[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]
[QUOTE="IndigoSunrise"]
And this ladies and gentlemen and assorted furry cute woodland creaturesis why we need gun control. ;)
IndigoSunrise
Perhaps you had better take a back seat and learn the story as to why I take no chances on home invasions. Sit down and cool that ass off.
In Novemember of 1996, while I was still in college in Atlanta, I was upstairs stepping out of the shower when I heard my downstairs window shatter. The only light on in the house at this time was in the bathroom where I was.
Without getting dressed, I turned off the light and ran across the hallway to my bedroom and retrived my 9mm. I sat with my back against the door peeking around the corner and down the stairs. The only light coming in was a streetlight shining through the front door and onto the steps, very little light at all.
I heard two men talking, and then one of them came around the corner and started to come up the stairs to where I was. I took aim, as best I could in the dark, and pulled off one round.
The guy dropped something on the steps and rolled backward, screaming. He scrambled to his feet and ran back into the living room and out the window. I assume his partner was either outside the whole time or had gone out the window just as quickly.
Once I calmed down and got the lights on, I saw what he had dropped on the steps: A 16 guage double barrel, double hammer.
Just because I didn't know he was armed, doesn't mean he wasn't, because he was. These days, I don't take chances. If you break into my house, I assume you're armed and work from there.
BTW, that same guy was killed less than two weeks later when he broke into a womans apartment a few miles away: she shot him dead. And yes, he was again armed.
At autopsy they found my bullet still in him (forensics matched it), under his collar bone. The bastard didn't even go to a hospital. How crazy is that?
If you had known he had the gun PRIOR to shooting him I would agree with you however because you didn't I still say your actions were excessive.
Now I know you'll treat this as putting a criminals rights before a innocent person but the fact it isn't ethical to attack until someone attacks you. Simply intruding isn't attacking.He hadn't attacked you yet.
However what is done is done. I'm not trying to make you feel bad or anything. I don't feel too bad for the guy in fact I don't feel bad for the guy at all. (he can't feel anything now) however I'm not going to congradulate you or anything I'm sure you were fearing for your life. I may have done the same thing if I was armed. However I wouldn't think I was justified in what I did.
Don't lose any sleep over it though. What is done is done. At least you didn't kill the guy. Someone else did.
So I should have waited and see if he'd use his weapon that I didn't know he had? Why does the intruder get the upper hand? In a battle, and that's what a home invasion in s prelude to, suprise if the best weapon you have for coming out alive. I am NOT about to give that element up to the intruder.
When you're a homeowner and someone breaks into your house, you have to assume they mean the worst. You're not going to interview them to figure out their intentions, you just have to react and protect yourself.
Log in to comment