[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
If abortion is murder, then masterbation is mass genocide. Watch out, next those pro lifers will be coming after your masterbation privaleges.
McJugga
A human is created at conception, not before, not after.
sureThis topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
If abortion is murder, then masterbation is mass genocide. Watch out, next those pro lifers will be coming after your masterbation privaleges.
McJugga
A human is created at conception, not before, not after.
sure[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
If abortion is murder, then masterbation is mass genocide. Watch out, next those pro lifers will be coming after your masterbation privaleges.
McJugga
A human is created at conception, not before, not after.
Sperm are memebers of the Genus Homo Species SapienTherefore they are human
(Your logic not mine)
[QUOTE="McJugga"]
[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
If abortion is murder, then masterbation is mass genocide. Watch out, next those pro lifers will be coming after your masterbation privaleges.
LostProphetFLCL
A human is created at conception, not before, not after.
sureThen when is a human created?
After three months? Is a fetus just a clump of cells, then bam! After three months it is suddenly a human?
Please, tell me, when is a human created?
The baby is human, I'm not denying that, but I'm denying whether it's a living thing or not. How can you end a life that has not started?You believe that a need for a host determines whether one is human or not?
McJugga
Whether something needs a host cell or not is how biology can differentiate between living things and non-living things that can do all the things living things can do but need a host cell.
It is why viruses are not regarded as living things, because they need a host cell to live. Why does the baby being human allow it to be an exception?
The baby is human, I'm not denying that, but I'm denying whether it's a living thing or not. How can you end a life that has not started?[QUOTE="McJugga"]
You believe that a need for a host determines whether one is human or not?
Famiking
Whether something needs a host cell or not is how biology can differentiate between living things and non-living things that can do all the things living things can do but need a host cell.
It is why viruses are not regarded as living things, because they need a host cell to live. Why does the baby being human allow it to be an exception?
A fetus is alive, and meets all the requirements to be living, as I pointed out a few pages back.
Someone in a coma might need a machine to keep him or her alive.
Some people born with certain disease might also need a machine to stay alive.
They are still human.
sure[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
[QUOTE="McJugga"]
A human is created at conception, not before, not after.
McJugga
Then when is a human created?
After three months? Is a fetus just a clump of cells, then bam! After three months it is suddenly a human?
Please, tell me, when is a human created?
The opinion is going to vary from person to person. Why don't pro-choices just try to understand that some people are going to have different opinions than them, and allow them to do what they want with their body. (Ironically, I have noticed that alot of people who don't believe in a woman's rights are the same people who whine about the government staying out of peoples lives)[QUOTE="McJugga"]
[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
If abortion is murder, then masterbation is mass genocide. Watch out, next those pro lifers will be coming after your masterbation privaleges.
htekemerald
A human is created at conception, not before, not after.
Sperm are memebers of the Genus Homo Species SapienTherefore they are human
(Your logic not mine)
Sperm is not human life, a fertilized egg is.
At what point do you believe a fetus magically turns into a human?
The opinion is going to vary from person to person. Why don't pro-choices just try to understand that some people are going to have different opinions than them, and allow them to do what they want with their body. (Ironically, I have noticed that alot of people who don't believe in a woman's rights are the same people who whine about the government staying out of peoples lives)
LostProphetFLCL
If the opinion of when a fetus is made varies from person to person, then that means humans are going to be killed through abortion.
It isn't just about what a woman does with her body, there is also that person inside of her.
You ignored my post entirely.A fetus is alive, and meets all the requirements to be living, as I pointed out a few pages back.
Someone in a coma might need a machine to keep him or her alive.
Some people born with certain disease might also need a machine to stay alive.They are still human.
McJugga
Like I said, anything that needs a host to live is not regarded a living thing by scientist. I also agreed with the fact that babies are humans.
People who need machines... it would not contradict abortion for countries where euthanasia is legal, on the other hand, there body is entirely self-sustaining but to a point. The same can not be said for a foetus in its first trimester.
