The Israelis bombed a UN compound

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
LJS has a very valid point, a point that most people seem to miss. Hamas cares very little about the palestinian people. They are merely tools to achieve their goal. Their lives are insignificant to them. They are conducting more of a urban war than a guerilla war. They are firing rockets from within populated areas. I'm sure it doesn't take too much understaning to realize that Israel is going to respond by firing missles back at those areas. In fact, I suspect they are counting on it.sonicare
I think Hamas realizes that they can't actually "win" and "beat" Isael so what they do is taint the reputation of Israel to the point where if Israel were to continue attacking it would severely damage their credibility on the global stage and would make any form of retaliation by Israel political suicide.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#102 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

Oh wow this is BBC-style braudcasting at its best! Israel has never used white phospherous. All of their weapon equipment is screed by forign parties before used in combat. The white phospherous 'rumour' originated from, you guessed it, GAZA. In it's current state, im sure any bull they say which provides a great excuse as to why Israel are 'dominating' them in war will be backed and supported by Iran...seeing as Iran fund Hamas. This means the media influence is less than perfect.

Also, Israel has rarely abducted. When they DO abduct, they abduct members of the militia, and even then they hold them in acceptable conditions, unlike Hamas who abduct to torture.

Finally, Israel send humanitry supplies through their barriar- they feed the citizens of Gaza. Hamas, the loving government they are, are too busy busying and smuggling weapons into the country to provide food and water for their citizens.

HellsAngel2c
Never used White phosphorous? They used it against Hezbollah in 2006, and many humanitarian rights agencies are beginning to study footage coming out of the region. Highly trained professionals are seeing them use it in highly populated areas. These reports are from objective, third party sources. And Israel did adbuct, in 2004, foreign dignitaries of the Palestinian government in power. Adbucting protected parties is a war crime. Finally, it doesn't matter what the reason is, a blockade which denies relief is against he geneva conventions.
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#103 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts
[QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]

I wonder if you would say the same if a country dropped a nuke on your country and killed your entire family. Sacrifices are always good, as long as they arent your loved ones... :?

And not living in a Utopia is not a valid excuse for actin barbaric. If I live in the Ghetto that doesnt give me the right to murder people.

II_Seraphim_II
You need to keep your personal feelings out of it, otherwise you should refrain from topics such as these. Besides, Israel is not acting barbaric by any standards.And that last analogy with you living in the ghetto, what on earth does that have to do with anything.

You implied that because we dont live in a Utopia its ok to kill innocents if we get what we want. My analogy with the ghetto was to show that the ghetto is not a Utopia, so does the resident of the ghetto have the right to kill to improve his situation?

Yes, i think its perfectly reasonable to kill civilians to get what we want, if what we want can only be achieved by killing civilians, and the thing we want is important enough to do so. I shouldnt have to point out to you that its not like Israel is targeting civilians, tho, they are targeting terrorists utilizing the civilian cover. Its just collateral damage.
Avatar image for Vanadium2k8
Vanadium2k8

1605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 Vanadium2k8
Member since 2008 • 1605 Posts
[QUOTE="Vanadium2k8"][QUOTE="sonicare"]LJS has a very valid point, a point that most people seem to miss. Hamas cares very little about the palestinian people. They are merely tools to achieve their goal. Their lives are insignificant to them. They are conducting more of a urban war than a guerilla war. They are firing rockets from within populated areas. I'm sure it doesn't take too much understaning to realize that Israel is going to respond by firing missles back at those areas. In fact, I suspect they are counting on it.sonicare
Yep, if there is a terrorist in an area, bomb the whole place for 100% success!

Congratualtions on completely missing the point.

No, I'm saying just because it's expected doesn't mean it's right.
Avatar image for mastersword007
mastersword007

6630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 mastersword007
Member since 2005 • 6630 Posts
[QUOTE="mastersword007"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"] You need to keep your personal feelings out of it, otherwise you should refrain from topics such as these. Besides, Israel is not acting barbaric by any standards.And that last analogy with you living in the ghetto, what on earth does that have to do with anything.BiancaDK


Yes, because acting in rage and killing a lot of civilians, destroying a lot of facilities that were supposed to help the Palestinians and much more, is not barbaric at all.

