the Muslims..October_Tide

It was there Holy Land too... and Christians did not allow them to pray there... what choice did they have?

And explain pre-Inquisition Spain... controlled by Muslims, they alllowed all religions to worship there... until a couple of Christian rulers decided to torture and murder millions.

Eh wasn't it only controlled by Muslims because Spain was invaded by the Moors?

Sorry if my history is waaaaaaaaaaaaaay off.

Wow sharp talk about slanted bigotry here...and now you're making up excuses for them in regards to their Jihads...and Muslims did not allow ALL religions to worship there peacefully..they even taxed non-muslims..as per their teachings in the Quran.. "In general, Christians subject to Islamic rule were allowed to practice their religion with some notable limitations, see Pact of Umar. As People of the Book they were awarded dhimmi status, which, although inferior to the status of Muslims, was more favourable than the plight of adherents of non-Abrahamic faiths. At times, anti-Christian progroms occurred. Under sharia, non-Muslims are obligated to pay jizya taxes, which contributed a significant proportion of income for the Islamic state and persuaded many Christians to convert to Islam (Stillman (1979), p. 160.). According to the Hanafi school of sharia, the testimony of a non-Muslim (such as a Christian) was not considered valid against the testimony of a Muslim. Other schools differed. Christian men were not allowed to marry a Muslim woman under sharia. Muslim men on the other hand were allowed to marry Christian women. Christians under Islamic rule had the right to convert to Islam or any other religion, while a murtad, or apostate of Islam, faced severe penalties or even hadd, which could include the death penalty."
Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"][QUOTE="gaming25"] I couldnt find what you said.gaming25

It's there...

Wow youre a jerk.

Because i'm not going to re-post?..That's hardly fair..
Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]Oh you mean the wars conducted by the monarchy?..You do realize that protestants are a christian denomination right?..Regardless..that war was waged by both sides..neither of which could be called the aggressor definitively as both instigated and so on..and you mean..the pogroms that were not exclusively waged by Christians?.. "The 11th century, however, saw several Muslim pogroms against Jews; those that occurred in Cordoba in 1011 and in Granada in 1066. In the 1066 Granada massacre, a Muslim mob crucified the Jewish vizier Joseph ibn Naghrela and massacred about 4,000 Jews In 1033 about 6,000 Jews were killed in Fez, Morocco by Muslim mobs.Mobs in Fez murdered thousands of Jews, leaving only 11 alive, in 1465." Also, not exclusive to Jews.."Jews, Poles, and Catholics were massacred during the Khmelnytsky Uprising of Ukrainian Cossacks in retaliation for Polish colonialism in 1648–1654 and during the Koliyivshchyna in 1768-1769."

Xx_Hopeless_xX

you lost when you started pulling quotes from Wikipedia. The Word "Pogrom" reffers to any mob violence agaist an group. But the word came from anti-jewish violence in eastern Europe, where it occured on a regular basis.

Your point on Protestants doesnt even make sense, the war was started by the Catholics, its not exacly a big secret. (Martin Luther, the founder of the Protestant faith was persecuted by the Catholic Church.)

Your Monarchy claim doesnt hold much ground either, the monarchy was all christians.

:lol: "You lost"..what are we in 5th grade here?.. And martin Luther WAS NOT persecuted by the Catholic church..have you ever take a history course?..HE was following the philosophical system of solving problems in regards to religion at the time nad he came across some proofs in the bible he culd not prove using the methods of the time... hence he posted his "99 theses" or whatever number there were on church doors and so forth in the form of pamphlets..this would not have been possible had the invention of the printing press not come about a few years before..the theses were then blown out of proportion and hence the protestant reformation is born.. But did they do it in the name of Chrsitianity..? No they didn't..

Funny since Martin Luther was excommunicated by the catholic church.

Also, look up the "edict of Worms"

Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

[QUOTE="October_Tide"]

[QUOTE="heysharpshooter"]

It was there Holy Land too... and Christians did not allow them to pray there... what choice did they have?

And explain pre-Inquisition Spain... controlled by Muslims, they alllowed all religions to worship there... until a couple of Christian rulers decided to torture and murder millions.

Xx_Hopeless_xX

Eh wasn't it only controlled by Muslims because Spain was invaded by the Moors?

Sorry if my history is waaaaaaaaaaaaaay off.

Wow sharp talk about slanted bigotry here...and now you're making up excuses for them in regards to their Jihads...and Muslims did not allow ALL religions to worship there peacefully..they even taxed non-muslims..as per their teachings in the Quran.. "In general, Christians subject to Islamic rule were allowed to practice their religion with some notable limitations, see Pact of Umar. As People of the Book they were awarded dhimmi status, which, although inferior to the status of Muslims, was more favourable than the plight of adherents of non-Abrahamic faiths. At times, anti-Christian progroms occurred. Under sharia, non-Muslims are obligated to pay jizya taxes, which contributed a significant proportion of income for the Islamic state and persuaded many Christians to convert to Islam (Stillman (1979), p. 160.). According to the Hanafi school of sharia, the testimony of a non-Muslim (such as a Christian) was not considered valid against the testimony of a Muslim. Other schools differed. Christian men were not allowed to marry a Muslim woman under sharia. Muslim men on the other hand were allowed to marry Christian women. Christians under Islamic rule had the right to convert to Islam or any other religion, while a murtad, or apostate of Islam, faced severe penalties or even hadd, which could include the death penalty."

beats being kicked out of everywhere like the jews in Europe.

Avatar image for SaudiFury
SaudiFury

8709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 1

#115 SaudiFury
Member since 2007 • 8709 Posts

[QUOTE="cybrcatter"][QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]:lol: so the only thing you can say is "i doubt you have understanding of the religion therefore your claims are false"?..Xx_Hopeless_xX
All you can say is you read the preceding text, that still doesn't mean you posses the full understanding of what it implies. Some people devote their lives to truly understanding the bible.

It gives the reader more then enough of the general idea to understand what the text is implying...you don't have to read all of Surah to understand what Surah 9:5 is stating..you don't have to read all of any of the other sections either to understand in what context they are being stated as it is QUITE explicitly laid out..

Ok... that's it... Now i'm talking..

[9:4] If the idol worshipers sign a peace treaty with you, and do not violate it, nor band together with others against you, you shall fulfill your treaty with them until the expiration date. GOD loves the righteous.

[9:5] Once the Sacred Months are past, (and they refuse to make peace) you may kill the idol worshipers when you encounter them, punish them, and resist every move they make. If they repent and observe the Contact Prayers (Salat) and give the obligatory charity (Zakat), you shall let them go. GOD is Forgiver, Most Merciful.

[9:6] If one of the idol worshipers sought safe passage with you, you shall grant him safe passage, so that he can hear the word of GOD, then send him back to his place of security. That is because they are people who do not know.

[9:7] How can the idol worshipers demand any pledge from GOD and from His messenger? Exempted are those who have signed a peace treaty with you at the Sacred Masjid. If they honor and uphold such a treaty, you shall uphold it as well. GOD loves the righteous.

[9:8] How can they (demand a pledge) when they never observed any rights of kinship between you and them, nor any covenant, if they ever had a chance to prevail. They pacified you with lip service, while their hearts were in opposition, and most of them are wicked.

[9:9] They traded away GOD's revelations for a cheap price. Consequently, they repulsed the people from His path. Miserable indeed is what they did!

[9:10] They never observe any rights of kinship towards any believer, nor do they uphold their covenants; these are the real transgressors.

The Surah is called " The Repentance", it is also the only one that does not start with "God the most merciful and most benevolent" As I, and my family, and dozens of other Muslims i've argued politics with, we've agreed that this is time bound not metaphysical.

terrorists, extremists, mullah's and religious dictators who seek power, elevate these verses to be a metaphyiscal fight against non-believers.

For instance the very verse you mentioned starts in the beginning by saying "Once the Sacred Months have Past" Now do the Jews? do the Christians? have sacred months? no i don't think so, and i believe Muhammad barely knew or knew nothing about Hinduasim or Buddhism.

It's talking about the Pagans who were persecuting Muslims. in fact for three years Muhammad and his believers were being starved out (his first Khadijah - of whom HE WORKED FOR! would die from it) and ostracized while they living in Mecca. he sent Muslims off to Christian kingdom of Ethiopia who offered safe them safe asylum from the Pagans. he sent them off to Yathrib (later to be renamed Medina).

The pagans broke their agreement and the Muslims rose up to fight them. to pretend or act that the extremists and fundamentalists got it right and any liberal or moderate are wrong is dishonest. especially when out of the 1.3-1.5 billion Muslims on the planet, and the extremists are not only targeting Christians, and Jews. but also Muslims who disagree with them.

A classic example would be Anwar Sadat of Egypt who made peace with Israel, would later be gunned down by the Muslim Brotherhood.

or The Al-Qaeda suicide bomber who recently tried killing Prince Mohammed Bin Nayef (head of the Counter-Terrorism) of Saudi Arabia.

Avatar image for Ravirr
Ravirr

7931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#116 Ravirr
Member since 2004 • 7931 Posts

I sometimes wonder how many people actually talk to muslims, or how many people have actually had people look down on you for your beliefs.

I'll start off saying I'm a christian, and in high school, we read a play. This was a good play about a court case between evolution and creationism being taught in school. It portrayed christians rather negatively (fat loud mouthed, a bit irrational, I believe the lawyer for creationism died of a heart attack) in the book but the meaning in the end was good. They the two ideologies could work together (anyone know this play?) Anyways the way this book portrayed christians brought up a lot of hatred and discontent from other students. I would walk around the halls at my school and here these remarks about christians from my class mates. yeah it doesn't feel good, people would use strong language when they found out I was christian, and it went from there. Slowly this stopped but it has left a lasting impact on me. I was not one of those people in the book, I was a quiet well mannered student who didn't interfere, yet I was clumped up with people who's views I didn't even share. Why? Why are we judging entire groups because of a few. its sickening to hear this. Lets get off of our moral high horse, and lets talk to people who practice islam. I know I have, they are against radical islam and want to have a peaceful life. So why so much hate? I would hate it if everyone lumped me with Westboro, so why are we doing it to them?

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"][QUOTE="cobrax25"]

you lost when you started pulling quotes from Wikipedia. The Word "Pogrom" reffers to any mob violence agaist an group. But the word came from anti-jewish violence in eastern Europe, where it occured on a regular basis.

Your point on Protestants doesnt even make sense, the war was started by the Catholics, its not exacly a big secret. (Martin Luther, the founder of the Protestant faith was persecuted by the Catholic Church.)

Your Monarchy claim doesnt hold much ground either, the monarchy was all christians.

cobrax25

:lol: "You lost"..what are we in 5th grade here?.. And martin Luther WAS NOT persecuted by the Catholic church..have you ever take a history course?..HE was following the philosophical system of solving problems in regards to religion at the time nad he came across some proofs in the bible he culd not prove using the methods of the time... hence he posted his "99 theses" or whatever number there were on church doors and so forth in the form of pamphlets..this would not have been possible had the invention of the printing press not come about a few years before..the theses were then blown out of proportion and hence the protestant reformation is born.. But did they do it in the name of Chrsitianity..? No they didn't..

Funny since Martin Luther was excommunicated by the catholic church.

Also, look up the "edict of Worms"

So you don't disagree..also you have no source..and excommunicated after he posted the theses..also, excommunication can HARDLY be considered persecution.."the culmination of an ongoing struggle between Martin Luther and the Roman Catholic Church over reform"..Yes, the Catholic Church was not perfect at the time as they did indulge in selling spiritual blessings and numerous cries for reform in that regard had been made by many of its members..but they were hardly calling for the persecution of all those who were not Christian..that is hardly the sole reason for Luther's excommunication..
Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts
[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"][QUOTE="cybrcatter"] All you can say is you read the preceding text, that still doesn't mean you posses the full understanding of what it implies. Some people devote their lives to truly understanding the bible. SaudiFury
It gives the reader more then enough of the general idea to understand what the text is implying...you don't have to read all of Surah to understand what Surah 9:5 is stating..you don't have to read all of any of the other sections either to understand in what context they are being stated as it is QUITE explicitly laid out..

Ok... that's it... ****er... Now i'm talking.. [9:4] If the idol worshipers sign a peace treaty with you, and do not violate it, nor band together with others against you, you shall fulfill your treaty with them until the expiration date. GOD loves the righteous. [9:5] Once the Sacred Months are past, (and they refuse to make peace) you may kill the idol worshipers when you encounter them, punish them, and resist every move they make. If they repent and observe the Contact Prayers (Salat) and give the obligatory charity (Zakat), you shall let them go. GOD is Forgiver, Most Merciful. [9:6] If one of the idol worshipers sought safe passage with you, you shall grant him safe passage, so that he can hear the word of GOD, then send him back to his place of security. That is because they are people who do not know. [9:7] How can the idol worshipers demand any pledge from GOD and from His messenger? Exempted are those who have signed a peace treaty with you at the Sacred Masjid. If they honor and uphold such a treaty, you shall uphold it as well. GOD loves the righteous. [9:8] How can they (demand a pledge) when they never observed any rights of kinship between you and them, nor any covenant, if they ever had a chance to prevail. They pacified you with lip service, while their hearts were in opposition, and most of them are wicked. [9:9] They traded away GOD's revelations for a cheap price. Consequently, they repulsed the people from His path. Miserable indeed is what they did! [9:10] They never observe any rights of kinship towards any believer, nor do they uphold their covenants; these are the real transgressors. The Surah is called " The Repentance", it is also the only one that does not start with "God the most merciful and most benevolent" As I, and my family, and dozens of other Muslims i've argued politics with, we've agreed that this is time bound not metaphysical. terrorists, extremists, mullah's and religious dictators who seek power, elevate these verses to be a metaphyiscal fight against non-believers. For instance the very verse you mentioned starts in the beginning by saying "Once the Sacred Months have Past" Now do the Jews? do the Christians? have sacred months? no i don't think so, and i believe Muhammad barely knew or knew nothing about Hinduasim or Buddhism. It's talking about the Pagans who were persecuting Muslims. in fact for three years Muhammad and his believers were being starved out (his first Khadijah - of whom HE WORKED FOR! would die from it) and ostracized while they living in Mecca. he sent Muslims off to Christian kingdom of Ethiopia who offered safe them safe asylum from the Pagans. he sent them off to Yathrib (later to be renamed Medina). The pagans broke their agreement and the Muslims rose up to fight them. to pretend or act that the extremists and fundamentalists got it right and any liberal or moderate are wrong is dishonest. especially when out of the 1.3-1.5 billion Muslims on the planet, and the extremists are not only targeting Christians, and Jews. but also Muslims who disagree with them. A classic example would be Anwar Sadat of Egypt who made peace with Israel, would later be gunned down by the Muslim Brotherhood. or The Al-Qaeda suicide bomber who recently tried killing Prince Mohammed Bin Nayef (head of the Counter-Terrorism) of Saudi Arabia.

xXHopless did take it out of context after all. Owned.
Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"][QUOTE="cybrcatter"] All you can say is you read the preceding text, that still doesn't mean you posses the full understanding of what it implies. Some people devote their lives to truly understanding the bible. SaudiFury

It gives the reader more then enough of the general idea to understand what the text is implying...you don't have to read all of Surah to understand what Surah 9:5 is stating..you don't have to read all of any of the other sections either to understand in what context they are being stated as it is QUITE explicitly laid out..

Ok... that's it... Now i'm talking..

[9:4] If the idol worshipers sign a peace treaty with you, and do not violate it, nor band together with others against you, you shall fulfill your treaty with them until the expiration date. GOD loves the righteous. Until the expiration date..yeah that's real righteous...

[9:5] Once the Sacred Months are past, (and they refuse to make peace) you may kill the idol worshipers when you encounter them, punish them, and resist every move they make. If they repent and observe the Contact Prayers (Salat) and give the obligatory charity (Zakat), you shall let them go. GOD is Forgiver, Most Merciful. That's sounds like they want to be peaceful doesn't it...

[9:6] If one of the idol worshipers sought safe passage with you, you shall grant him safe passage, so that he can hear the word of GOD, then send him back to his place of security. That is because they are people who do not know. ONLY if he seeks safe passage with them..if not then he will be killed correct?..

[9:7] How can the idol worshipers demand any pledge from GOD and from His messenger? Exempted are those who have signed a peace treaty with you at the Sacred Masjid. If they honor and uphold such a treaty, you shall uphold it as well. GOD loves the righteous.

[9:8] How can they (demand a pledge) when they never observed any rights of kinship between you and them, nor any covenant, if they ever had a chance to prevail. They pacified you with lip service, while their hearts were in opposition, and most of them are wicked.

[9:9] They traded away GOD's revelations for a cheap price. Consequently, they repulsed the people from His path. Miserable indeed is what they did!

[9:10] They never observe any rights of kinship towards any believer, nor do they uphold their covenants; these are the real transgressors. Yeah, that's not anything calling those who don't share kinship with believers evil..

The Surah is called " The Repentance", it is also the only one that does not start with "God the most merciful and most benevolent" As I, and my family, and dozens of other Muslims i've argued politics with, we've agreed that this is time bound not metaphysical.

Ok, so thank you for showing that it was not taken out of context..in fact..you just added to my argument...

terrorists, extremists, mullah's and religious dictators who seek power, elevate these verses to be a metaphyiscal fight against non-believers.

For instance the very verse you mentioned starts in the beginning by saying "Once the Sacred Months have Past" Now do the Jews? do the Christians? have sacred months? no i don't think so, and i believe Muhammad barely knew or knew nothing about Hinduasim or Buddhism. What the hell does that have to do with killing them after the Holy Months of Muslims have passed?..

It's talking about the Pagans who were persecuting Muslims. in fact for three years Muhammad and his believers were being starved out (his first Khadijah - of whom HE WORKED FOR! would die from it) and ostracized while they living in Mecca. he sent Muslims off to Christian kingdom of Ethiopia who offered safe them safe asylum from the Pagans. he sent them off to Yathrib (later to be renamed Medina). How do you know it's talking of such?..There's no mention of such a thing..nor do you refute any of the other quotes i put forth..

The pagans broke their agreement and the Muslims rose up to fight them. to pretend or act that the extremists and fundamentalists got it right and any liberal or moderate are wrong is dishonest. especially when out of the 1.3-1.5 billion Muslims on the planet, and the extremists are not only targeting Christians, and Jews. but also Muslims who disagree with them. Oh, the pagans broke their agreement how?..And i never stated that the extremists were targeting a specific group..

A ****c example would be Anwar Sadat of Egypt who made peace with Israel, would later be gunned down by the Muslim Brotherhood. I never stated that alll Muslims were evil..again you go back to using people as examples..

or The Al-Qaeda suicide bomber who recently tried killing Prince Mohammed Bin Nayef (head of the Counter-Terrorism) of Saudi Arabia. And again..

Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"] :lol: "You lost"..what are we in 5th grade here?.. And martin Luther WAS NOT persecuted by the Catholic church..have you ever take a history course?..HE was following the philosophical system of solving problems in regards to religion at the time nad he came across some proofs in the bible he culd not prove using the methods of the time... hence he posted his "99 theses" or whatever number there were on church doors and so forth in the form of pamphlets..this would not have been possible had the invention of the printing press not come about a few years before..the theses were then blown out of proportion and hence the protestant reformation is born.. But did they do it in the name of Chrsitianity..? No they didn't..Xx_Hopeless_xX

Funny since Martin Luther was excommunicated by the catholic church.

Also, look up the "edict of Worms"

So you don't disagree..also you have no source..and excommunicated after he posted the theses..also, excommunication can HARDLY be considered persecution.."the culmination of an ongoing struggle between Martin Luther and the Roman Catholic Church over reform"..Yes, the Catholic Church was not perfect at the time as they did indulge in selling spiritual blessings and numerous cries for reform in that regard had been made by many of its members..but they were hardly calling for the persecution of all those who were not Christian..that is hardly the sole reason for Luther's excommunication..

the "edict of worms" was bassiclly a death sentence for Luther, it allowed anyone who killed him to go unpunished....both by god and by the authorities. The fact that he escaped was out of extreame chance.

and again, their is widespread proof of persecution of non-catholics in Europe...Its absolutly idodic to deny it. Jews have been litterally kicked out of almost every European country at one point or another in history.

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts
[QUOTE="SaudiFury"][QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"] It gives the reader more then enough of the general idea to understand what the text is implying...you don't have to read all of Surah to understand what Surah 9:5 is stating..you don't have to read all of any of the other sections either to understand in what context they are being stated as it is QUITE explicitly laid out..gaming25
Ok... that's it... ****er... Now i'm talking.. [9:4] If the idol worshipers sign a peace treaty with you, and do not violate it, nor band together with others against you, you shall fulfill your treaty with them until the expiration date. GOD loves the righteous. [9:5] Once the Sacred Months are past, (and they refuse to make peace) you may kill the idol worshipers when you encounter them, punish them, and resist every move they make. If they repent and observe the Contact Prayers (Salat) and give the obligatory charity (Zakat), you shall let them go. GOD is Forgiver, Most Merciful. [9:6] If one of the idol worshipers sought safe passage with you, you shall grant him safe passage, so that he can hear the word of GOD, then send him back to his place of security. That is because they are people who do not know. [9:7] How can the idol worshipers demand any pledge from GOD and from His messenger? Exempted are those who have signed a peace treaty with you at the Sacred Masjid. If they honor and uphold such a treaty, you shall uphold it as well. GOD loves the righteous. [9:8] How can they (demand a pledge) when they never observed any rights of kinship between you and them, nor any covenant, if they ever had a chance to prevail. They pacified you with lip service, while their hearts were in opposition, and most of them are wicked. [9:9] They traded away GOD's revelations for a cheap price. Consequently, they repulsed the people from His path. Miserable indeed is what they did! [9:10] They never observe any rights of kinship towards any believer, nor do they uphold their covenants; these are the real transgressors. The Surah is called " The Repentance", it is also the only one that does not start with "God the most merciful and most benevolent" As I, and my family, and dozens of other Muslims i've argued politics with, we've agreed that this is time bound not metaphysical. terrorists, extremists, mullah's and religious dictators who seek power, elevate these verses to be a metaphyiscal fight against non-believers. For instance the very verse you mentioned starts in the beginning by saying "Once the Sacred Months have Past" Now do the Jews? do the Christians? have sacred months? no i don't think so, and i believe Muhammad barely knew or knew nothing about Hinduasim or Buddhism. It's talking about the Pagans who were persecuting Muslims. in fact for three years Muhammad and his believers were being starved out (his first Khadijah - of whom HE WORKED FOR! would die from it) and ostracized while they living in Mecca. he sent Muslims off to Christian kingdom of Ethiopia who offered safe them safe asylum from the Pagans. he sent them off to Yathrib (later to be renamed Medina). The pagans broke their agreement and the Muslims rose up to fight them. to pretend or act that the extremists and fundamentalists got it right and any liberal or moderate are wrong is dishonest. especially when out of the 1.3-1.5 billion Muslims on the planet, and the extremists are not only targeting Christians, and Jews. but also Muslims who disagree with them. A classic example would be Anwar Sadat of Egypt who made peace with Israel, would later be gunned down by the Muslim Brotherhood. or The Al-Qaeda suicide bomber who recently tried killing Prince Mohammed Bin Nayef (head of the Counter-Terrorism) of Saudi Arabia.

xXHopless did take it out of context after all. Owned.

Xx_Hopeless_xX replied and did not i nfact take it out of context..and "owned" like..what the hell?..Are we stooping to elementary grade replies now?..
Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

also, Following the Protestant reformation were what is now known as the "wars of religion" in Europe.

Its far to long and complex to explain it all now: but wikipedia has a really good and sourced entry on it.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_wars_of_religion

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"][QUOTE="cobrax25"]

Funny since Martin Luther was excommunicated by the catholic church.

Also, look up the "edict of Worms"

cobrax25

So you don't disagree..also you have no source..and excommunicated after he posted the theses..also, excommunication can HARDLY be considered persecution.."the culmination of an ongoing struggle between Martin Luther and the Roman Catholic Church over reform"..Yes, the Catholic Church was not perfect at the time as they did indulge in selling spiritual blessings and numerous cries for reform in that regard had been made by many of its members..but they were hardly calling for the persecution of all those who were not Christian..that is hardly the sole reason for Luther's excommunication..

the "edict of worms" was bassiclly a death sentence for Luther, it allowed anyone who killed him to go unpunished....both by god and by the authorities. The fact that he escaped was out of extreame chance.

and again, their is widespread proof of persecution of non-catholics in Europe...Its absolutly idodic to deny it. Jews have been litterally kicked out of almost every European country at one point or another in history.

He actually sought refuge with..oh guess what..a Bishop..:lol:.. And you keep repeating this yet everything you have put forth has been effectively refuted..i don't see Christians specifically targeting them in the name of their religion..and when they were targeted so were Christians as shown by my statements earlier..
Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

also, Following the Protestant reformation were what is now known as the "wars of religion" in Europe.

