Alpha Protocol impressions

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for omenodebander
omenodebander

1401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#101 omenodebander
Member since 2004 • 1401 Posts

wait bad graphics? what is wrong with gaming today? bad graphics? seriously there is a great difference between great graphics for what what it does, and then awful graphics that look like big rigs. The frigging game looks good, the graphics are fine enough as it is, nothing ground breaking just good enough.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#102 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

wait bad graphics? what is wrong with gaming today? bad graphics? seriously there is a great difference between great graphics for what what it does, and then awful graphics that look like big rigs. The frigging game looks good, the graphics are fine enough as it is, nothing ground breaking just good enough.

omenodebander
The graphics are pretty dated and the game does not have an open world. So its a linear third person shooter without big levels. The year is 2010 and it looks pretty dated. If you can find a game in 2010 or 2009 that comes from a good dev and looks worse, then ill agree with you.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d78b683675c5
deactivated-5d78b683675c5

3161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 deactivated-5d78b683675c5
Member since 2007 • 3161 Posts

[QUOTE="Baranga"]

Giant Bomb quick look.

Obvious problems, nothing too bad though. Feels a lot like Deus Ex from this video...

dakan45

Especially at the cafe and at those moments that he shoots repeteadly with the pistol and the bad guy runs towards him and bashes him with the rifle

That really surprised me because when I first saw recent gameplay videos I instantly remembered this interview. The interview is from two years ago but he says that the RPG elements of the game wouldn't affect a players ability to aim. Not sure what happened since then but it kind of bums me out. I still plan on getting the game, maybe not on release day though.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#104 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"]

[QUOTE="Baranga"]

Giant Bomb quick look.

Obvious problems, nothing too bad though. Feels a lot like Deus Ex from this video...

dahwnpapaya

Especially at the cafe and at those moments that he shoots repeteadly with the pistol and the bad guy runs towards him and bashes him with the rifle

That really surprised me because when I first saw recent gameplay videos I instantly remembered this interview. The interview is from two years ago but he says that the RPG elements of the game wouldn't affect a players ability to aim. Not sure what happened since then but it kind of bums me out. I still plan on getting the game, maybe not on release day though.

Thats nothing, GT video review shows that even if you can take a headshot, you will miss because the rpg dice randomly say so.

Avatar image for Ocid1
Ocid1

362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 Ocid1
Member since 2005 • 362 Posts

[QUOTE="dahwnpapaya"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"]

Especially at the cafe and at those moments that he shoots repeteadly with the pistol and the bad guy runs towards him and bashes him with the rifle

dakan45

That really surprised me because when I first saw recent gameplay videos I instantly remembered this interview. The interview is from two years ago but he says that the RPG elements of the game wouldn't affect a players ability to aim. Not sure what happened since then but it kind of bums me out. I still plan on getting the game, maybe not on release day though.

Thats nothing, GT video review shows that even if you can take a headshot, you will miss because the rpg dice randomly say so.

Hence the reason the games called an RPG. Seems to me your looking for something more along the lines of a shooter. Contrary to what GT says just because it looks like one it doesn't need to play like one because thats not how the devs intended it.

No the graphics don't look that bad. Why the hell are you so hung up on graphics?

Avatar image for deactivated-5d78b683675c5
deactivated-5d78b683675c5

3161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 deactivated-5d78b683675c5
Member since 2007 • 3161 Posts

Hence the reason the games called an RPG. Seems to me your looking for something more along the lines of a shooter. Contrary to what GT says just because it looks like one it doesn't need to play like one because thats not how the devs intended it.

No the graphics don't look that bad. Why the hell are you so hung up on graphics?

Ocid1

Then I think you need to look at the interview I posted. And I know I've read/watched more interviews where they said the same thing.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#107 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"]

[QUOTE="dahwnpapaya"]

That really surprised me because when I first saw recent gameplay videos I instantly remembered this interview. The interview is from two years ago but he says that the RPG elements of the game wouldn't affect a players ability to aim. Not sure what happened since then but it kind of bums me out. I still plan on getting the game, maybe not on release day though.

Ocid1

Thats nothing, GT video review shows that even if you can take a headshot, you will miss because the rpg dice randomly say so.

Hence the reason the games called an RPG. Seems to me your looking for something more along the lines of a shooter. Contrary to what GT says just because it looks like one it doesn't need to play like one because thats not how the devs intended it.

No the graphics don't look that bad. Why the hell are you so hung up on graphics?

Seems to me you were not looking at the previews. and what the user before me said. So save your excuses, it was suposed to be a shooter mostly and rpg second.

Avatar image for HenriH-42
HenriH-42

2113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#108 HenriH-42
Member since 2007 • 2113 Posts

it was suposed to be a shooter mostly and rpg second.

dakan45

Wait, what?

http://koti.welho.com/khavulin/pics/gamespot/alpha.jpg

"The espionage RPG"

"RPG"

It's neither supposed to be a shooter or a stealth game. It's an RPG, where both choices are available. This whole mess reminds me of when people dissed Deus Ex because it wasn't a good shooter or a good stealth game (having only played the first level, mind you.)

Avatar image for coreybg
coreybg

2608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#109 coreybg
Member since 2009 • 2608 Posts

I planed on buying this game until I watched the review from ytd.

The only good game Obsidian ever developed(and they weren't alone) was KOTOR II.

To everyone who plans on buying the game - watch the review first.

Avatar image for JackBurton
JackBurton

3808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#110 JackBurton
Member since 2002 • 3808 Posts

WTF is up with the oversized console-esque reticle?!

Avatar image for deactivated-5d78b683675c5
deactivated-5d78b683675c5

3161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 deactivated-5d78b683675c5
Member since 2007 • 3161 Posts

Seems to me you were not looking at the previews. and what the user before me said. So save your excuses, it was suposed to be a shooter mostly and rpg second.

dakan45

Well, it wasn't supposed to be a shooter first and rpg second. From early interviews I just thought the developers would have fine tuned the shooter mechanics while adding the rpg elements on top of it(like it was said in the interview). I didn't expect to be able to go in guns blazing and play it like a run and gun shooter, but it would be nice to have my own accuracy count for something. Imo its not a bad thing considering the game is a rpg, just not what I was expecting.

Avatar image for STOCKMAN22
STOCKMAN22

415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 STOCKMAN22
Member since 2010 • 415 Posts

IS this game any good at all??? I see here most people here says that games suck.. Is it worth buying? Will it run on max settings on my athlon x2 4400 8800 gt 512 2gb ram?

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#113 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"]

it was suposed to be a shooter mostly and rpg second.

HenriH-42

Wait, what?

http://koti.welho.com/khavulin/pics/gamespot/alpha.jpg

"The espionage RPG"

"RPG"

It's neither supposed to be a shooter or a stealth game. It's an RPG, where both choices are available. This whole mess reminds me of when people dissed Deus Ex because it wasn't a good shooter or a good stealth game (having only played the first level, mind you.)

Developers said its gonna be more action than rpg. They even said in interviews that skills wont effect how accurate you were. So please save me the pointless arguments,because it does not matter if it became what you wanted to be, since thats not what they said it would be. I hope other companies do not adopt that logic, to deliver the opposite of what promised. If thats the case there is no point of reading previews...or even bother interviewing them.

Avatar image for Ocid1
Ocid1

362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 Ocid1
Member since 2005 • 362 Posts

[QUOTE="Ocid1"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"] Thats nothing, GT video review shows that even if you can take a headshot, you will miss because the rpg dice randomly say so.

dakan45

Hence the reason the games called an RPG. Seems to me your looking for something more along the lines of a shooter. Contrary to what GT says just because it looks like one it doesn't need to play like one because thats not how the devs intended it.

No the graphics don't look that bad. Why the hell are you so hung up on graphics?

Seems to me you were not looking at the previews. and what the user before me said. So save your excuses, it was suposed to be a shooter mostly and rpg second.

Yes i was looking at previews, recent ones. Doesn't matter what someone said TWO years ago what matters is the product that came out in the end.

If you were to go about basing your gaming purchases or opinions on a game in what you've read in previews you'd be buying nearly everything. Very few previews are actually negative.

Still you haven't explained why the graphics matter just oh so much.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#115 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
I always base my buys on the previews and reviews that actually show something instead of praising the game. If i did not i will be bashing the game without even knowing that the previews pointed out it was suposed to be like that. Also when did graphics stop to matter? making a linear game with so dated graphics and meh perfomance is by no means a good thing. They just add up to the weak score of the game. Anyway i hope i find myself enjoying the game, but i doubt it.
Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#116 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts

I always base my buys on the previews and reviews that actually show something instead of praising the game. If i did not i will be bashing the game without even knowing that the previews pointed out it was suposed to be like that. Also when did graphics stop to matter? making a linear game with so dated graphics and meh perfomance is by no means a good thing. They just add up to the weak score of the game. Anyway i hope i find myself enjoying the game, but i doubt it.dakan45
well you might hate it, as an action game its a failure. As an rpg its pretty damn good, and thats exactly what I expected. Maybe they could improve the action in a sequel like bioware did with mass effect 2, but for now this seems to be one of those games I love and reviewers like kevin vanord hate. Also, the graphics and performance are fine on pc, not award winning but fine.

Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#117 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

WTF is up with the oversized console-esque reticle?!

JackBurton

A fat reticle doesn't make you rage when you miss, it reminds you that bullets aren't lasers. I hated how in Deus Ex the reticle was eventually shrinking to 5 pixels and I missed by four meters.

Avatar image for Gooeykat
Gooeykat

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#118 Gooeykat
Member since 2006 • 3412 Posts

[QUOTE="dahwnpapaya"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"]

Especially at the cafe and at those moments that he shoots repeteadly with the pistol and the bad guy runs towards him and bashes him with the rifle

dakan45

That really surprised me because when I first saw recent gameplay videos I instantly remembered this interview. The interview is from two years ago but he says that the RPG elements of the game wouldn't affect a players ability to aim. Not sure what happened since then but it kind of bums me out. I still plan on getting the game, maybe not on release day though.

Thats nothing, GT video review shows that even if you can take a headshot, you will miss because the rpg dice randomly say so.

Yeah, but that happens in fallout 3 as well, at least it did for me several times. If you're going to play an RPG shooter, that's what you get. I think they need to adjust the code a bit to account for the distance to target. Maybe a patch.
Avatar image for Gooeykat
Gooeykat

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#119 Gooeykat
Member since 2006 • 3412 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"]

[QUOTE="dahwnpapaya"]

That really surprised me because when I first saw recent gameplay videos I instantly remembered this interview. The interview is from two years ago but he says that the RPG elements of the game wouldn't affect a players ability to aim. Not sure what happened since then but it kind of bums me out. I still plan on getting the game, maybe not on release day though.

Ocid1

Thats nothing, GT video review shows that even if you can take a headshot, you will miss because the rpg dice randomly say so.

Hence the reason the games called an RPG. Seems to me your looking for something more along the lines of a shooter. Contrary to what GT says just because it looks like one it doesn't need to play like one because thats not how the devs intended it.

No the graphics don't look that bad. Why the hell are you so hung up on graphics?

Same here, I think the graphics are getting brought up the most because it's the most obvious for people. I will be the first to admit they are bit dated but not bad by any means. The bigger problems to me are AI and engine performance. If these can be patched, I'll be happy.
Avatar image for Ocid1
Ocid1

362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 Ocid1
Member since 2005 • 362 Posts
[QUOTE="dakan45"]I always base my buys on the previews and reviews that actually show something instead of praising the game. If i did not i will be bashing the game without even knowing that the previews pointed out it was suposed to be like that. Also when did graphics stop to matter? making a linear game with so dated graphics and meh perfomance is by no means a good thing. They just add up to the weak score of the game. Anyway i hope i find myself enjoying the game, but i doubt it.

Well maybe in the future you'll look at previews that are more recent say within a six month period or you would know that the interview that was quoted from 2 years ago is basically made redundant. Graphics stopped mattering for me a long time ago. The graphics aren't the best out there sure its not like it'll challenge crysis or anything but they aren't awful and you can't comment on the performance if you haven't played it yet.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#121 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Fallout 3 suposed to be much more rpg combat based than alpha protocol. Also why i cant comment in perfomance? Diffirent hardware and diffirent drivers= diffirent perfomance.
Avatar image for Born_Lucky
Born_Lucky

1730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 Born_Lucky
Member since 2003 • 1730 Posts

So far on Metacritic -

Alpha Protocol

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#124 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

So far on Metacritic -

Alpha Protocol

Born_Lucky

Gamespot tries to be harsh, but in the end they come up unfair. 6.0 of an awesome game simply because of bad graphics and some A.I problems.

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#125 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

[QUOTE="HenriH-42"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"]

it was suposed to be a shooter mostly and rpg second.

dakan45

Wait, what?

http://koti.welho.com/khavulin/pics/gamespot/alpha.jpg

"The espionage RPG"

"RPG"

It's neither supposed to be a shooter or a stealth game. It's an RPG, where both choices are available. This whole mess reminds me of when people dissed Deus Ex because it wasn't a good shooter or a good stealth game (having only played the first level, mind you.)

Developers said its gonna be more action than rpg. They even said in interviews that skills wont effect how accurate you were. So please save me the pointless arguments,because it does not matter if it became what you wanted to be, since thats not what they said it would be. I hope other companies do not adopt that logic, to deliver the opposite of what promised. If thats the case there is no point of reading previews...or even bother interviewing them.

They said it was going to be an espionage RPG, read the cover of the game.. in interviews they said rpg first and action second.

If it was more action then RPG it would say ACTION espionage on the cover.

Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts
Played it for about six hours today, Lazy Saturday, and I have to say..It has it's faults but I do find it fun and that's the important thing. =P
Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#127 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts
[QUOTE="Treflis"]Played it for about six hours today, Lazy Saturday, and I have to say..It has it's faults but I do find it fun and that's the important thing. =P

glad to hear that, it seems like something pc gamers would like but adhd console gamers wont have the patience for.
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#128 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
[QUOTE="TerrorRizzing"][QUOTE="Treflis"]Played it for about six hours today, Lazy Saturday, and I have to say..It has it's faults but I do find it fun and that's the important thing. =P

glad to hear that, it seems like something pc gamers would like but adhd console gamers wont have the patience for.

When then are the menus, HUD, and even the mini games consolised. That's why I'm not getting it.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#129 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
So what? Like i cant check youtube videos and compare rigs and perfomance there. So no i dont need to play the game to know how it perfoms. Second, the titles on the boxes are usually a mess. Not let me remind you of oblivion or fable. But if devs are gonna be like peter molyneux, full of lies and a diffirent final product, i just dont see reason to be interested in their work since its gonna be lies in the end. Now osbidian says that fallout new vegas is gonna have better gunplay and you will be able to make headshots easier. They can put "rpg" in the title but that wont make it right just because they will lie to us and make the combat more rpgsh when they said otherwise ;) Catch my drift yet?
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#130 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

Once Nvidia drivers accomodate this game,(SLI support/profiles and such) I will definitely get it, Graphics aren't as important as performance, and gameplay. (though they do have to be decent, and they are decent enough for me.)

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#131 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

Played it for about six hours today, Lazy Saturday, and I have to say..It has it's faults but I do find it fun and that's the important thing. =PTreflis

Nice, good to hear bud. Cant wait to sink into this game on monday.

My buddy who is about 11 hours deep says its a flawed masterpeice (controls and graphics he thought could be better) but great rpg elements, good story and some unique ideas.

Sounds like a fun little rpg to me.

You should post some screenshots in the "WHAT ARE YOU PLAYING?" thread bud, would love to see some more pics :D

Avatar image for coreybg
coreybg

2608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#132 coreybg
Member since 2009 • 2608 Posts

I played the game at a friend's house for about an hour and I must say this game doesn't even come close to the RPG standarts.And seriously,espionage?Not much of a spy when enemies see you 50 yards away in the dark and always know where you are when they're alert.And the sensetivity is rather inadjustable.It's either - mouse is to slow when looking arround and normal when aiming or - normal when looking arround and too fast when aiming.It's exactly as the review describes it.Good thing I didn't preorder it.

Avatar image for Elian2530
Elian2530

3658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#133 Elian2530
Member since 2009 • 3658 Posts
I have to say, I'm not impressed at all by Alpha Protocol but I do admire gamers that find a way to enjoy games that critics and media deem "horrible" or "average." In that sense, people with a high critique will miss out on somewhat average but FUN games. Kudos to TC.
Avatar image for Ocid1
Ocid1

362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 Ocid1
Member since 2005 • 362 Posts
[QUOTE="dakan45"]So what? Like i cant check youtube videos and compare rigs and perfomance there. So no i dont need to play the game to know how it perfoms. Second, the titles on the boxes are usually a mess. Not let me remind you of oblivion or fable. But if devs are gonna be like peter molyneux, full of lies and a diffirent final product, i just dont see reason to be interested in their work since its gonna be lies in the end. Now osbidian says that fallout new vegas is gonna have better gunplay and you will be able to make headshots easier. They can put "rpg" in the title but that wont make it right just because they will lie to us and make the combat more rpgsh when they said otherwise ;) Catch my drift yet?

Yeah i caught your drift. Lol your basing the performance off the game on youtube vids. Sure ok My point is games change during development don't go by what was said 2 years ago. Go by some recent previews or just the reviews. Again seems to me like you were after a TPS and not an RPG.
Avatar image for 1kalli1
1kalli1

398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 1kalli1
Member since 2007 • 398 Posts
Lol, why are people bashing the graphics? I think they look pretty good.
Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts

[QUOTE="Treflis"]Played it for about six hours today, Lazy Saturday, and I have to say..It has it's faults but I do find it fun and that's the important thing. =Pkozzy1234

Nice, good to hear bud. Cant wait to sink into this game on monday.

My buddy who is about 11 hours deep says its a flawed masterpeice (controls and graphics he thought could be better) but great rpg elements, good story and some unique ideas.

Sounds like a fun little rpg to me.

You should post some screenshots in the "WHAT ARE YOU PLAYING?" thread bud, would love to see some more pics :D

Keep an eye out then, Might be a couple of pictures there tomorrow. =P

Avatar image for Gooeykat
Gooeykat

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#137 Gooeykat
Member since 2006 • 3412 Posts

I played the game at a friend's house for about an hour and I must say this game doesn't even come close to the RPG standarts.And seriously,espionage?Not much of a spy when enemies see you 50 yards away in the dark and always know where you are when they're alert.And the sensetivity is rather inadjustable.It's either - mouse is to slow when looking arround and normal when aiming or - normal when looking arround and too fast when aiming.It's exactly as the review describes it.Good thing I didn't preorder it.

coreybg

No, it's nothing like the review described it and that's the shame of it, many people will miss out because of these ridiculous reviews. My trust in gaming sites disappeared a while ago. Also..."you played the game for an hour" and your basing your opinion on that? The thing about RPGs is that the more you play them the better they get, why? Because the character interaction, role-play, story and character customization is the selling point. There is no way to get an accurate read on any RPG in one hour. They require time and patience, the more you play the more the game rewards you with more plot details, more abilities, fantastic character dialogue (this is something that Obsidian are masters at by the way). Anyway, those are my thoughts.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#138 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

I played the game at a friend's house for about an hour and I must say this game doesn't even come close to the RPG standarts.And seriously,espionage?Not much of a spy when enemies see you 50 yards away in the dark and always know where you are when they're alert.And the sensetivity is rather inadjustable.It's either - mouse is to slow when looking arround and normal when aiming or - normal when looking arround and too fast when aiming.It's exactly as the review describes it.Good thing I didn't preorder it.

coreybg
Wait, the mouse aiming is bad? Godamn it osbidian :cry:
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#139 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
[QUOTE="Ocid1"][QUOTE="dakan45"]So what? Like i cant check youtube videos and compare rigs and perfomance there. So no i dont need to play the game to know how it perfoms. Second, the titles on the boxes are usually a mess. Not let me remind you of oblivion or fable. But if devs are gonna be like peter molyneux, full of lies and a diffirent final product, i just dont see reason to be interested in their work since its gonna be lies in the end. Now osbidian says that fallout new vegas is gonna have better gunplay and you will be able to make headshots easier. They can put "rpg" in the title but that wont make it right just because they will lie to us and make the combat more rpgsh when they said otherwise ;) Catch my drift yet?

Yeah i caught your drift. Lol your basing the performance off the game on youtube vids. Sure ok My point is games change during development don't go by what was said 2 years ago. Go by some recent previews or just the reviews. Again seems to me like you were after a TPS and not an RPG.

What the hell are you talking about? The best way to measure perfomance on diffirent systems is to look at youtube gameplay videos and see how much fps they get and what settings they set their system. Also, the delay the game had, has no right to change the gameplay mechanics.
Avatar image for LongZhiZi
LongZhiZi

2453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 LongZhiZi
Member since 2009 • 2453 Posts
Reading a lot of your impressions has made me really want the game. I find it interesting that PC-orientated sites are giving this much higher scores than console-orientated sites (and it's been clear to me for a while that GS is console-orientated). The complaints I see from them are "but when I point my reticule at the guy and shoot with a gun I have little skill in, it misses!" That's the EXACT way an RPG should work. Sure, the hilariously bad stealth animation and the bugs are worthy of knocking some points off for the game, but it seems like *some* reviewers are upset that it's not a TPS with RPG elements. Apparently Obsidian made the mistake of delivering an RPG. I'll probably wait a bit to pick this one up- I'm backlogged as it is and maybe I can score a price drop or at least see some patches fixing up the AI problems.
Avatar image for Barbariser
Barbariser

6785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#141 Barbariser
Member since 2009 • 6785 Posts

Good to see that the main people bashing this game are basing their criticisms off its aesthetic mechanics. Means it's not for instant gratification, means it's a brain game. Means it's a game that's actually interesting.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#142 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

Good to see that the main people bashing this game are basing their criticisms off its aesthetic mechanics. Means it's not for instant gratification, means it's a brain game. Means it's a game that's actually interesting.

Barbariser
Depends,if you find interesting the fact that you shoot someone to the head, miss and the the ai runs towards you and start bashing you with their rifles when you are desperetly trying to kill them and they randomly see you when you try to sneak up, which are both something that could be avoided if the shooter and stealth elements were better rather just picking an unreal engine ai and putting rpg skills in it without optimizing the ai to counter act with the rpg gameplay... then ok i guess. What i am saying is....have you thought that maybe people who bash the game, bash it not because of its rpg mechanics instead of shooter, but rather because the way those mechanices are implemented in the gameplay is poor and the result is a poor bonding with mediocre gameplay feel? Have you thought the case that it might not be a game that requires thinking but simply the mechanics work very badly? http://www.giantbomb.com/videos/ Seriously, the gameplay looks bad.
Avatar image for Barbariser
Barbariser

6785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#143 Barbariser
Member since 2009 • 6785 Posts

[QUOTE="Barbariser"]

Good to see that the main people bashing this game are basing their criticisms off its aesthetic mechanics. Means it's not for instant gratification, means it's a brain game. Means it's a game that's actually interesting.

dakan45

Depends,if you find interesting the fact that you shoot someone to the head, miss and the the ai runs towards you and start bashing you with their rifles when you are desperetly trying to kill them and they randomly see you when you try to sneak up, which are both something that could be avoided if the shooter and stealth elements were better rather just picking an unreal engine ai and putting rpg skills in it without optimizing the ai to counter act with the rpg gameplay... then ok i guess. What i am saying is....have you thought that maybe people who bash the game, bash it not because of its rpg mechanics instead of shooter, but rather because the way those mechanices are implemented in the gameplay is poor and the result is a poor bonding with mediocre gameplay feel? Have you thought the case that it might not be a game that requires thinking but simply the mechanics work very badly? http://www.giantbomb.com/videos/ Seriously, the gameplay looks bad.

The fact that you think I was talking about the combat tells me a lot about you.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#144 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Oh, you meant the "roleplaying" There is nothing wrong with the roleplaying. Many reviewers have said that it does roleplaying very well and diffirent choices lead into diffirent events in the story and you cant guess how things will turn out depending on your choices. When you start the game, you suck at everything, both shooting and stealth and you upgrade them and play the way you want. Not the roleplaying? Well only cheap and easy hacking/lockpicking minigames are left. Cant say there is anything noticable about them.
Avatar image for Barbariser
Barbariser

6785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#145 Barbariser
Member since 2009 • 6785 Posts

Oh, you meant the "roleplaying" dakan45

That is correct. Based on what I've heard about the RPG aspects, Alpha Protocol is a braingame - which is quite delightful since I've played a grand total of two such RPGs released over the past five years, and neither of those two can stack up to what I've heard about Alpha Protocol when comes it down to the choice aspect.

Avatar image for Planeforger
Planeforger

20145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#146 Planeforger
Member since 2004 • 20145 Posts

Depends,if you find interesting the fact that you shoot someone to the head, miss and the the ai runs towards you and start bashing you with their rifles when you are desperetly trying to kill them and they randomly see you when you try to sneak up, which are both something that could be avoided if the shooter and stealth elements were better rather just picking an unreal engine ai and putting rpg skills in it without optimizing the ai to counter act with the rpg gameplay... dakan45

I haven't had a single problem with sneaking up on enemies so far - they don't "randomly" see you if you stay out of their field of vision.

As for the shooting, if you take the time to aim with guns that you're skilled in (and that you've upgraded with decent accuracy/stability-increasing modifications), you won't miss.

I don't know what people are expecting, really. It's an RPG, you shouldn't be able to be a perfect shot with every gun.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#147 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
So its clear that its an rpg with both mechanics and characters? That would be quite allright if the ai did not act so.... how should i say? "unreal" as unreal engine. In other worlds i wont something rpg based preventign the ai from bashing me with their weapons, say, missing depending on their rpg skill factor like the player? But that does not exist in the game, right?
Avatar image for Ocid1
Ocid1

362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 Ocid1
Member since 2005 • 362 Posts

[QUOTE="Ocid1"][QUOTE="dakan45"]So what? Like i cant check youtube videos and compare rigs and perfomance there. So no i dont need to play the game to know how it perfoms. Second, the titles on the boxes are usually a mess. Not let me remind you of oblivion or fable. But if devs are gonna be like peter molyneux, full of lies and a diffirent final product, i just dont see reason to be interested in their work since its gonna be lies in the end. Now osbidian says that fallout new vegas is gonna have better gunplay and you will be able to make headshots easier. They can put "rpg" in the title but that wont make it right just because they will lie to us and make the combat more rpgsh when they said otherwise ;) Catch my drift yet?dakan45
Yeah i caught your drift. Lol your basing the performance off the game on youtube vids. Sure ok My point is games change during development don't go by what was said 2 years ago. Go by some recent previews or just the reviews. Again seems to me like you were after a TPS and not an RPG.

What the hell are you talking about? The best way to measure perfomance on diffirent systems is to look at youtube gameplay videos and see how much fps they get and what settings they set their system. Also, the delay the game had, has no right to change the gameplay mechanics.

No youtube is not the best way to judge performance. Capturing in HD using fraps/whatever they use will kill their framerate somewhat regardless of what their settings are or system they have. They could have a core i7 8gb of RAM and 5850 but if they have they have a slightly slower harddrive then that will affect the quality of video that they end up with. Jankiness, framerate issues etc. etc.

Who are you to say what gives them the right to change the gameplay. Stop getting so hung up on ONE interview from 2 years ago. Are you funding the game? Do you even plan on buying it? For all we know they could have changed their minds the day after that interview.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#149 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Thats why they say in description "with fraps fps: xx" "without fraps fps: xx" Also no it does not give em the right, if it did, then i guess there is no point to track a game since the devs will decide to change audience in the last moment. Its their loss really, since everyone wanted the game the way it was.
Avatar image for coreybg
coreybg

2608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#150 coreybg
Member since 2009 • 2608 Posts

[QUOTE="coreybg"]

I played the game at a friend's house for about an hour and I must say this game doesn't even come close to the RPG standarts.And seriously,espionage?Not much of a spy when enemies see you 50 yards away in the dark and always know where you are when they're alert.And the sensetivity is rather inadjustable.It's either - mouse is to slow when looking arround and normal when aiming or - normal when looking arround and too fast when aiming.It's exactly as the review describes it.Good thing I didn't preorder it.

Gooeykat

No, it's nothing like the review described it and that's the shame of it, many people will miss out because of these ridiculous reviews. My trust in gaming sites disappeared a while ago. Also..."you played the game for an hour" and your basing your opinion on that? The thing about RPGs is that the more you play them the better they get, why? Because the character interaction, role-play, story and character customization is the selling point. There is no way to get an accurate read on any RPG in one hour. They require time and patience, the more you play the more the game rewards you with more plot details, more abilities, fantastic character dialogue (this is something that Obsidian are masters at by the way). Anyway, those are my thoughts.

Maybe it's nothing like the review described it to you,but I find it 100% accurate.Also RPG is my favourite genre, so I can tell a good RPG from a bad one.Tell me, can this game be compared to KOTOR,Dragon Age,Mass Effect,Fallout?It doesn't even have open world.The biggest choices you make is whether to kill someone or spare him.If it wasn't glitchy and there were better stealth mechanics I would play it, but seriously, isn't stealth impossible or what?