[QUOTE="evilross"][QUOTE="Darth_DuMas"][QUOTE="evilross"] If your so self conscious and thin skinned about your identity that you can't bear to hear people use words you take as derogatory, then I suggest you move to a country that has laws limiting the use of speech, or be open and honest about your feelings that you would like to have laws limiting free expression in public in this country.
Words are words, people in the USA have the right to say, and think anything they want. You do not have the right to not be offended by anything.Some people my make poor choices of word usage, and look like fools, but that is their right and choice. Its not your right to stifle public speech because you don't like what is said. Going that route is very dangerous to the freedoms and individuality of a nations citizens, regardless if limiting speech starts with good intentions.
blue_hazy_basic
I have the right to be offended by everything.
Does freedom of speech really extend to inciting racial hatred?
Surely this is one of the poorest uses of the whole "freedom of speech" thing ever. Thats freedom of speech for the dumb. Freedom of speech is for allowing the oppressed to speak about anything they want (like the Chinese people who can't, because of their government). Not for the racist to use it to justify their crap.
People fight long and hard for everyones equality not just for one races. If you say freedom of speech really extends this far and that people don't have the right to be offended, then surely thats the same as saying people of colour do not have the right to fight for their equality isn't it?
Your analogy is completely flawed. Public speech is not limited nor should it ever be. People can and should be able to think and say whatever they choose, understanding that they must deal with the repercussions of what words they choose to use.
The government does not have a right to limit what you can say in any manner, barring a few legal exceptions such as communicating threats, and speech is limited under oath of course, but under oath you also have the right to say nothing.
Your speech rights differ when in the private sector, where a privately owned establishment can choose to make you leave, ban you or what-not for whatever reason they choose. That extends to online environments like XBL, PSN, WoW, and such.
People like Duke, Wright, Farrakhan, and Fonda can say anything they want, without fear of prosecution for their believes, but they must also accept the general publics disdain for their speech, and limit their speech to public record, and private places that allow it. This apples to everyone, and should always apply to everyone.
Like I said before, I'm not commenting on the XBL situation, just the general flow of the tread, and the consensus opinion that people have the right to not be offended by anything.
You can't say the F word (or many others for that matter) on US TV. Europe which does have laws limiting public speech in many ways is arguably freer than the States. Don't confuse propaganda with reality.Oh and if I can say anything I want in America what would happen if I publically threatened the life of the president?
The FCC regulates open channel airwaves for content. Closed channel broadcasts are not regulated.
Some EU counties have very stifling speech laws, some things are even prosecutable. More free indeed.
I plainly stated that there are legal exceptions to free public speech, such as communicating threats. Read the whole post before replying please.
Log in to comment