What do you think is the worlds best military?

the War only aided the Red revolution, but it was going to happen anyway, muscleserge

So much for that "always strong" nonsense then.

"also the absence of the Czar from the throne due to him being at the eastern front most of the time also aided alot in the revolution. ."

Nicholas was an idiot no doubt.

"The economic problems had roots long before the war."

And were signifigantly worsened by it. Again, so much for the "always strong" claim.

[QUOTE="muscleserge"][QUOTE="CaptHawkeye"]

[QUOTE="muscleserge"] Ass-raping wow, you need to go to history class.CaptHawkeye

:roll: :lol: Don't respond to the argument or anything. Just attack my character!

Boo god damn hoo. Unlike your post above, I actually presented an AGRUMENT with my post.

Oh, and by the way. Rejecting an argument because you don't like how it was worded is a cop out. Known as "style over substance". Your little "history class" tirade, was an ad hominem. So don't bother confusing the two.

Isn't the SAS supposed to be better than any American Special Forces though?NicktehImperial

[QUOTE="CaptHawkeye"][QUOTE="muscleserge"][QUOTE="CaptHawkeye"]

[QUOTE="muscleserge"] Ass-raping wow, you need to go to history class.muscleserge

:roll: :lol: Don't respond to the argument or anything. Just attack my character!

Boo god damn hoo. Unlike your post above, I actually presented an AGRUMENT with my post.

Oh, and by the way. Rejecting an argument because you don't like how it was worded is a cop out. Known as "style over substance". Your little "history class" tirade, was an ad hominem. So don't bother confusing the two.

[QUOTE="muscleserge"] the War only aided the Red revolution, but it was going to happen anyway, CaptHawkeye

So much for that "always strong" nonsense then.

"also the absence of the Czar from the throne due to him being at the eastern front most of the time also aided alot in the revolution. ."

Nicholas was an idiot no doubt.

"The economic problems had roots long before the war."

And were signifigantly worsened by it. Again, so much for the "always strong" claim.

[QUOTE="muscleserge"][QUOTE="CaptHawkeye"][QUOTE="muscleserge"][QUOTE="CaptHawkeye"]

[QUOTE="muscleserge"] Ass-raping wow, you need to go to history class.DivergeUnify

:roll: :lol: Don't respond to the argument or anything. Just attack my character!

Boo god damn hoo. Unlike your post above, I actually presented an AGRUMENT with my post.

Oh, and by the way. Rejecting an argument because you don't like how it was worded is a cop out. Known as "style over substance". Your little "history class" tirade, was an ad hominem. So don't bother confusing the two.

[QUOTE="DivergeUnify"][QUOTE="muscleserge"][QUOTE="CaptHawkeye"][QUOTE="muscleserge"][QUOTE="CaptHawkeye"]

[QUOTE="muscleserge"] Ass-raping wow, you need to go to history class.muscleserge

:roll: :lol: Don't respond to the argument or anything. Just attack my character!

Boo god damn hoo. Unlike your post above, I actually presented an AGRUMENT with my post.

Oh, and by the way. Rejecting an argument because you don't like how it was worded is a cop out. Known as "style over substance". Your little "history class" tirade, was an ad hominem. So don't bother confusing the two.

The US obviously. However considering the way the US compares in terms of standards of living to many European countries it's hardly something to brag about. Can't we all just get along?espoac

[QUOTE="espoac"]The US obviously. However considering the way the US compares in terms of standards of living to many European countries it's hardly something to brag about. Can't we all just get along?DivergeUnify

[QUOTE="CaptHawkeye"]

[QUOTE="muscleserge"] the War only aided the Red revolution, but it was going to happen anyway, muscleserge

So much for that "always strong" nonsense then.

"also the absence of the Czar from the throne due to him being at the eastern front most of the time also aided alot in the revolution. ."

Nicholas was an idiot no doubt.

"The economic problems had roots long before the war."

And were signifigantly worsened by it. Again, so much for the "always strong" claim.

Not relevant, the claim you made was that Russia has ALWAYS been strong. When the reality is that Russia has had many bad years as well. This is just World War 1, what about the Sino-Russo war? The Japanese had no problems with the Russians then. Even the Soviet Union was largely irrelevant for much of the early 20th century until post WW2. The Soviet Union had actually spent many of its early years reliant upon foreign aid.

[QUOTE="DivergeUnify"][QUOTE="espoac"]The US obviously. However considering the way the US compares in terms of standards of living to many European countries it's hardly something to brag about. Can't we all just get along?espoac

Not relevant, the claim you made was that Russia has ALWAYS been strong.

CaptHawkeye

That's not a contradiction to his statement though...

[QUOTE="espoac"][QUOTE="DivergeUnify"][QUOTE="espoac"]The US obviously. However considering the way the US compares in terms of standards of living to many European countries it's hardly something to brag about. Can't we all just get along?DivergeUnify

It's usually just Nick.

USA

some people are saying china cause they have a crapload of people

but take 5 people with chainsaws against 50 people with spoons whos wins?

[QUOTE="muscleserge"][QUOTE="CaptHawkeye"]

[QUOTE="muscleserge"] the War only aided the Red revolution, but it was going to happen anyway, CaptHawkeye

So much for that "always strong" nonsense then.

"also the absence of the Czar from the throne due to him being at the eastern front most of the time also aided alot in the revolution. ."

Nicholas was an idiot no doubt.

"The economic problems had roots long before the war."

And were signifigantly worsened by it. Again, so much for the "always strong" claim.

Not relevant, the claim you made was that Russia has ALWAYS been strong. When the reality is that Russia has had many bad years as well. This is just World War 1, what about the Sino-Russo war? The Japanese had no problems with the Russians then. Even the Soviet Union was largely irrelevant for much of the early 20th century until post WW2. The Soviet Union had actually spent many of its early years reliant upon foreign aid.

[QUOTE="espoac"][QUOTE="DivergeUnify"][QUOTE="espoac"]The US obviously. However considering the way the US compares in terms of standards of living to many European countries it's hardly something to brag about. Can't we all just get along?DivergeUnify

[QUOTE="DivergeUnify"][QUOTE="espoac"][QUOTE="DivergeUnify"][QUOTE="espoac"]The US obviously. However considering the way the US compares in terms of standards of living to many European countries it's hardly something to brag about. Can't we all just get along?The_Ish

It's usually just Nick.

I made one, once and guess who teh first poster was
DivergeUnify

I don't know. I do not have that kind of memory.

[QUOTE="DivergeUnify"] I made one, once and guess who teh first poster was
The_Ish

I don't know. I do not have that kind of memory.

[QUOTE="The_Ish"]

[QUOTE="DivergeUnify"] I made one, once and guess who teh first poster was
DivergeUnify

I don't know. I do not have that kind of memory.

You? Your post was at the top. :P

[QUOTE="DivergeUnify"][QUOTE="The_Ish"]

[QUOTE="DivergeUnify"] I made one, once and guess who teh first poster was
The_Ish

I don't know. I do not have that kind of memory.

You? Your post was at the top. :P

How was the SECOND poster? :P

Fine I see how it is

How was the SECOND poster? :P

DivergeUnify

If he was me, he would be fine. :P

[QUOTE="EboyLOL"] What's basic training,like a month or so? And where did you serve? LJS9502_basic

Nine weeks I believe.....and Fort Bragg.

It's eight now. When did you go there?

[QUOTE="my_name_is_ron"]

[QUOTE="crusher2002000"]hey if u saw 350 million coming at ya i don't think the us could do **** sure they would take heavy causalitis but eventually they would wincrusher2002000

350 million what?

china has 350 million registered soldiers. plus 250 million reserve. so they have 600 million soldiers out of a billion ppl

uh, no, I remember reading the official stats a while back. They have a active military of 2.5 million. But if push came to shove they have 280 million able body males that could serve.

its the US duhhhh, we have everything, we love war. haha :(Putzwapputzen

We don't love war that much, we only spend about 20% of our income on the military, and 2 out of every 3 Americans is in the military.

Just because of Bush, that doesn't mean we're out to war.

[QUOTE="Putzwapputzen"]its the US duhhhh, we have everything, we love war. haha :(NicktehImperial

We don't love war that much, we only spend about 20% of our income on the military, and 2 out of every 3 Americans is in the military.

Just because of Bush, that doesn't mean we're out to war.

Where the hell did you find that number? Honestly, where do you get your WEED from?

Where do you Americans get off saying the Chinese army isn't trained? Of COURSE they are trained and they out number you guys AND messing with them would be messing with other asian countries. U.S.A has a strong army and i would definantly want them to win if WW3 happens becuase my country is basically the 2nd america but the chinese have numbers and when you have a army with many more people in it then you do rushing at you and shooting the only thing thats going to happen is you losing. Compare the USA military numbers to the chinese............

Where do you Americans get off saying the Chinese army isn't trained? Of COURSE they are trained and they out number you guys AND messing with them would be messing with other asian countries. U.S.A has a strong army and i would definantly want them to win if WW3 happens becuase my country is basically the 2nd america but the chinese have numbers and when you have a army with many more people in it then you do rushing at you and shooting the only thing thats going to happen is you losing. Compare the USA military numbers to the chinese............

XileLord

Our airforce could reduce every chinese city, airbase, stronghold, and fleet in one month. Our hunter-killer teams would strike deep and silent into every bunker, killing every high priority target, then falling silent never to be seen again. Our tanks would destroy any armored resistance, before they could be seen by the chinese. Our proud, excelent, and highly expert Army Infantry and Marine Infantry would out flank every chinese unit that trys to even begin to engage our forces.

In 2003 Baghdad was the largest air defended city in the world, and we lost not a single plane the entire campaign.

The USA could take on anyone easily in traditional warfare, it's only when we have to deal with guerilla crap that we get into troubleLS07

Guerilla warfare isnt a problem for our military, however it is a problem for our politicians which like to dump their ignorance into the military which means we can't operiate at 100 percent.

[QUOTE="NicktehImperial"]

[QUOTE="Putzwapputzen"]its the US duhhhh, we have everything, we love war. haha :(M1Hunter66

We don't love war that much, we only spend about 20% of our income on the military, and 2 out of every 3 Americans is in the military.

Just because of Bush, that doesn't mean we're out to war.

Where the hell did you find that number? Honestly, where do you get your WEED from?

I mean to say 2 out of every 300, sorry.