The baby is human, I'm not denying that, but I'm denying whether it's a living thing or not. How can you end a life that has not started?[QUOTE="Famiking"]
[QUOTE="McJugga"]
You believe that a need for a host determines whether one is human or not?
McJugga
Whether something needs a host cell or not is how biology can differentiate between living things and non-living things that can do all the things living things can do but need a host cell.
It is why viruses are not regarded as living things, because they need a host cell to live. Why does the baby being human allow it to be an exception?
A fetus is alive, and meets all the requirements to be living, as I pointed out a few pages back.
Someone in a coma might need a machine to keep him or her alive.
Some people born with certain disease might also need a machine to stay alive.
They are still human.
take them out of the whom, and they lack homeostasis, they also lack the ability to reproduce...[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
The opinion is going to vary from person to person. Why don't pro-choices just try to understand that some people are going to have different opinions than them, and allow them to do what they want with their body. (Ironically, I have noticed that alot of people who don't believe in a woman's rights are the same people who whine about the government staying out of peoples lives)
McJugga
If the opinion of when a fetus is made varies from person to person, then that means humans are going to be killed through abortion.
It isn't just about what a woman does with her body, there is also that person inside of her.
A fetus doesn't have a brain capable of abstract thought like this....I'd say it's not a person.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21255186/
did you know that abortion rates remain the same or even increase if banned? The difference is that women use more back door methods after that, like clothshangers, which just lead to higher rates of woman dying from internal bleeding, and why would anybody support that.
[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
take them out of the whom, and they lack homeostasis, they also lack the ability to reproduce...
McJugga
So once you kill a fetus, it is no longer alive?
I never knew that!
ya learn something everyday huh?I wish more people would learn to respect the privacy of others.
Sperm are memebers of the Genus Homo Species Sapien[QUOTE="htekemerald"]
[QUOTE="McJugga"]
A human is created at conception, not before, not after.
McJugga
Therefore they are human
(Your logic not mine)
Sperm is not human life, a fertilized egg is.
At what point do you believe a fetus magically turns into a human?
Uhh what?A sperm is the haploid part of the diplontic human alteration of generation, that means it belongs to the group homo sapien just as much as you do.
by your logic it is human, therefore killing it is murder.
You ignored my post entirely.[QUOTE="McJugga"]
A fetus is alive, and meets all the requirements to be living, as I pointed out a few pages back.
Someone in a coma might need a machine to keep him or her alive.
Some people born with certain disease might also need a machine to stay alive.They are still human.
Famiking
Like I said, anything that needs a host to live is not regarded a living thing by scientist. I also agreed with the fact that babies are humans.
People who need machines... it would not contradict abortion for countries where euthanasia is legal, on the other hand, there body is entirely self-sustaining but to a point. The same can not be said for a foetus in its first trimester.
So you believe it is a human, but you still think it is OK to kill the fetus.
There bodies are not entirely self sustaining. Without the machines they would die.
At what point is there life, according to you?
[QUOTE="McJugga"]
[QUOTE="htekemerald"] Sperm are memebers of the Genus Homo Species Sapien
Therefore they are human
(Your logic not mine)
htekemerald
Sperm is not human life, a fertilized egg is.
At what point do you believe a fetus magically turns into a human?
Uhh what?A sperm is the haploid part of the diplontic human alteration of generation, that means it belongs to the group homo sapien just as much as you do.
Nope.
[QUOTE="McJugga"]
[QUOTE="htekemerald"] Sperm are memebers of the Genus Homo Species Sapien
Therefore they are human
(Your logic not mine)
htekemerald
Sperm is not human life, a fertilized egg is.
At what point do you believe a fetus magically turns into a human?
Uhh what?A sperm is the haploid part of the diplontic human alteration of generation, that means it belongs to the group homo sapien just as much as you do.
by your logic it is human, therefore killing it is murder.
Oh noes, the teenage population is killing trillions!! Let's go try to over step some boundries and whine about what people are doing in their private lives!Uhh what?[QUOTE="htekemerald"]
[QUOTE="McJugga"]
Sperm is not human life, a fertilized egg is.
