This. I'm mixed with Asian blood though, but I care.Beyond the fact that I personally find white chicks to be the hottest, I don't really care.
coolbeans90
This topic is locked from further discussion.
This. I'm mixed with Asian blood though, but I care.Beyond the fact that I personally find white chicks to be the hottest, I don't really care.
coolbeans90
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]This. I'm mixed with Asian blood though, but I care. White girls are nice but i really like latinas and middle eastern women which is why I think Shakira is a goddess.Beyond the fact that I personally find white chicks to be the hottest, I don't really care.
th3warr1or
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"][QUOTE="Atheists_Pwn"] i disagree with his views on what "logic" entailsAtheists_Pwn
Did he have a coherent view of what "logic" entails?
No. It seems to be whatever hes emotionally comfortable with. But then again hes a massive troll, and its hard to know exactly where he stands on many issues. I talk to him on IM. He seems like a racist(his screen names: ahugecat, heil mr hitler he thinks that if he openly admits his views he will be banned. So when he says things like "im for legal immigration" hes really not, and theres plenty of verifiable evidence to support this if you look at some of his older posts. When I first met him he acted like a jewish person who believed that white people should be removed. So I dont know if his racism is legit, or if hes just really immature.Some of his posts in another thread directly stated that we should cut off legal immigration. He said race matters, and that whites in America turning into a minority is "genocide." I do think that it is immaturity though. He seems/argues like a kid.
Honestly, I'm concerned about white people disappearing into the flood of immigrants. It seems that every country that does well is completely swamped by immigrants from poorer regions trying to get in on the good times. I'm proud of my heritage and I don't want to see my race disappear in the future.
Now everyone will say this is racist, but really, how do you think people from Africa, or Asia or any other place would feel if white people flooded their region and replaced them as them as the majority race of that region? Not very good. In fact, isn't that exactly what happened the the native Americans (albeit, in a different manner)? I'm pretty sure many Natives are still angry with white people, but I guess that's totally cool because they're not white, so it's not racist.
America was built by a flood of Catholic immigrants. I see no difference now.Honestly, I'm concerned about white people disappearing into the flood of immigrants. It seems that every country that does well is completely swamped by immigrants from poorer regions trying to get in on the good times. I'm proud of my heritage and I don't want to see my race disappear in the future.
Now everyone will say this is racist, but really, how do you think people from Africa, or Asia or any other place would feel if white people flooded their region and replaced them as them as the majority race of that region? Not very good. In fact, isn't that exactly what happened the the native Americans (albeit, in a different manner)? I'm pretty sure many Natives are still angry with white people, but I guess that's totally cool because they're not white, so it's not racist.
redstorm72
[QUOTE="redstorm72"]America was built by a flood of Catholic immigrants. I see no difference now.Honestly, I'm concerned about white people disappearing into the flood of immigrants. It seems that every country that does well is completely swamped by immigrants from poorer regions trying to get in on the good times. I'm proud of my heritage and I don't want to see my race disappear in the future.
Now everyone will say this is racist, but really, how do you think people from Africa, or Asia or any other place would feel if white people flooded their region and replaced them as them as the majority race of that region? Not very good. In fact, isn't that exactly what happened the the native Americans (albeit, in a different manner)? I'm pretty sure many Natives are still angry with white people, but I guess that's totally cool because they're not white, so it's not racist.
wstfld
Well those weren't brown people, obviously. Silly :P
(Note: YES, I am being sarcastic)
[QUOTE="redstorm72"]America was built by a flood of Catholic immigrants. I see no difference now.Honestly, I'm concerned about white people disappearing into the flood of immigrants. It seems that every country that does well is completely swamped by immigrants from poorer regions trying to get in on the good times. I'm proud of my heritage and I don't want to see my race disappear in the future.
Now everyone will say this is racist, but really, how do you think people from Africa, or Asia or any other place would feel if white people flooded their region and replaced them as them as the majority race of that region? Not very good. In fact, isn't that exactly what happened the the native Americans (albeit, in a different manner)? I'm pretty sure many Natives are still angry with white people, but I guess that's totally cool because they're not white, so it's not racist.
wstfld
I don't really care what people believe. Basically what I was trying to say was I think genetic diversity is a good thing. Each race has their own unique history and culture, I think we should try and preserve that, not just overcrowd every region that does well with immigrants. If things keep the way they are, we are going to look like Tyra Banks and Will Smith... On second though, maybe masive immigration isn't such a bad thing. :P
America was built by a flood of Catholic immigrants. I see no difference now.[QUOTE="wstfld"][QUOTE="redstorm72"]
Honestly, I'm concerned about white people disappearing into the flood of immigrants. It seems that every country that does well is completely swamped by immigrants from poorer regions trying to get in on the good times. I'm proud of my heritage and I don't want to see my race disappear in the future.
