All 3D PS3 games capped at 720p

  • 158 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts

Sony's official guidelines for 3D gaming on PS3 limit the displayed image to a resolution of 720p, a Sony representative confirmed at the Develop conference this week.

Even games that run natively at 1080p resolution, like Super Stardust HD, are downscaled in 3D mode to two 720p images (one for each eye), Sony's Simon Benson explained during a demo of the technology at the conference. While the PS3 is capable of displaying a 1080p 3D image -- indeed, it will support 3D Blu-Ray movies at that resolution later this year -- Benson said upping the resolution comes at the expense of the silky-smooth 60 frames per second available at 720p (Blu-Ray movies run at 24 frames per second). Benson said that a "more cinematic game" might be well-suited for the lower frame rate and higher resolution, but that Sony's current guidelines for 3D games wouldn't allow for such a setting.

The effects of this policy are probably unnoticeable to most gamers. Benson said that, in 3D, even trained computer graphics artists could barely tell the difference between the resolutions. Still, for all you pixel counters out there who obsess over "full HD 1080p," here's another bit of technical trivia for you to argue over.

-----

LINK

>>; I still game in 480p...so this doesn't really matter to me...not that I'm hyped about all this 3D crap in the first place.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#2 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

The PS3 isn't as powerful as I thought it was after all...

Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts
.

The PS3 isn't as powerful as I thought it was after all...

mitu123
The Cell is surely more powerful than you thought it was :| :P
Avatar image for Ensamheten
Ensamheten

392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Ensamheten
Member since 2010 • 392 Posts

AC1(what happened with AC2?), UC2, KZ2 andCrysis shows that games can look great in 720p.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#5 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

.[QUOTE="mitu123"]

The PS3 isn't as powerful as I thought it was after all...

SilverChimera

The Cell is surely more powerful than you thought it was :| :P

It can't do 3D in 1080p.:lol:(I get what you're saying though.:P)

Avatar image for BTBAM127
BTBAM127

2522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 BTBAM127
Member since 2006 • 2522 Posts

for all the people who care that much about being only 720p they can just go play another system in 3d then.......oh wait there isnt any other one.

Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts

[QUOTE="SilverChimera"].[QUOTE="mitu123"]

The PS3 isn't as powerful as I thought it was after all...

mitu123

The Cell is surely more powerful than you thought it was :| :P

It can't do 3D in 1080p.:lol:(I get what you're saying though.:P)

I wonder if the 360 can show Skittles the Tiger in full 1080p. That'd be hardcore 8)
Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts

for all the people who care that much about being only 720p they can just go play another system in 3d then.......oh wait there isnt any other one.

BTBAM127
PC? Nvidia supports 3D.
Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#9 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts

for all the people who care that much about being only 720p they can just go play another system in 3d then.......oh wait there isnt any other one.

BTBAM127
Actually some PC games can do 3D as well. (Trackmania Nations, a free game has 3D support)
Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#10 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts
[QUOTE="BTBAM127"]

for all the people who care that much about being only 720p they can just go play another system in 3d then.......oh wait there isnt any other one.

killab2oo5
PC? Nvidia supports 3D.

I guess PC isn't a game system. It's just for browsing the web and... other stuff.
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#11 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
Oh no, the PS3 is doomed!
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#12 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="SilverChimera"] The Cell is surely more powerful than you thought it was :| :PSilverChimera

It can't do 3D in 1080p.:lol:(I get what you're saying though.:P)

I wonder if the 360 can show Skittles the Tiger in full 1080p. That'd be hardcore 8)

That'll be amazing, and I bet it can, since 360 upscales to 1080p better than PS3 anyways.;)

Avatar image for fastr
fastr

2100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 fastr
Member since 2010 • 2100 Posts
I love how there are always a ton of people.. oh the ps3 has a tiny bit more resolution! it looks a tiny bit better, but then this news comes out and suddenly that stuff doesn't matter.. chuckle. I mean, it doesn't matter, still funny tho.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#14 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

AC1(what happened with AC2?), UC2, KZ2 andCrysis shows that games can look great in 720p.

Ensamheten

But they would be better in 1080p...

Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#15 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts

That'll be amazing, and I bet it can, since 360 upscales to 1080p better than PS3 anyways.;)

mitu123

Skittles in 3D and full 1080p! That'd be a hardcore gamer's dream,

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#16 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"] That'll be amazing, and I bet it can, since 360 upscales to 1080p better than PS3 anyways.;)

SilverChimera

Skittles in 3D and full 1080p! That'd be a hardcore gamer's dream,

Hell yeah, and who knows, it'll be in graphics debates and show how powerful the 360 is.:o

Avatar image for mysterj
mysterj

928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 mysterj
Member since 2010 • 928 Posts
[QUOTE="BTBAM127"]

for all the people who care that much about being only 720p they can just go play another system in 3d then.......oh wait there isnt any other one.

killab2oo5
PC? Nvidia supports 3D.

3D on PC are pretty bad, since no games are actually made with 3D in mind.
Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts
I don't care because I'm not going 3D anytime soon.
Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts
[QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="BTBAM127"]

for all the people who care that much about being only 720p they can just go play another system in 3d then.......oh wait there isnt any other one.

mysterj
PC? Nvidia supports 3D.

3D on PC are pretty bad, since no games are actually made with 3D in mind.

...and they are bad because you've tried them on your PC right? :roll: Oh, and KZ2 and RE5 were made with 3D in mind right? :roll:
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#21 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

So Gran Turismo 5 in 3D is only 720p???????????????????????????????

????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

erglesmergle

Yep, isn't that a shame? I heard some games will be sub HD to even do 3D!

Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts

[QUOTE="SilverChimera"].[QUOTE="mitu123"] [QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="SilverChimera"].[QUOTE="mitu123"]

The PS3 isn't as powerful as I thought it was after all...

mitu123

The Cell is surely more powerful than you thought it was :| :P

It can't do 3D in 1080p.:lol:(I get what you're saying though.:P)

Lol, well i consider it PS4 technology, maybe then we'll get head tracking. I dont like the glasses thing, its to expensive, for the core gamer, i think we would appreciate head tracking much more. The cell is pretty powerful, this is really the RSX fault memory wise anyways.

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#23 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts
and this is a surprise because? Vast majority of the current 2d games are rendered at 720p with no or 2-4xAA and sometimes even lower than 720p and most of the times at 30fps. Did anyone expected 3d games on PS3 to be at 1080p? I will be surprised if they can pull of something like killzone 3 at 720p 30fps in 3D and still image guality looks almost as good as the 2d
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#24 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

and this is a surprise because? Vast majority of the current 2d games are rendered at 720p with no or 2-4xAA and sometimes even lower than 720p and most of the times at 30fps. Did anyone expected 3d games on PS3 to be at 1080p? I will be surprised if they can pull of something like killzone 3 at 720p 30fps in 3D and still image guality looks almost as good as the 2dadamosmaki
I'm sure someone did(fanboys in particular)...

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

Not that surprising, you need an i7 computer running two GTX 480s in SLI to get reliable 1080p 3D Vision gaming (and even then, the more demanding games like Metro 2033 would be lucky to reach 30 fps). Most PS3 games natively run at 720p or lower anyway, so it'd be a pipedream to hope for 3D 1080p for any non-PSN game. There's always something to look forward to next generation.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="SilverChimera"] The Cell is surely more powerful than you thought it was :| :PKokuro_Kun

It can't do 3D in 1080p.:lol:(I get what you're saying though.:P)

Lol, well i consider it PS4 technology, maybe then we'll get head tracking. I dont like the glasses thing, its to expensive, for the core gamer, i think we would appreciate head tracking much more. The cell is pretty powerful, this is really the RSX fault memory wise anyways.

We actually have head tracking already with PS Eye/Move, Gran Turismo 5 is using it.

Avatar image for mysterj
mysterj

928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 mysterj
Member since 2010 • 928 Posts
[QUOTE="mysterj"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"] PC? Nvidia supports 3D.abuabed
3D on PC are pretty bad, since no games are actually made with 3D in mind.