1: Theyre are obviously not acting in rage. I dont think you know what rage is? Do you see any carpet bombings yet? Mushroom clouds? 2: You seem only to mention them killing civilians and destroying facilities that are supposed to help the palestinians. You do know what "action/reaction" is?



Acting in rage is not just limited to such excessive actions.
I kinda cut short on the last part. See Vanadium2k8's post for more.
Newtons third law?
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#106 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts
[QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]

I wonder if you would say the same if a country dropped a nuke on your country and killed your entire family. Sacrifices are always good, as long as they arent your loved ones... :?

And not living in a Utopia is not a valid excuse for actin barbaric. If I live in the Ghetto that doesnt give me the right to murder people.

Vanadium2k8
You need to keep your personal feelings out of it, otherwise you should refrain from topics such as these. Besides, Israel is not acting barbaric by any standards.And that last analogy with you living in the ghetto, what on earth does that have to do with anything.

:lol: Bombing mobile clinics, major civilian centres, UN schools, mosques, fleeing citizens, using white phosphorus, using cluster bombs. I could go on forever. If Israel isn't barbaric by your standards, then you must have pretty slow standards.

apparently, you are physically incapable of seeing both sides of the story. Whatever floats your boat.
Avatar image for mastersword007
mastersword007

6630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 mastersword007
Member since 2005 • 6630 Posts
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"] You need to keep your personal feelings out of it, otherwise you should refrain from topics such as these. Besides, Israel is not acting barbaric by any standards.And that last analogy with you living in the ghetto, what on earth does that have to do with anything.BiancaDK
You implied that because we dont live in a Utopia its ok to kill innocents if we get what we want. My analogy with the ghetto was to show that the ghetto is not a Utopia, so does the resident of the ghetto have the right to kill to improve his situation?

Yes, i think its perfectly reasonable to kill civilians to get what we want, if what we want can only be achieved by killing civilians, and the thing we want is important enough to do so. I shouldnt have to point out to you that its not like Israel is targeting civilians, tho, they are targeting terrorists utilizing the civilian cover. Its just collateral damage.



...What is it that we want, which can be only achieved by killing civilians?
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#108 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
Vanadium, I wasn't justifying Israel's actions. I am merely placing some of the blame on Hamas.
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#109 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
LJS has a very valid point, a point that most people seem to miss. Hamas cares very little about the palestinian people. They are merely tools to achieve their goal. Their lives are insignificant to them. They are conducting more of a urban war than a guerilla war. They are firing rockets from within populated areas. I'm sure it doesn't take too much understaning to realize that Israel is going to respond by firing missles back at those areas. In fact, I suspect they are counting on it.sonicare
The point is that almost no one is condoning Hamas tactics and their willingness to kill civilians, yet people seem ok with condoning Israel's killing of civilians. Are Palestinian lives worth less than Israeli lives?
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"] You need to keep your personal feelings out of it, otherwise you should refrain from topics such as these. Besides, Israel is not acting barbaric by any standards.And that last analogy with you living in the ghetto, what on earth does that have to do with anything.BiancaDK
You implied that because we dont live in a Utopia its ok to kill innocents if we get what we want. My analogy with the ghetto was to show that the ghetto is not a Utopia, so does the resident of the ghetto have the right to kill to improve his situation?

Yes, i think its perfectly reasonable to kill civilians to get what we want, if what we want can only be achieved by killing civilians, and the thing we want is important enough to do so. I shouldnt have to point out to you that its not like Israel is targeting civilians, tho, they are targeting terrorists utilizing the civilian cover. Its just collateral damage.

Though it's military tactics 101 that you don't use air strikes and artilary against a gurrilla force. Unless you're willing to wipe it off the map it's pointless as strategic bombardment only strengthens civilian resolve causing more to join the armed forces.
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#111 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts
[QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="mastersword007"]

Yes, because acting in rage and killing a lot of civilians, destroying a lot of facilities that were supposed to help the Palestinians and much more, is not barbaric at all.mastersword007
1: Theyre are obviously not acting in rage. I dont think you know what rage is? Do you see any carpet bombings yet? Mushroom clouds? 2: You seem only to mention them killing civilians and destroying facilities that are supposed to help the palestinians. You do know what "action/reaction" is?



