Hey guys. They released the video on there site few minutes ago. I don't really like it. But its okay. Very weird trailer I must say! Well enjoy anyway!
http://digg.com/d31NxpQ
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Already seen the trailer over here... (albeit poor quality, but the trailer is crap anyway)...
http://uk.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27250199&tag=topics%3Btitle
this trailer tells me absolutely nothing about the game.kevy619
Sure it does, it tells you:
"See that? The actual game wont be nothing like that, it will be far better with all those things promised,etc,etc and it will be amazing :P"
But seriously, this is a pretty weird trailer. I am just not hyped. I mean they show us a deserted city and the main character slowly exploring the area with a dramatic feeling. Then BAM soldiers jump out of nowhere and fly in an empty city and an alien that came out from resistance 2 (Because the matrix aliens from the first game are in vocation) and thats it. No war, no ruined buildings from explosions, nothing. But hey dont worry because the actual game will be completly diffirent. Seriously i dont get it, That trailer felt like watching the very first bioshock teaser. The one that shows that skinny girl in the surface and not the big daddys underwater.
What i am trying to say is that this video is like some gears of war trailers that the character was alone running around in a ruined city with a similar song in the background and just like gears of war, the actual game wont be like that.
Oh noes!!! We are all doomed. But seriously the possibility of turning dissapointing its like flipping a coin. Maybe crytek bothers more with the pc version. Or then again maybe they treat their product like every other mutliplatform developer treat theirs. We cant be sure yet. But dont worry, actual ingame gameplay videos are gonna arrive soon. Then we will see how good the game will be.Crysis 2 on console... sorry, fail. Consoles ruin games.
haberman13
Anyone remember that original Crysis trailer, the one that plays at the start of the game that goes through ther suit functions? That trailer was ****ing awesome, and matched gameplay and graphics fairly closely. This trailer didn't look like what I would expect the game to look like and it showed no gameplay features and just felt way out of place and wrong for a Crysis game.
Even though it's early days that just looked pretty crap. :(
Terrible trailer, terrible song (what sort of emo music was that?)
Still buying Crysis 2, but I was very unimpressed by this trailer. Crytek can do better than this (and they have, with the old Crysis trailers).
I felt it was suitable for the cliffhanger ending at the end of Crysis. It has me hooked... a much darker/grittier feel and gives a sense of curiosity as to what happened the few years between Crysis 1 and 2.
Nothing is wrong with an unknown alien force as the main enemy. At least now they have the ability to create new and dynamic enemies whilst also adding in human enemies. Variety ftw.
[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="chandu83"] You have inside information about how the game is going to be like...that's good to know. chandu83Sometimes i get the feeling that gamers never learn how things work in games. So many games followed a similar course, its easy to say that the actual gameplay will be full of action and not emotion just like gears of war, fallout 3, world in conflict. Just like they hadsimilar teasers like that. But tell me, do you think that the actual game will be like that? Or it will be full of action and someone giving you objectives via radio just like the first game? What I think does not matter. There are no facts to back your assumptions.
How i did not back up with facts? Gears of war first trailers was like that and it was nothing like that. Infact it was full of action. Also how you can have emotions in a game like world in conflict? :roll:
Also i never complained about action :) I like action alot, i have said that many times and yet you tell me something as random and riddiculous as "go play games like heavy rain" Its like i am trying to explain you something and you tell me the exact opposite like that what i was talking about when i am telling you i am against it.
You completly misses the point of my post. :(
Heavy rain for example IS like that, its meant to have emotions and trailers like that. But a fps full of action having trailers like that is rather misleading and not suitable. For example wouldnt be weird if mw2 had a similar trailer of Soap running around in an empty city with similar music and Heavy rain having a trailer with explosions and soldiers running around everywhere with fast paced music?
What I think does not matter. There are no facts to back your assumptions.[QUOTE="chandu83"][QUOTE="dakan45"] Sometimes i get the feeling that gamers never learn how things work in games. So many games followed a similar course, its easy to say that the actual gameplay will be full of action and not emotion just like gears of war, fallout 3, world in conflict. Just like they hadsimilar teasers like that. But tell me, do you think that the actual game will be like that? Or it will be full of action and someone giving you objectives via radio just like the first game?dakan45
How i did not back up with facts? Gears of war first trailers was like that and it was nothing like that. Infact it was full of action. Also how you can have emotions in a game like world in conflict? :roll:
Also i never complained about action :) I like action alot, i have said that many times and yet you tell me something as random and riddiculous as "go play games like heavy rain" Its like i am trying to explain you something and you tell me the exact opposite like that what i was talking about when i am telling you i am against it.
You completly misses the point of my post. :(
Heavy rain for example IS like that, its meant to have emotions and trailers like that. But a fps full of action having trailers like that is rather misleading and not suitable. For example wouldnt be weird if mw2 had a similar trailer of Soap running around in an empty city with similar music and Heavy rain having a trailer with explosions and soldiers running around everywhere with fast paced music?
I said facts about Crysis 2. Not Gears of War. How did that even enter the picture?
I don't get it. You rated Alone in the Dark PC at 8.5 and you got problems with Crysis and Gears of War? And you expect people on this board to take you seriously?
I can almost see more threads popping up about you.
[QUOTE="dakan45"]
[QUOTE="chandu83"] What I think does not matter. There are no facts to back your assumptions.
Besides are complaining that certain games are full of action? What exactly do you want from a game? If you don't want action, go play games like Heavy Rain. chandu83
How i did not back up with facts? Gears of war first trailers was like that and it was nothing like that. Infact it was full of action. Also how you can have emotions in a game like world in conflict? :roll:
Also i never complained about action :) I like action alot, i have said that many times and yet you tell me something as random and riddiculous as "go play games like heavy rain" Its like i am trying to explain you something and you tell me the exact opposite like that what i was talking about when i am telling you i am against it.
You completly misses the point of my post. :(
Heavy rain for example IS like that, its meant to have emotions and trailers like that. But a fps full of action having trailers like that is rather misleading and not suitable. For example wouldnt be weird if mw2 had a similar trailer of Soap running around in an empty city with similar music and Heavy rain having a trailer with explosions and soldiers running around everywhere with fast paced music?
I said facts about Crysis 2. Not Gears of War. How did that even enter the picture?
I don't get it. You rated Alone in the Dark PC at 8.5 and you got problems with Crysis and Gears of War? And you expect people on this board to take you seriously?
I can almost see more threads popping up about you.
I dont usually agree with dakan, but hes aloud to like what he wants.I said facts about Crysis 2. Not Gears of War. How did that even enter the picture?I don't get it. You rated Alone in the Dark PC at 8.5 and you got problems with Crysis and Gears of War? And you expect people on this board to take you seriously?
I can almost see more threads popping up about you.chandu83
You still dont get the point :cry: My point was: That maybe this trailer looks like it wont have much of action but so did those other game trailers like the ones i pointed out like gears of war for example, turned out that the actual game is very diffirent from the trailer and full of action, that was my point. Also i dont get it. Why i cant like a game and dislike another despite ratings and beliefs what is good and what is bad. We are people with diffirent tastes and diffirent things to like and dislike. Not robots to have the same criteria. Every time i read one of your posts, you act like everyone must have the same tastes and likes and dislikes as you. Just like that wolfenstein thread. Like all the games you dont like are bad just because you and many others like you dont.
As i have said before my opinion, likes and dislikes and issues i have in games are my own and i am speaking my mind and my personal experiance and that does not mean that everyone should accept it like its their problem too. Honestly that sounds to me like because some people had problems with the mouse issue in dead space, that i should act like i had it too. But no, the game worked so no point of caring about it. But i guess that would sound wrong to you if i told you that i liked dead space more than crysis despite its issues and despite crysis being a pc exclusive....OH NOES!!!
That goes for alone in the dark. I like alone in the dark ideas and gameplay, i dont like crysis ideas and gameplay. I dont have to complain about alone in the dark because there is not something that i dont like. Unlike crysis. But the only problem i could call a valid issue by your criteria in alone in the dark will be the control which is solved as long as you play in first person view.
[QUOTE="haberman13"]well when it WINS, maybe crytek will learn a lesson.Crysis 2 on console... sorry, fail. Consoles ruin games.
kevy619
Corrected
Yep... When the console versions sell 10,000,000 copies between the PS3 and 360 and the PC version sells MAYBE 1,000,000 with another 6,000,000 pirated versions... They will learn the lesson everyone else has already learned... That the consoles are where the money is and Crysis 3 will be console exclusive...
YOU WAIT AND SEE GOOD SIR!
well when it WINS, maybe crytek will learn a lesson.[QUOTE="kevy619"][QUOTE="haberman13"]
Crysis 2 on console... sorry, fail. Consoles ruin games.
Buttons1990
Corrected
Yep... When the console versions sell 10,000,000 copies between the PS3 and 360 and the PC version sells MAYBE 1,000,000 with another 6,000,000 pirated versions... They will learn the lesson everyone else has already learned... That the consoles are where the money is and Crysis 3 will be console exclusive...
YOU WAIT AND SEE GOOD SIR!
^Which also depends on how they make the game, if its like the first, it wont do well on consoles, if it consolized. What you just said will happen. It is funny though when i said before "Crysis 3 wont be a optimized for lean" Thats what i meant. That if crysis 2 does well on the consoles, the developers. Or whatever developers make any game out there and not crytek specificly, will focus on consoles and dont even bother with simple stuff such as adding a lean mechanic on pc.well when it WINS, maybe crytek will learn a lesson.[QUOTE="kevy619"][QUOTE="haberman13"]
Crysis 2 on console... sorry, fail. Consoles ruin games.
Buttons1990
Corrected
Yep... When the console versions sell 10,000,000 copies between the PS3 and 360 and the PC version sells MAYBE 1,000,000 with another 6,000,000 pirated versions... They will learn the lesson everyone else has already learned... That the consoles are where the money is and Crysis 3 will be console exclusive...
YOU WAIT AND SEE GOOD SIR!
besides pritty graphics and physix the game is not worth to cry about ... i didnt find crysis gameplay fun at all , its boring and repetative ! its good mod engine nothing moreodd music, but a good trailer. I am soooo sold
Duking it out in an evacuated NY is going to be FREAKING EPIC!
odd music, but a good trailer. I am soooo sold
Duking it out in an evacuated NY is going to be FREAKING EPIC!
mrbojangles25
Agreed, like always.
All the footage so far look like cutscenes to me. I want to see the real game. I don't care much for the music. It's the first thing I turn off in all my games.
All the footage so far look like cutscenes to me. I want to see the real game. I don't care much for the music. It's the first thing I turn off in all my games.
jun_aka_pekto
I was just happy to see some of the enemies; I definately like the art direction they took with them, giving the aliens suits of their own.
[QUOTE="Buttons1990"][QUOTE="kevy619"] well when it WINS, maybe crytek will learn a lesson.Farkeman
Corrected
Yep... When the console versions sell 10,000,000 copies between the PS3 and 360 and the PC version sells MAYBE 1,000,000 with another 6,000,000 pirated versions... They will learn the lesson everyone else has already learned... That the consoles are where the money is and Crysis 3 will be console exclusive...
YOU WAIT AND SEE GOOD SIR!
besides pritty graphics and physix the game is not worth to cry about ... i didnt find crysis gameplay fun at all , its boring and repetative ! its good mod engine nothing more I agree, but the engine could be used for other games, it could turn out like unreal engine 3. I was watching some videos where the developers were showing that they make the engine so its an inexpensive way to achieve great graphics on consoles. So if it goes well the engine will be used by other developers just the unreal engine and we will play all games with crysis graphics. That alone is win.[QUOTE="chandu83"]I said facts about Crysis 2. Not Gears of War. How did that even enter the picture?
I don't get it. You rated Alone in the Dark PC at 8.5 and you got problems with Crysis and Gears of War? And you expect people on this board to take you seriously?
I can almost see more threads popping up about you.dakan45
You still dont get the point :cry: My point was: That maybe this trailer looks like it wont have much of action but so did those other game trailers like the ones i pointed out like gears of war for example, turned out that the actual game is very diffirent from the trailer and full of action, that was my point. Also i dont get it. Why i cant like a game and dislike another despite ratings and beliefs what is good and what is bad. We are people with diffirent tastes and diffirent things to like and dislike. Not robots to have the same criteria. Every time i read one of your posts, you act like everyone must have the same tastes and likes and dislikes as you. Just like that wolfenstein thread. Like all the games you dont like are bad just because you and many others like you dont.
As i have said before my opinion, likes and dislikes and issues i have in games are my own and i am speaking my mind and my personal experiance and that does not mean that everyone should accept it like its their problem too. Honestly that sounds to me like because some people had problems with the mouse issue in dead space, that i should act like i had it too. But no, the game worked so no point of caring about it. But i guess that would sound wrong to you if i told you that i liked dead space more than crysis despite its issues and despite crysis being a pc exclusive....OH NOES!!!
That goes for alone in the dark. I like alone in the dark ideas and gameplay, i dont like crysis ideas and gameplay. I dont have to complain about alone in the dark because there is not something that i dont like. Unlike crysis. But the only problem i could call a valid issue by your criteria in alone in the dark will be the control which is solved as long as you play in first person view.
You can like a game that nobody else likes. That's just fine.
But there is something called credibility, something that you just don't have on this board. Take a look around, there are plenty of people here who don't like Crysis, but you are the only one who stands out (need I remind you about the god awful Half Life 2 thread you started?)
You like or dislike anything you want, but I can also agree or disagree with your opinion. So far, I cannot think of any reason why I would agree with most things you spew forth.
I mean, you seem like to games with bad story, bad control issues, terrible visuals, and yet to come here and criticize Crysis and Half-Life 2. Don't think people are going to let that one go.
[QUOTE="dakan45"]
[QUOTE="chandu83"]I said facts about Crysis 2. Not Gears of War. How did that even enter the picture?
I don't get it. You rated Alone in the Dark PC at 8.5 and you got problems with Crysis and Gears of War? And you expect people on this board to take you seriously?
I can almost see more threads popping up about you.chandu83
You still dont get the point :cry: My point was: That maybe this trailer looks like it wont have much of action but so did those other game trailers like the ones i pointed out like gears of war for example, turned out that the actual game is very diffirent from the trailer and full of action, that was my point. Also i dont get it. Why i cant like a game and dislike another despite ratings and beliefs what is good and what is bad. We are people with diffirent tastes and diffirent things to like and dislike. Not robots to have the same criteria. Every time i read one of your posts, you act like everyone must have the same tastes and likes and dislikes as you. Just like that wolfenstein thread. Like all the games you dont like are bad just because you and many others like you dont.
As i have said before my opinion, likes and dislikes and issues i have in games are my own and i am speaking my mind and my personal experiance and that does not mean that everyone should accept it like its their problem too. Honestly that sounds to me like because some people had problems with the mouse issue in dead space, that i should act like i had it too. But no, the game worked so no point of caring about it. But i guess that would sound wrong to you if i told you that i liked dead space more than crysis despite its issues and despite crysis being a pc exclusive....OH NOES!!!
That goes for alone in the dark. I like alone in the dark ideas and gameplay, i dont like crysis ideas and gameplay. I dont have to complain about alone in the dark because there is not something that i dont like. Unlike crysis. But the only problem i could call a valid issue by your criteria in alone in the dark will be the control which is solved as long as you play in first person view.
You can like a game that nobody else likes. That's just fine.
But there is something called credibility, something that you just don't have on this board. Take a look around, there are plenty of people here who don't like Crysis, but you are the only one who stands out (need I remind you about the god awful Half Life 2 thread you started?)
You like or dislike anything you want, but I can also agree or disagree with your opinion. So far, I cannot think of any reason why I would agree with most things you spew forth.
I mean, you seem like to games with bad story, bad control issues, terrible visuals, and yet to come here and criticize Crysis and Half-Life 2. Don't think people are going to let that one go.
No one likes? There are people who like that game, few but they are there. Also i did not started the hl2 thread. Someone else started it and everyone start a war on me because i happen to agree with him. I also remember another user saying that he agreed with me in every point. As for credability? I practicly love many old games like say, half life, deus ex, system shock 2, doom, fallout 2, kotor, far cry. Even doom 3 which is not favored by many on this board. I guess you like the game too, right? Thats does not make you less credable now does it? However i have to admit that i did not like half life 2 back then, i prefered cod, far cry and doom 3. Thats one i guess. If it was not that famous till today it wouldnt be such a big deal. I dont consider it a true sequel to half life. I dont know, it just does not feel like its that good. I have to admit that i dont like the way games are turning into nowadays. For example, stalker came out and i was highly dissapointed. Clear sky was worse and finally call of pripiyat is what it suposse to be. Dont expect me to like much a game with ai bugs and dated visuals or a game that tries to oblivion with guns, yet its so much less. Also we got crysis which was nothing like far cry and i did not like it either. Finally we got ass effefct which to me is an extremelly inferior version of kotor. So as i said i dont like how games have turned into, you can say i dont like the games favored by pc gamers nowadays but i 100% agreed with almost all the games favored from 1993 till 2004. Excluding morrowind, hl2 and gothic 3. I like ideas and gameplay more than story and control issues. Besides those issues did not hardm series like resident evil or silent hill. Those games were always like that. The control issues is debatable. The only control issues that annoys me is mouse accelaration in fps. As for terrible visuals? The only game i can think that i complain about visuals is stalker and hl2 by saying that they are pretty dated with todays standards, but not bad. While i value that a game has great visuals. I dont care much about graphics, i prefer the gameplay. However defending a game with dated graphics and saying that are not dated...is something i will respond negatively. The graphics are old thats visible i wont defend it. But as i have said before. Its the game that counts, yet dated graphics is something i dont forgive because devs have to keep up with the rest of the games and improve their product. But seriously what games do i like that have bad story and terrible visuals? Besides crysis is criticized for having a bad story. But i never criticized its story.First words that come to mind...LAME.
I hope consolites are happy with their console game. And i hope Crytek is happy with creating mediocrity.
No one likes? There are people who like that game, few but they are there. Also i did not started the hl2 thread. Someone else started it and everyone start a war on me because i happen to agree with him. I also remember another user saying that he agreed with me in every point. As for credability? I practicly love many old games like say, half life, deus ex, system shock 2, doom, fallout 2, kotor, far cry. Even doom 3 which is not favored by many on this board. I guess you like the game too, right? Thats does not make you less credable now does it? However i have to admit that i did not like half life 2 back then, i prefered cod, far cry and doom 3. Thats one i guess. If it was not that famous till today it wouldnt be such a big deal. I dont consider it a true sequel to half life. I dont know, it just does not feel like its that good. I have to admit that i dont like the way games are turning into nowadays. For example, stalker came out and i was highly dissapointed. Clear sky was worse and finally call of pripiyat is what it suposse to be. Dont expect me to like much a game with ai bugs and dated visuals or a game that tries to oblivion with guns, yet its so much less. Also we got crysis which was nothing like far cry and i did not like it either. Finally we got ass effefct which to me is an extremelly inferior version of kotor. So as i said i dont like how games have turned into, you can say i dont like the games favored by pc gamers nowadays but i 100% agreed with almost all the games favored from 1993 till 2004. Excluding morrowind, hl2 and gothic 3. I like ideas and gameplay more than story and control issues. Besides those issues did not hardm series like resident evil or silent hill. Those games were always like that. The control issues is debatable. The only control issues that annoys me is mouse accelaration in fps. As for terrible visuals? The only game i can think that i complain about visuals is stalker and hl2 by saying that they are pretty dated with todays standards, but not bad. While i value that a game has great visuals. I dont care much about graphics, i prefer the gameplay. However defending a game with dated graphics and saying that are not dated...is something i will respond negatively. The graphics are old thats visible i wont defend it. But as i have said before. Its the game that counts, yet dated graphics is something i dont forgive because devs have to keep up with the rest of the games and improve their product. But seriously what games do i like that have bad story and terrible visuals? Besides crysis is criticized for having a bad story. But i never criticized its story.dakan45
Man, I post a sentance and you hit me back with a wall of text. Oh well.
Let's see. My credibility is never an issue. Check my reviews and emblems.
As for you, you like to talk a lot without saying anything of substance. Like Mass Effect being an inferior version of KOTOR. I mean, seriously...its unanimously rated as one of the best games and you find something to complain about.
I did not respond to you post about Alone in the Dark having tricks such as throwing moltov cocktails. You are comparing that to a nanosuit in Crysis thatlets you turn invisible? And the moltove cocktail wins? Can imagine why I am at loss for words?
About STALKER Clear Sky...I have not played the game, but I did check your reviews section and sure enough there was a review of the game and you rated it 8/10. So you dislike a game because it has AI bugs and you rate it 8/10. What's that all about?
Nowabout visuals being dated in Half-Life 2, did you try playing it at 1920x1200 and at highest settings? If you did, then lets talk about Half-Life 2.
Also we got crysis which was nothing like far cry and i did not like it either.Dakan45
So what you are saying is, you want the same game again. If it was the same game, then you are going to be back here complain how its the same game. Bottomline is there is no pleasing the likes of you.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment