[QUOTE="sinseers"][QUOTE="SambaLele"] [QUOTE="Mad_Rhetoric"]only 7 million to go;)Javy03
6 in fact.
And don't worry. If it managed to outsell the 360 by more than a million units in 2007 (when 360 had it's golden lineup, it'll hardly have any other such as good), with *no games*, now that the games are coming it'll outsell it even faster... that's only logical.
This is no personal dig at you sir but is the fact that the PS3 "managed to outsell the 360 by more than a million units in 2007 (when 360 had it's golden lineup, it'll hardly have any other such as good), with *no games*" supposed to be something to be proud about? I what other business do companies get rewarded with sales by releasing a product almost 2x the price of the competition, not even included one of the key components that they are marketing their product toward (I.E. No HDMI cable included for HD output from jump) and contain an undoubtedly weaker library of content in it's first year of release compared to it's competition?
So are people ok with a system having arguably the best current library of games being outsold by a system that promisies to deliver the best future library of games? So when does the future become the present? (Chicken or the Egg theory at work)
I don't own either of the 2 systems yet (306 or PS3 ....Price being the issue), but I have come to this realization recently. You wanna know who the BIG winner in this gen is going to be? I'll give you a clue. It most likely won't be Sony, MS or Nintendo. It will be those publishers who are smart enough to know that they can make a killing on all 3 systems as appossed to being bullheaded and just catering to one console. That's a win for them. Think I'm joking? Ask Activision, EA and Ubisoft. They are the TRUE winners if you ask me.
I personally bought a 20GB PS3 when they launched. It cost me only 100 dollars more then the 360 and although the 360 had more games, its "quality" did not appeal to me. When I planned to enter this gen. I looked at what would be available in the present and also in the future. When I bought my 20GB PS3 I may have had to rock Resistance a little longer then i would have liked but overall my waiting wasnt long.
The current 360 games at the time just didnt appeal to me, and again quality and score is relative as we see when we go to gamerankings. I recall PDZ, Dead Rising, and Oblivion carrying the 360 till GEOW. I enjoyed many exclusive and multiplats since then and now in 2008 I have a huge amount of quality set franchises to look foward to.
This isnt even touching the fact that the PS3 satisfied both my video game and movie hobby. The PS3 looked bad in comparison because everyone expected (foolishly) all the top titles to release with the system but it didnt happen that way. Now after gaming with new solid franchises in 07 I get rewarded with the franchises I love in 08.
Very nicely put.....now that's a qualified answer. I can't argue your points. That simply comes down to personal taste.
Log in to comment