Acting in rage is not just limited to such excessive actions.
I kinda cut short on the last part. See Vanadium2k8's post for more.
Newtons third law?

Ofcourse it isnt just limited to the 2 things i mentioned, but if israel was in a blind rage, wouldnt you think they would be more pro-reactive in their bombings? It hardly seems rageful to return fire.
Avatar image for Vanadium2k8
Vanadium2k8

1605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 Vanadium2k8
Member since 2008 • 1605 Posts
[QUOTE="Vanadium2k8"] apparently, you are physically incapable of seeing both sides of the story. Whatever floats your boat.BiancaDK
And you refuse to acknowledge that Israel is wrong. "Israel is not acting barbaric by any standards", funnier things have never been said in this thread.
Avatar image for ffaf666
ffaf666

377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#113 ffaf666
Member since 2006 • 377 Posts

LJS has a very valid point, a point that most people seem to miss. Hamas cares very little about the palestinian people. They are merely tools to achieve their goal. Their lives are insignificant to them. They are conducting more of a urban war than a guerilla war. They are firing rockets from within populated areas. I'm sure it doesn't take too much understaning to realize that Israel is going to respond by firing missles back at those areas. In fact, I suspect they are counting on it.sonicare

gaza is the most densily populated place on earth. Each palestian faction is local to a certian area, so they know many of people living there,many would be friends and family of friends and its common for relatives and whole families to live in the same district. The militants believe that they are protecting their people and i bet a militant would cry if they came across a dead child. yes Hamas arent saints, they shouldnt be firing rockets into israel but lets forget that they arent monsters either.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180073 Posts
[QUOTE="HellsAngel2c"]

Oh wow this is BBC-style braudcasting at its best! Israel has never used white phospherous. All of their weapon equipment is screed by forign parties before used in combat. The white phospherous 'rumour' originated from, you guessed it, GAZA. In it's current state, im sure any bull they say which provides a great excuse as to why Israel are 'dominating' them in war will be backed and supported by Iran...seeing as Iran fund Hamas. This means the media influence is less than perfect.

Also, Israel has rarely abducted. When they DO abduct, they abduct members of the militia, and even then they hold them in acceptable conditions, unlike Hamas who abduct to torture.

Finally, Israel send humanitry supplies through their barriar- they feed the citizens of Gaza. Hamas, the loving government they are, are too busy busying and smuggling weapons into the country to provide food and water for their citizens.

Vandalvideo
Never used White phosphorous? They used it against Hezbollah in 2006, and many humanitarian rights agencies are beginning to study footage coming out of the region. Highly trained professionals are seeing them use it in highly populated areas. These reports are from objective, third party sources. And Israel did adbuct, in 2004, foreign dignitaries of the Palestinian government in power. Adbucting protected parties is a war crime. Finally, it doesn't matter what the reason is, a blockade which denies relief is against he geneva conventions.

You conitnue to misunderstand the white phosphorus issue. For instance, the US has never signed an agreement not to us it and thus have used it in Iraq. Second, white phosphourus in and of itself is not banned. Depends on the use and intent.
Avatar image for mastersword007
mastersword007

6630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 mastersword007
Member since 2005 • 6630 Posts
Vanadium, I wasn't justifying Israel's actions. I am merely placing some of the blame on Hamas.sonicare

Sonicare, everyone knows Hamas is to blame too.
We're just trying to show that Israel isn't entirely innocent itself.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#116 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
[QUOTE="sonicare"]LJS has a very valid point, a point that most people seem to miss. Hamas cares very little about the palestinian people. They are merely tools to achieve their goal. Their lives are insignificant to them. They are conducting more of a urban war than a guerilla war. They are firing rockets from within populated areas. I'm sure it doesn't take too much understaning to realize that Israel is going to respond by firing missles back at those areas. In fact, I suspect they are counting on it.II_Seraphim_II
The point is that almost no one is condoning Hamas tactics and their willingness to kill civilians, yet people seem ok with condoning Israel's killing of civilians. Are Palestinian lives worth less than Israeli lives?

