60fps vs 1080p

if you had to go with one which is it ?

60 fps all the way for me

but deep down we should get most games at 60fps 1080p really

#ms sony sort it out dont be a lazy bish

I'd take 60 fps any day of the week, especially with fps's.

Why are you comparing framerate to screen resolution? Why not both?

I game on the PC the most which means I get to see both 1080p/30fps and 1080p/60fps depending on the game and detail settings. From my own experiences, 1080p/30fps is perfectly playable so long as the framerate minimum stays close to 30fps.

What I don't want is 720p. Don't care if it's 720p/60fps. 720p? Yuk. 720p is only fine if I'm using a 17" monitor. 

How about both?

Long live pc gaming

It depends on what framerate you're suggesting is achieved at 1080p. For some games I will have no issues with running 30fps/1080p, I'll never go below that. Although we could be discussing 45fps/1080p vs 60fps/720p, in that case I'll go 1080p. But in really depends on the game.

Locked 30 FPS works for most games.

i wonder if ms can pull off deadrising at 60fps 1080p

>2013

>Consolites think its either one or the other

Such low standards, really disusting

I'd like 120Hz monitor pricing to come down.

That is a tough choice. I love gaming at 1080p, so I am inclined to say that. However, it can be very troublesome on some games if the fps dips pretty low. Luckily, I have my gaming PC.

Those of you who are excited about 1080p on next gen consoles I advise you to temper your expectations. The consoles are certainly stronger techniquely, but I think many games will struggle to hit 60 fps @1080p, at least out of the gate. 

1080p

Both. At the moment Im gaming at 100fps/1080p

I'd love to get a 1200p screen one day.

Resolution is the single most important setting, but 60 fps is also very important and there isn't any reason to give it up. That is, if you game on PC naturally. Consolites have lower standards it seems, and they're perfectly OK playing slide-shows.

I'd like 120Hz monitor pricing to come down.

psymon100

Honestly man, I think its worth it! The difference is night and day! Especially in FPS games.

For action games, racers and most shooters, 60fps.

For everything else, better image quality at 30fps is fine.

How about both?

Long live pc gaming

whitey_rolls

>2013

>Consolites think its either one or the other

Such low standards, really disusting

ClassicRockFTW

Resolution is the single most important setting, but 60 fps is also very important and there isn't any reason to give it up. That is, if you game on PC naturally. Consolites have lower standards it seems, and they're perfectly OK playing slide-shows.

milannoir

I have to say 1080p because I never choose to drop the resolution to help the framerate, and for most games as long as it spends most of its time above 45 and doesn't dip below 30 thats fine for me.

i wonder if ms can pull off deadrising at 60fps 1080p

Cuby_Finest

[QUOTE="whitey_rolls"] [QUOTE="ClassicRockFTW"]

>2013

>Consolites think its either one or the other

Such low standards, really disusting

Wiimotefan

Resolution is the single most important setting, but 60 fps is also very important and there isn't any reason to give it up. That is, if you game on PC naturally. Consolites have lower standards it seems, and they're perfectly OK playing slide-shows.

milannoir

if i had to guess most PC owners don't run thire games maxed at 60fps 1080p

and if they want to compare pc games to consoles they should compare them with similar spec PC not a top end £2000 pc

>2013

>Consolites think its either one or the other

Such low standards, really disusting

ClassicRockFTW

>2013

>Consolites think its either one or the other

Such low standards, really disusting

ClassicRockFTW

Every time one of these topics is made, people miss the point completely. I'm sure the majority of gamers on this board have, at the very least, a decent mid range rig. That doesnt mean we cant discuss console specific trade offs.Wiimotefan

The TC wasn't clear either. Both PS4 and XB1 approximate mid-range PCs. The PS4 just happens to be at the upper part of that range while the XB1 will be at the lower part. Just like mid-range PCs, some games will run at 1080p/30fps and others will run at 1080p/60fps, depending on genre and complexity.

Both consoles will have their share of 1080p games. But, what the TC failed to mention is the XB1 will have to use 720p with some games to achieve 60 fps. My current PC approximates the XB1. Yes, a few games chug at 1080p at the highest detail settings (Far Cry 3 and Crysis 3). And yes, I also have to juggle resolutions sometimes (like what the XB1 will do). That's why I have two displays: 1080p TV and 1440x900 monitor. Depending on my mood, I can play the games (that chug) at High/1080p or Very High on the smaller monitor.

I would put framerate over resolution, any day. Both, if possibe.

Why not both?blangenakker

How about both?

Long live pc gaming

whitey_rolls

[QUOTE="Wiimotefan"][QUOTE="whitey_rolls"] [QUOTE="milannoir"]

Resolution is the single most important setting, but 60 fps is also very important and there isn't any reason to give it up. That is, if you game on PC naturally. Consolites have lower standards it seems, and they're perfectly OK playing slide-shows.

Cuby_Finest

if i had to guess most PC owners don't run thire games maxed at 60fps 1080p

and if they want to compare pc games to consoles they should compare them with similar spec PC not a top end £2000 pc

[QUOTE="whitey_rolls"]

How about both?

Long live pc gaming

DragonfireXZ95

Why only have one, i take both :cool:

1080p.

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="whitey_rolls"]

How about both?

Long live pc gaming

Cuby_Finest

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="whitey_rolls"]

How about both?

Long live pc gaming

Cuby_Finest

[QUOTE="Cuby_Finest"][QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] This. Fvck console gaming and the restrictions.Grey_Eyed_Elf

I'd like 120Hz monitor pricing to come down.

psymon100

I got my 27" 120hz for $430 :)

as for topic, 120fps or bust. :)

[QUOTE="Grey_Eyed_Elf"][QUOTE="Cuby_Finest"] do you run your pc games maxed at 60fps 1080p ?Cuby_Finest

[QUOTE="Cuby_Finest"]

[QUOTE="Grey_Eyed_Elf"] Oh so now they need to me MAXED?!... :lol: Your ridiculous. GTFO seriously. ALT F4 for the love of god. Low to medium + 60FPS + 1366x768 = Superior to current generation consoles. = HD 7750 or GTX 650 and any cheap quad or decent dual core Medium to High + 60FPS + 1920x1080 = Superior to next generation consoles. = HD 7870 or GTX 660 Ti and a decent quad core I play my games on High to maxed out at 2560x1080 and get 60FPS. Deal with reality not in console forum dwellers dream alternate universe.Grey_Eyed_Elf

calm down bro its only games

just wondering about your pc set up geeez

why so uptight

"ignorant and delusional" what makes you think that, you talking straight bs son

I would put framerate over resolution, any day. Both, if possibe.

PAL360

60 fps crysis 3 on 360 is unplayable because of the low fpsdvalo9

Yeah, Far Cry 3 is even worse!

How about both?

Long live pc gaming

whitey_rolls

Both, so PS4 it is.

get a pc and do both.

Having 60 frames per second is far more important. Gameplay is an absolute priority.

I'm trying to get 2k at 60 FPS for the next 5 years, and you're asking 60 fps or 1080p :P
2560x1440 or 2560x1600.

It's different for every game. Dark Souls I would much prefer the 1080p over 60 fps due to the speed the game plays at.

For BF3 I need quick reactions so I want as many frames as I can get. 

It's not as easy as 1 vs the other. Thankfully PC allows both :D

depends on the game, but most likely 1080p

In the worrld of PC gaming we get both as a standard. If you want true beauty, try 1440p and 60fps. Anti-Aliasing is not even needed the pixel density is so high.

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="whitey_rolls"]

How about both?

Long live pc gaming

Cuby_Finest

[QUOTE="Cuby_Finest"][QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] This. Fvck console gaming and the restrictions.clyde46