There is one little simple question atheism can't answer...

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#201 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180189 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="KeitekeTokage"]

But you don't know that, that's only what you claim. The symbolic cop out you're making was only made after sciencetific discoveries were made that completely contradicted what the Bible said for isntance. Many religious people would disagree with you as well as let you know there's a special place in hell for you. You stated that religion does not contradict science, and I have pointed out where it specifically does for at least a very large portion of the population (considering the examples I gave). This point still stands.

Please try to be more clear about what you're saying in the second bold.

KeitekeTokage

No it's not a claim. It's how it's taught. Most of the information presented in religious threads here is not based on understanding the source material. And one cannot have a discussion when the misinformation is the only information that's accepted.

Please cite your sources that many things in the Bible were meant to be symbolic. You're claiming right now that things such as the seven day creation, the flood, jesus walking on water, turning water to wine, etc were meant to be SYMBOLIC. Cite sources, or you're making yourself look silly. Are you just going to tell me "its supposed to be symbolic because I say so"?

OT not NT miracles. Cite my sources? I don't exist only online you know. A little study is not wrong.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#202 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
OT not NT miracles. Cite my sources? I don't exist only online you know. A little study is not wrong.LJS9502_basic
I usually read that as code for "I can't :( :( :("
Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#203 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts

[QUOTE="KeitekeTokage"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No it's not a claim. It's how it's taught. Most of the information presented in religious threads here is not based on understanding the source material. And one cannot have a discussion when the misinformation is the only information that's accepted.

LJS9502_basic

Please cite your sources that many things in the Bible were meant to be symbolic. You're claiming right now that things such as the seven day creation, the flood, jesus walking on water, turning water to wine, etc were meant to be SYMBOLIC. Cite sources, or you're making yourself look silly. Are you just going to tell me "its supposed to be symbolic because I say so"?

OT not NT miracles. Cite my sources? I don't exist only online you know. A little study is not wrong.

The only place things can be proven/disproven is on the internet. /sarcasm

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#204 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180189 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]OT not NT miracles. Cite my sources? I don't exist only online you know. A little study is not wrong.xaos
I usually read that as code for "I can't :( :( :("

Do what you want...doesn't matter to me.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#205 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180189 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="KeitekeTokage"] Please cite your sources that many things in the Bible were meant to be symbolic. You're claiming right now that things such as the seven day creation, the flood, jesus walking on water, turning water to wine, etc were meant to be SYMBOLIC. Cite sources, or you're making yourself look silly. Are you just going to tell me "its supposed to be symbolic because I say so"?BranKetra

OT not NT miracles. Cite my sources? I don't exist only online you know. A little study is not wrong.

The only place things can be proven/disproven is on the internet. /sarcasm

Apparently that is how most people here get their information.....
Avatar image for KeitekeTokage
KeitekeTokage

770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#206 KeitekeTokage
Member since 2011 • 770 Posts

[QUOTE="KeitekeTokage"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No it's not a claim. It's how it's taught. Most of the information presented in religious threads here is not based on understanding the source material. And one cannot have a discussion when the misinformation is the only information that's accepted.

LJS9502_basic

Please cite your sources that many things in the Bible were meant to be symbolic. You're claiming right now that things such as the seven day creation, the flood, jesus walking on water, turning water to wine, etc were meant to be SYMBOLIC. Cite sources, or you're making yourself look silly. Are you just going to tell me "its supposed to be symbolic because I say so"?

OT not NT miracles. Cite my sources? I don't exist only online you know. A little study is not wrong.

LOL, so lets start LJ. Is the flood meant to be symbolic? If so, how do you know its meant to be symbolic? Did you seriously just tell me that you're not going to cite your sources for the claim that its meant to be symbolic and was never meant to be taken literally. There are some Christians who think it IS meant to be symbolic, but I'd say a larger amount think it IS meant to be literally true. I'll try to actually find SOURCES for that claim, something you seem to lazy to do. But anyway, lets just start with the flood. Is that symbolic LJ?

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#207 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

LJ, we've now had an entire page of posts entirely stemming from your insistence that I wrote "the" instead of "a".

I don't know whether to cry or to be impressed.

GabuEx

I feel your pain.

Avatar image for KeitekeTokage
KeitekeTokage

770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#208 KeitekeTokage
Member since 2011 • 770 Posts
Here you go LJ, I know this is going to be shocking for you, but I actual did some research to back up what I said. Here is some research done on what percent of different sects of Christianity believe to be literal from the bible or not literal. http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/US/views_of_bible_poll_040216.html OMG sources! :o
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#209 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

OMG sources! :oKeitekeTokage
WTF they exist?

GET OUTTA HERE!

:P

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#210 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="KeitekeTokage"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]No it's not a claim. It's how it's taught. Most of the information presented in religious threads here is not based on understanding the source material. And one cannot have a discussion when the misinformation is the only information that's accepted.

LJS9502_basic

Please cite your sources that many things in the Bible were meant to be symbolic. You're claiming right now that things such as the seven day creation, the flood, jesus walking on water, turning water to wine, etc were meant to be SYMBOLIC. Cite sources, or you're making yourself look silly. Are you just going to tell me "its supposed to be symbolic because I say so"?

OT not NT miracles. Cite my sources? I don't exist only online you know. A little study is not wrong.

What exactly is the difference between OT and NT miracles as far as literal interpretation and symbolism are concerned?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180189 Posts

LOL, so lets start LJ. Is the flood meant to be symbolic? If so, how do you know its meant to be symbolic? Did you seriously just tell me that you're not going to cite your sources for the claim that its meant to be symbolic and was never meant to be taken literally. There are some Christians who think it IS meant to be symbolic, but I'd say a larger amount think it IS meant to be literally true. I'll try to actually find SOURCES for that claim, something you seem to lazy to do. But anyway, lets just start with the flood. Is that symbolic LJ?

KeitekeTokage

No the flood is not symbolic....a flood did occur. I said my sources are not from online. There is a world of information to be read in the world. I'm sure the information could be online if one searched for it. I did not learnonline though.

Where are your getting the information that most Christians take it literally? Fundamentalists take the Bible literally but theyare not the majority.

Avatar image for KeitekeTokage
KeitekeTokage

770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#212 KeitekeTokage
Member since 2011 • 770 Posts

[QUOTE="KeitekeTokage"] OMG sources! :oTeenaged

WTF they exist?

GET OUTTA HERE!

:P

I know!!! Look MOAR! http://www.pollingreport.com/science.htm :o
Avatar image for KeitekeTokage
KeitekeTokage

770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#213 KeitekeTokage
Member since 2011 • 770 Posts

[QUOTE="KeitekeTokage"]

LOL, so lets start LJ. Is the flood meant to be symbolic? If so, how do you know its meant to be symbolic? Did you seriously just tell me that you're not going to cite your sources for the claim that its meant to be symbolic and was never meant to be taken literally. There are some Christians who think it IS meant to be symbolic, but I'd say a larger amount think it IS meant to be literally true. I'll try to actually find SOURCES for that claim, something you seem to lazy to do. But anyway, lets just start with the flood. Is that symbolic LJ?

LJS9502_basic

No the flood is not symbolic....a flood did occur. I said my sources are not from online. There is a world of information to be read in the world. I'm sure the information could be online if one searched for it. I did not learnonline though.

Where are your getting the information that most Christians take it literally? Fundamentalists take the Bible literally but theyare not the majority.

Excuse me? You said OT miracles were symbolic? Changing your position now? And right here buddy, try using the internet in front of you, it actually yields information if you put in effort: http://www.pollingreport.com/science.htm
Avatar image for Optical_Order
Optical_Order

5100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#214 Optical_Order
Member since 2008 • 5100 Posts

Theist - "We can't figure it out. We don't know. Hey you, atheist! YOU figure it out!"

:roll: This makes sense.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#215 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

I said my sources are not from online. There is a world of information to be read in the world. I'm sure the information could be online if one searched for it. I did not learnonline though.

LJS9502_basic
It is possible to cite sources that are not websites.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#216 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180189 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="KeitekeTokage"] Please cite your sources that many things in the Bible were meant to be symbolic. You're claiming right now that things such as the seven day creation, the flood, jesus walking on water, turning water to wine, etc were meant to be SYMBOLIC. Cite sources, or you're making yourself look silly. Are you just going to tell me "its supposed to be symbolic because I say so"?GreySeal9

OT not NT miracles. Cite my sources? I don't exist only online you know. A little study is not wrong.

What exactly is the difference between OT and NT miracles as far as literal interpretation and symbolism are concerned?

Well like I said there does exist a subject called theology. That is the interpretation of the language, history, culture, and symbolism prevalent amongst a group of people at a specific time and place.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#217 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180189 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

I said my sources are not from online. There is a world of information to be read in the world. I'm sure the information could be online if one searched for it. I did not learnonline though.

xaos
It is possible to cite sources that are not websites.

Yeah...and it's not like I just read it. I have years of reading information that I didn't plan on reusing so why would I memorize the sources? I'm not an encyclopedia you know.
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#219 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]OT not NT miracles. Cite my sources? I don't exist only online you know. A little study is not wrong.LJS9502_basic

What exactly is the difference between OT and NT miracles as far as literal interpretation and symbolism are concerned?

Well like I said there does exist a subject called theology. That is the interpretation of the language, history, culture, and symbolism prevalent amongst a group of people at a specific time and place.

Oh boy. :roll:

I didn't ask for a definition of theology. I know what theology is.

I simply asked what the difference between OT and NT is as far as the degree of literalness is concerned. Why exactly do you make that distinction? Why is the distinction important to the degree of literalness or symbolism?

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#220 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]OT not NT miracles. Cite my sources? I don't exist only online you know. A little study is not wrong.LJS9502_basic

What exactly is the difference between OT and NT miracles as far as literal interpretation and symbolism are concerned?

Well like I said there does exist a subject called theology. That is the interpretation of the language, history, culture, and symbolism prevalent amongst a group of people at a specific time and place.

And where are the sources showing that theology agrees with how you view NT and OT?
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#221 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180189 Posts

excuse me? You said OT miracles were symbolic? Changing your position now? And right here buddy, try using the internet in front of you, it actually yields information if you put in effort: KeitekeTokage
Nope you might want to reread that. The word miracles I only put after NT...not OT. As for your source...that has nothing to do with what the Bible is intended to be.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#222 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

I said my sources are not from online. There is a world of information to be read in the world. I'm sure the information could be online if one searched for it. I did not learnonline though.

LJS9502_basic

It is possible to cite sources that are not websites.

Yeah...and it's not like I just read it. I have years of reading information that I didn't plan on reusing so why would I memorize the sources? I'm not an encyclopedia you know.

So, you can't say anything about the sources at all? :?

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#223 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

I said my sources are not from online. There is a world of information to be read in the world. I'm sure the information could be online if one searched for it. I did not learnonline though.

LJS9502_basic
It is possible to cite sources that are not websites.

Yeah...and it's not like I just read it. I have years of reading information that I didn't plan on reusing so why would I memorize the sources? I'm not an encyclopedia you know.

Well how can we have a constructive debate when all we have are opinions?
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#224 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180189 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="xaos"] It is possible to cite sources that are not websites. GreySeal9

Yeah...and it's not like I just read it. I have years of reading information that I didn't plan on reusing so why would I memorize the sources? I'm not an encyclopedia you know.

So, you can't say anything about the sources at all? :?

Sorry for having a life outside the internet.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#225 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180189 Posts
[QUOTE="Teenaged"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="xaos"] It is possible to cite sources that are not websites.

Yeah...and it's not like I just read it. I have years of reading information that I didn't plan on reusing so why would I memorize the sources? I'm not an encyclopedia you know.

Well how can we have a constructive debate when all we have are opinions?

I haven't seen anything constructive in here so I don't think it's possible TBH.
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#226 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Yeah...and it's not like I just read it. I have years of reading information that I didn't plan on reusing so why would I memorize the sources? I'm not an encyclopedia you know. LJS9502_basic

So, you can't say anything about the sources at all? :?

Sorry for having a life outside the internet.

What in the world are you talking about? :?

You say that you have years of reading information outside of the internet and I'm asking, can you describe these sources, give us a little sypnosis on what conclusions they came to, what evidence they used, etc?

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#227 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Yeah...and it's not like I just read it. I have years of reading information that I didn't plan on reusing so why would I memorize the sources? I'm not an encyclopedia you know. LJS9502_basic

So, you can't say anything about the sources at all? :?

Sorry for having a life outside the internet.

I don't see how that response has anything at all to do with what he said; basically, just seems like an ad hominem that has nothing to do with what he asked
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#228 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Teenaged"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Yeah...and it's not like I just read it. I have years of reading information that I didn't plan on reusing so why would I memorize the sources? I'm not an encyclopedia you know.

Well how can we have a constructive debate when all we have are opinions?

I haven't seen anything constructive in here so I don't think it's possible TBH.

"In here" as in all of OT? If yes then what motivates you to debate if its not to have a constructive discussion?
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#229 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

So, you can't say anything about the sources at all? :?

xaos

Sorry for having a life outside the internet.

I don't see how that response has anything at all to do with what he said; basically, just seems like an ad hominem that has nothing to do with what he asked

Yeah, I asked about his offline sources. Not sure what a life outside the internet has to do with anything.

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#230 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Sorry for having a life outside the internet. GreySeal9

I don't see how that response has anything at all to do with what he said; basically, just seems like an ad hominem that has nothing to do with what he asked

Yeah, I asked about his offline sources. Not sure what a life outside the internet has to do with anything.

It probably means that he doesn't have the time to read through the source material. It can take a while.
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#231 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="xaos"] I don't see how that response has anything at all to do with what he said; basically, just seems like an ad hominem that has nothing to do with what he askedBranKetra

Yeah, I asked about his offline sources. Not sure what a life outside the internet has to do with anything.

It probably means that he doesn't have the time to read through the source material. It can take a while.

If he has read about this stuff for years, he should be able to give a brief summary of what his sources said and why and where the sources were.

Simply saying "I have sources outside the internet but I'm not going to say anything about them at all" is not really conducive to debate.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#232 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180189 Posts

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Sorry for having a life outside the internet. GreySeal9

I don't see how that response has anything at all to do with what he said; basically, just seems like an ad hominem that has nothing to do with what he asked

Yeah, I asked about his offline sources. Not sure what a life outside the internet has to do with anything.

Am I supposed to keep everything I've ever read in case the conversation comes up in OT? Here's a siteabout symbolism.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#233 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180189 Posts

[QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Yeah, I asked about his offline sources. Not sure what a life outside the internet has to do with anything.

GreySeal9

It probably means that he doesn't have the time to read through the source material. It can take a while.

If he has read about this stuff for years, he should be able to give a brief summary of what his sources said and why and where the sources were.

Simply saying "I have sources outside the internet" is not really conducive to debate.

Seriously? I'm supposed to remember sources for something I read years ago with no intent of ever using? How many sources can you remember about something you read once several years ago and didn't think would be important? None of you could do that.
Avatar image for KeitekeTokage
KeitekeTokage

770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#234 KeitekeTokage
Member since 2011 • 770 Posts

[QUOTE=""]No it's not a claim. It's how it's taught. Most of the information presented in religious threads here is not based on understanding the source material. And one cannot have a discussion when the misinformation is the only information that's accepted.

Please cite your sources that many things in the Bible were meant to be symbolic. You're claiming right now that things such as the seven day creation, the flood, jesus walking on water, turning water to wine, etc were meant to be SYMBOLIC. Cite sources, or you're making yourself look silly. Are you just going to tell me "its supposed to be symbolic because I say so"?

OT not NT miracles. Cite my sources? I don't exist only online you know. A little study is not wrong.

You responded to me saying many things in the bible were meant to be symbolic by saying "OT NOT NT MIRACLES." What do you mean it has nothing to do with the bible? You have got to be the most dishonest Christian/Creationist I've ever engaged with. Luckily everyone else can see you weasel around and get a good laugh with me.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#235 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="xaos"] I don't see how that response has anything at all to do with what he said; basically, just seems like an ad hominem that has nothing to do with what he askedLJS9502_basic

Yeah, I asked about his offline sources. Not sure what a life outside the internet has to do with anything.

Am I supposed to keep everything I've ever read in case the conversation comes up in OT? Here's a siteabout symbolism.

You don't have to re-read everything. If you've read about this stuff for years, you can give a basic summary about what the sources said and what kind of sources they were.

BTW, your links is not working for me. I'm getting a blank page.

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#236 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="xaos"] I don't see how that response has anything at all to do with what he said; basically, just seems like an ad hominem that has nothing to do with what he askedLJS9502_basic

Yeah, I asked about his offline sources. Not sure what a life outside the internet has to do with anything.

Am I supposed to keep everything I've ever read in case the conversation comes up in OT? Here's a siteabout symbolism.

From the site:

Our mission is to encourage and sponsor serious, faithful, gospel-related scholarship and the ensuing publication of that scholarship.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#237 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180189 Posts
And is Wiki on Jewish symbolism which would be of import to the OT.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#238 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180189 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Yeah, I asked about his offline sources. Not sure what a life outside the internet has to do with anything.

Teenaged

Am I supposed to keep everything I've ever read in case the conversation comes up in OT? Here's a siteabout symbolism.

From the site:

Our mission is to encourage and sponsor serious, faithful, gospel-related scholarship and the ensuing publication of that scholarship.

Uh...it's a religious topic....of course it's going to have a religious slant.:lol:
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#239 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="BranKetra"] It probably means that he doesn't have the time to read through the source material. It can take a while.LJS9502_basic

If he has read about this stuff for years, he should be able to give a brief summary of what his sources said and why and where the sources were.

Simply saying "I have sources outside the internet" is not really conducive to debate.

Seriously? I'm supposed to remember sources for something I read years ago with no intent of ever using? How many sources can you remember about something you read once several years ago and didn't think would be important? None of you could do that.

You don't know that at all.

I'm not asking for the exact sources. I'm simply asking for a brief summary of what conclusions the sources came to and why and what type of sources they were. I didn't ask for the exact names. You should be able to provide atleast something.

I mean, what is the point of talking about sources if you're not going to comment on them at all?

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#240 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts
And is Wiki on Jewish symbolism which would be of import to the OT.LJS9502_basic
The article seems irrelevant. By reading the headlines of its sections there's no mention of miracles.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#241 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180189 Posts

You responded to me saying many things in the bible were meant to be symbolic by saying "OT NOT NT MIRACLES." What do you mean it has nothing to do with the bible? You have got to be the most dishonest Christian/Creationist I've ever engaged with. Luckily everyone else can see you weasel around and get a good laugh with me.

KeitekeTokage

Yes long form Old Testament....not New Testament miracles which was the leap you made so I clarifyed. And I've done so again.

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#242 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts

[QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Yeah, I asked about his offline sources. Not sure what a life outside the internet has to do with anything.

GreySeal9

It probably means that he doesn't have the time to read through the source material. It can take a while.

If he has read about this stuff for years, he should be able to give a brief summary of what his sources said and why and where the sources were.

Simply saying "I have sources outside the internet but I'm not going to say anything about them at all" is not really conducive to debate.

True. I've noticed in a lot of these threads, people respond childishly and expect a legit answer. If it were me, I probably wouldn't just give out knowledge to them that I studied for years to learn. I'm not saying it's you, but they are around.
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#243 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts
[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Am I supposed to keep everything I've ever read in case the conversation comes up in OT? Here's a siteabout symbolism.LJS9502_basic

From the site:

Our mission is to encourage and sponsor serious, faithful, gospel-related scholarship and the ensuing publication of that scholarship.

Uh...it's a religious topic....of course it's going to have a religious slant.:lol:

Uh.... there can be philologic and/or historic analysis without religious slant, at least not so blatant. I'm not surprised you try to make it seem as if blatant bias is inevitable.
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#244 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Yeah, I asked about his offline sources. Not sure what a life outside the internet has to do with anything.

Teenaged

Am I supposed to keep everything I've ever read in case the conversation comes up in OT? Here's a siteabout symbolism.

From the site:

Our mission is to encourage and sponsor serious, faithful, gospel-related scholarship and the ensuing publication of that scholarship.

Hey, Teenaged. Can you try re-linking the same site? I can't access it for some reason.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#245 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180189 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]And is Wiki on Jewish symbolism which would be of import to the OT.Teenaged
The article seems irrelevant. By reading the headlines of its sections there's no mention of miracles.

I wasn't talking about miracles. I was talking symbolism in the OT. That was the dude with the long name...so perhaps you should be speaking with him.
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#246 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Am I supposed to keep everything I've ever read in case the conversation comes up in OT? Here's a siteabout symbolism.GreySeal9

From the site:

Our mission is to encourage and sponsor serious, faithful, gospel-related scholarship and the ensuing publication of that scholarship.

Hey, Teenaged. Can you try re-linking the same site? I can't access it for some reason.

Here.

There was simply a missing "h" at the "http" part. :P

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#247 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="KeitekeTokage"]

You responded to me saying many things in the bible were meant to be symbolic by saying "OT NOT NT MIRACLES." What do you mean it has nothing to do with the bible? You have got to be the most dishonest Christian/Creationist I've ever engaged with. Luckily everyone else can see you weasel around and get a good laugh with me.

LJS9502_basic

Yes long form Old Testament....not New Testament miracles which was the leap you made so I clarifyed. And I've done so again.

Why exactly do you make the distinction between OT and NT miracles?

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#248 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts
[QUOTE="Teenaged"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]And is Wiki on Jewish symbolism which would be of import to the OT.LJS9502_basic
The article seems irrelevant. By reading the headlines of its sections there's no mention of miracles.

I wasn't talking about miracles. I was talking symbolism in the OT. That was the dude with the long name...so perhaps you should be speaking with him.

Your post was quoting no one so how was I supposed to know what you were addressing with that link....?
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#249 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]From the site:

Our mission is to encourage and sponsor serious, faithful, gospel-related scholarship and the ensuing publication of that scholarship.

Teenaged

Hey, Teenaged. Can you try re-linking the same site? I can't access it for some reason.

Here.

There was simply a missing "h" at the "http" part. :P

Thanks.

Avatar image for alexside1
alexside1

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#250 alexside1
Member since 2006 • 4412 Posts
What exactly are you guys bickering about?