That has nothing to do with what I was discussing. Nor was I condoning Israel's actions.
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#117 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts
[QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"] You implied that because we dont live in a Utopia its ok to kill innocents if we get what we want. My analogy with the ghetto was to show that the ghetto is not a Utopia, so does the resident of the ghetto have the right to kill to improve his situation?markop2003
Yes, i think its perfectly reasonable to kill civilians to get what we want, if what we want can only be achieved by killing civilians, and the thing we want is important enough to do so. I shouldnt have to point out to you that its not like Israel is targeting civilians, tho, they are targeting terrorists utilizing the civilian cover. Its just collateral damage.

Though it's military tactics 101 that you don't use air strikes and artilary against a gurrilla force. Unless you're willing to wipe it off the map it's pointless as strategic bombardment only strengthens civilian resolve causing more to join the armed forces.

psychological warfare has a big saying in the weapons israel is utilizing.
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#118 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts


...What is it that we want, which can be only achieved by killing civilians?mastersword007

Im curious about this too....What is it that one could want (other than genocide) that can only be attained by killing civilians?

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#119 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
You conitnue to misunderstand the white phosphorus issue. For instance, the US has never signed an agreement not to us it and thus have used it in Iraq. Second, white phosphourus in and of itself is not banned. Depends on the use and intent.LJS9502_basic
I've already suppplied you, in another thread, undeniable proof that the use of incindiary type devices in civilian centers is banned by international conventions. IT is against the law. That and that. As a product of primary design, it BURNS PEOPLE.
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#120 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts
[QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="Vanadium2k8"] apparently, you are physically incapable of seeing both sides of the story. Whatever floats your boat.Vanadium2k8
And you refuse to acknowledge that Israel is wrong. "Israel is not acting barbaric by any standards", funnier things have never been said in this thread.

Ill acknowledge that israel is wrong in its ways, when you decide to back up your bias arguments with more than mere opinions.
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#121 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="sonicare"]LJS has a very valid point, a point that most people seem to miss. Hamas cares very little about the palestinian people. They are merely tools to achieve their goal. Their lives are insignificant to them. They are conducting more of a urban war than a guerilla war. They are firing rockets from within populated areas. I'm sure it doesn't take too much understaning to realize that Israel is going to respond by firing missles back at those areas. In fact, I suspect they are counting on it.sonicare
The point is that almost no one is condoning Hamas tactics and their willingness to kill civilians, yet people seem ok with condoning Israel's killing of civilians. Are Palestinian lives worth less than Israeli lives?

That has nothing to do with what I was discussing. Nor was I condoning Israel's actions.

Im not saying you are condoning Israel's actions. I was just explaining to you that a lot of people who seem to arguing against Israel, arent arguing FOR Hamas. We know what Hamas is doing is wrong. We understand why people find Hamas deplorable. Thats a closed and done case, what we don't understand is why the same people who complain about Hamas killing civilians turn around and protect Israel killing civilians.
Avatar image for Vanadium2k8
Vanadium2k8

1605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 Vanadium2k8
Member since 2008 • 1605 Posts
Vanadium, I wasn't justifying Israel's actions. I am merely placing some of the blame on Hamas.sonicare
Don't think anyone had a problem with acknowledging that fact :) Though what many people do have a problem acknowledging is getting past this "Israel has a right to defend itself" BS. Soz, if that's not what you're trying to say.
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
[QUOTE="markop2003"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"] Yes, i think its perfectly reasonable to kill civilians to get what we want, if what we want can only be achieved by killing civilians, and the thing we want is important enough to do so. I shouldnt have to point out to you that its not like Israel is targeting civilians, tho, they are targeting terrorists utilizing the civilian cover. Its just collateral damage.BiancaDK
Though it's military tactics 101 that you don't use air strikes and artilary against a gurrilla force. Unless you're willing to wipe it off the map it's pointless as strategic bombardment only strengthens civilian resolve causing more to join the armed forces.

psychological warfare has a big saying in the weapons israel is utilizing.

They make resolve stronger, i don't think it's ever weakened civilian resolve as they just start to hate the attackers.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180073 Posts
[QUOTE="sonicare"]LJS has a very valid point, a point that most people seem to miss. Hamas cares very little about the palestinian people. They are merely tools to achieve their goal. Their lives are insignificant to them. They are conducting more of a urban war than a guerilla war. They are firing rockets from within populated areas. I'm sure it doesn't take too much understaning to realize that Israel is going to respond by firing missles back at those areas. In fact, I suspect they are counting on it.II_Seraphim_II
The point is that almost no one is condoning Hamas tactics and their willingness to kill civilians, yet people seem ok with condoning Israel's killing of civilians. Are Palestinian lives worth less than Israeli lives?