Its far to long and complex to explain it all now: but wikipedia has a really good and sourced entry on it.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_wars_of_religion

cobrax25
About halfway down..."The first large-scale violence was engendered by the more radical of Luther's followers, who wished to extend wholesale reform of the Church to a similar wholesale reform of society in genera"
Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

also, Following the Protestant reformation were what is now known as the "wars of religion" in Europe.

Its far to long and complex to explain it all now: but wikipedia has a really good and sourced entry on it.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_wars_of_religion

Xx_Hopeless_xX

About halfway down..."The first large-scale violence was engendered by the more radical of Luther's followers, who wished to extend wholesale reform of the Church to a similar wholesale reform of society in genera"

oh...you mean like Radical Muslims? Whats that...Christianity has radicals to?

also: see 30 years war:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty_Years'_War

Avatar image for deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988

5396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
Member since 2008 • 5396 Posts

This thread has gone from teh funnies, to teh religion debate to...

Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts
[QUOTE="gaming25"][QUOTE="SaudiFury"] Ok... that's it... ****er... Now i'm talking.. [9:4] If the idol worshipers sign a peace treaty with you, and do not violate it, nor band together with others against you, you shall fulfill your treaty with them until the expiration date. GOD loves the righteous. [9:5] Once the Sacred Months are past, (and they refuse to make peace) you may kill the idol worshipers when you encounter them, punish them, and resist every move they make. If they repent and observe the Contact Prayers (Salat) and give the obligatory charity (Zakat), you shall let them go. GOD is Forgiver, Most Merciful. [9:6] If one of the idol worshipers sought safe passage with you, you shall grant him safe passage, so that he can hear the word of GOD, then send him back to his place of security. That is because they are people who do not know. [9:7] How can the idol worshipers demand any pledge from GOD and from His messenger? Exempted are those who have signed a peace treaty with you at the Sacred Masjid. If they honor and uphold such a treaty, you shall uphold it as well. GOD loves the righteous. [9:8] How can they (demand a pledge) when they never observed any rights of kinship between you and them, nor any covenant, if they ever had a chance to prevail. They pacified you with lip service, while their hearts were in opposition, and most of them are wicked. [9:9] They traded away GOD's revelations for a cheap price. Consequently, they repulsed the people from His path. Miserable indeed is what they did! [9:10] They never observe any rights of kinship towards any believer, nor do they uphold their covenants; these are the real transgressors. The Surah is called " The Repentance", it is also the only one that does not start with "God the most merciful and most benevolent" As I, and my family, and dozens of other Muslims i've argued politics with, we've agreed that this is time bound not metaphysical. terrorists, extremists, mullah's and religious dictators who seek power, elevate these verses to be a metaphyiscal fight against non-believers. For instance the very verse you mentioned starts in the beginning by saying "Once the Sacred Months have Past" Now do the Jews? do the Christians? have sacred months? no i don't think so, and i believe Muhammad barely knew or knew nothing about Hinduasim or Buddhism. It's talking about the Pagans who were persecuting Muslims. in fact for three years Muhammad and his believers were being starved out (his first Khadijah - of whom HE WORKED FOR! would die from it) and ostracized while they living in Mecca. he sent Muslims off to Christian kingdom of Ethiopia who offered safe them safe asylum from the Pagans. he sent them off to Yathrib (later to be renamed Medina). The pagans broke their agreement and the Muslims rose up to fight them. to pretend or act that the extremists and fundamentalists got it right and any liberal or moderate are wrong is dishonest. especially when out of the 1.3-1.5 billion Muslims on the planet, and the extremists are not only targeting Christians, and Jews. but also Muslims who disagree with them. A classic example would be Anwar Sadat of Egypt who made peace with Israel, would later be gunned down by the Muslim Brotherhood. or The Al-Qaeda suicide bomber who recently tried killing Prince Mohammed Bin Nayef (head of the Counter-Terrorism) of Saudi Arabia.Xx_Hopeless_xX
xXHopless did take it out of context after all. Owned.

Xx_Hopeless_xX replied and did not i nfact take it out of context..and "owned" like..what the hell?..Are we stooping to elementary grade replies now?..

You failed to talk about the treaty and peace agreement. Nevermind the fact they couldve been talking about a specific people at that time with the word "the idol worshippers".
Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"][QUOTE="cobrax25"]

also, Following the Protestant reformation were what is now known as the "wars of religion" in Europe.

Its far to long and complex to explain it all now: but wikipedia has a really good and sourced entry on it.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_wars_of_religion

cobrax25

About halfway down..."The first large-scale violence was engendered by the more radical of Luther's followers, who wished to extend wholesale reform of the Church to a similar wholesale reform of society in genera"

oh...you mean like Radical Muslims? Whats that...Christianity has radicals to?

also: see 30 years war:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty_Years'_War

Protestants are a sub group of Christianity...so i don't understand what you're trying to point out..and what?..Have radical Christians ever done anything like..say...blowing up thousands of innocents and making numerous threats and attempts within MODERN times..the only remotely comparable thing that you can attribute to Christianity as a whole is the Crusades..and even then..if looked at within context of the times..Crusades were fairly common..and even then..Christians protected the persecuted from danger...And within ONE decade i have not seen any christian attempt to, plan to or act upon any plot to harm innocents in the name of their God..
Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

also: See Edict of Expulsion:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edict_of_Expulsion

comes included with this nifty chart showing everywhere the jews have been kicked out of in Europe.

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts
[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"][QUOTE="gaming25"] xXHopless did take it out of context after all. Owned.gaming25
Xx_Hopeless_xX replied and did not i nfact take it out of context..and "owned" like..what the hell?..Are we stooping to elementary grade replies now?..

You failed to talk about the treaty and peace agreement. Nevermind the fact they couldve been talking about a specific people at that time with the word "the idol worshippers".

Are they not still perpetrating violence against them?..Oh and the peace treaty that...once it expires..they can be set upon?..That peace treaty?..
Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

also: See Edict of Expulsion:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edict_of_Expulsion

comes included with this nifty chart showing everywhere the jews have been kicked out of in Europe.

cobrax25

What is with you and the Jews being kicked out of Europe?..It was not done in the name of Christianity so it is irrelevant to this discussion..

Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts
[QUOTE="gaming25"][QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"] Xx_Hopeless_xX replied and did not i nfact take it out of context..and "owned" like..what the hell?..Are we stooping to elementary grade replies now?..Xx_Hopeless_xX
You failed to talk about the treaty and peace agreement. Nevermind the fact they couldve been talking about a specific people at that time with the word "the idol worshippers".

