[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No it's not a claim. It's how it's taught. Most of the information presented in religious threads here is not based on understanding the source material. And one cannot have a discussion when the misinformation is the only information that's accepted. Please cite your sources that many things in the Bible were meant to be symbolic. You're claiming right now that things such as the seven day creation, the flood, jesus walking on water, turning water to wine, etc were meant to be SYMBOLIC. Cite sources, or you're making yourself look silly. Are you just going to tell me "its supposed to be symbolic because I say so"?OT not NT miracles. Cite my sources? I don't exist only online you know. A little study is not wrong.[QUOTE="KeitekeTokage"]
But you don't know that, that's only what you claim. The symbolic cop out you're making was only made after sciencetific discoveries were made that completely contradicted what the Bible said for isntance. Many religious people would disagree with you as well as let you know there's a special place in hell for you. You stated that religion does not contradict science, and I have pointed out where it specifically does for at least a very large portion of the population (considering the examples I gave). This point still stands.
Please try to be more clear about what you're saying in the second bold.
KeitekeTokage
Log in to comment