If Hamas wasn't using the civilians then there would be no problem. Tell me what you would do if someone was firing rockets at you and your family?
Avatar image for Vanadium2k8
Vanadium2k8

1605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 Vanadium2k8
Member since 2008 • 1605 Posts
[QUOTE="BiancaDK"] Ill acknowledge that israel is wrong in its ways, when you decide to back up your bias arguments with more than mere opinions.

So all the types of bombings and war crimes I listed are opinions. Nice to know.
Avatar image for mastersword007
mastersword007

6630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 mastersword007
Member since 2005 • 6630 Posts
[QUOTE="mastersword007"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"] 1: Theyre are obviously not acting in rage. I dont think you know what rage is? Do you see any carpet bombings yet? Mushroom clouds? 2: You seem only to mention them killing civilians and destroying facilities that are supposed to help the palestinians. You do know what "action/reaction" is?BiancaDK


Acting in rage is not just limited to such excessive actions.
I kinda cut short on the last part. See Vanadium2k8's post for more.
Newtons third law?

Ofcourse it isnt just limited to the 2 things i mentioned, but if israel was in a blind rage, wouldnt you think they would be more pro-reactive in their bombings? It hardly seems rageful to return fire.



True, but they're not just returning fire are they?
Israel is not concentrating on avoiding civilian casualties as much as they should be.
We do not even know if those places were filled with terrorist and we can't just blindly trust what israel says.

True, sometimes innocent casualties are inevitable, but that doesn't mean a country shouldn't try to keep that number as low as possible.
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts

[QUOTE="mastersword007"]
...What is it that we want, which can be only achieved by killing civilians?II_Seraphim_II

Im curious about this too....What is it that one could want (other than genocide) that can only be attained by killing civilians?

Sometimes it can be a side effect of a good tactic like bombing oil refinaries or munitions factories, i can only think of it as a side effect really
Avatar image for Devour2Survive
Devour2Survive

782

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 Devour2Survive
Member since 2008 • 782 Posts
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="sonicare"]LJS has a very valid point, a point that most people seem to miss. Hamas cares very little about the palestinian people. They are merely tools to achieve their goal. Their lives are insignificant to them. They are conducting more of a urban war than a guerilla war. They are firing rockets from within populated areas. I'm sure it doesn't take too much understaning to realize that Israel is going to respond by firing missles back at those areas. In fact, I suspect they are counting on it.LJS9502_basic
The point is that almost no one is condoning Hamas tactics and their willingness to kill civilians, yet people seem ok with condoning Israel's killing of civilians. Are Palestinian lives worth less than Israeli lives?

If Hamas wasn't using the civilians then there would be no problem. Tell me what you would do if someone was firing rockets at you and your family?

I would blindly start shooting rockets everywhere not caring what they hit and who they hit... :|
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#129 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts
[QUOTE="markop2003"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="markop2003"] Though it's military tactics 101 that you don't use air strikes and artilary against a gurrilla force. Unless you're willing to wipe it off the map it's pointless as strategic bombardment only strengthens civilian resolve causing more to join the armed forces.

psychological warfare has a big saying in the weapons israel is utilizing.

They make resolve stronger, i don't think it's ever weakened civilian resolve as they just start to hate the attackers.

people can hate on israel all they want, but this time around, theyll know that there will be a tomahawk missile heading their way ETA 5 minutes next time they decide to take violent action against israel. :P
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#130 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
If Hamas wasn't using the civilians then there would be no problem. Tell me what you would do if someone was firing rockets at you and your family?LJS9502_basic
Hamas themselves hadn't started firing rockets until August, 2 months after the blockade, which was supposed to end, was still there.
Avatar image for lucky326
lucky326

3799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#131 lucky326
Member since 2006 • 3799 Posts
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="sonicare"]LJS has a very valid point, a point that most people seem to miss. Hamas cares very little about the palestinian people. They are merely tools to achieve their goal. Their lives are insignificant to them. They are conducting more of a urban war than a guerilla war. They are firing rockets from within populated areas. I'm sure it doesn't take too much understaning to realize that Israel is going to respond by firing missles back at those areas. In fact, I suspect they are counting on it.LJS9502_basic
The point is that almost no one is condoning Hamas tactics and their willingness to kill civilians, yet people seem ok with condoning Israel's killing of civilians. Are Palestinian lives worth less than Israeli lives?

