[QUOTE="Blue-Sky"]
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] whe you have no argument just say nazi! should schools present views when applicable? hell yes, and if someone looks at the evidence we have and concludes the earth is flat that is fine, i doubt it will be frequent as the scientific evidence oppose to such a thing are extremely strong. i know you would like everyone only to be privy to what you deem correct, then eveyone would agree with the one true view.
tenaka2, do you really support a system that does not let the best evidence theory prevail but a system that will create a population of kuraimen's?
surrealnumber5
You're saying "let the best evidence theory prevail" but what about the argument that doesn't require evidence, logic or reasoning? I understand what you're saying but in order for that happen, there needs to be standard for what's considered true and what's considered false. And the best standard for that is the science methodology.
This law does not prohibit anything that operates within the science methodology.
logic and reasoning are subject to the one doing the deducing, how many of histories great thinkers whould have been if they only kept their thoughts to that of the standard population.... you have a carl sagan avy, i dont know how you would even know of him without knowing at least some scientific history. outliers change the world not the standard. if we accept politicians telling us what is acceptable how is that any better than what the church did to Galileo and his kind.What are you talking about? You're not even in the context of the topic anymore. Great enlightenment thinkers and even the religious that contributed to science all conformed to some standard form of logic. You think the catholic priest, Georges Lemaitre would have discovered expansion of the universe if he didn't conform to the same scientific standards? Wasn't the entire basis for Aristotle's writing about translating morality and ethics into a logical and coherent matter?
When did Carl Sagan not conform science methodology? You seem to be interpreting this debate as forcing everyone into big brother, one like mind mentality, and that is simply not the case, and almost an exaggeration of what this really is.
Log in to comment