Are they not still perpetrating violence against them?..Oh and the peace treaty that...once it expires..they can be set upon?..That peace treaty?..

"and they refuse to make peace" did you forget about that?
Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts
[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"][QUOTE="gaming25"] You failed to talk about the treaty and peace agreement. Nevermind the fact they couldve been talking about a specific people at that time with the word "the idol worshippers".gaming25
Are they not still perpetrating violence against them?..Oh and the peace treaty that...once it expires..they can be set upon?..That peace treaty?..

"and they refuse to make peace" did you forget about that?

What are you talking about?...Are you saying it's ok for them to kill those who do not make peace explicitly with them?..
Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"] About halfway down..."The first large-scale violence was engendered by the more radical of Luther's followers, who wished to extend wholesale reform of the Church to a similar wholesale reform of society in genera"Xx_Hopeless_xX

oh...you mean like Radical Muslims? Whats that...Christianity has radicals to?

also: see 30 years war:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty_Years'_War

Protestants are a sub group of Christianity...so i don't understand what you're trying to point out..and what?..Have radical Christians ever done anything like..say...blowing up thousands of innocents and making numerous threats and attempts within MODERN times..the only remotely comparable thing that you can attribute to Christianity as a whole is the Crusades..and even then..if looked at within context of the times..Crusades were fairly common..and even then..Christians protected the persecuted from danger...And within ONE decade i have not seen any christian attempt to, plan to or act upon any plot to harm innocents in the name of their God..

Oh, so its okay that Christians atack a sub-group of Christianity?

Why should any of this be limited to modern times? The Bible is very old. 400 years ago it was the Europeans that were in turmoil while the middle east enjoyed a time of relative peace?

Also, look up the IRA. They were a very well known Catholic Terrorist group from the 70's who were at war with the British for 20 years.

Avatar image for SaudiFury
SaudiFury

8709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 1

#135 SaudiFury
Member since 2007 • 8709 Posts
[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"][QUOTE="gaming25"] You failed to talk about the treaty and peace agreement. Nevermind the fact they couldve been talking about a specific people at that time with the word "the idol worshippers".gaming25
Are they not still perpetrating violence against them?..Oh and the peace treaty that...once it expires..they can be set upon?..That peace treaty?..

"and they refuse to make peace" did you forget about that?

There's another often quoted Islamic verse.. "..Strike terror [into the hearts of] the enemies of God and your enemies." (8:60) but the very next verse says "But if the enemy incline towards peace, then you (must also) incline towards peace, and trust in God for He is the One that hears and knows (all things)" (8:61) I dunno. i'm done.. If he wants to highlight the parts of the verses i wrote up and give it as proof that the fundies are right. then i have nothing else left to say. but know this Hopeless. I harbor no hate towards you, and your free to think what your gonna think. but i've had to do this debate so many times it's not funny... g'night guys..
Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

also: See Edict of Expulsion:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edict_of_Expulsion

comes included with this nifty chart showing everywhere the jews have been kicked out of in Europe.

Xx_Hopeless_xX

What is with you and the Jews being kicked out of Europe?..It was not done in the name of Christianity so it is irrelevant to this discussion..

lol...not done in the name of Christianity...who do you think it was that was kicking them out?

you know what my favorite part about you is...that for you Al-Quida is enough to judge the entire muslim faith, but somehow what plenty of Christian kings and rulers have done towards other faiths is completly irrelevent.

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"][QUOTE="cobrax25"]

oh...you mean like Radical Muslims? Whats that...Christianity has radicals to?

also: see 30 years war:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty_Years'_War

cobrax25

Protestants are a sub group of Christianity...so i don't understand what you're trying to point out..and what?..Have radical Christians ever done anything like..say...blowing up thousands of innocents and making numerous threats and attempts within MODERN times..the only remotely comparable thing that you can attribute to Christianity as a whole is the Crusades..and even then..if looked at within context of the times..Crusades were fairly common..and even then..Christians protected the persecuted from danger...And within ONE decade i have not seen any christian attempt to, plan to or act upon any plot to harm innocents in the name of their God..

Oh, so its okay that Christians atack a sub-group of Christianity?

Why should any of this be limited to modern times? The Bible is very old. 400 years ago it was the Europeans that were in turmoil while the middle east enjoyed a time of relative peace?

Also, look up the IRA. They were a very well known Catholic Terrorist group from the 70's who were at war with the British for 20 years.

What the hell?...Were you not trying to claim Christians targeted other religious groups?..Warring amongst Chrsitians even then is STILL not killing in the name of God..

Because within the context of older periods people were far less "peaceful" if you will...so, by showing me an example comparable to the attack on 9/11 or any other attack within the past decade in times where people are more educated and less hostile in general you may form an effective argument..

Seeing as Ireland is largely Christian you'd be hard pressed to find a group that is not made up of Christians..and they are not killing in the name of God..they are killing to change their government.".The country is overwhelmingly Roman Catholic. According to official government statistics based on the 2006 census, the religious affiliation of the population is 86.8 percent Catholic (3,681,446), 2.9 percent Church of Ireland (125,585)" So that's basically a moot point..

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

also: See Edict of Expulsion:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edict_of_Expulsion

comes included with this nifty chart showing everywhere the jews have been kicked out of in Europe.

cobrax25

What is with you and the Jews being kicked out of Europe?..It was not done in the name of Christianity so it is irrelevant to this discussion..

lol...not done in the name of Christianity...who do you think it was that was kicking them out?

you know what my favorite part about you is...that for you Al-Quida is enough to judge the entire muslim faith, but somehow what plenty of Christian kings and rulers have done towards other faiths is completly irrelevent.

Am i judging the Faith?..No, i am questioning it's teachings and ideology.. And you have yet to provide proof that it was done in the name of God..rather then done by rulers...and i love how you deign it necessary to judge me rather then focusing on the pantheon of evidence supporting my argument..
Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts
[QUOTE="gaming25"][QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"] Are they not still perpetrating violence against them?..Oh and the peace treaty that...once it expires..they can be set upon?..That peace treaty?..Xx_Hopeless_xX
"and they refuse to make peace" did you forget about that?

What are you talking about?...Are you saying it's ok for them to kill those who do not make peace explicitly with them?..

Are we talking about now, or are we talking about the particular problem they had back then? Please stay on track, because there are many things they say about foriegn policy in general that you cant take out of context.
Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="gaming25"][QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"] Are they not still perpetrating violence against them?..Oh and the peace treaty that...once it expires..they can be set upon?..That peace treaty?..SaudiFury
"and they refuse to make peace" did you forget about that?

There's another often quoted Islamic verse.. "..Strike terror [into the hearts of] the enemies of God and your enemies." (8:60) but the very next verse says "But if the enemy incline towards peace, then you (must also) incline towards peace, and trust in God for He is the One that hears and knows (all things)" (8:61) I dunno. i'm done.. If he wants to highlight the parts of the verses i wrote up and give it as proof that the fundies are right. then i have nothing else left to say. but know this Hopeless. I harbor no hate towards you, and your free to think what your gonna think. but i've had to do this debate so many times it's not funny... g'night guys..

I don't believe i quoted that anyway...and incline does not definitively state that peace will be reached..rather that it should be considered...and i harbor no ill towards you as a person either.

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts
[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"][QUOTE="gaming25"] "and they refuse to make peace" did you forget about that?gaming25
What are you talking about?...Are you saying it's ok for them to kill those who do not make peace explicitly with them?..

Are we talking about now, or are we talking about the particular problem they had back then? Please stay on track, because there are many things they say about foriegn policy in general that you cant take out of context.

I have no idea what you were trying to convey with your last post...which peace treaty were you referring to?..
Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"] Protestants are a sub group of Christianity...so i don't understand what you're trying to point out..and what?..Have radical Christians ever done anything like..say...blowing up thousands of innocents and making numerous threats and attempts within MODERN times..the only remotely comparable thing that you can attribute to Christianity as a whole is the Crusades..and even then..if looked at within context of the times..Crusades were fairly common..and even then..Christians protected the persecuted from danger...And within ONE decade i have not seen any christian attempt to, plan to or act upon any plot to harm innocents in the name of their God..Xx_Hopeless_xX

Oh, so its okay that Christians atack a sub-group of Christianity?

Why should any of this be limited to modern times? The Bible is very old. 400 years ago it was the Europeans that were in turmoil while the middle east enjoyed a time of relative peace?

Also, look up the IRA. They were a very well known Catholic Terrorist group from the 70's who were at war with the British for 20 years.

What the hell?...Were you not trying to claim Christians targeted other religious groups?..Warring amongst Chrsitians even then is STILL not killing in the name of God..

Because within the context of older periods people were far less "peaceful" if you will...so, by showing me an example comparable to the attack on 9/11 or any other attack within the past decade in times where people are more educated and less hostile in general you may form an effective argument..

Seeing as Ireland is largely Christian you'd be hard pressed to find a group that is not made up of Christians..and they are not killing in the name of God..they are killing to change their government.".The country is overwhelmingly Roman Catholic. According to official government statistics based on the 2006 census, the religious affiliation of the population is 86.8 percent Catholic (3,681,446), 2.9 percent Church of Ireland (125,585)" So that's basically a moot point..

They did, I have shown you many examples of Jews in Europe being targeted. And I though Christians were so tollerent agaist other faiths? Why is it that people in Europe stopped believing in the Catholic Church and were instantly atacked by them.

Also, I absolutly love how older periods dont matter because people were less "peacefull" and yet you are quoting from a book written 2000 years ago. As though people were more peacefull and educated then.

Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts

[QUOTE="gaming25"][QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]What are you talking about?...Are you saying it's ok for them to kill those who do not make peace explicitly with them?..Xx_Hopeless_xX
Are we talking about now, or are we talking about the particular problem they had back then? Please stay on track, because there are many things they say about foriegn policy in general that you cant take out of context.

I have no idea what you were trying to convey with your last post...which peace treaty were you referring to?..

That had nothing to do with my last post. But since you ask,when I said "peace treaty"I was talking about what it said in the 4th verse.

Avatar image for Communist_Soul
Communist_Soul

3080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 Communist_Soul
Member since 2009 • 3080 Posts

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"] About halfway down..."The first large-scale violence was engendered by the more radical of Luther's followers, who wished to extend wholesale reform of the Church to a similar wholesale reform of society in genera"Xx_Hopeless_xX

oh...you mean like Radical Muslims? Whats that...Christianity has radicals to?

also: see 30 years war:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty_Years'_War

Protestants are a sub group of Christianity...so i don't understand what you're trying to point out..and what?..Have radical Christians ever done anything like..say...blowing up thousands of innocents and making numerous threats and attempts within MODERN times..the only remotely comparable thing that you can attribute to Christianity as a whole is the Crusades..and even then..if looked at within context of the times..Crusades were fairly common..and even then..Christians protected the persecuted from danger...And within ONE decade i have not seen any christian attempt to, plan to or act upon any plot to harm innocents in the name of their God..

Well the Holocaust can be attributed to Christianity.

"The anti-Semitism of the new movement [Christian Social movement] was based on religious ideas instead of racial knowledge." –Adolf Hitler Mein Kampf

"Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord." –Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf)

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

Oh, so its okay that Christians atack a sub-group of Christianity?

Why should any of this be limited to modern times? The Bible is very old. 400 years ago it was the Europeans that were in turmoil while the middle east enjoyed a time of relative peace?

Also, look up the IRA. They were a very well known Catholic Terrorist group from the 70's who were at war with the British for 20 years.

cobrax25

What the hell?...Were you not trying to claim Christians targeted other religious groups?..Warring amongst Chrsitians even then is STILL not killing in the name of God..

Because within the context of older periods people were far less "peaceful" if you will...so, by showing me an example comparable to the attack on 9/11 or any other attack within the past decade in times where people are more educated and less hostile in general you may form an effective argument..

Seeing as Ireland is largely Christian you'd be hard pressed to find a group that is not made up of Christians..and they are not killing in the name of God..they are killing to change their government.".The country is overwhelmingly Roman Catholic. According to official government statistics based on the 2006 census, the religious affiliation of the population is 86.8 percent Catholic (3,681,446), 2.9 percent Church of Ireland (125,585)" So that's basically a moot point..

They did, I have shown you many examples of Jews in Europe being targeted. And I though Christians were so tollerent agaist other faiths? Why is it that people in Europe stopped believing in the Catholic Church and were instantly atacked by them.

Also, I absolutly love how older periods dont matter because people were less "peacefull" and yet you are quoting from a book written 2000 years ago. As though people were more peacefull and educated then.

When, may i ask were the Jews targeted specifically by Christians in the name of God? And when were these people attacked..? And who were they attacked by?..The laypeople of the Era that you are probably questioning were far from highly informed and they revolted at every chance they got....And again you go back to the Jew example..when i have stated numerous times now that they were not expelled in the name of God nor were the persecuted in the name of God with the exception of the Crusades in which was already covered extensively.. I am quoting a book written 2000 years ago in an argument in which both the Quran and the Bible were being quoted..the claims that the Bible supported violence have already been debunked whereas the ones in regards to the Quran still stand..so why don't you keep the statements and quotes within the parameters being used when they are being quoted..
Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]What is with you and the Jews being kicked out of Europe?..It was not done in the name of Christianity so it is irrelevant to this discussion..

Xx_Hopeless_xX

lol...not done in the name of Christianity...who do you think it was that was kicking them out?

you know what my favorite part about you is...that for you Al-Quida is enough to judge the entire muslim faith, but somehow what plenty of Christian kings and rulers have done towards other faiths is completly irrelevent.

Am i judging the Faith?..No, i am questioning it's teachings and ideology.. And you have yet to provide proof that it was done in the name of God..rather then done by rulers...and i love how you deign it necessary to judge me rather then focusing on the pantheon of evidence supporting my argument..

:lol::lol::lol:

They targeted Jews, of course it was a matter of religion....It would be one thing if they targeted farmers, or bankers, or even a social group....but they targeted a religion, why do you think that was so?

You are telling me I have no proof? I have 1000 years of history on my side...what do you have?

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"][QUOTE="cobrax25"]

oh...you mean like Radical Muslims? Whats that...Christianity has radicals to?

also: see 30 years war:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty_Years'_War

Communist_Soul

Protestants are a sub group of Christianity...so i don't understand what you're trying to point out..and what?..Have radical Christians ever done anything like..say...blowing up thousands of innocents and making numerous threats and attempts within MODERN times..the only remotely comparable thing that you can attribute to Christianity as a whole is the Crusades..and even then..if looked at within context of the times..Crusades were fairly common..and even then..Christians protected the persecuted from danger...And within ONE decade i have not seen any christian attempt to, plan to or act upon any plot to harm innocents in the name of their God..

Well the Holocaust can be attributed to Christianity.

"The anti-Semitism of the new movement [Christian Social movement] was based on religious ideas instead of racial knowledge." –Adolf Hitler Mein Kampf

"Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord." –Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf)

So where again is he supported by the Views of Christianity?..And Hitler was using the Christian name as a way to gain support amongst the German populous..
Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"][QUOTE="cobrax25"]

lol...not done in the name of Christianity...who do you think it was that was kicking them out?

you know what my favorite part about you is...that for you Al-Quida is enough to judge the entire muslim faith, but somehow what plenty of Christian kings and rulers have done towards other faiths is completly irrelevent.

cobrax25

Am i judging the Faith?..No, i am questioning it's teachings and ideology.. And you have yet to provide proof that it was done in the name of God..rather then done by rulers...and i love how you deign it necessary to judge me rather then focusing on the pantheon of evidence supporting my argument..

:lol::lol::lol:

They targeted Jews, of course it was a matter of religion....It would be one thing if they targeted farmers, or bankers, or even a social group....but they targeted a religion, why do you think that was so?

You are telling me I have no proof? I have 1000 years of history on my side...what do you have?

So they targeted Jews in the name of God on what occasion?...I have yet to see one where they targeted them backed up the teachings of Christianity.. And you have yet to bring up an effective argument in regards to the "history" on your side..you even misconstrued or attempted to misconstrue the situation of Martin Luther..
Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"] What the hell?...Were you not trying to claim Christians targeted other religious groups?..Warring amongst Chrsitians even then is STILL not killing in the name of God..

Because within the context of older periods people were far less "peaceful" if you will...so, by showing me an example comparable to the attack on 9/11 or any other attack within the past decade in times where people are more educated and less hostile in general you may form an effective argument..

Seeing as Ireland is largely Christian you'd be hard pressed to find a group that is not made up of Christians..and they are not killing in the name of God..they are killing to change their government.".The country is overwhelmingly Roman Catholic. According to official government statistics based on the 2006 census, the religious affiliation of the population is 86.8 percent Catholic (3,681,446), 2.9 percent Church of Ireland (125,585)" So that's basically a moot point..

Xx_Hopeless_xX

They did, I have shown you many examples of Jews in Europe being targeted. And I though Christians were so tollerent agaist other faiths? Why is it that people in Europe stopped believing in the Catholic Church and were instantly atacked by them.

Also, I absolutly love how older periods dont matter because people were less "peacefull" and yet you are quoting from a book written 2000 years ago. As though people were more peacefull and educated then.

When, may i ask were the Jews targeted specifically by Christians in the name of God? And when were these people attacked..? And who were they attacked by?..The laypeople of the Era that you are probably questioning were far from highly informed and they revolted at every chance they got....And again you go back to the Jew example..when i have stated numerous times now that they were not expelled in the name of God nor were the persecuted in the name of God with the exception of the Crusades in which was already covered extensively.. I am quoting a book written 2000 years ago in an argument in which both the Quran and the Bible were being quoted..the claims that the Bible supported violence have already been debunked whereas the ones in regards to the Quran still stand..so why don't you keep the statements and quotes within the parameters being used when they are being quoted..

Every one else (Christians). Do you even know what a revolt is? How can you revolt agaist a minority population.

Your coming across as a massive hypocrite, you cant quote the bible and then pretend like the 2000 years of christian history doesnt matter.

Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"] Am i judging the Faith?..No, i am questioning it's teachings and ideology.. And you have yet to provide proof that it was done in the name of God..rather then done by rulers...and i love how you deign it necessary to judge me rather then focusing on the pantheon of evidence supporting my argument..Xx_Hopeless_xX

:lol::lol::lol:

They targeted Jews, of course it was a matter of religion....It would be one thing if they targeted farmers, or bankers, or even a social group....but they targeted a religion, why do you think that was so?

You are telling me I have no proof? I have 1000 years of history on my side...what do you have?

So they targeted Jews in the name of God on what occasion?...I have yet to see one where they targeted them backed up the teachings of Christianity.. And you have yet to bring up an effective argument in regards to the "history" on your side..you even misconstrued or attempted to misconstrue the situation of Martin Luther..

They were atacked by Christians...If Christians were tollerent towards others why did they attack other religious groups?

Dont pretend like you know anything about Martin Luther....Dont act like the Protestant Reformation happened and Protenstants became well intergrated in European society...