If Hamas wasn't using the civilians then there would be no problem. Tell me what you would do if someone was firing rockets at you and your family?

Well that depends on circumstances now, Hamas can claim the land there firing rockets at is theres and I find that acceptable truth be told.
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#132 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts
[QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="mastersword007"]

Acting in rage is not just limited to such excessive actions.
I kinda cut short on the last part. See Vanadium2k8's post for more.
Newtons third law?mastersword007
Ofcourse it isnt just limited to the 2 things i mentioned, but if israel was in a blind rage, wouldnt you think they would be more pro-reactive in their bombings? It hardly seems rageful to return fire.



True, but they're not just returning fire are they?
Israel is not concentrating on avoiding civilian casualties as much as they should be.
We do not even know if those places were filled with terrorist and we can't just blindly trust what israel says.

True, sometimes innocent casualties are inevitable, but that doesn't mean a country shouldn't try to keep that number as low as possible.

How do you know theyre not doing everything within their power and within reason to avoid civilian casualties?
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180073 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"] The point is that almost no one is condoning Hamas tactics and their willingness to kill civilians, yet people seem ok with condoning Israel's killing of civilians. Are Palestinian lives worth less than Israeli lives?Devour2Survive
If Hamas wasn't using the civilians then there would be no problem. Tell me what you would do if someone was firing rockets at you and your family?

I would blindly start shooting rockets everywhere not caring what they hit and who they hit... :|

That isn't what is going on. Israel has a good military...they don't fire blindly. If you have a problem with this...it should be that Hamas has no regard for their people.:|
Avatar image for Bloodbath_87
Bloodbath_87

7586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#134 Bloodbath_87
Member since 2008 • 7586 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]You conitnue to misunderstand the white phosphorus issue. For instance, the US has never signed an agreement not to us it and thus have used it in Iraq. Second, white phosphourus in and of itself is not banned. Depends on the use and intent.Vandalvideo
I've already suppplied you, in another thread, undeniable proof that the use of incindiary type devices in civilian centers is banned by international conventions. IT is against the law. That and that. As a product of primary design, it BURNS PEOPLE.

I've never really understood that. I mean, how different is burning people from just blowing them to pieces?
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
[QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="markop2003"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"] psychological warfare has a big saying in the weapons israel is utilizing.

They make resolve stronger, i don't think it's ever weakened civilian resolve as they just start to hate the attackers.

people can hate on israel all they want, but this time around, theyll know that there will be a tomahawk missile heading their way ETA 5 minutes next time they decide to take violent action against israel. :P

Dosn't matter strategic bombardment just dosn't work, the best you'll do is just annoy the fire service.
Avatar image for JohnnySN1P3R
JohnnySN1P3R

1916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#136 JohnnySN1P3R
Member since 2008 • 1916 Posts
[QUOTE="danwallacefan"]

[QUOTE="Vanadium2k8"]Blockades started in 2006.

the rocket attacks started in 2005

[QUOTE="Vanadium2k8"]Hamas has received aid from who? All the aid that was sent to Palestine would have to go to Israel first, the blockades themselves are enough proof to show that the aid never reached Palestine anyway.Vanadium2k8

no actually they're called wire-transfers. Hamas has recieved billions in aid from Iran.

Hamas was elected 2006.

They've been around longer than that. Also, I believe it was an honest mistake. Gaza is so packed with buildings, of course it can be a stray shell. I still fully Support Israel all the way.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#137 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Bloodbath_87"] I've never really understood that. I mean, how different is burning people from just blowing them to pieces?