At what point do you believe a fetus magically turns into a human?
McJugga
A sperm is the haploid part of the diplontic human alteration of generation, that means it belongs to the group homo sapien just as much as you do.
Nope.
Oh my!! how can we compete with people who don't believe in woman's rights when they have such great arguments.Gez, who knew that the key to debating was mindlessly giving no real opinion or thought in response to something?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21255186/
did you know that abortion rates remain the same or even increase if banned? The difference is that women use more back door methods after that, like clothshangers, which just lead to higher rates of woman dying from internal bleeding, and why would anybody support that.
LostProphetFLCL
Notice the increase at the beginning of legalization.
Uhh what?[QUOTE="htekemerald"]
[QUOTE="McJugga"]
Sperm is not human life, a fertilized egg is.
At what point do you believe a fetus magically turns into a human?
McJugga
A sperm is the haploid part of the diplontic human alteration of generation, that means it belongs to the group homo sapien just as much as you do.
Nope.
Ahh I see the moment it becomes inconvenient to your argument you pretend the biology is wrong.[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21255186/
did you know that abortion rates remain the same or even increase if banned? The difference is that women use more back door methods after that, like clothshangers, which just lead to higher rates of woman dying from internal bleeding, and why would anybody support that.
McJugga
Notice the increase at the beginning of legalization.
doesn't change my statistic, abortions have a 50% higher rate in brazil despite being illegal. When abortion was legalized in East Germany decreased when made legal, and keep in mind those numbers may be wrong due to people lying, remember it was illegal, who knows, it could have been closer to 35.Well 70000 women die every year die because of unproffesional abortions, and who would honestly support that? It's like 14 9/11s every year because of people who oppose abortion.
[QUOTE="McJugga"]
[QUOTE="htekemerald"] Uhh what?
A sperm is the haploid part of the diplontic human alteration of generation, that means it belongs to the group homo sapien just as much as you do.
htekemerald
Nope.
Ahh I see the moment it becomes inconvenient to your argument you pretend the biology is wrong.Chocolate chips =/= a chocolate chip cookie.
If not at the moment of conception, when is a human created?
doesn't change my statistic, abortions have a 50% higher rate in brazil despite being illegal. When abortion was legalized in East Germany decreased when made legal, and keep in mind those numbers may be wrong due to people lying, remember it was illegal, who knows, it could have been closer to 35.
Well 70000 women die every year die because of unproffesional abortions, and who would honestly support that? It's like 14 9/11s every year because of people who oppose abortion.
LostProphetFLCL
Why would people get less abortions because it is legal. "Oh, I am going to raise a child now. Getting an abortion is no longer cool"
I don't think that is how people think.
To think that the number of abortions will not decrease if it was made illegal is ridiculous.
So you believe it is a human, but you still think it is OK to kill the fetus.
There bodies are not entirely self sustaining. Without the machines they would die.
At what point is there life, according to you?McJugga
Yes, exactly.
And people with machines in their bodies are self sustaining - only for a while. Just like a baby after the first trimester who was ejected from the mother during pregnancy, but not killed, it lasts for a couple of minutes and then dies.
Life starts after the first trimester. I only think abortion is the acceptable thing to do if there are health risks, if you were raped, or if you are of low socioeconomic status. I think abortion is "wrong" if you are of high socioeconomic status but I don't think the right should be taken away from you - but taxed to discourage away from abortion. All abortions should be before the second trimester begins.
[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
doesn't change my statistic, abortions have a 50% higher rate in brazil despite being illegal. When abortion was legalized in East Germany decreased when made legal, and keep in mind those numbers may be wrong due to people lying, remember it was illegal, who knows, it could have been closer to 35.
Well 70000 women die every year die because of unproffesional abortions, and who would honestly support that? It's like 14 9/11s every year because of people who oppose abortion.
McJugga
Why would people get less abortions because it is legal. "Oh, I am going to raise a child now. Getting an abortion is no longer cool"
I don't think that is how people think.