Now everyone will say this is racist, but really, how do you think people from Africa, or Asia or any other place would feel if white people flooded their region and replaced them as them as the majority race of that region? Not very good. In fact, isn't that exactly what happened the the native Americans (albeit, in a different manner)? I'm pretty sure many Natives are still angry with white people, but I guess that's totally cool because they're not white, so it's not racist.
redstorm72
I don't really care what people believe. Basically what I was trying to say was I think genetic diversity is a good thing. Each race has their own unique history and culture, I think we should try and preserve that, not just overcrowd every region that does well with immigrants. If things keep the way they are, we are going to look like Tyra Banks and Will Smith... On second though, maybe masive immigration isn't such a bad thing. :P
if you care about genetic diversity then you should be trying to reproduce with people unlike yourself. Why should we preserve "races" when the history wont go away?[QUOTE="GTALoco"]When people talk about a majority they're usually referring to an absolute majority, which is a majority that makes up more than half of "whatever".The only reason this would concern anyone is if they are racist. Plain and simple. And anyway, 46 percent of the population is still bigger than any other group, so they'd still be a majority.
ProudLarry
I get that, but for all practical purposes 50% is an entirely meaninless number. The only reason someone would care about what percentage of the population is a certain race is because they're interested in the power dymanic (even though that's not really based on population size anyways--sociologists consider women a minority group because they are not the dominant gender).
America was built by a flood of Catholic immigrants. I see no difference now.[QUOTE="wstfld"][QUOTE="redstorm72"]
Honestly, I'm concerned about white people disappearing into the flood of immigrants. It seems that every country that does well is completely swamped by immigrants from poorer regions trying to get in on the good times. I'm proud of my heritage and I don't want to see my race disappear in the future.
Now everyone will say this is racist, but really, how do you think people from Africa, or Asia or any other place would feel if white people flooded their region and replaced them as them as the majority race of that region? Not very good. In fact, isn't that exactly what happened the the native Americans (albeit, in a different manner)? I'm pretty sure many Natives are still angry with white people, but I guess that's totally cool because they're not white, so it's not racist.
redstorm72
I don't really care what people believe. Basically what I was trying to say was I think genetic diversity is a good thing. Each race has their own unique history and culture, I think we should try and preserve that, not just overcrowd every region that does well with immigrants. If things keep the way they are, we are going to look like Tyra Banks and Will Smith... On second though, maybe masive immigration isn't such a bad thing. :P
I think you're a white supremacist in disguise. This is exactly the kind of thing they say.No offense intended.(if you're serious)
[QUOTE="redstorm72"][QUOTE="wstfld"] America was built by a flood of Catholic immigrants. I see no difference now. Atheists_Pwn
I don't really care what people believe. Basically what I was trying to say was I think genetic diversity is a good thing. Each race has their own unique history and culture, I think we should try and preserve that, not just overcrowd every region that does well with immigrants. If things keep the way they are, we are going to look like Tyra Banks and Will Smith... On second though, maybe masive immigration isn't such a bad thing. :P
if you care about genetic diversity then you should be trying to reproduce with people unlike yourself. Why should we preserve "races" when the history wont go away?Whatever, I don't really care enough to keep arguing this. If you want everyone on earth to become some completely bland mix of everything, that's up to you. I personally do not. I think our diversity makes us stronger.
Also, the history may not go away, but if there is no one around who is related (racially and emotionally) to it, it will be largely forgotten.
[QUOTE="redstorm72"]
[QUOTE="wstfld"] America was built by a flood of Catholic immigrants. I see no difference now. SgtKevali
I don't really care what people believe. Basically what I was trying to say was I think genetic diversity is a good thing. Each race has their own unique history and culture, I think we should try and preserve that, not just overcrowd every region that does well with immigrants. If things keep the way they are, we are going to look like Tyra Banks and Will Smith... On second though, maybe masive immigration isn't such a bad thing. :P
I think you're a white supremacist in disguise. This is exactly the kind of thing they say.No offense intended.(if you're serious)
Far from it. If you consider what I said to be racist or white supremacist sounding, then you must think the entire U.K. is racist. One of the most heated issues there is immigration, with most parties saying they want to significantly reduce immigration. I am well aware that what I say sounds racist, but really,I am just tired of all this political correctness bull crap. I'm so sick of being called a racist if I have an opinion that isn't "everyone is amazing and everyone should be allowed in every country, blah, blah, blah". I'm not really sure why it is such a contentious issue to say I want to preserve my culture. An example would be Quebec, they have worked very hard to keep their culture intact, and one of these means is keeping a tight leash on immigration. Mass immigration creates this melting pot of races and beliefs, each one fighting for it's place in society, and in this shuffle a country will lose it's identity.
@Athiest pwn, in a inter racial birth if one parent is white and the other black for example then the kid is going to be black albeit a lighter shade. This will not breed diversity it will only destroy it. The white race made up about 35% of the worlds population at the start of the 20th century now we make up no more than 10%, by the end of this century will make up only about 1%, does this concern me? Damn right it does! As it should concern anyone who apparently loves diversity, I don't want world with just one race which is what will happen with inter racial breeding. These are just some of the reasons why I am a White Nationalist and fully support the creation of a country made for whites, much the same as Israel is for the Jews. How anyone can be against that while preaching diversity or multi cultralism is beyond me. This post will likely be answered be I will try but I'm using my iPod and this one took me about 15 mins to write.Phoenix6359
Hehe, I'm White and Black and I look a lot more white than black. And you're not a white nationalist, you're a racist. Stop using euphemisms.
if you care about genetic diversity then you should be trying to reproduce with people unlike yourself. Why should we preserve "races" when the history wont go away?[QUOTE="Atheists_Pwn"][QUOTE="redstorm72"]
I don't really care what people believe. Basically what I was trying to say was I think genetic diversity is a good thing. Each race has their own unique history and culture, I think we should try and preserve that, not just overcrowd every region that does well with immigrants. If things keep the way they are, we are going to look like Tyra Banks and Will Smith... On second though, maybe masive immigration isn't such a bad thing. :P
redstorm72
Whatever, I don't really care enough to keep arguing this. If you want everyone on earth to become some completely bland mix of everything, that's up to you. I personally do not. I think our diversity makes us stronger.
Also, the history may not go away, but if there is no one around who is related (racially and emotionally) to it, it will be largely forgotten.
People can be diverse without being different "races" "Also, the history may not go away, but if there is no one around who is related (racially and emotionally) to it, it will be largely forgotten." um...not if its documented.@Athiest pwn, in a inter racial birth if one parent is white and the other black for example then the kid is going to be black albeit a lighter shade. This will not breed diversity it will only destroy it. The white race made up about 35% of the worlds population at the start of the 20th century now we make up no more than 10%, by the end of this century will make up only about 1%, does this concern me? Damn right it does! As it should concern anyone who apparently loves diversity, I don't want world with just one race which is what will happen with inter racial breeding. These are just some of the reasons why I am a White Nationalist and fully support the creation of a country made for whites, much the same as Israel is for the Jews. How anyone can be against that while preaching diversity or multi cultralism is beyond me. This post will likely be answered be I will try but I'm using my iPod and this one took me about 15 mins to write.Phoenix6359No. The kid will be human. Not black or white. "The white race made up about 35% of the worlds population at the start of the 20th century now we make up no more than 10%," There is no white race. and who cares? "I am a White Nationalist and fully support the creation of a country made for whites" White nationalism is the problem. Because its nothing more than racism with a poorly planned out P.C stunt I dont support Israel. i support multi cultralism because its freedom, and if theres one culture that comes out of it im 100% fine with that.
[QUOTE="redstorm72"][QUOTE="Atheists_Pwn"] if you care about genetic diversity then you should be trying to reproduce with people unlike yourself. Why should we preserve "races" when the history wont go away?Atheists_Pwn
Whatever, I don't really care enough to keep arguing this. If you want everyone on earth to become some completely bland mix of everything, that's up to you. I personally do not. I think our diversity makes us stronger.
Also, the history may not go away, but if there is no one around who is related (racially and emotionally) to it, it will be largely forgotten.
People can be diverse without being different "races" "Also, the history may not go away, but if there is no one around who is related (racially and emotionally) to it, it will be largely forgotten." um...not if its documented.Yes, but race is directly tied to culture. So, if a race disappears, so does its culture. Also, there is a difference between documented history, and people who are directly related to that history. Would reading about slavery have the same impact as hearing the great grandson of a slave talk about it? No.