Burning is a slow and agonizing process which is inhumane. Blowing them up is quick, and will most likely either kill them or send them into anaphylaxis shock.
Avatar image for mastersword007
mastersword007

6630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 mastersword007
Member since 2005 • 6630 Posts
[QUOTE="mastersword007"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"] Ofcourse it isnt just limited to the 2 things i mentioned, but if israel was in a blind rage, wouldnt you think they would be more pro-reactive in their bombings? It hardly seems rageful to return fire.BiancaDK


True, but they're not just returning fire are they?
Israel is not concentrating on avoiding civilian casualties as much as they should be.
We do not even know if those places were filled with terrorist and we can't just blindly trust what israel says.

True, sometimes innocent casualties are inevitable, but that doesn't mean a country shouldn't try to keep that number as low as possible.

How do you know theyre not doing everything within their power and within reason to avoid civilian casualties?



How do you know they are?
Avatar image for danwallacefan
danwallacefan

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#139 danwallacefan
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]If Hamas wasn't using the civilians then there would be no problem. Tell me what you would do if someone was firing rockets at you and your family?Vandalvideo
Hamas themselves hadn't started firing rockets until August, 2 months after the blockade, which was supposed to end, was still there.

they started firing rockets the day after the IDF withdrew from Gaza.
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
[QUOTE="mastersword007"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"] Ofcourse it isnt just limited to the 2 things i mentioned, but if israel was in a blind rage, wouldnt you think they would be more pro-reactive in their bombings? It hardly seems rageful to return fire.BiancaDK


True, but they're not just returning fire are they?
Israel is not concentrating on avoiding civilian casualties as much as they should be.
We do not even know if those places were filled with terrorist and we can't just blindly trust what israel says.

True, sometimes innocent casualties are inevitable, but that doesn't mean a country shouldn't try to keep that number as low as possible.

How do you know theyre not doing everything within their power and within reason to avoid civilian casualties?

Simply monitoring all the borders to stop weapons getting in could work. AAlso killing the weapons dealers with special forces.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180073 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"] The point is that almost no one is condoning Hamas tactics and their willingness to kill civilians, yet people seem ok with condoning Israel's killing of civilians. Are Palestinian lives worth less than Israeli lives?lucky326
If Hamas wasn't using the civilians then there would be no problem. Tell me what you would do if someone was firing rockets at you and your family?

Well that depends on circumstances now, Hamas can claim the land there firing rockets at is theres and I find that acceptable truth be told.

I see. So if I trash your house I can use the excuse that's it's my house? That is acceptable?
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#142 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]If Hamas wasn't using the civilians then there would be no problem. Tell me what you would do if someone was firing rockets at you and your family?danwallacefan
Hamas themselves hadn't started firing rockets until August, 2 months after the blockade, which was supposed to end, was still there.

they started firing rockets the day after the IDF withdrew from Gaza.

Actually, the ones who fired rockets were the group called Islamic Jihad, in retalliation for a raid in the West Bank. It wasn't hamas. If anything, they were more related to Fatah than Hamas.
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#143 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts
[QUOTE="markop2003"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="markop2003"] They make resolve stronger, i don't think it's ever weakened civilian resolve as they just start to hate the attackers.

people can hate on israel all they want, but this time around, theyll know that there will be a tomahawk missile heading their way ETA 5 minutes next time they decide to take violent action against israel. :P

Dosn't matter strategic bombardment just dosn't work, the best you'll do is just annoy the fire service.

it doesent work because you say so? Id like you to back your claim up with something tangible. Youll quickly notice that this conflict is quite unique.
Avatar image for Devour2Survive
Devour2Survive

782

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 Devour2Survive
Member since 2008 • 782 Posts
[QUOTE="Devour2Survive"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]If Hamas wasn't using the civilians then there would be no problem. Tell me what you would do if someone was firing rockets at you and your family?LJS9502_basic
I would blindly start shooting rockets everywhere not caring what they hit and who they hit... :|

That isn't what is going on. Israel has a good military...they don't fire blindly. If you have a problem with this...it should be that Hamas has no regard for their people.:|

They are firing blindly when all these reports keep coming in. Israel is going all out with no remorse. Sure they want Hamas eliminated(which is impossible), but they are making way too much damage than its worth. Also, stop bringing up Hamas and Palestinian people as if you give a rats ass about the people, they are hiding in these buildings because they don't have their own bases, they don't have enough funds for that...they got nothing really. You are acting like its one military uniformed force vs another when in reality Hamas is more of a bunch of rebellions in costumes.
Avatar image for lucky326
lucky326

3799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#145 lucky326
Member since 2006 • 3799 Posts
[QUOTE="lucky326"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]If Hamas wasn't using the civilians then there would be no problem. Tell me what you would do if someone was firing rockets at you and your family?LJS9502_basic
Well that depends on circumstances now, Hamas can claim the land there firing rockets at is theres and I find that acceptable truth be told.

