Why atheism is wrong.

Why atheism is wrong

Thats a very good read for all you atheists or agnostics out there.

Because a can of Coke represents the uncertainty and dynamics within the universe.

I refuse to use the "If God created the universe, then who created God?" because it's a horrible argument, it's over-used, and it'll be use by the time this thread's over with.

As for the bananas, ever think for a second that humans aren't the only ones that use them? Ever think we humans just adapted to bananas and make, "hey, this makes good food, perhaps we should eat it" after trying other objects?

I'll give you credit. I was expecting less from this thread. This absolutely makes a good case for deism which I've always wanted to argue for despite my atheistic beliefs that there is a central deism design implicit in both evolution and the big bang.

I "lol"ed.qetuo6

i smell epic thread
HERE ILL GET IT STARTED

athiests, IF THEY ARE WRONG THEY GO TO HELL

christians, IF THEY ARE WRONG, NOTHING HAPPENSZe_ALEX

That's a pretty weak reason to be a Christian. How about you believe in Christianity because you feel it's the truth, not because you're going to heaven?

athiests, IF THEY ARE WRONG THEY GO TO HELL

christians, IF THEY ARE WRONG, NOTHING HAPPENSZe_ALEX

That is Awesome!!

[QUOTE="Ze_ALEX"]i smell epic thread
HERE ILL GET IT STARTED

athiests, IF THEY ARE WRONG THEY GO TO HELL

christians, IF THEY ARE WRONG, NOTHING HAPPENSGenetic_Code

That's a pretty weak reason to be a Christian. How about you believe in Christianity because you feel it's the truth, not because you're going to heaven?

Because a can of Coke represents the uncertainty and dynamics within the universe.

I refuse to use the "If God created the universe, then who created God?" because it's a horrible argument, it's over-used, and it'll be use by the time this thread's over with.

As for the bananas, ever think for a second that humans aren't the only ones that use them? Ever think we humans just adapted to bananas and make, "hey, this makes good food, perhaps we should eat it" after trying other objects?

I'll give you credit. I was expecting less from this thread. This absolutely makes a good case for deism which I've always wanted to argue for despite my atheistic beliefs that there is a central deism design implicit in both evolution and the big bang.

Genetic_Code

Hey! The banana also fits in a monkey's paw.

i smell epic thread
HERE ILL GET IT STARTED

athiests, IF THEY ARE WRONG THEY GO TO HELL

christians, IF THEY ARE WRONG, NOTHING HAPPENSZe_ALEX

No that's incorrect. What if it turns out there is a God, who doesn't want to be worshipped and so punishes Christians while reward Atheists.

Quick someone make a thread why christianity is wrong !AtrumRegina

How bout a why the multi dimentional unlimited parodox time theory is wrong thread?? (Yes I just BSed that)

I didn't know that Coke cans had sex.

Maybe science should work on cataloguing the Coca-Cola genome.

[QUOTE="AtrumRegina"]Quick someone make a thread why christianity is wrong !supercubedude64

WHY CHRISTIANITY IS WRONG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBGIQ7ZuuiU&feature=related

You know you can lose a level for posting rick roll, it happened to me once!

There is no way to prove athiesm wrong. :D7SeasonPoints

Sounds similar to every religion in existance....

There is no way to prove athiesm wrong. :D7SeasonPoints

Then there is also no way to prove Christianity is wrong.

:lol: Well this is one of the funniest threads I've seen today, which is kind of sad. :(bededog

Yeah, still I was hoping for an appearance by the croco-duck.

i smell epic thread
HERE ILL GET IT STARTED

athiests, IF THEY ARE WRONG THEY GO TO HELL

christians, IF THEY ARE WRONG, NOTHING HAPPENSZe_ALEX

What the hell is with the restating of old arguments for the existence of God in extremely simple language. Did you guys hold a convention or something?

btw, Pascal's Wager is a terrible reasons to believe, BECAUSE IT ISN'T AUTHENTIC. Christians are called to believe with all their heart, soul, strength and mind. I found out that most can do the first three, some others can do the last one; rarely does one meet one who does all four, because that would be a person who has faith despite all the doubt, existential anxiety, despair that might come with it.

Hey! The banana also fits in a monkey's paw.

harashawn

Shh... Opposable thumbs are awesome. We all know that.

YAY!!

