Put in that situation, a person will probably not think rationally, and will act on impulse. My impulse would be to save the person I care about the most, and so my true love would be saved. Though I would find the death of the rest deeply unfortunate, I would not second guess my 'decision,' because that would be pointless. You're acting on the spur of the moment. You can't waste time thinking about it, or everyone dies and you save no one.pianist
Yeah, well in Spidey 1, he saves MJ first, so I guess on impulse, if he hadn't have had enough time to save the children too, he would have been choosing his love over them.
I personally would save the children then try and save my love if I could. Think about the parents of all those children who would die, compared to just your one love. I couldn't bring myself to sacrifice them all.
Screw the children. screw the leader. I'd pick true love. But on the other hand, she might feel guilty about the children not being saved... Steingrimur
Hm, that's difficult. If I save the 2nd graders I'd live with the regret the rest of my life. If I save the girl I'll live with guilt the rest of my life. The third choice, well, I couldn't give a crap for any leader of my damn country, they'd elect a new one anyway. :roll:
I'd save the girl. There are good reasons to save the 2nd graders but I know that if I was actually faced with that choice I couldn't let her go. I can't believe three people have chosen the leader so far. No good argument I can think of to save the president/PM over the girl or the kids.
I'd save the girl. There are good reasons to save the 2nd graders but I know that if I was actually faced with that choice I couldn't let her go. I can't believe three people have chosen the leader so far. No good argument I can think of to save the president/PM over the girl or the kids. redfield_137
I think if you were thrown into the situation without having time to think abbout your decision, you would naturally go for option 2 anyway, without time for morals to affect you decision natural human selfishness would cause you to go for option 2. And what would be more painful to watch, someone you love die, or a bunch of people you have never met and probably would never meet again?
I'd save the children. A whole bus full of innocent lives are worth more than the life of any sleaze-ball politician. And I don't think the type of person I would love could live with me knowing that I allowed a bus full of children to die. I know that I sure as hell couldn't live with a person who spared my life over the lives of 50 children.famicommander
My thoughts pretty much exactly. I could also never live with myself knowing I let a bunch of kids die just so I could be in love...
true love of course, it's a shame about the second graders but i couldn't care less about Gordon Brown, how about if i kill him then the 2nd graders live too?
Depends would people know? Like if i saved a girl instead of a bus would people know what i did? Because if i saved a girl instead of a bus i would get sued by the parents of the kids and there would a target on my head.
Depends would people know? Like if i saved a girl instead of a bus would people know what i did? Because if i saved a girl instead of a bus i would get sued by the parents of the kids and there would a target on my head.borts
I would save a bus full of 2nd graders beacause me and my true love would have already lived life enough to now what goes on in life.but some 2nd graders havent even done anything thing in life yet.so i would save them.i would NEVER save the president of my country
Log in to comment