I see. So if I trash your house I can use the excuse that's it's my house? That is acceptable?

I own that house and I see Hamas as being the owners of that piece of land, therefore your argument doesn't work.
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#146 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts
[QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="mastersword007"]

True, but they're not just returning fire are they?
Israel is not concentrating on avoiding civilian casualties as much as they should be.
We do not even know if those places were filled with terrorist and we can't just blindly trust what israel says.

True, sometimes innocent casualties are inevitable, but that doesn't mean a country shouldn't try to keep that number as low as possible.mastersword007
How do you know theyre not doing everything within their power and within reason to avoid civilian casualties?



How do you know they are?

Oh come on, you wanna play that game? Seriously?
Avatar image for ffaf666
ffaf666

377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#147 ffaf666
Member since 2006 • 377 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]You conitnue to misunderstand the white phosphorus issue. For instance, the US has never signed an agreement not to us it and thus have used it in Iraq. Second, white phosphourus in and of itself is not banned. Depends on the use and intent.Bloodbath_87
I've already suppplied you, in another thread, undeniable proof that the use of incindiary type devices in civilian centers is banned by international conventions. IT is against the law. That and that. As a product of primary design, it BURNS PEOPLE.

I've never really understood that. I mean, how different is burning people from just blowing them to pieces?

white phosphourus acts as a smoke screen too and can be used in conventiional warefare, which this isnt And using in densily populated area is illegal. IF you dont kill the militants or their supporters, you leave them scared for life with eyeballs burnt and stuff, its quite mean.
Avatar image for mastersword007
mastersword007

6630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 mastersword007
Member since 2005 • 6630 Posts
[QUOTE="mastersword007"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"] How do you know theyre not doing everything within their power and within reason to avoid civilian casualties?BiancaDK


How do you know they are?

Oh come on, you wanna play that game? Seriously?



Hey, you started it :P
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180073 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]You conitnue to misunderstand the white phosphorus issue. For instance, the US has never signed an agreement not to us it and thus have used it in Iraq. Second, white phosphourus in and of itself is not banned. Depends on the use and intent.Bloodbath_87
I've already suppplied you, in another thread, undeniable proof that the use of incindiary type devices in civilian centers is banned by international conventions. IT is against the law. That and that. As a product of primary design, it BURNS PEOPLE.

I've never really understood that. I mean, how different is burning people from just blowing them to pieces?

White phosphourus is not illegal in and of itself. I've given him links but I don't think he understands the legalese. Anyway, white phosphourus is allowed as a tracer and screen. It is not to be used.....and this is the important word...DELIBERATELY on civilians or civilian populations. The agreement does allow that mistakes can happen. And if a country has not signed the agreement they are under no obligation to abide by it.
Avatar image for lucky326
lucky326

3799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#150 lucky326
Member since 2006 • 3799 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Devour2Survive"] I would blindly start shooting rockets everywhere not caring what they hit and who they hit... :|Devour2Survive
That isn't what is going on. Israel has a good military...they don't fire blindly. If you have a problem with this...it should be that Hamas has no regard for their people.:|

They are firing blindly when all these reports keep coming in. Israel is going all out with no remorse. Sure they want Hamas eliminated(which is impossible), but they are making way too much damage than its worth. Also, stop bringing up Hamas and Palestinian people as if you give a rats ass about the people, they are hiding in these buildings because they don't have their own bases, they don't have enough funds for that...they got nothing really. You are acting like its one military uniformed force vs another when in reality Hamas is more of a bunch of rebellions in costumes.

Aye, if Israel launched this bombing crusade properly they would be hitting Political locations, Barracks, Storage area's ect. This however isn't a real strategic bombing campaign as they seem to have no real targets when firing. All there doing is hitting the civilians and it's hurting Israel a lot more than Gaza.