[QUOTE="Ze_ALEX"]i smell epic thread
HERE ILL GET IT STARTED

athiests, IF THEY ARE WRONG THEY GO TO HELL

christians, IF THEY ARE WRONG, NOTHING HAPPENSfkholmes

No that's incorrect. What if it turns out there is a God, who doesn't want to be worshipped and so punishes Christians while reward Atheists.

[QUOTE="fkholmes"]

[QUOTE="Ze_ALEX"]i smell epic thread
HERE ILL GET IT STARTED

athiests, IF THEY ARE WRONG THEY GO TO HELL

christians, IF THEY ARE WRONG, NOTHING HAPPENSZe_ALEX

No that's incorrect. What if it turns out there is a God, who doesn't want to be worshipped and so punishes Christians while reward Atheists.

Doesn't change the fact that their god doesn't exist in their scenario while the other one does.

[QUOTE="Ze_ALEX"]i smell epic thread
HERE ILL GET IT STARTED

athiests, IF THEY ARE WRONG THEY GO TO HELL

christians, IF THEY ARE WRONG, NOTHING HAPPENSSTWELCH

What the hell is with the restating of old arguments for the existence of God in extremely simple language. Did you guys hold a convention or something?

btw, Pascal's Wager is a terrible reasons to believe, BECAUSE IT ISN'T AUTHENTIC. Christians are called to believe with all their heart, soul, strength and mind. I found out that most can do the first three, some others can do the last one; rarely does one meet one who does all four, because that would be a person who has faith despite all the doubt, existential anxiety, despair that might come with it.

[QUOTE="7SeasonPoints"]There is no way to prove athiesm wrong. :Dharashawn

Then there is also no way to prove Christianity is wrong.

i fail to see how it is wrong. Severed_Hand

Because cola cans don't reproduce with variation in an environment where they suffer attrition. Though I still maintain this is a gag thread.

[QUOTE="Ze_ALEX"][QUOTE="fkholmes"]

[QUOTE="Ze_ALEX"]i smell epic thread
HERE ILL GET IT STARTED

athiests, IF THEY ARE WRONG THEY GO TO HELL

christians, IF THEY ARE WRONG, NOTHING HAPPENSGenetic_Code

No that's incorrect. What if it turns out there is a God, who doesn't want to be worshipped and so punishes Christians while reward Atheists.

Doesn't change the fact that their god doesn't exist in their scenario while the other one does.

Yep. What if one out of the thousands of other religions are correct. Greek Gods and Godesses? Maybe!?

[QUOTE="Ze_ALEX"][QUOTE="fkholmes"]

[QUOTE="Ze_ALEX"]i smell epic thread
HERE ILL GET IT STARTED

athiests, IF THEY ARE WRONG THEY GO TO HELL

christians, IF THEY ARE WRONG, NOTHING HAPPENSGenetic_Code

No that's incorrect. What if it turns out there is a God, who doesn't want to be worshipped and so punishes Christians while reward Atheists.

Doesn't change the fact that their god doesn't exist in their scenario while the other one does.

Come on. You people can't honestly look at the complexity of every living thing, and how it fits perfectly within it's environment perforing it's specific tasks and say "no one designed this."harashawn

It's called millions of years of evolution and adaptation....

I'm going to try to show how stupid the site is without losing my sanity..

*takes deep breath* Here we go.

1) We know a Coke Can is designed because we can see the process by which the can is made. We can't see the process by which a divine being makes anything.

2) They just had to bring out the banana... I just hope they don't use the peanut butter...

3) Yay, quote mining!

4) (this one is for test two) Yes to all of those with the same reasoning as #1

5) You need proof to convince anyone of any claim... Claiming I painted the Mona Lisa just by taking a crap in a toilet isn't going to fly...

6) The bit involving declarative statements goes both ways.

7) The man who looks at a building at claims it has no designer is a fool because we have records, evidence, to prove that there were builders present.

At least they didn't bring up peanut butter.

Come on. You people can't honestly look at the complexity of every living thing, and how it fits perfectly within it's environment perforing it's specific tasks and say "no one designed this."harashawn

Sure I can, because I know that natural SELECTION actually SELECTS for traits that "work".

Come on. You people can't honestly look at the complexity of every living thing, and how it fits perfectly within it's environment perforing it's specific tasks and say "no one designed this."harashawn

Maybe people would take that article more seriously if the author understood how evolution works.

Come on. You people can't honestly look at the complexity of every living thing, and how it fits perfectly within it's environment perforing it's specific tasks and say "no one designed this."harashawn