...and they are bad because you've tried them on your PC right? :roll: Oh, and KZ2 and RE5 were made with 3D in mind right? :roll:

There def will be dedicated 3D games on PS3, I don't know why you would randomly list KZ2/RE5 :roll: I don't know what games are actually being built for 3D but the Crysis footage in 3D was def poorly received by the press compare to KZ3.
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="SilverChimera"] The Cell is surely more powerful than you thought it was :| :PKokuro_Kun

It can't do 3D in 1080p.:lol:(I get what you're saying though.:P)

Lol, well i consider it PS4 technology, maybe then we'll get head tracking. I dont like the glasses thing, its to expensive, for the core gamer, i think we would appreciate head tracking much more. The cell is pretty powerful, this is really the RSX fault memory wise anyways.

CELL? Powerfull?

Sony(SCEA)'sstudypaper on "Deferred Pixel Shading on the Playstation 3" and comparative performance to Geforce 7800 GTX. Can be found from http://research.scea.com/ps3_deferred_shading.pdf

Quote

D. Comparison to GeForce 7800 GTX GPU

We implemented the same algorithm on a high end state of
the art GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX running in a
Linux workstation. This GPU has 24 fragment shader
pipelines running at 430 Mhz and processes 24 fragments
in parallel. By comparison the 5 SPEs that we used process
20 pixels in parallel in quad-SIMD form.

The GeForce required 11.1 ms to complete the shading
operation. In comparison the Cell/B.E. required 11.65 ms
including the DMA waiting time

From Sony's own words, 5 SPEs(with DMA) is roughly equal to Geforce 7800 GTX

Avatar image for mysterj
mysterj

928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 mysterj
Member since 2010 • 928 Posts

[QUOTE="Kokuro_Kun"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"] It can't do 3D in 1080p.:lol:(I get what you're saying though.:P)

ronvalencia

Lol, well i consider it PS4 technology, maybe then we'll get head tracking. I dont like the glasses thing, its to expensive, for the core gamer, i think we would appreciate head tracking much more. The cell is pretty powerful, this is really the RSX fault memory wise anyways.

CELL? Powerfull?

Sony(SCEA)'sstudypaper on "Deferred Pixel Shading on the Playstation 3" and comparative performance to Geforce 7800 GTX. Can be found from http://research.scea.com/ps3_deferred_shading.pdf

Quote

D. Comparison to GeForce 7800 GTX GPU

We implemented the same algorithm on a high end state of
the art GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX running in a
Linux workstation. This GPU has 24 fragment shader
pipelines running at 430 Mhz and processes 24 fragments
in parallel. By comparison the 5 SPEs that we used process
20 pixels in parallel in quad-SIMD form.

The GeForce required 11.1 ms to complete the shading
operation. In comparison the Cell/B.E. required 11.65 ms
including the DMA waiting time

From Sony's own words, 5 SPEs(with DMA) is roughly equal to Geforce 7800 GTX

For a specific operation :roll: You can't really compare CPUs and GPUs, few weeks ago Intel also confirmed their CPU is only 1/14 of processing power of an Nvidia GPU on a specific task.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="BTBAM127"]

for all the people who care that much about being only 720p they can just go play another system in 3d then.......oh wait there isnt any other one.

mysterj

PC? Nvidia supports 3D.

3D on PC are pretty bad, since no games are actually made with 3D in mind.

Well, there are over 200 games rated "Excellent" in 3D Vision by Nvidia itself. And even if we ignored all of them, there are certainly games made with 3D in mind (the so-called '3D Vision Ready' titles): Battlefield Bad Company 2, Resident Evil 5, Lost Planet 2, Metro 2033, Batman Arkam Asylum, Just Cause 2, Mafia 2, etc. I guess this is really something people have to decide for themselves, because to me it seems like far and away the best 3D solution out there right now.

Avatar image for LP4EVA2005
LP4EVA2005

8585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 LP4EVA2005
Member since 2004 • 8585 Posts
meh i couldnt care less. games in 720p looks perfectly fine so im good.
Avatar image for omho88
omho88

3967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 omho88
Member since 2007 • 3967 Posts

I guess this is a great news, that means the PS3 can do 3D without any resolution compromisation as we thought. Most PS3 games run at 720p anyway.

I remember when 3D was announced the first time, most of us thought the HD quality is done for good and the 3D games will all be sub HD.

Avatar image for ShadowriverUB
ShadowriverUB

5515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 ShadowriverUB
Member since 2009 • 5515 Posts

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]and this is a surprise because? Vast majority of the current 2d games are rendered at 720p with no or 2-4xAA and sometimes even lower than 720p and most of the times at 30fps. Did anyone expected 3d games on PS3 to be at 1080p? I will be surprised if they can pull of something like killzone 3 at 720p 30fps in 3D and still image guality looks almost as good as the 2dmitu123

I'm sure someone did(fanboys in particular)...

I didn't hear anyone on SW that was saing about 1080p 3D on PS3, most of PS3 games running nativly on 720p so i don't see point of expecting 1080p

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#34 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]and this is a surprise because? Vast majority of the current 2d games are rendered at 720p with no or 2-4xAA and sometimes even lower than 720p and most of the times at 30fps. Did anyone expected 3d games on PS3 to be at 1080p? I will be surprised if they can pull of something like killzone 3 at 720p 30fps in 3D and still image guality looks almost as good as the 2dShadowriverUB

I'm sure someone did(fanboys in particular)...

I didn't hear anyone on SW that was saing about 1080p 3D on PS3

You forgot about Peristantthug...

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#35 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowriverUB"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"] I'm sure someone did(fanboys in particular)...

mitu123

I didn't hear anyone on SW that was saing about 1080p 3D on PS3

You forgot about Peristantthug...

and dont forget those who believed 1080p 120fps and 4d All in all i'm pleasently surprised that PS3 is even capable of 3d at 720p at good image quality (which shows Sony did a good jub with PS3 making it future proof) but no logic person apart system wars fanboys can expect more from 6-7 year old designed hardware
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

For a specific operation :roll: You can't really compare CPUs and GPUs, few weeks ago Intel also confirmed their CPU is only 1/14 of processing power of an Nvidia GPU on a specific task.

mysterj

Notice the title "Deferred Pixel Shading on the Playstation 3". SPE is not quite a real CPU e.g. Fold @ Home CELL/SPE client is not same as X86/PPE work types.

Avatar image for TheColbert
TheColbert

3846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 TheColbert
Member since 2008 • 3846 Posts
I don't care because I'm not going 3D anytime soon.abuabed
Same.
Avatar image for mysterj
mysterj

928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 mysterj
Member since 2010 • 928 Posts

[QUOTE="mysterj"]

For a specific operation :roll: You can't really compare CPUs and GPUs, few weeks ago Intel also confirmed their CPU is only 1/14 of processing power of an Nvidia GPU on a specific task.

ronvalencia

Notice the title "Deferred Pixel Shading on the Playstation 3". SPE is not quite a real CPU e.g. Fold @ Home CELL/SPE client is not same as X86/PPE work types.

SPE count as CPU or not has nothing to do with my argument, Cell doesn't just do "deferred pixel shading", and GTX 7800 certainly can be used to do other calculation as well, if other tests were ran with SPE/GPU doing other tasks then the comparable processing speed would be very different. So ur 5 SPE= GTX7800 argument is completely false and the only basis for it was one simple test which you misinterpreted.
Avatar image for Sword-Demon
Sword-Demon

7007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 Sword-Demon
Member since 2008 • 7007 Posts

umm... is 720p bad now? :?

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#40 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts
[QUOTE="mysterj"] There def will be dedicated 3D games on PS3, I don't know why you would randomly list KZ2/RE5 :roll: I don't know what games are actually being built for 3D but the Crysis footage in 3D was def poorly received by the press compare to KZ3.

...he said that because he's pointing out your ignorance of nVidia's 3D. There are hundreds of PC titles that work fantastically with the glasses, and another dozen built with native support for them. For example, right now Blizzard is developing a patch to make Starcraft II work perfectly with 3D glasses (which is not hard to do, it isn't, games don't "have to be built from the ground up" for 3D... they're already 3D, you're just gleaming the Z-axis and doing some calculations). Anyway, it's a bit more complicated than that obviously, but this notion that a PS3 is capable of better 3D than PCs is idiotic. At the end of the day, good 3D output is about graphical processing power, the PS3 isn't in the same ballpark as the GTX 480
Avatar image for linkin_guy109
linkin_guy109

8864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#41 linkin_guy109
Member since 2005 • 8864 Posts

3d gaming in general has limitations no matter what your gaming on, for ps3 itll be limited to 720p, and im pretty sure that for pc gaming in 3d the fps is capped at 60, i could be wrong but im pretty sure i read that somewhere

Avatar image for bobbleheadrogue
bobbleheadrogue

2203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#42 bobbleheadrogue
Member since 2009 • 2203 Posts
I don't care because I'm not going 3D anytime soon.abuabed
me neither...not unless the 3D TV drops below the $1000 mark :P
Avatar image for ShadowriverUB
ShadowriverUB

5515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 ShadowriverUB
Member since 2009 • 5515 Posts

That limit might be not caused by CPU or even GPU, it might be bandwith limit of HDMI chipset inside PS3 :> it's HDMI 1.3 that was not made for 3D

Avatar image for ScreamAimPwn
ScreamAimPwn

107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#44 ScreamAimPwn
Member since 2010 • 107 Posts
I'm pumped about Ps3 going 3D. I was excited enough when i went from a non HD ps2 to a HD ps3. xD
Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#45 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

That limit might be not caused by CPU or even GPU, it might be bandwith limit of HDMI chipset inside PS3 :> it's HDMI 1.3 that was not made for 3D

ShadowriverUB
No that limit its due to not having a powerfull enough GPU ( and to some extend CPU ) to be capable for 1080p with 3d mode ( most 2d games are already a 720p 30fps let alone 3d games )
Avatar image for The_Gaming_Baby
The_Gaming_Baby

6425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 117

User Lists: 52

#46 The_Gaming_Baby
Member since 2010 • 6425 Posts

Most games are not higher than 720p anyway

Avatar image for mysterj
mysterj

928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 mysterj
Member since 2010 • 928 Posts
[QUOTE="subrosian"][QUOTE="mysterj"] There def will be dedicated 3D games on PS3, I don't know why you would randomly list KZ2/RE5 :roll: I don't know what games are actually being built for 3D but the Crysis footage in 3D was def poorly received by the press compare to KZ3.

...he said that because he's pointing out your ignorance of nVidia's 3D. There are hundreds of PC titles that work fantastically with the glasses, and another dozen built with native support for them. For example, right now Blizzard is developing a patch to make Starcraft II work perfectly with 3D glasses (which is not hard to do, it isn't, games don't "have to be built from the ground up" for 3D... they're already 3D, you're just gleaming the Z-axis and doing some calculations). Anyway, it's a bit more complicated than that obviously, but this notion that a PS3 is capable of better 3D than PCs is idiotic. At the end of the day, good 3D output is about graphical processing power, the PS3 isn't in the same ballpark as the GTX 480

You do realize that some 3D basically just puts space between left/right eye image and produce a cheap pop out effect.(there's ur not hard to do) Anyways there's absolutely no press on nVidia 3D so no one actually knows how they run so everybody's in the dark about how well these "3D compatible" games are implemented. OFC PS3 don't have the horse power as the latest GPU but it's silly to assume PC developers will actually spend the effort or have the same budget for a market that has yet to materialize.
Avatar image for MrJack3690
MrJack3690

2227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 MrJack3690
Member since 2004 • 2227 Posts

I think it's because the Tv's can only produce 1080p Images, and for 3D it needs to produce 2 images, so 2x 720 = 1080.

Plus the processing power of the PS3 can only do 1080p I think, so again 2x 720p = 1080...

But I honestly have no idea, I think that's why its capped @ 720, but you'd have to ask somebody who knows this subject better than I do.

Now what I want to know is say a 3D enabled game (like Wipeout HD) which was @ 1080p is now 720 for the 3D images, if you turn it off can it go back to being non 3D and be 1080p??

Avatar image for MK-Professor
MK-Professor

4218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#49 MK-Professor
Member since 2009 • 4218 Posts

Sony lying again, all the games run at 1280x720 and some times at 1024x600. So in 3D, games will run with resolution lower than 1280x720.

Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

almost all games are 720P anyway, so who cares? Is this more like a maximum potential, but many will be lower such as 480P? There are maybe 3 games that are actually 1080P.