People can be diverse without being different "races" "Also, the history may not go away, but if there is no one around who is related (racially and emotionally) to it, it will be largely forgotten." um...not if its documented.[QUOTE="Atheists_Pwn"][QUOTE="redstorm72"]
Whatever, I don't really care enough to keep arguing this. If you want everyone on earth to become some completely bland mix of everything, that's up to you. I personally do not. I think our diversity makes us stronger.
Also, the history may not go away, but if there is no one around who is related (racially and emotionally) to it, it will be largely forgotten.
redstorm72
Yes, but race is directly tied to culture. So, if a race disappears, so does its culture. Also, there is a difference between documented history, and people who are directly related to that history. Would reading about slavery have the same impact as hearing the great grandson of a slave talk about it? No.
Race is not directly tied to culture. how you came to that ridiculous conclusion is beyond me, and not all culture is good. Some parts of European living have to go, and the same can be said about any culture. "So, if a race disappears, so does its culture." FACEPALM. Seriously. Non sequitur. "Also, there is a difference between documented history, and people who are directly related to that history." At this point you're just not making sense. Why you think that is beyond me, and why you think it matters is probably beyond you. "Would reading about slavery have the same impact as hearing the great grandson of a slave talk about it? No." And this is important why?I noticed a few interesting posts, most of which related to diversity. I don't get some of the thought processes behind them. Some claim that racial diversity is inherently a good thing, and would prefer people to be segregated or self-segregate for the sake of racial diversity. (ironically enough, eliminating racial diverstiy within geographic regions...) I question, why the hell does racial diversity matter? I find race itself to be almost irrelevant to anything in life, and it seems that only considerations to race are culturally recognized for the sake of itself. If race is an irrelevant quality to a person, why would preserving racial diversity in and of itself be at all important?
For the record, I am not talking about cultural diversity. It is a different bag of chips, and I'm not willing to eat them now.
its a cop out for white supremacy. Goto stormfront, theyre all white nationalists like these guys are claiming.I noticed a few interesting posts mostly related to diversity. I don't get some of the thought processes behind it. Some claim that racial diversity is inherently a good thing, and would prefer people to be segregate or self-segregate for the sake of racial diversity. (ironically enough, eliminating racial diverstiy with geographic regions...) I question, why the hell does racial diversity matter? I find race itself to be almost irrelevant to anything in life, and it seems that only considerations to race are culturally recognized for the sake of itself. If race is an irrelevant quality to a person, why would preserving racial diversity in and of itself be at all important?
For the record, I am not talking about cultural diversity. It is a different bag of chips, and I'm not willing to eat them now.
coolbeans90
[QUOTE="redstorm72"][QUOTE="Atheists_Pwn"] People can be diverse without being different "races" "Also, the history may not go away, but if there is no one around who is related (racially and emotionally) to it, it will be largely forgotten." um...not if its documented. Atheists_Pwn
Yes, but race is directly tied to culture. So, if a race disappears, so does its culture. Also, there is a difference between documented history, and people who are directly related to that history. Would reading about slavery have the same impact as hearing the great grandson of a slave talk about it? No.
Race is not directly tied to culture. how you came to that ridiculous conclusion is beyond me, and not all culture is good. Some parts of European living have to go, and the same can be said about any culture. "So, if a race disappears, so does its culture." FACEPALM. Seriously. Non sequitur. "Also, there is a difference between documented history, and people who are directly related to that history." At this point you're just not making sense. Why you think that is beyond me, and why you think it matters is probably beyond you. "Would reading about slavery have the same impact as hearing the great grandson of a slave talk about it? No." And this is important why?Well, due to historical reasons, culture is often tied to race. It has everything to do with the circumstances of one's birth and upbringing, but there is a high correlation between race and culture, and it seems that generally society acknowledges the relationship, unfortunately.
Race is not directly tied to culture. how you came to that ridiculous conclusion is beyond me, and not all culture is good. Some parts of European living have to go, and the same can be said about any culture. "So, if a race disappears, so does its culture." FACEPALM. Seriously. Non sequitur. "Also, there is a difference between documented history, and people who are directly related to that history." At this point you're just not making sense. Why you think that is beyond me, and why you think it matters is probably beyond you. "Would reading about slavery have the same impact as hearing the great grandson of a slave talk about it? No." And this is important why?[QUOTE="Atheists_Pwn"][QUOTE="redstorm72"]
Yes, but race is directly tied to culture. So, if a race disappears, so does its culture. Also, there is a difference between documented history, and people who are directly related to that history. Would reading about slavery have the same impact as hearing the great grandson of a slave talk about it? No.
coolbeans90
Well, due to historical reasons, culture is often tied to race. It has everything to do with the circumstances of one's birth and upbringing, but there is a high correlation between race and culture, and it seems that generally society acknowledges the relationship, unfortunately.
Yes, "race" can come with culture, but its not directly tied to it. If you raise a white kid in Japan with Japanese parents, he will act Japanese.[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]
[QUOTE="Atheists_Pwn"] Race is not directly tied to culture. how you came to that ridiculous conclusion is beyond me, and not all culture is good. Some parts of European living have to go, and the same can be said about any culture. "So, if a race disappears, so does its culture." FACEPALM. Seriously. Non sequitur. "Also, there is a difference between documented history, and people who are directly related to that history." At this point you're just not making sense. Why you think that is beyond me, and why you think it matters is probably beyond you. "Would reading about slavery have the same impact as hearing the great grandson of a slave talk about it? No." And this is important why?Atheists_Pwn
Well, due to historical reasons, culture is often tied to race. It has everything to do with the circumstances of one's birth and upbringing, but there is a high correlation between race and culture, and it seems that generally society acknowledges the relationship, unfortunately.
Yes, "race" can come with culture, but its not directly tied to it. If you raise a white kid in Japan with Japanese parents, he will act Japanese.Exactly.
Yes, "race" can come with culture, but its not directly tied to it. If you raise a white kid in Japan with Japanese parents, he will act Japanese.
Atheists_Pwn
That's true for some, but not all.
Some do assimilate, some do not.
But take Miami for example. Cubans have been immigrating there for nearly 50 years and still haven't assimilated.
This is one of the reasons I am against illegal immigration/mass immigration, you should only get the ones that can assimilate.
[QUOTE="Atheists_Pwn"]
Yes, "race" can come with culture, but its not directly tied to it. If you raise a white kid in Japan with Japanese parents, he will act Japanese.
AHUGECAT
That's true for some, but not all.
Some do assimilate, some do not.
But take Miami for example. Cubans have been immigrating there for nearly 50 years and still haven't assimilated.
This is one of the reasons I am against illegal immigration/mass immigration, you should only get the ones that can assimilate.
Due to cultural circumstances, not racial...
[QUOTE="Atheists_Pwn"]
Yes, "race" can come with culture, but its not directly tied to it. If you raise a white kid in Japan with Japanese parents, he will act Japanese.
AHUGECAT
That's true for some, but not all.
Some do assimilate, some do not.
But take Miami for example. Cubans have been immigrating there for nearly 50 years and still haven't assimilated.
This is one of the reasons I am against illegal immigration/mass immigration, you should only get the ones that can assimilate.
Assimilate to what?
[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]
[QUOTE="Atheists_Pwn"]
Yes, "race" can come with culture, but its not directly tied to it. If you raise a white kid in Japan with Japanese parents, he will act Japanese.
SgtKevali
That's true for some, but not all.
Some do assimilate, some do not.
But take Miami for example. Cubans have been immigrating there for nearly 50 years and still haven't assimilated.
This is one of the reasons I am against illegal immigration/mass immigration, you should only get the ones that can assimilate.
Assimilate to what?
Well for the first thing, English.
[QUOTE="redstorm72"][QUOTE="Atheists_Pwn"] People can be diverse without being different "races" "Also, the history may not go away, but if there is no one around who is related (racially and emotionally) to it, it will be largely forgotten." um...not if its documented. Atheists_Pwn
Yes, but race is directly tied to culture. So, if a race disappears, so does its culture. Also, there is a difference between documented history, and people who are directly related to that history. Would reading about slavery have the same impact as hearing the great grandson of a slave talk about it? No.
Race is not directly tied to culture. how you came to that ridiculous conclusion is beyond me, and not all culture is good. Some parts of European living have to go, and the same can be said about any culture. "So, if a race disappears, so does its culture." FACEPALM. Seriously. Non sequitur. "Also, there is a difference between documented history, and people who are directly related to that history." At this point you're just not making sense. Why you think that is beyond me, and why you think it matters is probably beyond you. "Would reading about slavery have the same impact as hearing the great grandson of a slave talk about it? No." And this is important why?Um... So you respond to my post by saying everything I said doesn't make sense? That's kind of a weak argument. I realize that culture is not 100% tied to race, but it is an incredibly huge factor. For example, if the Cree native american tribe were to die out today, how many people would know of their culture? Not many. This relates to the topic at hand because, if white people where to cease to exist, which is what will happen eventually if immigration continues as it has, our culture will also cease to exist.
Alos, who are you to judge what cultures are good? What, because you don't like some parts of European culture, they shouldn't exist. Culture is the combination of beliefs and history, both good and bad, of a group of people.
In the end, none of this will matter to you. You have made it completely clear that you do not care about culture. You may be okay with there being one singular culture, but I would say that most people do care about their culture. Whatever, you will probably just "Facepalm" my entire argument so I'll stop here.
Race is not directly tied to culture. how you came to that ridiculous conclusion is beyond me, and not all culture is good. Some parts of European living have to go, and the same can be said about any culture. "So, if a race disappears, so does its culture." FACEPALM. Seriously. Non sequitur. "Also, there is a difference between documented history, and people who are directly related to that history." At this point you're just not making sense. Why you think that is beyond me, and why you think it matters is probably beyond you. "Would reading about slavery have the same impact as hearing the great grandson of a slave talk about it? No." And this is important why?[QUOTE="Atheists_Pwn"][QUOTE="redstorm72"]
Yes, but race is directly tied to culture. So, if a race disappears, so does its culture. Also, there is a difference between documented history, and people who are directly related to that history. Would reading about slavery have the same impact as hearing the great grandson of a slave talk about it? No.
redstorm72
Um... So you respond to my post by saying everything I said doesn't make sense? That's kind of a weak argument. I realize that culture is not 100% tied to race, but it is an incredibly huge factor. For example, if the Cree native american tribe were to die out today, how many people would know of their culture? Not many. This relates to the topic at hand because, if white people where to cease to exist, which is what will happen eventually if immigration continues as it has, our culture will also cease to exist.
Alos, who are you to judge what cultures are good? What, because you don't like some parts of European culture, they shouldn't exist. Culture is the combination of beliefs and history, both good and bad, of a group of people.
In the end, none of this will matter to you. You have made it completely clear that you do not care about culture. You may be okay with there being one singular culture, but I would say that most people do care about their culture. Whatever, you will probably just "Facepalm" my entire argument so I'll stop here.
You should know too, Canada has been hit hard by it. Vancouver is the first Asian city outside of Asia (not my words). I have never been stared down as much as I went to Vancouver.
I mean I am not saying it's bad for immigration, but Canada is not only going overboard on it (seriously in some cities demographics changed overnight) but Canada's socialism will make the citizens pay for their food, home, etc. etc.
Race is not directly tied to culture. how you came to that ridiculous conclusion is beyond me, and not all culture is good. Some parts of European living have to go, and the same can be said about any culture. "So, if a race disappears, so does its culture." FACEPALM. Seriously. Non sequitur. "Also, there is a difference between documented history, and people who are directly related to that history." At this point you're just not making sense. Why you think that is beyond me, and why you think it matters is probably beyond you. "Would reading about slavery have the same impact as hearing the great grandson of a slave talk about it? No." And this is important why?[QUOTE="Atheists_Pwn"][QUOTE="redstorm72"]
Yes, but race is directly tied to culture. So, if a race disappears, so does its culture. Also, there is a difference between documented history, and people who are directly related to that history. Would reading about slavery have the same impact as hearing the great grandson of a slave talk about it? No.
redstorm72
Um... So you respond to my post by saying everything I said doesn't make sense? That's kind of a weak argument. I realize that culture is not 100% tied to race, but it is an incredibly huge factor. For example, if the Cree native american tribe were to die out today, how many people would know of their culture? Not many. This relates to the topic at hand because, if white people where to cease to exist, which is what will happen eventually if immigration continues as it has, our culture will also cease to exist.
Alos, who are you to judge what cultures are good? What, because you don't like some parts of European culture, they shouldn't exist. Culture is the combination of beliefs and history, both good and bad, of a group of people.
In the end, none of this will matter to you. You have made it completely clear that you do not care about culture. You may be okay with there being one singular culture, but I would say that most people do care about their culture. Whatever, you will probably just "Facepalm" my entire argument so I'll stop here.
Your posts dont make sense because of how many non sequiturs are in your posts.so if one culture thinks its ok to have genital mutilation, we should allow it. Because its there culture? If one culture thinks its ok to think the earth is flat, we should allow it?
No, we shouldnt. We should literally walk up to them and tell them they are wrong and tell them why. Culture and beliefs deserve absolutely zero protection from scrutiny.
You know what that means white guys? Go out there and reproduce.......... I mean seriously what are you guys doing still reading this....................................... For reals? you are still reading this? :|...............yeah you guys are DOOOOMMMED!!! lol
You should know too, Canada has been hit hard by it. Vancouver is the first Asian city outside of Asia (not my words). I have never been stared down as much as I went to Vancouver.
I mean I am not saying it's bad for immigration, but Canada is not only going overboard on it (seriously in some cities demographics changed overnight) but Canada's socialism will make the citizens pay for their food, home, etc. etc.
AHUGECAT
I know, that is why I am so vocal on the issue. The government is so busy trying to build a "diverse" nation, they can't see the start of some huge problems. Hell, we can barely get everyone to follow the same laws as is because it might "conflict with someones culture". Examples would be Hindu's not having to wear helmet's (turban or whatever it's called) and Muslims getting to carry a ceremonial dagger to school (only a couple of cases). What about Canadian Culture? If things continue as is, we are going to lose everything that was great about this country I love because we have to constantly make allowances for every different group.
Don't agree with you on the whole socialist thing though, I love my free health care. But yeah, it kind of sucks having to pay for immigrants welfare when they came to this country to suck off the system (not saying this is all the cases, but some). The immigration laws are rediculous here. My friends dad came from Nigeria, which was fine, he was a hard working member of society. However, because he moved here, everyone of his family members could to. He brought in his mother, brother and 4 nephews, none of which contribute anything to Canada.Really, we need to drastically cut immigration, and only let people who have skills this country can use immigrate.
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]
[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]
That's true for some, but not all.
Some do assimilate, some do not.
But take Miami for example. Cubans have been immigrating there for nearly 50 years and still haven't assimilated.
This is one of the reasons I am against illegal immigration/mass immigration, you should only get the ones that can assimilate.
AHUGECAT
Assimilate to what?
Well for the first thing, English.
Is that the official language?
Far from it. If you consider what I said to be racist or white supremacist sounding, then you must think the entire U.K. is racist. One of the most heated issues there is immigration, with most parties saying they want to significantly reduce immigration.redstorm72
I don't know where you're getting this fantasy from.
The BNP is the only party in the UK that supports such a view, and they're so marginalised their members aren't allowed to be police officiers.
[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]
You should know too, Canada has been hit hard by it. Vancouver is the first Asian city outside of Asia (not my words). I have never been stared down as much as I went to Vancouver.
I mean I am not saying it's bad for immigration, but Canada is not only going overboard on it (seriously in some cities demographics changed overnight) but Canada's socialism will make the citizens pay for their food, home, etc. etc.
redstorm72
I know, that is why I am so vocal on the issue. The government is so busy trying to build a "diverse" nation, they can't see the start of some huge problems. Hell, we can barely get everyone to follow the same laws as is because it might "conflict with someones culture". Examples would be Hindu's not having to wear helmet's (turban or whatever it's called) and Muslims getting to carry a ceremonial dagger to school (only a couple of cases). What about Canadian Culture? If things continue as is, we are going to lose everything that was great about this country I love because we have to constantly make allowances for every different group.
Don't agree with you on the whole socialist thing though, I love my free health care. But yeah, it kind of sucks having to pay for immigrants welfare when they came to this country to suck off the system (not saying this is all the cases, but some). The immigration laws are rediculous here. My friends dad came from Nigeria, which was fine, he was a hard working member of society. However, because he moved here, everyone of his family members could to. He brought in his mother, brother and 4 nephews, none of which contribute anything to Canada.Really, we need to drastically cut immigration, and only let people who have skills this country can use immigrate.
"Hell, we can barely get everyone to follow the same laws as is because it might "conflict with someones culture"" Wait I thought you wanted to preserve culture? And now the truth is unavoidable.I bet we'll regain our majority status later on. If we don't, we can always act oppressed, demand more rights/affirmative action, a history month, and expect the majority to apoligize for being whatever race they are. :P
"sigh" it seems some of you are behind this new movement of "the race is the Human race" etc. There is a species of Ape know as Homo Sapiens, this species evolved in Central Africa. It eventually left Africa and began expanding across the planet, some went North to Europe, some went East into Asia and eventually into the Americas, some decided to say at the crossroads known as the Middle-East and some even decided to stay in Africa. This is where the sub-species known as Races begins. White people developed lighter skin as a means to collect more sunlight for the production of Vitamin D, East Asians also have lighter skin as there environment is not as hot or sunny as South Asia. Dark Skin is an evolutionary by product of being in strong sunlight prone areas such as Africa, South Asia and Central America, this is also why Mediterraneans are much darker than say someone from a Nordic country. These different skin tones were the first sign of differences in Humans,
The second was developing more physical traits that were advantagous for their environment such as larger noses (Incans needed these because of lack of oxygen in their environment), The Epicanthic Fold/Asian eyes (this may have developed because of the extreme wind which is present in Central Asia and didn't change once Humans left these areas) and Human hair colour (White people have very differing hair colours due to isolation and differing environments-fairer hair is a by product of lighter skin due to low UV light)
The last is culture, race walks hand in hand with it, White people all have very similar cultures, East Asians are the same, as do South Asians (Indians being the exception due to influence from the Middle-East and East Asia). In a multi cultural society people do not all follow the same culture, the ruling culture (Western culture in Western countries) provides the baseline that the Government and Main stream media follow and from their all the different races follow their own culture. You will rarely see a Indian family performing stereotypical White cultural events in their own homes and quite often Indians will stick together in their own neighbourhoods, this is the same for Whites, Asians, Africans and Hispanics.
Many here have called me a "Racist" (while claiming Race doesn't exist:roll: ) or a White Supremacist so I shall explain the differences between the three branches of White Nationalism:
White Separatism- This involves a area of land that is only to be used for White people, this may or may not involve a whole country. It could mearly be a state, this movement is dedicated to people who only wish to be away from non-Whites and don't care how it comes about. This is the most realistic option available for now.
White Nationalism- This involves White people having a country of their own in which there is no non-White immigration. This would probably involve a country in Europe and would likely result in many deportations.
White Supremicism- This involves the belief that all other races are inferior to Whites and that it is a White persons duty to rule all other races. This may or may not involve Slavery or Genocide.
As you can see it is not just a narrow point of view and there are many differing opinions about how any of these movements could come about.
Many here won't believe what I say but then again I don't really care, if you walk around with rose coloured glasses then the only one who is ignorant is you.
[QUOTE="redstorm72"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]
You should know too, Canada has been hit hard by it. Vancouver is the first Asian city outside of Asia (not my words). I have never been stared down as much as I went to Vancouver.
I mean I am not saying it's bad for immigration, but Canada is not only going overboard on it (seriously in some cities demographics changed overnight) but Canada's socialism will make the citizens pay for their food, home, etc. etc.
Atheists_Pwn
I know, that is why I am so vocal on the issue. The government is so busy trying to build a "diverse" nation, they can't see the start of some huge problems. Hell, we can barely get everyone to follow the same laws as is because it might "conflict with someones culture". Examples would be Hindu's not having to wear helmet's (turban or whatever it's called) and Muslims getting to carry a ceremonial dagger to school (only a couple of cases). What about Canadian Culture? If things continue as is, we are going to lose everything that was great about this country I love because we have to constantly make allowances for every different group.
Don't agree with you on the whole socialist thing though, I love my free health care. But yeah, it kind of sucks having to pay for immigrants welfare when they came to this country to suck off the system (not saying this is all the cases, but some). The immigration laws are rediculous here. My friends dad came from Nigeria, which was fine, he was a hard working member of society. However, because he moved here, everyone of his family members could to. He brought in his mother, brother and 4 nephews, none of which contribute anything to Canada.Really, we need to drastically cut immigration, and only let people who have skills this country can use immigrate.
"Hell, we can barely get everyone to follow the same laws as is because it might "conflict with someones culture"" Wait I thought you wanted to preserve culture? And now the truth is unavoidable.My nations culture. Hindu's have India, Muslims have the middle east, etc, and none of these cultures are under threat. I'm primarily concerned with my own culture, I make no attempt to hide that. You can't preserve hundreds of different cultures in one nation, they will conflict with each other as they all try to get recognition. In the end, it will just be one huge melting pot with no consistent culture.
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]
[QUOTE="Atheists_Pwn"] Race is not directly tied to culture. how you came to that ridiculous conclusion is beyond me, and not all culture is good. Some parts of European living have to go, and the same can be said about any culture. "So, if a race disappears, so does its culture." FACEPALM. Seriously. Non sequitur. "Also, there is a difference between documented history, and people who are directly related to that history." At this point you're just not making sense. Why you think that is beyond me, and why you think it matters is probably beyond you. "Would reading about slavery have the same impact as hearing the great grandson of a slave talk about it? No." And this is important why?Atheists_Pwn
Well, due to historical reasons, culture is often tied to race. It has everything to do with the circumstances of one's birth and upbringing, but there is a high correlation between race and culture, and it seems that generally society acknowledges the relationship, unfortunately.
Yes, "race" can come with culture, but its not directly tied to it. If you raise a white kid in Japan with Japanese parents, he will act Japanese.The difference is that Japan is not multi cultural, if a Japanese kid is born to Japanese parents in a Japanese area in the US for example he will act Japanese.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment