360 is the biggest fail in console history, both in terms of hardware design due to RROD, and game line-up due to no exclusivesPressXtoJumpApparently you've never heard of the 3do or pippen. That's okay. Fanboys have tunnel vision.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="kuraimen"] I hope he doesn't take it as far as stalking people and sending them weird notes. That kind of obssesive behavior is definitely worrying. I never thought a forum could affect someone so much mentally.clone01In all honesty, you seem to be the obsessive one here. Do you need a tinfoil hat? I know its hard to deal with being called out as the fakeboy you are, but you need to get over it. Maybe go outside or something. Or perhaps actually participate in a forum with hobbies you actually do, instead of pretending. "Hush now baby, baby don't you cry..." I love Pink Floyd music, they have lyrics for every occasion.
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="Davekeeh"]
Here come the excuses again lmao
tormentos
According to Epic, if they were to make Gears of War 3 multiplatform, it wouldn't look as good on the PS3 as it does on the Xbox 360 and "would suffer from performance issues" due to its use of Motion Blur Skinning, which, according to them, "is expected to be too slow" on the PS3.
Link
So, I'm guessing Epic's word is law on this one right? If we can take David Cage's word, even considering that he's never developed for the 360 before?
The PS3 runs Unreal engine just fine... I haven't see the 360 run Uncharted 3 engine.Yeah, it runs the Unreal Engine fine, but according to Epic (you know, the people who made it), certain elements of it, like the Motion Blur Skinning, wouldn't run as well on the PS3 as they do on the 360.
And of course the 360 hasn't run the Uncharted engine because Naughty Dog is owned by Sony. :|
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="crimsonman1245"]
Naughty Dog will have 3 by themselves, thats not counting Sony Santa Monica, Guerilla, and Quantic Dreams.
gpuking
Yeah...no... Gears of War 3 is competitive with any PS3 exclusive and looks better than just about all of them except perhaps Uncharted 3. (The Last of Us isn't out yet so I'm not counting it)
UC2&3, KZ2&3, GOW3, GOWA, TLOU and Beyond look better than anything on the 360. OK, that's 8 games but still.The Last of Us, God of War Ascension and Beyond aren't out yet and Gears of War 3 looks better than all of those games except Uncharted 3, which I'd say it's about even with.
[QUOTE="PressXtoJump"]360 is the biggest fail in console history, both in terms of hardware design due to RROD, and game line-up due to no exclusivesclone01Apparently you've never heard of the 3do or pippen. That's okay. Fanboys have tunnel vision. no i dont play sh!t systems like the 360, 3do and pippen
[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="PressXtoJump"]360 is the biggest fail in console history, both in terms of hardware design due to RROD, and game line-up due to no exclusivesPressXtoJumpApparently you've never heard of the 3do or pippen. That's okay. Fanboys have tunnel vision. no i dont play sh!t systems like the 360, 3do and pippen I don't envy fanboys like you, there, Chad Warden. You miss out on a lot of good stuff. But to the topic at hand, I disproved your argument. You said the 360 is the biggest fail in console history (because you apparently think it was a failure. whatever). There have been fantastically failed attempts at consoles through the years. I realize you love your piece of plastic, but its okay to look at things objectively every once in a while.
[QUOTE="ronvalencia"] It's more of a business decision than a technical one.tormentosSince i believe you are a more technical guy unlike fanboys here,i actually think that even if Uncharted 3 was allow to be made on 360,i don't think it would look the same,it would run but severely downgrade in parts like Physics,animations and some other parts. The PS3 thanks to cell handle Physics better than the 360,Uncharted 3 water,fire and sand physics were a stead ahead of anything on 360,the whole cruise ship stage is a level based heavily on physics,so was the sand stage,i think the 360 would have problems running it. Hell the original xbox had problems running the raining part in MGS2,it wasn't because it was cheap port.
Yes it was. :?
The gap in power between the Xbox and PS2 was bigger than the gap between the PS3 and 360. The only reason MGS2 performed poorly on the Xbox is because it wasn't ported well. The Xbox demonstrated time and time again that it was the more powerful system of the two, beyond mere miniscule differences between multiplats and exclusives you see between the 360 and PS3 this gen.
[QUOTE="PressXtoJump"][QUOTE="clone01"] Apparently you've never heard of the 3do or pippen. That's okay. Fanboys have tunnel vision.clone01no i dont play sh!t systems like the 360, 3do and pippen I don't envy fanboys like you, there, Chad Warden. You miss out on a lot of good stuff. But to the topic at hand, I disproved your argument. You said the 360 is the biggest fail in console history (because you apparently think it was a failure. whatever). There have been fantastically failed attempts at consoles through the years. I realize you love your piece of plastic, but its okay to look at things objectively every once in a while. are we talking about relavent successive systems? or gimmicks and pseudo-money-makers, because then your selection is also wrong
[QUOTE="PressXtoJump"] are we talking about relavent successive systems? or gimmicks and pseudo-money-makers, because then your selection is also wrongclone01We're talking about your original statement. You specifically said the 360 is the biggest fail in console history. That is completely incorrect, there, ps trey for life. If you want to shift your criteria, to suit your argument, then the dreamcast and atari 5200 were easily larger successive failures than the 360. Seriously, I know your a fanboy, but you can still be one and not make completely off base statements. i didnt specify earlier, but thats cuz i like to keep my posts readable and to the point. dreamcasts game line up alone puts it above 360 as a failure.
[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="PressXtoJump"] are we talking about relavent successive systems? or gimmicks and pseudo-money-makers, because then your selection is also wrongPressXtoJumpWe're talking about your original statement. You specifically said the 360 is the biggest fail in console history. That is completely incorrect, there, ps trey for life. If you want to shift your criteria, to suit your argument, then the dreamcast and atari 5200 were easily larger successive failures than the 360. Seriously, I know your a fanboy, but you can still be one and not make completely off base statements. i didnt specify earlier, but thats cuz i like to keep my posts readable and to the point. dreamcasts game line up alone puts it above 360 as a failure. also, since were reaching back to solve arguments, consider me a ps1/ps2/n64/gamecube fanboy ;)
[QUOTE="PressXtoJump"][QUOTE="clone01"] We're talking about your original statement. You specifically said the 360 is the biggest fail in console history. That is completely incorrect, there, ps trey for life. If you want to shift your criteria, to suit your argument, then the dreamcast and atari 5200 were easily larger successive failures than the 360. Seriously, I know your a fanboy, but you can still be one and not make completely off base statements.PressXtoJumpi didnt specify earlier, but thats cuz i like to keep my posts readable and to the point. dreamcasts game line up alone puts it above 360 as a failure. also, since were reaching back to solve arguments, consider me a ps1/ps2/n64/gamecube fanboy ;) the 4 systems that f*cked dreamcast from all 4 corners :lol:.... i told em, before the finish.... they didnt listen,....
[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="PressXtoJump"] are we talking about relavent successive systems? or gimmicks and pseudo-money-makers, because then your selection is also wrongPressXtoJumpWe're talking about your original statement. You specifically said the 360 is the biggest fail in console history. That is completely incorrect, there, ps trey for life. If you want to shift your criteria, to suit your argument, then the dreamcast and atari 5200 were easily larger successive failures than the 360. Seriously, I know your a fanboy, but you can still be one and not make completely off base statements. i didnt specify earlier, but thats cuz i like to keep my posts readable and to the point. dreamcasts game line up alone puts it above 360 as a failure. You're using your opinion as criteria for something that I've objectively proven otherwise. You also didn't address the Atari 5200, which still makes your statement incorrect, extrreeeeeme ps tre gamerz. oh, and here's the 360 game spreadsheet. you'll find it has far more highly rated games than the dreamcast did... https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AriQpIFbPoEacGM1b0xxcGVucFQ3OFc4N3BNZmd2QkE&gid=1
[QUOTE="PressXtoJump"][QUOTE="clone01"] We're talking about your original statement. You specifically said the 360 is the biggest fail in console history. That is completely incorrect, there, ps trey for life. If you want to shift your criteria, to suit your argument, then the dreamcast and atari 5200 were easily larger successive failures than the 360. Seriously, I know your a fanboy, but you can still be one and not make completely off base statements.PressXtoJumpi didnt specify earlier, but thats cuz i like to keep my posts readable and to the point. dreamcasts game line up alone puts it above 360 as a failure. also, since were reaching back to solve arguments, consider me a ps1/ps2/n64/gamecube fanboy ;) Okay. I think all fanboys are pretty much idiots, so...cool? Proud of yourself?
Heavy Rain is definitely one of the gems of this generation. Such unique gameplay and story elements. Amazing game. Anyone not playing it is missing out...especially if you enjoyed indigo prophecy. And the 360 can handle Heavy Rain...though I'm sure it would look slightly different.
[QUOTE="PressXtoJump"][QUOTE="clone01"] We're talking about your original statement. You specifically said the 360 is the biggest fail in console history. That is completely incorrect, there, ps trey for life. If you want to shift your criteria, to suit your argument, then the dreamcast and atari 5200 were easily larger successive failures than the 360. Seriously, I know your a fanboy, but you can still be one and not make completely off base statements.clone01i didnt specify earlier, but thats cuz i like to keep my posts readable and to the point. dreamcasts game line up alone puts it above 360 as a failure. You're using your opinion as criteria for something that I've objectively proven otherwise. You also didn't address the Atari 5200, which still makes your statement incorrect, extrreeeeeme ps tre gamerz. oh, and here's the 360 game spreadsheet. you'll find it has far more highly rated games than the dreamcast did... https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AriQpIFbPoEacGM1b0xxcGVucFQ3OFc4N3BNZmd2QkE&gid=1 i knowwwwwwww that list was also above ps3's too!!!!
[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="PressXtoJump"] no i dont play sh!t systems like the 360, 3do and pippenPressXtoJumpI don't envy fanboys like you, there, Chad Warden. You miss out on a lot of good stuff. But to the topic at hand, I disproved your argument. You said the 360 is the biggest fail in console history (because you apparently think it was a failure. whatever). There have been fantastically failed attempts at consoles through the years. I realize you love your piece of plastic, but its okay to look at things objectively every once in a while. are we talking about relavent successive systems? or gimmicks and pseudo-money-makers, because then your selection is also wrong
how is it a pseudo moneymaker?
are we talking about relavent successive systems? or gimmicks and pseudo-money-makers, because then your selection is also wrong[QUOTE="PressXtoJump"][QUOTE="clone01"] I don't envy fanboys like you, there, Chad Warden. You miss out on a lot of good stuff. But to the topic at hand, I disproved your argument. You said the 360 is the biggest fail in console history (because you apparently think it was a failure. whatever). There have been fantastically failed attempts at consoles through the years. I realize you love your piece of plastic, but its okay to look at things objectively every once in a while.CaseyWegner
how is it a pseudo moneymaker?
ask the real mods, they have a forum for people who have questions!![QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="PressXtoJump"] i didnt specify earlier, but thats cuz i like to keep my posts readable and to the point. dreamcasts game line up alone puts it above 360 as a failure.PressXtoJumpYou're using your opinion as criteria for something that I've objectively proven otherwise. You also didn't address the Atari 5200, which still makes your statement incorrect, extrreeeeeme ps tre gamerz. oh, and here's the 360 game spreadsheet. you'll find it has far more highly rated games than the dreamcast did... https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AriQpIFbPoEacGM1b0xxcGVucFQ3OFc4N3BNZmd2QkE&gid=1 i knowwwwwwww that list was also above ps3's too!!!! Yep, and it still disproves your original argument.
[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="PressXtoJump"] are we talking about relavent successive systems? or gimmicks and pseudo-money-makers, because then your selection is also wrongPressXtoJump
how is it a pseudo moneymaker?
ask the real mods, they have a forum for people who have questions!!the real mods? anyway, they didn't make the comment. you did.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment