and what happens if GW2 fails...?

  • 106 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

Of course this isn't a troll thread, because I will be buying GW2 on DAY 1.

It's just that I really want it to turn out good, and the past 2-3 years I have actually become afraid of HYPE.

I pre-ordered and purchased both AION and Warhammer Online, because of all the hype that came before it. We all know how those 2 turned out.

I recently got the CE of SWTOR, and even though I don't regret the purchase since I have put in 100hrs and my GF also plays and loves it, I see endless threads on these forums about it failing (which I don't agree) or not the game everyone was expecting (which I agree with in some parts).

BF3, labeled as the king of military shooters. A few months after lots of people say it's broken, lots of people have abandoned it and if I understand correctly more people are playing MW3. Remember when everyone said BF3 would destroy CoD? (Yes, I also bought BF3 fyi)

Diablo 3, of course I will be buying Day 1 (and even considering CE). BUT, all of a sudden D3 has some big changes and the Chief Designer leaves the company. I will love D3 but oh oh... so much hype.

Which brings me to GW2.

Everyone is calling this MMO the next coming of Christ. I LOVE the ideas the devs are trying to pull off, but will we see threads about people complaining?

Not EVERYONE will like it will they?

Is it REALLY the next coming?

To be honest, I REALLY WANT it to be the next coming.... but the more I hear the hype, the more doubt I have...

Avatar image for Johnny_Rock
Johnny_Rock

40314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 Johnny_Rock
Member since 2002 • 40314 Posts

It won't have a subscription fee, so it won't fail.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

It won't have a subscription fee, so it won't fail.

Johnny_Rock
That IS a bonus going for it, but it will also have micro-transactions. Just cause something is FREE doesn't mean it will succeed. It still has to be a good game. How many FREE MMOs out there that no one plays?
Avatar image for Prexxus
Prexxus

1443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Prexxus
Member since 2003 • 1443 Posts

NCSoft does not fail. But if you think it will have anywhere near the same numbers as WoW you're wrong. NCSoft games have always been for the hardcore players.

Ive been playing there games since Lineage I. They have NEVER let me down.

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
From the looks of things TOR is failing because bioware waited until after the game released to take care of the issues that people have been addressing since it's beta.Honestly from your OP it looks like your drawn to what's hyped more than you should. Of course people will complain about the game in some shape or form and of course some people are just going to not like it.
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

NCSoft does not fail. But if you think it will have anywhere near the same numbers as WoW you're wrong. NCSoft games have always been for the hardcore players.

Ive been playing there games since Lineage I. They have NEVER let me down.

Prexxus
NCSoft doesn't fail? Wasn't AION from them? And I don't agree GW1 is hardcore.
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

NCSoft does not fail. But if you think it will have anywhere near the same numbers as WoW you're wrong. NCSoft games have always been for the hardcore players.

Ive been playing there games since Lineage I. They have NEVER let me down.

Prexxus
NCSoft doesn't fail? Wasn't AION from them? And I don't agree GW1 is hardcore.
Avatar image for Prexxus
Prexxus

1443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Prexxus
Member since 2003 • 1443 Posts

[QUOTE="Prexxus"]

NCSoft does not fail. But if you think it will have anywhere near the same numbers as WoW you're wrong. NCSoft games have always been for the hardcore players.

Ive been playing there games since Lineage I. They have NEVER let me down.

FelipeInside

NCSoft doesn't fail? Wasn't AION from them? And I don't agree GW1 is hardcore.

Aion was not a failure at all. You must of not played it very much. GW1 was very hardcore if you were in any way good or competitive at it. You could go through the games story and play casual but that's not what GW was about.

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="Prexxus"]

NCSoft does not fail. But if you think it will have anywhere near the same numbers as WoW you're wrong. NCSoft games have always been for the hardcore players.

Ive been playing there games since Lineage I. They have NEVER let me down.

Prexxus
NCSoft doesn't fail? Wasn't AION from them? And I don't agree GW1 is hardcore.

Aion was not a failure at all. You must of not played it very much. GW1 was very hardcore if you were in any way good or competitive at it. You could go through the games story and play casual but that's not what GW was about.

If Aion wasn't about to become a f2p game i'd agree with you.
Avatar image for Prexxus
Prexxus

1443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Prexxus
Member since 2003 • 1443 Posts

[QUOTE="Prexxus"][QUOTE="FelipeInside"] NCSoft doesn't fail? Wasn't AION from them? And I don't agree GW1 is hardcore.lawlessx
Aion was not a failure at all. You must of not played it very much. GW1 was very hardcore if you were in any way good or competitive at it. You could go through the games story and play casual but that's not what GW was about.

If Aion wasn't about to become a f2p game i'd agree with you.

about 4 years with over 5 million subs is a fail? Who cares if it's going F2P now? They've made billions with that game.

Avatar image for Raxzor
Raxzor

5399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#11 Raxzor
Member since 2003 • 5399 Posts

I can see what the OP is doing by setting up a senario, but seriously GW2 will not fail I will even take bets on it succeeding. GW2 is a innovating MMO that is yours for a one off fee that means even the non-MMO PC games will be curious on picking it up, so it will sell. Also it has that the GW1 players that will pick up andcontinue with their micro transactions like they did in the first game. So if NCsoft just retain all its GW1 players it will be a success.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="Prexxus"]

NCSoft does not fail. But if you think it will have anywhere near the same numbers as WoW you're wrong. NCSoft games have always been for the hardcore players.

Ive been playing there games since Lineage I. They have NEVER let me down.

Prexxus

NCSoft doesn't fail? Wasn't AION from them? And I don't agree GW1 is hardcore.

Aion was not a failure at all. You must of not played it very much. GW1 was very hardcore if you were in any way good or competitive at it. You could go through the games story and play casual but that's not what GW was about.

From everything I understand, have read and general consensus AION failed hard. After all the hype everyone noticed it was just like a normal Korean grind. There aren't many playing I believe. I did play it for a while and noticed it was way too repetitive.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#13 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
There are no what if's. It will succeed.
Avatar image for Prexxus
Prexxus

1443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Prexxus
Member since 2003 • 1443 Posts
[QUOTE="Prexxus"]

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"] NCSoft doesn't fail? Wasn't AION from them? And I don't agree GW1 is hardcore.FelipeInside

Aion was not a failure at all. You must of not played it very much. GW1 was very hardcore if you were in any way good or competitive at it. You could go through the games story and play casual but that's not what GW was about.

From everything I understand, have read and general consensus AION failed hard. After all the hype everyone noticed it was just like a normal Korean grind. There aren't many playing I believe. I did play it for a while and noticed it was way too repetitive.

Go read their revenue reports and come back.
Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts

[QUOTE="Prexxus"]

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"] NCSoft doesn't fail? Wasn't AION from them? And I don't agree GW1 is hardcore.FelipeInside

Aion was not a failure at all. You must of not played it very much. GW1 was very hardcore if you were in any way good or competitive at it. You could go through the games story and play casual but that's not what GW was about.

From everything I understand, have read and general consensus SWTOR failed hard. After all the hype everyone noticed it was just like a normal WOW rip off. There aren't many playing I believe. I did play it for a while and noticed it was way too repetitive.

I just had to do it:P

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

I can see what the OP is doing by setting up a senario, but seriously GW2 will not fail I will even take bets on it succeeding. GW2 is a innovating MMO that is yours for a one off fee that means even the non-MMO PC games will be curious on picking it up, so it will sell. Also it has that the GW1 players that will pick up andcontinue with their micro transactions like they did in the first game. So if NCsoft just retain all its GW1 players it will be a success.

Raxzor
I hope so. I'm not setting up any specific scenario, just expressing my experience in the last 2 years.
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="Prexxus"] Aion was not a failure at all. You must of not played it very much. GW1 was very hardcore if you were in any way good or competitive at it. You could go through the games story and play casual but that's not what GW was about.

lawlessx

From everything I understand, have read and general consensus SWTOR failed hard. After all the hype everyone noticed it was just like a normal WOW rip off. There aren't many playing I believe. I did play it for a while and noticed it was way too repetitive.

I just had to do it:P

That wasn't nice, lol.....
Avatar image for deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
deactivated-57e5de5e137a4

12929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
Member since 2004 • 12929 Posts
I hope not. I'm more interested in The Secret World, but I wanted to play GW2 as well. I kinda doubt it will because lots of people will try it since it doesn't have a fee.
Avatar image for Prexxus
Prexxus

1443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Prexxus
Member since 2003 • 1443 Posts

Fact is Aion like every other NcSoft game was for a more hardcore audience like I said. It had amazing end game content. The sieges were huge, they gave your hole factions bonuses and places to farm and gave your clan medals for pvp gear.

The world PvP was constant and almost everywhere. There was never a shortage of it and all the bosses were outdoors so you had to fight over them. That created a lot of really fun scenarios and drama.

Thats why Aion was such a huge success for a long time. It had the content ready when it released and it wasent for little care bear kiddies either. They still have 3 or 4 million paying custommers + the F2P guys in europe.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#20 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
[QUOTE="Prexxus"]

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"] NCSoft doesn't fail? Wasn't AION from them? And I don't agree GW1 is hardcore.FelipeInside

Aion was not a failure at all. You must of not played it very much. GW1 was very hardcore if you were in any way good or competitive at it. You could go through the games story and play casual but that's not what GW was about.

From everything I understand, have read and general consensus AION failed hard. After all the hype everyone noticed it was just like a normal Korean grind. There aren't many playing I believe. I did play it for a while and noticed it was way too repetitive.

MMO's, repetitive. Oh..the irony.
Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
I hope not. I'm more interested in The Secret World, but I wanted to play GW2 as well. I kinda doubt it will because lots of people will try it since it doesn't have a fee.guynamedbilly
The secret World does indeed look interesting. Working on getting my way into the beta
Avatar image for jakes456
jakes456

1398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 jakes456
Member since 2011 • 1398 Posts

it will fail if they don't do anything game changing for MMO's. a good story will only hold on to the player so long.

WoW did everything right until Cataclysm. any company developing an MMO needs to take all the best things from WoW and then build their game. that's if they want it to be a success.

Avatar image for illmatic87
illmatic87

17935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 564

User Lists: 0

#23 illmatic87
Member since 2008 • 17935 Posts
A hybrid of 2 sucessful business models, a next-gen approach to massively multiplayer online games, NCSoft publishing that makes it into Steam (This is a point you really have to consider) and planned release on Mac. It wont fail. Heck, I wouldnt be surprised if it adds steam friends integration and achievements, ArenaNet seems so hell bent in letting people and friends around you play together without hassle.
Avatar image for Code135
Code135

892

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 Code135
Member since 2005 • 892 Posts

GW2 will fail only if you let a blind person play it and he ends up saying "how boring" (excuse me for the dark humor). This will however never happen, therefore GW2 will not fail ...

P.S. Epic conclusion, right ?

Avatar image for Heartagram_03
Heartagram_03

3697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#25 Heartagram_03
Member since 2005 • 3697 Posts

Judging from the success of GW1 and GW2 gameplay videos, interviews, dev diaries. NCsoft is actually taking risks with the MMO genre and will definitely catch many subscribers from other mmo's. SWTOR on the other hand, had a rough launch with constant bugs with numerous balancing issues. I'm not pleased at all about the IA nerf.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

Judging from the success of GW1 and GW2 gameplay videos, interviews, dev diaries. NCsoft is actually taking risks with the MMO genre and will definitely catch many subscribers from other mmo's. SWTOR on the other hand, had a rough launch with constant bugs with numerous balancing issues. I'm not pleased at all about the IA nerf.

Heartagram_03

Do you REALLY think GW2 will launch with no bugs or balancing issues?

Do you think GW1 launched perfectly with no bugs or balancing issues?

Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

its not easy to predict if something is gonna succeed of not, but the way i look it they are managing guild wars 2 in an incredibly smart way, and they at least are innovating and trying to create new ideas for the game, its clear from all the videos aand interviews, it looks to be an amazing game with fresh ideas that has a good chance of succeding, while the old republic just tried to reuse the wow formula, you may call it what you like but the old republic did not innovate at all, they failed the momment they took the easy way. Big differences

Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

[QUOTE="Heartagram_03"]

Judging from the success of GW1 and GW2 gameplay videos, interviews, dev diaries. NCsoft is actually taking risks with the MMO genre and will definitely catch many subscribers from other mmo's. SWTOR on the other hand, had a rough launch with constant bugs with numerous balancing issues. I'm not pleased at all about the IA nerf.

FelipeInside

Do you REALLY think GW2 will launch with no bugs or balancing issues?

Do you think GW1 launched perfectly with no bugs or balancing issues?

the faction system is obsolete and leads to failure in most mmorpgs, which is another big plus fro gw2

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

its not easy to predict if something is gonna succeed of not, but the way i look it they are managing guild wars 2 in an incredibly smart way, and they at least are innovating and trying to create new ideas for the game, its clear from all the videos aand interviews, it looks to be an amazing game with fresh ideas that has a good chance of succeding, while the old republic just tried to reuse the wow formula, you may call it what you like but the old republic did not innovate at all, they failed the momment they took the easy way. Big differences

Krelian-co
SWTOR did bring new things to the table, but also cut corners in others.
Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

its not easy to predict if something is gonna succeed of not, but the way i look it they are managing guild wars 2 in an incredibly smart way, and they at least are innovating and trying to create new ideas for the game, its clear from all the videos aand interviews, it looks to be an amazing game with fresh ideas that has a good chance of succeding, while the old republic just tried to reuse the wow formula, you may call it what you like but the old republic did not innovate at all, they failed the momment they took the easy way. Big differences

FelipeInside

SWTOR did bring new things to the table, but also cut corners in others.

the fact that they change some thing here and there doesn't mean they didn't basically carbon copy the wow system. if people want to play wow they go to wow, which is the better game, they wanted to succed using a system people have played for like 7 years now and are tired of it, big fail

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
But cant we say that about most MMOs? And didn't WoW just copy EQ and optimized things?
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

It won't have a subscription fee, so it won't fail.

Johnny_Rock
This, it also has its own dedicated community made up of several millions.
Avatar image for vfibsux
vfibsux

4497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#34 vfibsux
Member since 2003 • 4497 Posts

The hype around GW2 is they have come out and explained exactly how they are trying to revoluntionize the genre. Why is this hype? Because people are tired of the same old WoW formula every MMO has adopted since that abomination was spawned. That is my opinion WoWboys, I hate what it did to the genre.

THe modern MMO is in dire need of a revamp, so far while not reinventing it GW2 at least stands to make some much needed changes in such things as the quest system.

Another thing people are excited about is this is the first MMO since Daoc to include a 3 realm battle system. I cannot understand for the life of me why it took so long for an MMO to adopt this successful concept, GW2 finally has.

As for TOR, it is failing compared to the hype it received. For far too many it was a free month of play then toss it away MMO. History has shown when an MMO loses a large number of subs before the free month is up it is tough for it to make a comeback. The problem is it is too much a SP game, and people play a few run throughs of those (if that for some) then toss them. The Star Wars title is not a freebie, last time I checked there was another Star Wars MMO that is quite extinct.

Not saying TOR will fall as far as Galaxies did, I think it will keep a sustainable base if they do things right from here on out.

Avatar image for vfibsux
vfibsux

4497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#35 vfibsux
Member since 2003 • 4497 Posts

But cant we say that about most MMOs? And didn't WoW just copy EQ and optimized things?FelipeInside

WoW revolutionized the genre (in a bad way imo) with its accessibility. X marks the spot/directional arrow questing, no death penalties, quest indicators over npcs heads, etc. The only MMO that can claim it copied nothing is UO. In the end this whole MMO copy debate is stupid, it is like saying I cannot build a restaurant and serve pancakes without someone saying I copied IHOP.

Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

But cant we say that about most MMOs? And didn't WoW just copy EQ and optimized things?FelipeInside

and thats why most mmorpg fail, there are very few you can actually call succesful, plus wow may have copy EQ but not to the extend the old republic copied wow, and plus there was little competition in mmorpg market, people hardly knew the genre back then while now its saturated.

Avatar image for JW-toch
JW-toch

344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 JW-toch
Member since 2008 • 344 Posts

I don't think GW2 will fail. It already has a large fanbase, so lots of people will probably buy it nonetheless. Then there's the no subscription part, so even when you're a casual gamer or don't have loads of free time, which most MMO's need, you don't have to worry about your subscription running out. And the game isn't really copying WoW, which most other potential WoW-beaters were doing. I'm not saying this game is going to be revolutionairy and WoW probably will have more subscribers than GW2, but GW2 will not fail, just like the first GW didn't fail.

Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

25287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 25287 Posts

If GW2 fails, I will go back to playing single player games or Guild Wars 1. But there are games like ArcheAge, Firefall, The Secret World and Planetside 2 (despite my growing concerns for it). In any case there looks to be plenty of mmos that seem to want to change up the mmo genre and free us from the stagnantion the genre is suffering from now.

Oh and dont forget TERA, Blade and Soul and Continent of the Ninth.

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"]

Do you REALLY think GW2 will launch with no bugs or balancing issues?

Do you think GW1 launched perfectly with no bugs or balancing issues?

Krelian-co

the faction system is obsolete and leads to failure in most mmorpgs, which is another big plus fro gw2

I believe that dephends on its integration more than anything to be quite honest. The Us vs Them system is garbage. But when you add a third faction (Planetside, Dark Age of Camelot) in there or allow for a neutral FFA faction (EverQuest 2) it gets quite interesting.

Avatar image for trastamad03
trastamad03

4859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 trastamad03
Member since 2006 • 4859 Posts
If it fails, I'll just uninstall it. Play something else. It's not the end of the world.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#40 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Games are getting far to much hype to take out well established series.

GW2 won't fail. However it won't be the king. This idea that you need to be #1 in order to have succeeded is rubbish.

Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#41 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts

Games are getting far to much hype to take out well established series.

GW2 won't fail. However it won't be the king. This idea that you need to be #1 in order to have succeeded is rubbish.

Wasdie
Agree completely. In my opinion GW2 will be a success, no doubts about that, but being the game that dethrones WoW, well, good luck with that.
Avatar image for tanerb
tanerb

1300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 tanerb
Member since 2003 • 1300 Posts

what is gw2?

Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#43 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts
Guild Wars2.
Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#44 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts

It's ok, Blizzard will save us.

Avatar image for Zubinen
Zubinen

2555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 Zubinen
Member since 2011 • 2555 Posts
Skyrim is selling almost entirely on hype, majority are still drunk on hype, same for BF3 and SWOTOR which through excellent marketing have encouraged similar consumer behavior. As for Diablo III, well it's Blizzard, it's actually a very high quality product, thoroughly stress tested(unlike Skyrim or BF3 which have publishers that refuse to allow them to have internal testing which is something mandatory even for flop quality products) and is only hyped up as much as it needs to be(unlike SWOTOR). GW2 is being overhyped, but the question is, does it deserve to be hyped this much? Probably not.
Avatar image for danjammer69
danjammer69

4331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 danjammer69
Member since 2004 • 4331 Posts

GW2 will not fail.

The fans will not let it happen.

Anet has been a fantastic supporter of GW1, constantly updating the game throughout the years.

I find the true fan of Guild Wars to be of a different breed than that of other MMO's. It may sound stupid, but the game really is something special. If you have played it for a while, you know exactly what I mean.

I remember playing the game in the winter of 2006. I used to live in upstate New York. We were having a major snowstorm and I was playing GW in the Shiverpeaks. It just was a really cool feeling. It's the atmosphere and very much the music that helps GW be what it is.

Of all the games that I have played in my 37 years, and there are alot of them, GW is the only one besides BF2 that would give me that certain feeling and detachment from reality that you can only know if you have experienced it.

But what i am saying is...if there are problems with the game at release, the GW community will speak up about it and will almost certainly get what they want.

Avatar image for Jabby250
Jabby250

524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Jabby250
Member since 2011 • 524 Posts

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"]But cant we say that about most MMOs? And didn't WoW just copy EQ and optimized things?Krelian-co

and thats why most mmorpg fail, there are very few you can actually call succesful, plus wow may have copy EQ but not to the extend the old republic copied wow, and plus there was little competition in mmorpg market, people hardly knew the genre back then while now its saturated.

Not really. Most MMOs can be quite profitable with only a 'few' hundred thousand subscribers. That you need at least a million subscribers or so to make a successful MMO is a myth. There are some MMOs that have performed poorly in the last few years like Tabula Rasa or Warhammer Online (which was actually good), but the numbers are largely exaggerated.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
Guys, sorry if I didn't express myself correctly. I too don't think GW2 will fail in numbers/players, like all of you have said, just the sheer amount of dedicated GW fans will keep it alive. I was more worried about the actual game and gameplay. I praise the devs for trying all these new things, but it could backfire on them?
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

Well if it's like that, for me personally it failed, I don't like anything about its gameplay, if I could I'd pay for a instant full level character to easily explore the world because that's all I intend to do in GW. I don't care about the lore, the quests, raids, dungeons, w/e, I just want to explore it since a few zones from the trailer were extremely interesting.

Avatar image for PC360Wii
PC360Wii

4658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 PC360Wii
Member since 2007 • 4658 Posts

[QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="Prexxus"] Aion was not a failure at all. You must of not played it very much. GW1 was very hardcore if you were in any way good or competitive at it. You could go through the games story and play casual but that's not what GW was about. Prexxus

If Aion wasn't about to become a f2p game i'd agree with you.

about 4 years with over 5 million subs is a fail? Who cares if it's going F2P now? They've made billions with that game.

Ummm 5 million subs in asia, barely any in western / EU.