I wonder why this gap is so big. Perhaps it costs them a lot of money to offer people all those 'services'.sad that like 8 years after pc have been doing it consoles still have to "choose" one. Just one should be unacceptable
Krelian-co
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I wonder why this gap is so big. Perhaps it costs them a lot of money to offer people all those 'services'.sad that like 8 years after pc have been doing it consoles still have to "choose" one. Just one should be unacceptable
Krelian-co
The only reason why PC doesn't have to "choose one" is because PC is not one single system. As long as consoles are dealing with the same hardware and are not upgradable, it will ALWAYS be a matter of choosing one or the other (at least sometimes, at the developer's discretion).sad that like 8 years after pc have been doing it consoles still have to "choose" one. Just one should be unacceptable
Krelian-co
[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]The only reason why PC doesn't have to "choose one" is because PC is not one single system. As long as consoles are dealing with the same hardware and are not upgradable, it will ALWAYS be a matter of choosing one or the other (at least sometimes, at the developer's discretion). It's just weird that for the same money (if you include royalties and fees) you get a way more capable PC than console hardware, with more software support and services to boot.sad that like 8 years after pc have been doing it consoles still have to "choose" one. Just one should be unacceptable
MrGeezer
Definitely frame-rate over resolution. I remember I tried playing Left 4 Dead one time before I had a decent graphics card in my system. Let's just say that playing the game at 10-15 FPS wasn't the most enjoyable experience.Â
its one or the other on most gaming pcs if we look at the spec totals steam released.>2013
>Consolites think its either one or the other
Such low standards, really disusting
ClassicRockFTW
[QUOTE="gpuking"]Just how many of you have the rigs to run next gen games at 1080p/60fps? Yeah it took two or was it three 7990s to run BF4 Fishing at Baku level at 60fps, I highly doubt any of you has a single 7990 much less crossfire. You can't even run a current gen Crysis 3 at 60fps without going sli or xfire. Games like TW3 and BF4 all look better than Crysis 3 so tell me how some of you are seemingly so confident to take that for granted? It's one thing to run crossgen games at 1080p/60fps but a whole different ballpark to run a native nextgen game at that setting.PernicioEnigmaMy 780 can run Crysis 3 maxed at 1080p with an average of around 80fps. I think it's debatable whether TW3 or BF4 looks better than Crysis 3, and that doesn't necessarily mean they'll be more demanding than Crysis 3. BF3 for example runs really well, and it doesn't look much worse than BF4.
Nope, it really doesn't. Doens't even average 60fps as matter of fact.
My 780 can run Crysis 3 maxed at 1080p with an average of around 80fps. I think it's debatable whether TW3 or BF4 looks better than Crysis 3, and that doesn't necessarily mean they'll be more demanding than Crysis 3. BF3 for example runs really well, and it doesn't look much worse than BF4.[QUOTE="PernicioEnigma"][QUOTE="gpuking"]Just how many of you have the rigs to run next gen games at 1080p/60fps? Yeah it took two or was it three 7990s to run BF4 Fishing at Baku level at 60fps, I highly doubt any of you has a single 7990 much less crossfire. You can't even run a current gen Crysis 3 at 60fps without going sli or xfire. Games like TW3 and BF4 all look better than Crysis 3 so tell me how some of you are seemingly so confident to take that for granted? It's one thing to run crossgen games at 1080p/60fps but a whole different ballpark to run a native nextgen game at that setting.gpuking
Nope, it really doesn't. Doens't even average 60fps as matter of fact.
Â
Â
Â
Â
+1.
Â
He must be on crack, i am going 780 SLi with a 2560x1440 display, i won't be able to max crysis 3 with above 60fps constant.
Just how many of you have the rigs to run next gen games at 1080p/60fps? Yeah it took two or was it three 7990s to run BF4 Fishing at Baku level at 60fps, I highly doubt any of you has a single 7990 much less crossfiregpukinglol. Its obvious by the 2nd sentence that you have no clue what your talking about. The Battlefield 4 demo was running on a single 7990 which is a dual card (its 2x7970ghz built into a single card). The reason they needed a 7990 was because its was running at 2.5 times the resolution of 1080p (the demo was 3072 x 1728 aka 3K resolution).
Troll harder. The demo was running 2.5x the resolution of 1080p on a pre-alpha beta and it was still getting 60+FPS all maxed on 2x7970. My video card (which I paid less than $200 for) is basically a stock 7970 so I should easily get 1080P 60+FPS no problem (my card was less than $200 in todays price, imagine what I could buy when they release there new cards this winter).
So to sum things up you have no idea what your talking about. A single 7990 was able to max the game at 3K resolution without any problems. My sub $200 video card (which is nothing special at all) will most likely max the game at 1080p so not only is your battlefield 4 rant wrong, but your rant about "how many of you have rigs good enough" talk is BS also (a TON of people have a better GPU than I do).
lol. Its obvious you don't own the game. If you turn motion blur to medium (which is a preference setting) and shaders to medium (you can't even notice shaders on medium if you have shadows on very high) then your FPS almost doubles........ (thus he is getting 60+ FPS).Nope, it really doesn't. Doens't even average 60fps as matter of fact.
gpuking
Just how many of you have the rigs to run next gen games at 1080p/60fps? Yeah it took two or was it three 7990s to run BF4 Fishing at Baku level at 60fps, I highly doubt any of you has a single 7990 much less crossfire. You can't even run a current gen Crysis 3 at 60fps without going sli or xfire. Games like TW3 and BF4 all look better than Crysis 3 so tell me how some of you are seemingly so confident to take that for granted? It's one thing to run crossgen games at 1080p/60fps but a whole different ballpark to run a native nextgen game at that setting.gpukingWTF? Three 7990s isn't possible and 2 would be Quad Crossfire.:|Â
Also triple and quad crossfire doesn't scale at 1080p...
Just how many of you have the rigs to run next gen games at 1080p/60fps? Yeah it took two or was it three 7990s to run BF4 Fishing at Baku level at 60fps, I highly doubt any of you has a single 7990 much less crossfire. You can't even run a current gen Crysis 3 at 60fps without going sli or xfire. Games like TW3 and BF4 all look better than Crysis 3 so tell me how some of you are seemingly so confident to take that for granted? It's one thing to run crossgen games at 1080p/60fps but a whole different ballpark to run a native nextgen game at that setting.gpukingCrysis 3 can easily be ran at 60fps on a single card by dropping a couple of settings that have very minimal visual impact. Medium shaders for example looks almost identical to max and runs way better.
The only reason why PC doesn't have to "choose one" is because PC is not one single system. As long as consoles are dealing with the same hardware and are not upgradable, it will ALWAYS be a matter of choosing one or the other (at least sometimes, at the developer's discretion). It's just weird that for the same money (if you include royalties and fees) you get a way more capable PC than console hardware, with more software support and services to boot.[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="Krelian-co"]
sad that like 8 years after pc have been doing it consoles still have to "choose" one. Just one should be unacceptable
KungfuKitten
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment