Adrian Chmielarz destroys Polygon's editor

  • 180 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#101 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@Desmonic said:
@parkurtommo said:

If we're talking post medieval/more or less 13-1400s or something, I'm pretty certain there HAD to be other races in these areas, be it due to slavery or otherwise... Gies is dumb but arguing against him with dumb shit might make him look right.

That's holds true for Southern Europe, not really for Northern/Central Europe. I mean, talking about slavery based of skin colour. The ancient trade routes were mostly Mediterranean, and that's where most of the European contacts with different ethnicities pre-Discoveries period were made (despite having knowledge of their existence, the Portuguese were still initially "shocked" when making contact with the many black tribes in Africa).

Slavery in general can be a different story. Ancient Greece and the Roman Empire (for example) made slaves out of anyone not born under/ruled by a specific city state or the Empire, regardless of skin colour or gender.

so if it turns out there were people of color because of slaves...wouldn't the world (interwebs) fucking explode if they put black slaves into the game

Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#102 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

@Aljosa23 said:
@parkurtommo said:
@Bigboi500 said:

What world do SJWs live in?

The internet! Where you can say whatever you want and surround yourself with an insular bubble that always agrees with you!

You mean like this very thread? It's devolved into an "SJW" bashing circle jerk.

Well I guess, but I think if your last impression of "SJW" was the mentioned article then you would of course be upset with them.

But pretty much anyone who uses the internet frequently is going to be in their own bubble, it's profitable for google, facebook, twitter, etc.

Avatar image for Desmonic
Desmonic

19990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#103  Edited By Desmonic  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 19990 Posts

@lostrib: Highly likely. If these devs had made the same game based on Southern Europe around the same-ish time period (though for the full effect it would need to be from the 1500's onward) that's exactly what you'd see. Black slaves, asian "brides" (brought as slaves of course, mostly from Japan if I recall correctly) and filthy rich merchants, slave traders and nobility.

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#104 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

But what about the Elves, Dwarves, trolls and monsters and their timelines of existence involving historical accuracy?

Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#105  Edited By blue_hazy_basic
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts

@Bigboi500 said:

But what about the Elves, Dwarves, trolls and monsters and their timelines of existence involving historical accuracy?

All part of Norse/Slavic mythology and as much a reality to people of the time as the Christian-Judeo beliefs were to those that followed them. You need only see parts of Iceland or Ireland still where people refuse to build roads or cut down trees so as not offend fairies or trolls to know that they were very real to people.

Avatar image for Desmonic
Desmonic

19990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#106 Desmonic  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 19990 Posts

@blue_hazy_basic said:
@Bigboi500 said:

But what about the Elves, Dwarves, trolls and monsters and their timelines of existence involving historical accuracy?

All part of Norse/Slavic mythology and as much a reality to people of the time as the Christian-Judeo beliefs were to those that followed them. You need only see parts of Iceland or Ireland still where people refuse to build roads or cut down trees so as not offend fairies or trolls to know that they were very real to people.

Yup. In fact there was a pretty cool indie-ish movie a few years ago called Troll Hunter based on the same mythology ( as far as I can tell). Go watch it dudes, it's cool! :)

Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#107  Edited By blue_hazy_basic
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts

@Desmonic: Yea that "movie" was boss. :) (was on netflix so no excuses people!)

Avatar image for AM-Gamer
AM-Gamer

8116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 AM-Gamer
Member since 2012 • 8116 Posts

@-God-: omg we finally agree on something!

Avatar image for R10nu
R10nu

1679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 R10nu
Member since 2006 • 1679 Posts

@uninspiredcup said:

My friend, this is very much like arguing: because Rocky is a boxer, Ivan Drago isn't a cliche'.

"Ivan Drago is cliche because he is a boxer" was basically an assertion you made, i just provided an obvious example that contradicts it (Every important character in those films is a boxer).

If you can explain how, in your opinion, the troll relates to Russia other than drinking vodka - i'm all ears.

Also, Drago is a character in an Amercan cold war era movie. This game is made by Poles. You know, those fellas who are about as much into vodka as Russians.

The whole Witcher universe is based on slavic culture, something also shared by both.

Everyone drinks vodka in that universe.

I mean, even the most ultra-hipster SJW victim-complexed Russians couldn't draw the line between the troll and supposed prejudice against Russians that you did.

Think about that for a minute or twenty.

Russia is a place where Witcher is bigger deal than fucking Star Wars.

Understanding that, CDPR actually handles Russian localization for those games in-house, and it's basically the best way to play them after the original, Polish VO.

But who am i kidding, of course they'll do anything to spite their biggest fanbase outside of Poland, right?

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#110 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

@blue_hazy_basic said:
@Bigboi500 said:

But what about the Elves, Dwarves, trolls and monsters and their timelines of existence involving historical accuracy?

All part of Norse/Slavic mythology and as much a reality to people of the time as the Christian-Judeo beliefs were to those that followed them. You need only see parts of Iceland or Ireland still where people refuse to build roads or cut down trees so as not offend fairies or trolls to know that they were very real to people.

Interesting stuff for sure.

Avatar image for DocSanchez
DocSanchez

5557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#111 DocSanchez
Member since 2013 • 5557 Posts

@Desmonic: It was a weird mythological Jurassic Park in it's way. Worth a watch certainly.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

63096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#112  Edited By uninspiredcup  Online
Member since 2013 • 63096 Posts

@R10nu said:
@uninspiredcup said:

My friend, this is very much like arguing: because Rocky is a boxer, Ivan Drago isn't a cliche'.

If you can explain how, in your opinion, the troll relates to Russia other than drinking vodka - i'm all ears.

The ogre is Russian. Your argument doesn't make much sense.

The ogre (Russian), is loud, stupid and obsessed with Vodka. The American character (Gerald), is a handsome man who has sex with many beautiful woman saving the world as the aspirational anti-hero.

Much of Europe hates Russia, this is fact. Poland specifically moves away from them over here, where it's safer. Making Russia the bad guy or fool, perpetuates Americanized conditioning.

Avatar image for DocSanchez
DocSanchez

5557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#113 DocSanchez
Member since 2013 • 5557 Posts

@WilliamRLBaker: Good thing though William since this whole saga started more and more are ridiculing this sort of nonsense. They are aware of it, unafraid, and even boisterous about attacking the sort of willful ignorance we are seeing from polygon and kotaku. People aren't getting away with it any more.

Avatar image for R10nu
R10nu

1679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115  Edited By R10nu
Member since 2006 • 1679 Posts
@uninspiredcup said:
@R10nu said:

If you can explain how, in your opinion, the troll relates to Russia other than drinking vodka - i'm all ears.

The ogre is Russian. Your argument doesn't make much sense.

The ogre (Russian), is loud, stupid and obsessed with Vodka.

The first two can be more easily attributed to Americans.

Since there's no moonshine, they have to make do with local beverage, vodka.

Troll is American confirmed.

@uninspiredcup said:
The American character (Gerald)

You're saying Americans are sterile mutants who were sold off to a cult by their parents, that are looked down upon by everyone surrounding them their whole life?

Woah there.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

63096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#116  Edited By uninspiredcup  Online
Member since 2013 • 63096 Posts

@R10nu said:
@uninspiredcup said:
@R10nu said:

If you can explain how, in your opinion, the troll relates to Russia other than drinking vodka - i'm all ears.

The ogre is Russian. Your argument doesn't make much sense.

The ogre (Russian), is loud, stupid and obsessed with Vodka.

The first two can be more easily attributed to Americans.

Since there's no moonshine, they have to make do with local beverage, vodka.

Troll is American confirmed.

@uninspiredcup said:
The American character (Gerald)

You're saying Americans are sterile mutants who were sold off to a cult by their parents, that are looked down upon by everyone surrounding them?

Woah there.

Another thing that is annoying, as well as deeply offensive is making the dwarf characters Scottish. Not only is it insulting towards Scottish people, it's insulting to Dwarfs, implying they are Scottish. Many Dwarfs, such as Peter Dinklage, are actually American.

Avatar image for Seabas989
Seabas989

13567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#117 Seabas989
Member since 2009 • 13567 Posts

@Midnightshade29 said:

@JangoWuzHere: I say those words ease it's my experience there. People were complaining about how blank game should be censored and I commented that "censorship in all art is wrong. Let artist express there expressions and tell the stories they want to tell." And got met with a few hostile comments and bam banned for no reason mentioned. .. except for the fact that I wasn't toeing the ultra politically correct rehotoric they were spewing.

Most people over there aren't willing to hear an opposing view, it's why they ban anyone with a different opinion. It's frankly sickening and is nothing I would expect in a world with freedom of speech.

So yeah if I claim Gaf has an agenda and say terms like that it's because that site has made me look at them that way (not simple game discussions but anything that promotes censoring of art I am totally against)

Back in the day it was republican jack Thompson now we have some so called gamers that are for censoring? (Although I believe some are just following the crowd)

For the most part this is why I never bothered to sign up to gaf. That entire forum over there is a circle jerk with oversensitive mods.

Nevertheless, Neogaf can do what they want and I don't want to sign up there and i can ridicule them so that's that.

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#118  Edited By Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

@Seabas989 said:
@Midnightshade29 said:

@JangoWuzHere: I say those words ease it's my experience there. People were complaining about how blank game should be censored and I commented that "censorship in all art is wrong. Let artist express there expressions and tell the stories they want to tell." And got met with a few hostile comments and bam banned for no reason mentioned. .. except for the fact that I wasn't toeing the ultra politically correct rehotoric they were spewing.

Most people over there aren't willing to hear an opposing view, it's why they ban anyone with a different opinion. It's frankly sickening and is nothing I would expect in a world with freedom of speech.

So yeah if I claim Gaf has an agenda and say terms like that it's because that site has made me look at them that way (not simple game discussions but anything that promotes censoring of art I am totally against)

Back in the day it was republican jack Thompson now we have some so called gamers that are for censoring? (Although I believe some are just following the crowd)

For the most part this is why I never bothered to sign up to gaf. That entire forum over there is a circle jerk with oversensitive mods.

Nevertheless, Neogaf can do what they want and I don't want to sign up there and i can ridicule them so that's that.

I had no idea they were like that over there. All I've ever heard from gamers here was how "great" that place was. Now I'm glad I never bothered trying to get in to a place like that.

Avatar image for Dire_Weasel
Dire_Weasel

16681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#119 Dire_Weasel
Member since 2002 • 16681 Posts

You've used the term "Social Justice Warrior", so now I have to assume you're a #gamergate proponent, aka, a low-life, misogynistic POS.

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52568

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52568 Posts

Never liked using the term "SJW" or what have you. I don't care about Gamergate or whoever is anti-gamergate. Just seems people are bored, and need something to talk about. You see it in Games Discussion, nothing ever happens. Just a bunch of people posting tweets and 15 minute long videos. Not interested.

I'm just a bit annoyed by how political stuff gets brought up all the time now. It wasn't like this a couple of years ago. I blame social media. Twitter. I like Twitter, but it has given everyone a voice, for better or worse. Just too much drama in my video games. I don't mind people arguing about stuff. They're free to, but jeez, it's gone a bit of the deep end, hasn't it? Just chill out. Stop getting offended over nothing. Have a beer, a smoke, a .. whatever helps you relax, and stop pissing about on Twitter.

As far as that article goes, yeah, Arthur got smacked. Good read.

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#121 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

@Dire_Weasel said:

You've used the term "Social Justice Warrior", so now I have to assume you're a #gamergate proponent, aka, a low-life, misogynistic POS.

Avatar image for Thunderdrone
Thunderdrone

7154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122  Edited By Thunderdrone
Member since 2009 • 7154 Posts

Social Justice Warrior might be the dumbest fucking "insult term" ever created and/or popularized by the internet. How is warrioring in favour of social justice an insult? Jackasses

Its like choosing to call people that misdirect their anger regarding race issues "Anti-Racism Crusaders"...... THATS A POSITIVE NAME AND SOMETHING WE ALL SHOULD BE, you stupid motherfuckers!

Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#123  Edited By blue_hazy_basic
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts

EDIT crap wrong thread lol

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#124 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

@Thunderdrone said:

Social Justice Warrior might be the dumbest fucking "insult term" ever created and/or popularized by the internet. How is warrioring in favour of social justice an insult? Jackasses

Its like choosing to call people that misdirect their anger regarding race issues "Anti-Racism Crusaders"...... THATS A POSITIVE NAME AND SOMETHING WE ALL SHOULD BE, you stupid motherfuckers!

Welcome to System Wars, where almost every term is misused or perverted to mean something different than intended. I hate the term "weaboo" because here it's used to insult anyone who like anything Japanese instead of someone who only likes Japanese products while shitting on anything that isn't.

There's about a million other terms that are ill used here too. You just have to put on your stupid hat when walking through the SW door.

Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#126 blue_hazy_basic
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts

@Bigboi500: :P

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#127  Edited By Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

Love that gif. :P One of my favorite Simpsons episodes too.

Avatar image for jman1553
jman1553

1332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128  Edited By jman1553
Member since 2009 • 1332 Posts

@JangoWuzHere said:

Doesn't this belong in Games discussion, preferably in some GamerGate thread?

You need to belong to GamerGate to believe that SJWs are idiots?

Avatar image for Dire_Weasel
Dire_Weasel

16681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#129 Dire_Weasel
Member since 2002 • 16681 Posts

@jman1553 said:
@JangoWuzHere said:

Doesn't this belong in Games discussion, preferably in some GamerGate thread?

You need to belong to GamerGate to believe that SJWs are idiots?

"Social Justice Warrior" is dog-whistle term recently popularized and co-opted by #gamergate.

Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130  Edited By RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

@Bigboi500 said:

But what about the Elves, Dwarves, trolls and monsters and their timelines of existence involving historical accuracy?

The plot of The Witcher basically tells of a portal to another world that the people crossed into.

This world is the World of The Witcher.

So that is how normal humans got mixed in with Elves, Dwarves and other creatures.

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#131 GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts

@lostrib said:
@Desmonic said:
@parkurtommo said:

If we're talking post medieval/more or less 13-1400s or something, I'm pretty certain there HAD to be other races in these areas, be it due to slavery or otherwise... Gies is dumb but arguing against him with dumb shit might make him look right.

That's holds true for Southern Europe, not really for Northern/Central Europe. I mean, talking about slavery based of skin colour. The ancient trade routes were mostly Mediterranean, and that's where most of the European contacts with different ethnicities pre-Discoveries period were made (despite having knowledge of their existence, the Portuguese were still initially "shocked" when making contact with the many black tribes in Africa).

Slavery in general can be a different story. Ancient Greece and the Roman Empire (for example) made slaves out of anyone not born under/ruled by a specific city state or the Empire, regardless of skin colour or gender.

so if it turns out there were people of color because of slaves...wouldn't the world (interwebs) fucking explode if they put black slaves into the game

Could you imagine the Brouhaha that would kick up. You'd need a very comfy chair and a very large bucket of pop corn for that one.

Avatar image for Seabas989
Seabas989

13567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#132 Seabas989
Member since 2009 • 13567 Posts

@Bigboi500 said:
@Thunderdrone said:

Social Justice Warrior might be the dumbest fucking "insult term" ever created and/or popularized by the internet. How is warrioring in favour of social justice an insult? Jackasses

Its like choosing to call people that misdirect their anger regarding race issues "Anti-Racism Crusaders"...... THATS A POSITIVE NAME AND SOMETHING WE ALL SHOULD BE, you stupid motherfuckers!

Welcome to System Wars, where almost every term is misused or perverted to mean something different than intended. I hate the term "weaboo" because here it's used to insult anyone who like anything Japanese instead of someone who only likes Japanese products while shitting on anything that isn't.

There's about a million other terms that are ill used here too. You just have to put on your stupid hat when walking through the SW door.

Not to derail the topic but I have seen some people get offended by the term "SJW," or being called a "SJW." Is it a stupid insult? Yes. But are people offended by it? Yes.

So yeah, more like: Welcome to the Internet.

Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#133 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

@Seabas989 said:
@Bigboi500 said:
@Thunderdrone said:

Social Justice Warrior might be the dumbest fucking "insult term" ever created and/or popularized by the internet. How is warrioring in favour of social justice an insult? Jackasses

Its like choosing to call people that misdirect their anger regarding race issues "Anti-Racism Crusaders"...... THATS A POSITIVE NAME AND SOMETHING WE ALL SHOULD BE, you stupid motherfuckers!

Welcome to System Wars, where almost every term is misused or perverted to mean something different than intended. I hate the term "weaboo" because here it's used to insult anyone who like anything Japanese instead of someone who only likes Japanese products while shitting on anything that isn't.

There's about a million other terms that are ill used here too. You just have to put on your stupid hat when walking through the SW door.

Not to derail the topic but I have seen some people get offended by the term "SJW," or being called a "SJW." Is it a stupid insult? Yes. But are people offended by it? Yes.

So yeah, more like: Welcome to the Internet.

Personally I always thought SJW was a very nice way to call someone.

I mean we're talking about people who are fighting for social justice! How noble! Social Justice Warriors! I don't see how it can be taken as an insult, ignoring the attributed meaning it has on the internet.

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#134  Edited By Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts

When people are talking about sjws they usually mean the authoritative left. The type of people that are so hyper progressive to the point where they become bigoted themselves

There is nothing wrong with social justice, It is something that is needed. but the people who swear by it up and down tend to be the loudest

Avatar image for Seabas989
Seabas989

13567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#135 Seabas989
Member since 2009 • 13567 Posts

@Shinobishyguy said:

When people are talking about sjws they usually mean the authoritative left. The type of people that are so hyper progressive to the point where they become bigoted themselves

Agreed somewhat. I mainly just point to Johnathan McIntosh's tweets as an example. That guy has issues.

I grew to dislike these radical leftists almost as much as social conservatives, (Hypocrisy, stuck in a bubble, mob mentality, and my favorite, "Listen and Believe" LOL).

I'm also glad I don't have twitter.

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#136 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts

@Seabas989: they'd probably just put you on the block list, gotta make sure the echochamber doesn't have any cracks right?

Avatar image for Seabas989
Seabas989

13567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#137 Seabas989
Member since 2009 • 13567 Posts

@Shinobishyguy said:

@Seabas989: they'd probably just put you on the block list, gotta make sure the echochamber doesn't have any cracks right?

True. :P

Plus they would call me a conservative, right winger that hates diversity lol.

Avatar image for nutcrackr
nutcrackr

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#138  Edited By nutcrackr
Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts

I believe that polygon post clickbait reviews now. They create controversy by pushing on the GamerGate button and this attracts both sides of the argument.

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#139 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts

@Seabas989: hell you could be black, trans, or any type of minority or marginalized group and they'd still talk over you like they know better

Avatar image for FireEmblem_Man
FireEmblem_Man

20389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#141 FireEmblem_Man
Member since 2004 • 20389 Posts

When will SJW's start protesting against Taco Bell or Chipotle as they portrait Mexican's only eat taco's and burritos?

Avatar image for IgGy621985
IgGy621985

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 IgGy621985
Member since 2004 • 5922 Posts

I find this one pretty disturbing too, considering the guy I heard for the first time got the Witcher 3 review

Avatar image for super600
super600

33161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#144  Edited By super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33161 Posts

@Desmonic said:

@super600: In the context of the game and its inspirations, it still wouldnt have worked. They would feel like token characters which is honestly pointless IMO. Its as valid as saying more non-asian people should have roles/be present in the Yakuza series just because. Context, even in fiction, is always needed.

The issue doesnt seem to be with the score (I just found that out through you) but more with a poor argument filled with clickbait.

I don't know a lot about the witcher series, but depending on the time period of the witcher 3 it's possible to add other races to the game that were present during the time period the game took place in while still not getting out of the context of the game and the books it was inspired from, but I don't think it matters much. I do take issue with that one statement Adrian said in his piece where he mentioned that reviews like that Polygon review are poisonous to the gaming industry.I thought that statement was hyperbolic. I don't think this review has any effect on the gaming industry. Some of the controversial stuff mentioned in the review may turn a small amount of potential witcher 3 buyers away, but it won't have any effect on the actual gaming industry.He didn't need to write that in that article.

Avatar image for fend_oblivion
fend_oblivion

6760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#145  Edited By fend_oblivion
Member since 2006 • 6760 Posts

The hypocrisy in Arthur Gies is strong. Member of Suicide Girls that was angry with the way Bayonetta was portrayed. Now angry with misogyny in The Witcher 3, a game where witches rule the world.

Avatar image for kaealy
kaealy

2179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 kaealy
Member since 2004 • 2179 Posts

@IgGy621985 said:

I find this one pretty disturbing too, considering the guy I heard for the first time got the Witcher 3 review

I think he was being sarcastic?

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#147 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

@super600 said:
@Desmonic said:

@super600: In the context of the game and its inspirations, it still wouldnt have worked. They would feel like token characters which is honestly pointless IMO. Its as valid as saying more non-asian people should have roles/be present in the Yakuza series just because. Context, even in fiction, is always needed.

The issue doesnt seem to be with the score (I just found that out through you) but more with a poor argument filled with clickbait.

I don't know a lot about the witcher series, but depending on the time period of the witcher 3 it's possible to add other races to the game that were present during the time period the game took place in while still not getting out of the context of the game and the books it was inspired from, but I don't think it matters much. I do take issue with that one statement Adrian said in his piece where he mentioned that reviews like that Polygon review are poisonous to the gaming industry.I thought that statement was hyperbolic. I don't think this review has any effect on the gaming industry. Some of the controversial stuff mentioned in the review may turn a small amount of potential witcher 3 buyers away, but it won't have any effect on the actual gaming industry.He didn't need to write that in that article.

He's a complete idiot. His twitter just has him ranting on and on about politics in video games and people who criticize gamergate.

I'm just going to guess that he takes offense because CDprojekt and his team are from Poland. He's criticizing a review for a game he hasn't even played. If this were any other game, then he'd probably just say something stupid on twitter and move on.

Avatar image for IgGy621985
IgGy621985

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 IgGy621985
Member since 2004 • 5922 Posts

@kaealy: I sincerely hope.

Avatar image for Desmonic
Desmonic

19990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#149 Desmonic  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 19990 Posts

@super600 said:
@Desmonic said:

@super600: In the context of the game and its inspirations, it still wouldnt have worked. They would feel like token characters which is honestly pointless IMO. Its as valid as saying more non-asian people should have roles/be present in the Yakuza series just because. Context, even in fiction, is always needed.

The issue doesnt seem to be with the score (I just found that out through you) but more with a poor argument filled with clickbait.

I don't know a lot about the witcher series, but depending on the time period of the witcher 3 it's possible to add other races to the game that were present during the time period the game took place in while still not getting out of the context of the game and the books it was inspired from, but I don't think it matters much. I do take issue with that one statement Adrian said in his piece where he mentioned that reviews like that Polygon review are poisonous to the gaming industry.I thought that statement was hyperbolic. I don't think this review has any effect on the gaming industry. Some of the controversial stuff mentioned in the review may turn a small amount of potential witcher 3 buyers away, but it won't have any effect on the actual gaming industry.He didn't need to write that in that article.

The time period itself, if translated into our own, seems to be up to the 1400's..maybe 1500's (mind you that the games have some more modern weapons and devices thrown into the mix as part of the fantasy).

In any case, people of different colour in Northern/Central Europe were not a common thing until recently (and by recently I mean the past 2 centuries at best). Those countries were never invaded by the Moors like most of Southern Europe and repealed the Mongols and it's traces somewhat successfully (as in, they didn't leave massive influences on those lands like the Roman Empire did for example).

That's what most people seem to miss. Yes, in Southern Europe people of different colour (not necessarily black, mostly brown) were somewhat common depending on which country you were (Portugal, Spain, Italy, Greece and a few more). They were not however representative populations and were true minorities. In Portugal the majority of the descendants of the Moorish invasions ended up mixing with the local population and after a century or two their most prominent feature - the brown skin- had vanished. Despite all that, like I said in another post, when the explorers made contact with many African tribes they were still "shocked" by their black colour.

Northern/Central Europe? At best you had some decent populations of Jewish people. And the ones residing over Europe (which had been there for some time by the 1400's-1500's) were white. So they weren't treated as people of different colour but as people of different religion (which in those days wasn't all that much better, unless you had economical power, which they did). You also had nomadic people like the Romaji, but as far as I'm aware they didn't venture much into to the North.

So in the actual real world inspiration for the series, little to no people of colour makes sense. If the series was based on Southern Europe this criticism would be completely valid. The "but it's fantasy!" argument would make sense if the series wasn't so grounded in our own reality (the morality, the religious/political/economical issues, the allegories depicting racism and bigotry, etc). For example, Dragon Age manages to pull it off because it rarely feels as anything in it fits our own reality (granted I'm just starting Inquisition).

---

As for the rest of the post, I honestly don't care. As I've said I refuse to give Polygon any clicks (and mostly because of issues like these). If they want to be on the frontline of these discussions (which I think are a healthy thing if done correctly) they need to first learn how to discuss. Hyperbole is not an argument. Sensationalism is not an argument. Presenting issues without any facts behind them is not an argument. Having a one sided view on X topic with no "fair" chance of rebuttal is not a discussion. It's blatant clickbait which I refuse to support.

Sorry for the long post btw :P

Avatar image for Dire_Weasel
Dire_Weasel

16681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#150 Dire_Weasel
Member since 2002 • 16681 Posts

Can we please send this #gamergate thread back to the GGD sticky thread where it belongs? This topic has nothing to do with System Wars.