To think that the number of abortions will not decrease if it was made illegal is ridiculous.
people would just start doing it themselves or with backally doctors, to deny that is to ignore the studies....I just think it's incredibly rude for a man to tell a woman what she can or can't do with her body....
[QUOTE="McJugga"]
So you believe it is a human, but you still think it is OK to kill the fetus.
There bodies are not entirely self sustaining. Without the machines they would die.
At what point is there life, according to you?Famiking
Yes, exactly.
And people with machines in their bodies are self sustaining - only for a while. Just like a baby after the first trimester who was ejected from the mother during pregnancy, but not killed, it lasts for a couple of minutes and then dies.
Are you suggesting that the human is not alive at one moment, then all of a sudden it is alive after three months? If you took a fetus out of the mother's body, it would live for a few seconds. How long does a human have to live outside of the mother's uterus in order to be human?
Ahh I see the moment it becomes inconvenient to your argument you pretend the biology is wrong.[QUOTE="htekemerald"]
[QUOTE="McJugga"]
Nope.
McJugga
Chocolate chips =/= a chocolate chip cookie.
If not at the moment of conception, when is a human created?
Please learn the basics about biology before you continue. Im sure your local library has several books that can help you.Also please get an argument that is not riddled with double standards.
people would just start doing it themselves or with backally doctors, to deny that is to ignore the studies....
I just think it's incredibly rude for a man to tell a woman what she can or can't do with her body....
LostProphetFLCL
You honestly believe that everyone who was going to get an abortion AND more people who were not going to get one in the first place will get them illegally, knowing the health risks, and knowing that they could go to jail if abortion were made illegal?
It isn't just her body, it is the human inside of her.
[QUOTE="Famiking"]
[QUOTE="McJugga"]
So you believe it is a human, but you still think it is OK to kill the fetus.
There bodies are not entirely self sustaining. Without the machines they would die.
At what point is there life, according to you?McJugga
Yes, exactly.
And people with machines in their bodies are self sustaining - only for a while. Just like a baby after the first trimester who was ejected from the mother during pregnancy, but not killed, it lasts for a couple of minutes and then dies.
Are you suggesting that the human is not alive at one moment, then all of a sudden it is alive after three months? If you took a fetus out of the mother's body, it would live for a few seconds. How long does a human have to live outside of the mother's stomach in order to be human?
Sex 101; the fetus doesn't develop in the stomach.Please learn the basics about biology before you continue. Im sure your local library has several books that can help you.Also please get an argument that is not riddled with double standards.htekemerald
If you are so knowledgeble about biology, when is the fetus considered a human?
[QUOTE="McJugga"]
[QUOTE="Famiking"]
Yes, exactly.
And people with machines in their bodies are self sustaining - only for a while. Just like a baby after the first trimester who was ejected from the mother during pregnancy, but not killed, it lasts for a couple of minutes and then dies.
LostProphetFLCL
Are you suggesting that the human is not alive at one moment, then all of a sudden it is alive after three months? If you took a fetus out of the mother's body, it would live for a few seconds. How long does a human have to live outside of the mother's stomach in order to be human?
Sex 101; the fetus doesn't develop in the stomach.Fine, uterus...
[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
people would just start doing it themselves or with backally doctors, to deny that is to ignore the studies....
I just think it's incredibly rude for a man to tell a woman what she can or can't do with her body....
McJugga
You honestly believe that everyone who was going to get an abortion AND more people who were not going to get one in the first place will get them illegally, knowing the health risks, and knowing that they could go to jail if abortion were made illegal?
It isn't just her body, it is the human inside of her.
well, that's what the statistics and patterns would suggest, after all abortion rates dropped in east germany once legalized, so shouldn't it follow logically that they'd increase if made illegal, that happened in romania after all. If you want to go on assumptions rather than looking at studies....and if it's human or not is just opinion, why do people feel the need to force their views on others and take away their right to own their own body.....
interesting facts
[QUOTE="htekemerald"] Please learn the basics about biology before you continue. Im sure your local library has several books that can help you.
Also please get an argument that is not riddled with double standards.McJugga
If you are so knowledgeble about biology, when is the fetus considered a human?
when born under current law :DLets say for arguments sake the fetus is both alive and human. The end of the first trimester is important because that is what was determined to be a state of development that shouldn't be passed for abortions unless there are severe circumstances. I know people don't agree that a line like that should be decided on but it's the best we have to work with. It is before this point that I would still fully consider the fetus to be a part of the womans body and not some separate entity. Because this is part of her body other people should have no say in what she does with it.
who cares it is still a false generalization. No it is not. According to your own source, and following your own logic, 76% of the population is pro-abortion.[QUOTE="Jacobistheman"]
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] Notice the qualifier "virtually".-Sun_Tzu-
[QUOTE="htekemerald"] Please learn the basics about biology before you continue. Im sure your local library has several books that can help you.
Also please get an argument that is not riddled with double standards.McJugga
If you are so knowledgeble about biology, when is the fetus considered a human?
Human is not a taxonomic term and thus has no place in biology.[QUOTE="McJugga"]
[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
people would just start doing it themselves or with backally doctors, to deny that is to ignore the studies....
I just think it's incredibly rude for a man to tell a woman what she can or can't do with her body....
LostProphetFLCL
You honestly believe that everyone who was going to get an abortion AND more people who were not going to get one in the first place will get them illegally, knowing the health risks, and knowing that they could go to jail if abortion were made illegal?
It isn't just her body, it is the human inside of her.
well, that's what the statistics and patterns would suggest, after all abortion rates dropped in east germany once legalized, so shouldn't it follow logically that they'd increase if made illegal, that happened in romania after all. If you want to go on assumptions rather than looking at studies....and if it's human or not is just opinion, why do people feel the need to force their views on others and take away their right to own their own body.....
interesting facts
The first line of the Romania article A"The number of abortions in Romania is declining"
The second link is extremely biased...
"why do people feel the need to force their views on others" You are right! Who are you to tell me who I can and who I can't kill!
[QUOTE="McJugga"]
[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21255186/
did you know that abortion rates remain the same or even increase if banned? The difference is that women use more back door methods after that, like clothshangers, which just lead to higher rates of woman dying from internal bleeding, and why would anybody support that.
LostProphetFLCL
Notice the increase at the beginning of legalization.
doesn't change my statistic, abortions have a 50% higher rate in brazil despite being illegal. When abortion was legalized in East Germany decreased when made legal, and keep in mind those numbers may be wrong due to people lying, remember it was illegal, who knows, it could have been closer to 35.Well 70000 women die every year die because of unproffesional abortions, and who would honestly support that? It's like 14 9/11s every year because of people who oppose abortion.
you forgot to mention that the number of abortions world wide is like 29 9/11 A DAY, not a year. I would rather have 70000 a year of people killing themselves trying to have an abortion than 40 million babies a day getting murdered.[QUOTE="McJugga"]
[QUOTE="htekemerald"] Please learn the basics about biology before you continue. Im sure your local library has several books that can help you.
Also please get an argument that is not riddled with double standards.htekemerald
If you are so knowledgeble about biology, when is the fetus considered a human?
Human is not a taxonomic term and thus has no place in biology.OK... At what point do you think it is not OK for someone to be killed.
well, that's what the statistics and patterns would suggest, after all abortion rates dropped in east germany once legalized, so shouldn't it follow logically that they'd increase if made illegal, that happened in romania after all. If you want to go on assumptions rather than looking at studies....[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
[QUOTE="McJugga"]
You honestly believe that everyone who was going to get an abortion AND more people who were not going to get one in the first place will get them illegally, knowing the health risks, and knowing that they could go to jail if abortion were made illegal?
It isn't just her body, it is the human inside of her.
McJugga
and if it's human or not is just opinion, why do people feel the need to force their views on others and take away their right to own their own body.....
interesting facts
The first line of the Romania article A"The number of abortions in Romania is declining"
The second link is extremely biased...
"why do people feel the need to force their views on others" You are right! Who are you to tell me who I can and who I can't kill!
you don't have to get an abortion if you don't want to. You're telling woman what they can and can't do, I feel like we're moving back to the time before sufferage sometimes..."Did you even read the title of the artical. Also, this is not following my logic, there is a difference between pro-choice and pro-abortion. You can be pro-choice without being pro-abortion. You really need to read what I say."
The problem with your "distinction" between pro-choice and pro-abortion is that you say supporting an abortion under any circumstances means pro-abortion. So what would you say if for example there were a pregnant woman who would likely die in child-birth due to complications but the child already had a very low probability of survival even if she did have it.. would you think she should have an abortion or should both die "naturally" instead?
you don't have to get an abortion if you don't want to. You're telling woman what they can and can't do, I feel like we're moving back to the time before sufferage sometimes...LostProphetFLCL
Do you believe abortion should be illegal after the first trimester?
doesn't change my statistic, abortions have a 50% higher rate in brazil despite being illegal. When abortion was legalized in East Germany decreased when made legal, and keep in mind those numbers may be wrong due to people lying, remember it was illegal, who knows, it could have been closer to 35.[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
[QUOTE="McJugga"]
Notice the increase at the beginning of legalization.
Jacobistheman
Well 70000 women die every year die because of unproffesional abortions, and who would honestly support that? It's like 14 9/11s every year because of people who oppose abortion.
you forgot to mention that the number of abortions world wide is like 29 9/11 A DAY, not a year. I would rather have 70000 a year of people killing themselves trying to have an abortion than 40 million babies a day getting murdered.Fetus isn't a person though, those women are. You're advocating the death of adults rather then terminations of clumps of cells....low probability of life =/= die. It isn't my distinction it is simple logic that if you support abortion you are pro-aboriton. The prefix pro means that you support it."Did you even read the title of the artical. Also, this is not following my logic, there is a difference between pro-choice and pro-abortion. You can be pro-choice without being pro-abortion. You really need to read what I say."
The problem with your "distinction" between pro-choice and pro-abortion is that you say supporting an abortion under any circumstances means pro-abortion. So what would you say if for example there were a pregnant woman who would likely die in child-birth due to complications but the child already had a very low probability of survival even if she did have it.. would you think she should have an abortion or should both die "naturally" instead?
piratedrunk
[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]you don't have to get an abortion if you don't want to. You're telling woman what they can and can't do, I feel like we're moving back to the time before sufferage sometimes...
McJugga
Do you believe abortion should be illegal after the first trimester?
why does it matter? I'm a guy, it's not my decision, it's a womans opinion that matters. I wouldn't force a woman to do or not do something with her body after all....[QUOTE="piratedrunk"]low probability of life =/= die. It isn't my distinction it is simple logic that if you support abortion you are pro-aboriton. The prefix pro means that you support it."Did you even read the title of the artical. Also, this is not following my logic, there is a difference between pro-choice and pro-abortion. You can be pro-choice without being pro-abortion. You really need to read what I say."
The problem with your "distinction" between pro-choice and pro-abortion is that you say supporting an abortion under any circumstances means pro-abortion. So what would you say if for example there were a pregnant woman who would likely die in child-birth due to complications but the child already had a very low probability of survival even if she did have it.. would you think she should have an abortion or should both die "naturally" instead?
Jacobistheman
Ok then for arguments sake lets say both would definitely die if the woman did not have an abortion. what then?
[QUOTE="McJugga"]
[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]you don't have to get an abortion if you don't want to. You're telling woman what they can and can't do, I feel like we're moving back to the time before sufferage sometimes...
LostProphetFLCL
Do you believe abortion should be illegal after the first trimester?
why does it matter? I'm a guy, it's not my decision, it's a womans opinion that matters. I wouldn't force a woman to do or not do something with her body after all....So you think abortion should be legal at any stage, even a day before birth?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment