This topic is locked from further discussion.
Uncharted isn't even as good as Gears 1 first off. Second...Killzone 2 looks like crap next to the gameplay video played at the conference.
MadExponent
they blur every freaking thing
[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="bungie93"][QUOTE="Mamba_Negra"]that looks amazing, even PS3 fanboys like SolidTy, Chutebox, Treal, should agree.
SolidTy
I know. A PS3 fanboy just owned himself in this thread when he thought the screenshots were using 16x AA. Its just that amazing.
You're a joke... either you're trolling or you're gunna be majorly dissapointed when you get GoW2 and realise it doesn't run @ 1080p with 16xaa :roll:It's GeoW2.
GOW2 = God of War.
Just thought I would point that out for ya...
Thanks for stating the obvious, seeing as the topic title says Gears of War 2 I think we all know I mean that game.Hey, you didn't know, it's all good.
Just glad to help out, buddy! :)
I didn't know? So I was presuming the guy I was quoting was planning on buying God of War 2 for PS2 after looking at screenshots of gears of war 2?dont post pics of pc games unless their runnning on your rig.blackice1983Look at bunjie93, posting pictures of GeOW2 running @ 1920x1080 with 16xaa Don't post pictures of games running at resolutions 360 isn't capable of producing or dream of running with more than 2fps.
[QUOTE="SolidTy"]I didn't know? So I was presuming the guy I was quoting was planning on buying God of War 2 for PS2 after looking at screenshots of gears of war 2?Hey, you didn't know, it's all good.
Just glad to help out, buddy! :)
Brainkiller05
I'm just glad I could help. That's what I do! :)
[QUOTE="blackice1983"]dont post pics of pc games unless their runnning on your rig.Brainkiller05Look at bunjie93, posting pictures of GeOW2 running @ 1920x1080 with 16xaa Don't post pictures of games running at resolutions 360 isn't capable of producing or dream of running with more than 2fps.
Eh, dude, the difference. I'm not paying over a grand just for CPU and GPU to run that hoss. I paid $350 and I can play badass good looking games in 1080p.
/thread
Look at bunjie93, posting pictures of GeOW2 running @ 1920x1080 with 16xaa Don't post pictures of games running at resolutions 360 isn't capable of producing or dream of running with more than 2fps.[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="blackice1983"]dont post pics of pc games unless their runnning on your rig.MadExponent
Eh, dude, the difference. I'm not paying over a grand just for CPU and GPU to run that hoss. I paid $350 and I can play badass good looking games in 1080p.
/thread
Actualy game is not in 1080p its more like 600-720p stretched
And yes who is talking about price? We are talking about GRAPHICS ... so i think you are all PWNED
[QUOTE="blackice1983"]dont post pics of pc games unless their runnning on your rig._rpg_FAN
Oh and GEOW 2 pics are from your x360? I think game is not even released yet.. so ...
Crysis is out allready and it still looks best so you have to face it sooner or later
Well different 360s don't have different graphic capabilities so that's a stupid comparison
[QUOTE="blackice1983"]dont post pics of pc games unless their runnning on your rig.Brainkiller05Look at bunjie93, posting pictures of GeOW2 running @ 1920x1080 with 16xaa Don't post pictures of games running at resolutions 360 isn't capable of producing or dream of running with more than 2fps.
16aa? its funny how unreal engine 3 doesnt even support aa
Look at bunjie93, posting pictures of GeOW2 running @ 1920x1080 with 16xaa Don't post pictures of games running at resolutions 360 isn't capable of producing or dream of running with more than 2fps.[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="blackice1983"]dont post pics of pc games unless their runnning on your rig.MadExponent
Eh, dude, the difference. I'm not paying over a grand just for CPU and GPU to run that hoss. I paid $350 and I can play badass good looking games in 1080p.
/thread
I'm sorry but how is your post even relevant?Look at bunjie93, posting pictures of GeOW2 running @ 1920x1080 with 16xaa Don't post pictures of games running at resolutions 360 isn't capable of producing or dream of running with more than 2fps.[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="blackice1983"]dont post pics of pc games unless their runnning on your rig.blackice1983
16aa? its funny how unreal engine 3 doesnt even support aa
It didn't used to be because of the deferred rendering, though it is possible now... and even if it wasn't then you're just admitting the image was doctored. Also doesn't take away from the fact the image is 1920x1080, which the game doesn't even run at.Just FYI game looks much better than that. I have to say that those screenshots don't do the game justice. You'd have to see it on TV in motion to see it's beauty. MADVLAD123
That's true. But to say it's the graphics king is a stretch. Killzone 2 looks noticeably better.
[QUOTE="blackice1983"]Look at bunjie93, posting pictures of GeOW2 running @ 1920x1080 with 16xaa Don't post pictures of games running at resolutions 360 isn't capable of producing or dream of running with more than 2fps.[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="blackice1983"]dont post pics of pc games unless their runnning on your rig.Brainkiller05
16aa? its funny how unreal engine 3 doesnt even support aa
It didn't used to be because of the deferred rendering, though it is possible now... and even if it wasn't then you're just admitting the image was doctored. Also doesn't take away from the fact the image is 1920x1080, which the game doesn't even run at.that pc is stretched because ign has the same pic at 1280x720 or what ever native res is 720P and it still looks great.
graphics king no. console graphics king yes
[QUOTE="blackice1983"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]King is K2, then R2.
Delsage
lol this blury trash
That Killzone 2 vid. =:shock:
+ The picture in there is motion blur. Gives the game a moving camera type of feel.
no it hides visual flaws like textures and the overall blandness of the landscape
[QUOTE="blackice1983"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]King is K2, then R2.
Delsage
lol this blury trash
That Killzone 2 vid. =:shock:
+ The picture in there is motion blur. Gives the game a moving camera type of feel.
Thats from the 1st multiplayer footage:)
[QUOTE="Delsage"][QUOTE="blackice1983"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]King is K2, then R2.
killzowned24
lol this blury trash
That Killzone 2 vid. =:shock:
+ The picture in there is motion blur. Gives the game a moving camera type of feel.
Thats from the 1st multiplayer footage:)
I know.
[QUOTE="Delsage"][QUOTE="blackice1983"]lol this blury trash
blackice1983
That Killzone 2 vid. =:shock:
+ The picture in there is motion blur. Gives the game a moving camera type of feel.
no it hides visual flaws like textures and the overall blandness of the landscape
Ok, whatever makes you feel better.:|
[QUOTE="blackice1983"][QUOTE="Delsage"][QUOTE="blackice1983"]lol this blury trash
Delsage
That Killzone 2 vid. =:shock:
+ The picture in there is motion blur. Gives the game a moving camera type of feel.
no it hides visual flaws like textures and the overall blandness of the landscape
Ok, whatever makes you feel better.:|
when ever a person is right u get responses like that
Anyone that is a graphics whore can point out how crappy and washed out KZ2 looks. Resistance 2 looks better to me. At least Insomniac has proven they can make a good game.MadExponent
I agree. Killzone 2 is just not a good looking game. I have no idea why Cows hype it for graphics when there are already much better looking PS3 games like MGS4 and UT3.
Gears of War 2, however, just destroys any console game.
First was GeoW vs Uncharted, Uncharted won then GeoW vs MGS4 and guess who MGS4 and now I guess it will be GeoW2 vs KZ2? and guess who will win yeah... lems never give up.Hitman533
a game that comes out a year or more later looking barly better than gears is embarassing
[QUOTE="MADVLAD123"]Just FYI game looks much better than that. I have to say that those screenshots don't do the game justice. You'd have to see it on TV in motion to see it's beauty. TREAL_Since
That's true. But to say it's the graphics king is a stretch. Killzone 2 looks noticeably better.
I believe Killzone 2 only looks good due to its depth of field, blur effects, and filters. I believe Gears2 looks better technically because it's much more clearer and crisper and it is full of many textures (which is Unreal Engine 3's specialty it seems).
Also we need to get some higher resolution videos of the Gears 2 stage demo, because if people can get some screencaps from that, it would really show off its amazing graphics.
[QUOTE="MadExponent"]Anyone that is a graphics whore can point out how crappy and washed out KZ2 looks. Resistance 2 looks better to me. At least Insomniac has proven they can make a good game.bungie93
I agree. Killzone 2 is just not a good looking game. I have no idea why Cows hype it for graphics when there are already much better looking PS3 games like MGS4 and UT3.
Gears of War 2, however, just destroys any console game.
ufunny thing is when you download it on the PS3 and watch it on an HD tv. It looks even worse. The textures are so, so bad.[QUOTE="Delsage"][QUOTE="blackice1983"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]King is K2, then R2.
blackice1983
lol this blury trash
That Killzone 2 vid. =:shock:
+ The picture in there is motion blur. Gives the game a moving camera type of feel.
no it hides visual flaws like textures and the overall blandness of the landscape
Real life has motion blur...spin around in a circle really fast. I wonder why that is. It's probably to hidevisual flaws like textures and the overall blandness of the landscape.Motion blur is to show a sense of speed. It's been out for many years for MANY games. If it was to cover up flaws, all you would see if motion blur through the whole game. Guess what? It's only when you're turning fast or sprinting!
/you
first off I agree for consoles which is the only important systems anyway. Now Please dont bring KZ2 into this. The textures alone should disqualify it from the NEXT GEN catagory.360-ps3-wii-pc
I agree. In order for a game to be the "graphics king," every aspect of the game must be incredible. Killzone 2's PS2 texture automatically disqualify it from the title.
[QUOTE="360-ps3-wii-pc"]first off I agree for consoles which is the only important systems anyway. Now Please dont bring KZ2 into this. The textures alone should disqualify it from the NEXT GEN catagory.bungie93
I agree. In order for a game to be the "graphics king," every aspect of the game must be incredible. Killzone 2's PS2 texture automatically disqualify it from the title.
gears textures are great.
LMAO.
[QUOTE="bungie93"][QUOTE="360-ps3-wii-pc"]first off I agree for consoles which is the only important systems anyway. Now Please dont bring KZ2 into this. The textures alone should disqualify it from the NEXT GEN catagory.killzowned24
I agree. In order for a game to be the "graphics king," every aspect of the game must be incredible. Killzone 2's PS2 texture automatically disqualify it from the title.
gears textures are great.
mp auto fail for u seeing how sp looks better than any console game
[QUOTE="psn_Jaimzl"]uncharted textures are way better than thatbungie93
Thanks for the laugh.
You guys really need to refresh your memory.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment