You really think that!!! It would not stay the same more and more people would get hooked on the crap.Duckyindiana
Well, there are two questions to be asked, then:1.) What makes people want to take drugs in the first place?
2.) What are the pros and cons of banning these drugs?
The first question has a lot of answers, and often depends on the drug in question. In the case of soft drugs, the mind-altering effects are well-documented, and this state of being "out of mind" is often worth whatever risks are included. From anecdotal evidence, the reason people choose to take drugs that will obviously screw you up, is because they're already so screwed up as it is -- whether it's because of prior addictions, economic turmoil, depression, etc. In the case of soft drugs, the harms are similar to those of drugs already on the market, and perhaps even less (marijuana will screw you up less in the long run than alcohol). In the case of hard drugs, banning them would only be fixing a symptom of a problem, not the cause of it.
To answer the second question, the benefits of banning this stuff is that theoretically it will make it harder to get. This is true, to a degree, but people will get these drugs anyway, if they really want it. Addicts, after all, are defined by the fact that they will go through any lengths to get what they need for the next hit or whatever. The cons, on the other hand, are largely economical and basically end in a lot of wasted money that's been used to clean up something that still isn't clean. It's a losing war.
Log in to comment